Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Avoiding Corporate Liability
Once upon a time early in the 19th century, corporations came into existence by state legislatures approving charters, which were granted for a limited period of time and for limited purposes. These corporations - producing textiles and other products in New England - raised capital in part because their investors had limited liability. That meant they could not lose any more than their investment if things went wrong.
Since corporations were artificial legal entities and not human, these lawmakers feared that without some strong leashes, they could be creating Frankensteins.
Over the following two hundred years, these ever larger corporations and their attorneys have been driving relentlessly, dynamically to erect systems of privileges and immunities that give the corporations themselves limited liability.
Their first big move was to take the chartering authority from the state legislature and place it inside an executive agency where chartering became automatic, shorn of the conditions the lawmakers once imposed.
Once chartering became automatic, perpetual and open-ended, corporate lawyers moved to have the courts - not the legislatures - turn corporations into "persons" for purposes of constitutional rights.
Their big breakthrough came with the Santa Clara case in 1886 when the U.S. Supreme Court allowed its summary headnotes to declare that the railroad in the case was a "person" for purposes of the 14th amendment. Through elaborations in later Supreme Court decisions, that meant that companies like Aetna, General Electric, Exxon and Lockheed had most of the same constitutional rights as real people like you.
Soon it was off to the races and the promised land of no-fault corporate behavior. Early in the 20th century, companies erected "no-fault" workers compensation schemes limiting damages for the horrors of worker injuries and workplace diseases in those mines, factories, and foundries.
Then came the steady erosion of shareholder rights and power, notwithstanding the securities acts of 1933 and 1934 which emphasized disclosure and anti-fraud rules. As owners, the shareholders have had little control over the corporations they "own". The split between ownership by the stockholders and control by the corporate bosses, and their rubber stamp boards of directors, is now wider than the Grand Canyon.
With the limitless "business judgment rule" and the permissive corporate chartering goliath ensconced in the state of Delaware, shareholders don't even have a vote as to whether their hired bosses should dissolve their company into bankruptcy.
These investors cannot even determine the limits on the runaway pay packages by and for their supreme executives. Investors cannot even propose their names for election to the boards of directors in these Kremlin-style corporate board elections. Investors are told-if you don't like what we your bosses are doing, you're free to sell your shares. And, of course, that exit leaves the rascals more in charge.
Anytime the law is activated on behalf of the "little people", corporate lobbyists move in to weaken or delete these instruments of accountability. For example, tort law giving wrongfully injured Americans their day in court against manufacturers of defective cars, hazardous chemicals or drugs and other products has been weakened by business-backed state and federal laws. More immunity for corporate wrongdoing.
When the early atomic power industry got underway in the nineteen fifties, insurance companies would not insure the potentially massive damages a breach of containment disaster might produce. No problem. The industry pushed Congress to pass the Price-Anderson Act in 1957, which greatly limited the utilities' and manufacturers' liability for the human devastation arising from a class nine meltdown.
How about the contracts you sign with credit card, auto dealer, insurance company, bank and other vendors? Over the years by using fine print contracts to avoid many obligations, sellers have disadvantaged consumers who have to sign on the dotted line. Corporate lawyers have turned contract law upside down. And if you don't want to sign, you can't go to a competitor company because the contracts are just as one-sided, taking away your rights page after page, including your right to go to court.
Well, suppose a corporation, like General Motors, is so mismanaged that it is losing sales, profits, creditworthiness and heading toward abject failure. No problem. There is always chapter 11 voluntary bankruptcy to terminate obligations to creditors, dealers, litigants, and other claimants with pennies on the dollar.
Here is how bankruptcy attorney Laurence H. Kallen described the process in his book, Corporate Welfare: "...in chapter 11 the megacorporations almost all succeed famously. They dominate the committees and bully the judges. They stay ten steps ahead of any feeble attempts at supervision. They use the bankruptcy laws to force plans of reorganization down creditors' throats. And then the executives of those corporations laugh all the way to the bank."
Speaking of banks, wouldn't you like to have the power to mutate yourself like six large insurance companies did last November to get billions of your tax dollars under the TARP rescue program?
Mired in their risky, reckless investments, including derivatives, these insurance companies qualified for the money simply by a paper restructuring of themselves as bank holding companies. Voilá! The U.S. Treasury declared they qualify as financial firms and will soon be receiving your money. The New York Times reports that "hundreds" of other such companies "are still in the pipeline for review."
Whether it is equal justice under the law, equal protection under the law, equal access to the law, or the power to make laws, there is no contest between the corporate entity and the real human being.
What Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis feared in an opinion he wrote during the nineteen thirties is happening. These megacorporations have become Frankensteins-moving to own our genes, the plant seeds of life and taking control of computerized artificial intelligence. Their final conquest is far along-the control of government which is then turned against its own people.
As Paul Harvey used to say: "Good day."
- Posted in


144 Comments so far
Show AllAnd as God used to say (or was it we who said it to God? I don't know, it's been so long since I've felt things to be anything other than totally royally hopelessly fucked up in this now god-forsaken hell-land corporate haven):
AMEN.
F Nader! He helped elect Bush 2000.
Oh, knock it off.
That's telling him. Funny how 2+2 always adds up to three in some people's heads...
true believers like Obama Democrats are basically looney toons.
Nader lost the elections for the Democrats? Bullhockey. The Democrats lost the country for the Corporations.
wrong nic
it was the suprme court who awarded the office to bush
the people voted for gore - and kerry in '04 as well - don't matter - votes don't mean shit
Nicholas..
No that is not true....
The voters who voted for Bush elected Bush.
In case you forgot, this is a democracy. That means the people should be trusted to make their own choices among as many candidates as want to present their viewpoints. If Al Gore had made a better case before these voters, he would have won. He didn't, so he lost.
But it seems as though you do not trust voters. It seems that you would prefer to curtail the choices they have because those voters are just too dumb to know what they're doing--or at least to vote for the candidate of your choice. In that case, why have even two candidates? Why not just limit the choice of these dumb voters to the one candidate you approve of--just as in the old Soviet Union?
Now THAT's democracy in action--if you voters are too f'in stupid to make the choice I think is right, you don't get to choose.
Thanks, pal, for your sterling contribution to the theory of democratic choice and for your inspiring vote of confidence in the American electorate. Stalin or Hitler couldn't have said it better.
VanMungo has a very limited definition of democracy. He only sees democracy as voting every once in a while. No mention of accurately counting the ballots or allowing more than two political parties to be on the ballot.
I think democracy is a form of government where the ordinary people of the land are the ones who decide what the government should be doing. The government is directed by these ordinary people. Since we are such a large nation we use a representative style of democracy. Instead of us each voting on each issue before the government, we vote for a Representative to vote in our name.
This is the point at which our democracy dissolves. It is common knowledge that our 'representatives' do not heed the opinions of their constituents. Our elected officials are much more attentive to their contributors. These 'donors' (they are not donating anything, they are paying for votes) are the corporations that Nader is talking about in this article.
We have two important jobs before us now. End corporate 'personhood', they are NOT PERSONS and don't deserve the protections of our Constitution. We then must get those corporations OUT OF OUR POLITICAL SYSTEM. Let's have a government of the people, by the people and for the people.
"The voters who voted for Bush elected Bush."
It is a little more complicated than that. No one elected Bush. The US Supreme Court unconstitutionally stopped the state Supreme Court in Florida from ordering a vote review of a contested election. Under the Ten Amendment the state has jurisdiction of elections within its borders. The Us Supreme Court over stepped its authority.
Gore did not fight it, so Mr. Bush took the election by default.
Methinks, Gore did not fight for victory because he was warned by the corporate handlers that he would be punished if he rocked the boat. Gore listened.
Thank to Nader, who help to elect Bush! For his open submission to haves and have mores opened eyes on mechanics of this corrupted state and its populace. Smart oBAMa only confirmed what so few people knew before, that the US of A now openly fascist state.
Amen
Yawn!
Corporate Al Gore, would have been almost as bad. He always sided with corporations when casting his vote on tie-breakers as VP. Better to know the bushmonkey is a devil, than to have a fake progressive like Gore with a 20,000 square foot house who claims he invented the internet and global warming.
Ralph Nader is dead on the mark as usual. The source of all our problems is Robber Barons running a corporate railroad straight over the backs of citizens. Ralphs deeds match his actions. He has always opposed big-company wrongdoing.
I voted and supported Raph Nader and I'd do it again.
TJ
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
Thanks to Nader to help to select arrogant Bush who openly represented haves and have mores. Sleasy Obama only confirmed the state of affairs in this openly fascist state of ours.
Amen.
WOW...I didn't realize how many "cool-aid" drinking Nader dinosaurs are on here. Yes, Nader was instrumental in electing Bush in 2000. Many, many, many of his closes freinds and supporters pleaded with him to remove himself from the election because people knew it was going to be a close election and Florida was the battle ground state. I should add long before election night and the Surpreme Court interfered. What did he accomplish by staying in the election in 2000? - I would assert damaging the Green Party name or for that matter the 3rd party option for real change.
Jeb Bush was going to hand Florida's electoral votes to his brother whether Nader was on the ballot there or not. The idea that Nader cost Gore the election is naive beyond comprehension.
q
I would recommend reading up on Democratic Theory and Comparative Govt. and Politics texts before shooting your mouth off. You obviously know very little about how election and voting systems work. Robert Dahl and Arend Lijphardt are a good place to start.
Oregoncharles
Your comment is pro-fascist. Only corporate candidates may run for office? Who's the one drinking the "cool-aid?" I put energy and money into Nader's campaigns and I would have been livid if he'd thrown it all away at the last minute. Nader wouldn't have done something nasty like that.
Are you working your butt off for IRV? I doubt it somehow. People like you are often do-nothings (or you're a two-party troll) but you like to throw stones at others who are trying to make a difference.
But this article is not about the election of 2000. It's about corporate person-hood and corporate power and greed and how their power has been growing for decades, at the expense of the American people - and thanks to Al Gore and Bill Clinton, corporations made a giant leap forward.
I think you're on the wrong site. If you favor fascism, you need to hang with people of your own ilk. Your anti-democratic attitude creates a really nasty stench.
Sioux Rose
Well-said. I recognize behind the screen name Nicholas a familiar voice that keeps saying the same thing as if the screen name change adds to the illusion of a larger consensus pool on this falacious matter.
So you really think more people are lining up behind Nader whereas the possibility that more people who understand the word REALISTIC and PRACTICAL are illusions? Your astro-zombie BS is giving you more mental sickness. You need to get back to earth and face reality. Nader's support went down from 2000 to 2008 and is not about to go back up even if he runs in 2012, highly unlikely since the oldie will be 78 by then. Nader doesn't have any plans on how to solve the multiple crises and he can't just shove his idealism down the people's throats when governing.
Mr. Nathan, please do us all and yourself a favor. Get off the computer, grow some organic produce on your farm, and eat that and no meat for the next 3 months. Your corn-fed brain needs a lot of Omega 3s for cleansing !
And your reply on telling Ms. Rose that a child must concede to his or her abusive parents shows what a sick puppy you really are. If the parents are abusive, the child cannot be blamed for choosing to run away and in fact there are legal venues for the child to stay away from his parents when both parents show abuse to the child.
Nader was blocked by the media and the two party duopoly as well as cornfed sick puppies such as you. Nader would have won otherwise.
Actually, YES, they are. I was a new Nader voter in 2008. I voted for Gore in 2000, Kerry in 2004. I'm DONE with the Democrats unless they nominate Dennis Kucinich for something. Screw them -- just like they've screwed us for decades by becoming more and more like Republicans every day.
AzJoe/NebNathan/other sockpuppets said:
"Nader's support went down from 2000 to 2008 and is not about to go back up even if he runs in 2012, highly unlikely since the oldie will be 78 by then. "
Why are you so afraid of him then? How could a toothless old guy who doesn't even drive a car strike such uncontrollable terror and foreboding in you article after article?
Unless your cold corporate heart knows he's right.
TJ
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
It's common on this board. Too many bedwetting purists who still believe Nader is a God here to save the day. Not all of us are Nader dinosaurs though so you're welcome to stay and balance out all the extremist hate talk. These purists are the ones ruining it for Nader and giving him a bad reputation. Nader's also done a disservice to the Green Party and by choosing to run a one-man show candidacy every time, he's making progressives and liberals look dumb and dumber.
Nathan, go to the woods and let the critters talk some sense into your head.
Nader could be exchanging recipes with us, and the Nader bashers would still try to argue over the 2000 election!
What he would have accomplished by staying in the 2000 election was destroyed by people like you. Instead of realizing that Al Gore wasn't viable enough to get elected himself, you choose to blame someone who was exercising his right as a citizen. You are more anti-Republican than Democrat. You deserve to not get what you want.
And Obama isn't going to fix anything. He is a coward.
Two-Party oligopoly apologists can't handle the content of what Nader says. They just blame him for a corrupt election and voting system. Kill the messenger and ignore the corruption, that's the ticket
Sioux Rose
SOCIALIST: Yep, it's that same tired old game.
S Rose: And just keeps on going after all these years, tired and tiresome, ho hum time for my nap.
The corrupt election system in Florida, and the most political decision ever handed down by the supreme court of the USA selected W. Nader is a patriot, and the reason he ran was because the Democratic party SOLD IT'S SOUL to corporate America just like the Republican party. There is very little difference between the two.
The democrats need to pull their heads out their a%&es. I refuse to vote for a democrat until they nominate someone worth voting for. I am proud to say that I voted for Nader and will gladly throw my vote in the toilet until the democrats wake up. DEMOCRATS TODAY ARE NOT LIBERAL OR PROGRESSIVE!! They still function on the same corporate money that the Republicans do. If you think there is any difference whatsoever between Bush and Obama you're ignorant. Besides, Gore really won the election in 2000. It was the Supreme Court that 'appointed' Bush President. And don't even get me started on Kerry in 2004. He runs his mouth the whole campaign about how every vote counts and then doesn't ask for a recount?!?
NADER 2012!!!!!
Not really. Gore could have won his own home state of TN, Clinton's home state of AR, or at least kept WV and he would have won. Quit blaming Nader for Gore's loss. Gore picked a dull neocon for VP, couldn't run a campaign, and lost because of his strong support of NAFTA and gun control. Millions of registered Democrats voted for Bush when they could have voted for Gore but I don't see you talking about that. Care to get your party in line?
And anyone voting for Obama threw their vote away. We now have perpetual war escalation in Afghanistan, a fantasy called "clean coal", covert air strikes on non combatants, TARP and FISA sell outs, diminished legal rights, AIPAC owns the man, as does the banks. He has also promised to continue occupying Iraq perpetually. Take his pathetic appointments most captured from the Clinton Administration and void of a single progressive.
Go lecture the rest of the sheep, lad.
God, people like you are tiring!
God, people like you are tiring!
Yes... Because Al Gore would have addressed the issues mentioned above. And for that matter, Nader was also responsible for the gross inaction of Congress. Nader also caused Gore voters to vote for Bush too. And did you know that Nader lobbied the supreme court to decide for Bush instead of Gore? Yes... the Bush years were the fault of Ralph Nader.
By the way... You are full of S@&t.
So, what's the solution?
Stop being a consumer. Any way you can. Derive benefit and life from doing things locally and on a small scale that doesn't feed the corporation--RESIST! Of course, they are so big and so powerful and so dangerous now, when you resist, they hunt you down. And hunt and hunt and hunt, and KILL. So it's kind of like a nightmare. It is a nightmare.
But this is the choice, they (the corporations) must die. Or we continue to die.
I am doing much better at that. Aside from paying off my debt and necessities such as my phone and rent, I spend most of the rest of my money on just food, organic and other such standards when possible. But to be honest that has more to do with me being poor right now than being completely committed do it...but I am also finding much more joy in simpler pleasures, and the only major purchases I plan to make anytime soon are for more kitchen equipment, sadly, my cooking options are limited right now.
You're doing your best and that's all any of us can do right now. Like I said, they have so much power, they are hunting us and killing us--those who would speak up and act for freedom.
You have my heartfelt thanks and support, zmann.
nedlud
Oregoncharles
There's a rumor that "some people" (millions?) are planning to refuse to pay off their debts. They'll just throw away the bill when it comes. Their reasoning: "You can't get blood out of a turnip and it will be expensive to try, especially if there are millions of turnips in refusal." The corporate class would be crying and begging on their knees if Americans started treating them with the same disregard as they do us.
I'll honor my debts, it's not like I didn't blow all the money with my credit cards, or use it to get my college degree. But I am going to demand (evil) Chase reduce my interest rate as WaMu promised before they were bought out.
Organcharles,
Let me know when to do it, and I'll go into default for six months. Phuck em. Worst case: We'll join tent city a few years earlier then we would have anyway. Then we can get the overthrow of GlobalMultiNationals underway.
Break the Fortune 500 into a million pieces.
NATIONAL BOYCOTT
NATIONAL STRIKE
BOSTON BILL PARTY
TJ
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
A start down the long road might be http:\\ni4d.us/
THANK YOU for posting this. :-) I'm a HUGE Gravel fan. Yes, more of us need to vote for this. :-)
Gravel? I didn't like his idea of a National Sales Tax. Otherwise, I loved his fierce opposition to the war in Iraq and his plans to stop it just like he did on Vietnam. It's a shame we don't have senators like that grilling the Pentagon anymore.
Socialism (a democratically controlled economic system) is the ONLY answer.
That is one answer. I am extremely doubtful that it would be the only answer, which is not to say that I would or would not support it.
Participatory economics (parecon).
--
Eric Patton
Cincinnati, OH
ebpatton@yahoo.com
or another similar concept: Economic Democracy