War Room is No Place for Bible Study
A Robert Draper article in Gentleman's Quarterly revealed that some of the top-secret "World Wide Intelligence Briefings" that Rumsfeld provided to Bush were covered with photographs of Americans at war, and captions taken from Scripture. In one, above a huddle of GIs apparently at prayer, is the question famously put by God, "Whom shall I send and who will go for Us?" Over the soldiers is the answer from Isaiah: "Here I am, Lord. Send me." Above a trooper hunched over a machine gun is this promise from Proverbs: "Commit to the Lord, whatever you do, and your plans will succeed." Another cover shows Isaiah-inspired US tanks: "Open the gates that the righteous nation may enter."
Sent by God. Protected by God. Sure to succeed. The righteous nation. A war defined not merely as just, but as holy. Such manifestations are one thing from eccentric religious groups operating on the fringe of the US military, in space guaranteed by freedom of religion. It is another when they show up at the peak of the chain of command - and from inside the intelligence community, which is charged with nothing less than defining the character of America's wars.
Those downplaying the significance of Draper's revelations suggest the wily Rumsfeld was just indulging the born-again commander-in-chief. Others merely blame the Bible-thumping Air Force general who prepared the briefing documents for the secretary of defense. (Once, that general would have been my father, the director of the Defense Intelligence Agency. A convinced Catholic, yet he would be appalled and alarmed by this business.)
No matter what the down-players say, Draper's revelation is only the latest of many that show a US military unduly influenced by an extreme kind of Christian evangelicalism.
Why should that appall and alarm? Let me suggest a biblical seven reasons:
- Single-minded religious zealotry bedevils critical thinking, and not just about religion. Military and political thinking suffers when the righteousness of born-again faith leads to self-righteousness. Critical thinking includes a self-criticism of which the "saved" know little.
- Military proselytizers use Jesus to build up "unit cohesion" by eradicating doubt about the mission, the command, and the self. But doubt - the capacity for second thought - is a military leader's best friend. Commanders, especially, need the skill of skepticism - the opposite of true belief.
- Otherworldly religion defining the afterlife as ultimate can undervalue the present life. Religion that looks forward to apocalypse, God's kingdom established by cosmic violence, can help ignite such violence. Armageddon, no mere metaphor now, is the nuclear arsenal.
- Religious fundamentalism affirms ideas apart from the context that produced them, reading the Bible literally or dogma ahistorically. Such a mindset can sponsor military fundamentalism, denying the context from which threats arise - refusing to ask, for example, what prompts so many insurgents to become willing suicides? Missing this, we keep producing more.
- A military that sees itself as divinely commissioned can all too readily act like God in battle - using mortal force from afar, without personal involvement. An Olympian aloofness makes America's new drone weapon the perfect slayer of civilians.
- A bifurcated religious imagination, dividing the world between good and evil, can misread the real character of an "enemy" population, many of whom want no part of war with us.
- The Middle East is the worst place in which to set loose a military force even partly informed by Christian Zionism, seeing the state of Israel as God's instrument for ushering in the Messianic Age - damning Muslims, while defending Jews for the sake of their eventual destruction.
The Pentagon is the wrong place for unbound Christian zealotry, not just because it violates the separation of church and state (and the rights of non-believers in the chain of command), but even more because it is inimical to the prudent use of force. When the history of America's failures in Iraq, and now Afghanistan, is written, expect to find that US military decision-making was made blind by faith.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
200 Comments so far
Show AllDuring the Vietnam war, there were buttons saying "Kill a Commie for Christ".
Today we have "Torture a terrorist for Christ".
Do those in the war room really understand what Christ actually meant? Rhetorical question.
I just made up a word. My Logogenistic first.
And I declare Diopomorphism to mean this-Imbuing and projecting personal/human qualities upon God.
Which I see throughout this thread. Men have ruined this Earth with whatever they could get their hands on. Including Christ's teachings. Including guns.
I love how one is ridiculed, one revered.
Diopomorphism.
"I have no faith in atheists."
God is Good, God is Great.
,
AMEN,......AMEN,.........AMEN.
Ah, this country has come so far in 110 years:
"I walked the floor of the White House night after night until midnight; and I am not ashamed to tell you, gentlemen, that I went down on my knees and prayed Almighty God for light and guidance more than one night. And one night it came to me this way--I don't know how it was, but it came: (1) That we could not give them [the Phillipine Islans] back to Spain--that would be cowardly and dishonorable; (2) that we could not turn them over to France or Germany--our commercial rivals in the Orient--that would be bad business and discreditable; (3) that we could not leave them to themselves--they were unfit for self-government--and they would soon have anarchy and misrule over there worse than Spain's was; and (4) that there was nothing left for us to do but to take them all, and to educate the Filipinos, and uplift and civilize and Christianize them, and by God's grace do the very best we could by them, as our fellow-men for whom Christ also died."
--William McKinley, 1899
(taken from Killing Hope by William Blum)
In this world now at this time there are perhaps a few remote Tribes left that still live as close to the Original Way or Old was as possible in places like the Amazon Jungles living simply with each other & off the bounty of the earth provided by Creator through nature.
Perhaps living as close to the pure way with one another & the earth as human beings can get as they haven't been completely swallowed up by the moola hoop cash register world, but of course they know it is creeping up on them, too.
As Tribal communalists they perhaps live in most Righteous way with one another & the earth as possible. Doesn't mean they are perfect, don't have problems, or even problems between one another from time to time like any people but they have the spiritual gift of forgiveness between one another & know they either function as a Tribe or they don't meaning they know each person is important.
If I were much much much younger I'd at least try to disappear into the rain forest & find a Tribe to live with to get back to just living without 6 million or 6 billion laws, however many political parties, or forms of worldly govts they offer, without computers, tv's, cars, & all the rest of that comes with it.
And yet I am happy to be a part of Creator's creation, but I am just a part. Love being out in nature with Creator's critters, & other life forms. Old enough & at least wise enough to know I am not going to solve this world's problems, nor have I seen any solutions that are going to solve this world problems as the NWO/One World Govt have their plans laid out down the time line anywhere from 5 to 50 years, but Creator may just have other plans as while I hate to use cliches, the plans of mice of men often go astray.
They just want to control everyone through all their laws, politics, money, and their Banks & Corporations that all their Institutions form a Pyramid like the one on the back of their dollar bill. All they have essentianly done is create a slave world where they are the Masters, and everyone else down through all their Pyramids are the slaves at all the various levels.
All an individual can do is Spiritually Reject their world, and not worship them or their world. Even Russell Means at his website was talking about how in many Tribes there are those that just want to be President or whatever of the Tribe because that is where the money & power are at so in those situations they no longer care about the Tribe as a whole but just want the money & power too.
So all things do translate into a selfish world of I got to pay my "bills" first for myself, & mine. Yet all of us still have that Tribal aspect to our lives if he we help one another even in a spiritual manner through this world, help our friends, & help strangers as we are able, love our enemies who's ego's are merely wrapped up in themselves & this world.
In the realm of their political world Ron Paul told them the truth that if there are other Nations out there that hate them it's because they keep screwing over all those other Nations in more ways than one.
It's just always strange to me how people think that they have some right to go into other people's Nations, kill them, steal their lands, set up puppet govts, steal all their natural resources, & then try to dress it up and sell it as being Good or themselves as being Good.
It's just a strange world.
Life is good. What an experience! It's always best to forgive.
Sioux Rose
SHADOW DANCER: The above is my personal favorite of all the comments you have posted. Thank you for sharing it. This tribal recognition of the shared good is truly the key to survival, and I believe its messages is planted in the hearts of all persons of all tribes. It's been forgotten and often ridiculed as our nation came under the influence of the Mars archetype which supports "the selfish gene" nonsensical theory. That was the favorite book of Jeff Skilling, the Enron "brain" behind a scandal of epoch proportions. Add selfishness to greed and the recipe for disaster becomes endless.
Again, many thanks. You are a wise soul.
Here is the comment by GoldenMean from the article "Torture Is Not a New US Foreign Policy Tool" by Cesar Chelala. It was in response to perry logans post which asks the questions: Might there be a direct connection between Christianity and the use of torture?
You bring up a good point of the correlation between modern Christianity and the use of torture...
It has been the case since the cooptation of "Christianity" by Constantine at the Council of Nicea in the 5th cent ad...
the Roman Empire was losing control of it's various pagan ethnic groups, and the emperor wanted to consolidate his power while culling the growing number of Christian zealots who were vocal about the brutal atrocities of empire, like crucifixions, as state sanctioned public displays of torture and murder...
The original "Christians" were a "literalist" spin-off of the Gnostic Mystery Schools, like the Theraputae and the Essenes (who had written the dead sea scrolls)... The Gnostics writings were symbolic narrative "road maps" for initiates to understand the path that the soul/ego must travel in order to identify with the "higher mind" aka Universal Spirit, of which each of our souls is but a fractal of the totality...
The gnostics drew from the traditions of Egypt, Babylon, Assyria, Persia, Judaism (which also borrowed heavily from those traditions) and even from the Buddhist monks in the near east at the time... The Gnostics recognized the common wisdom inherent in all religions, and using the trade languages of the time (especially written Greek) they sought to write a universal story that kept all the important common themes (son of god, enlightenment, reincarnation, karma, etc) and strip it of the disparate regional cultural idiosynchraties, and story that was set in a contemporary storyline to make it more appealing to a multi-cultural audience...
They also wrote the Jesus Myth to call bullshit on the brutal roman empire, and the corrupt Sadduccees who had turned the Temple into a "pay to play" prayer service, holding court until the return of the Messiah... The gnostics wrote that the Announted One had already come and gone, and the "money changers" hadn't even noticed, thus exposing their greed and aloofness...
Unfortunately, the true intention of using the Jesus story as a guide for spiritual growth on the path of enlightenment was lost on many ignorant folks who took a "literalist" interpretation of a symbolic language encoded to protect the higher wisdom from being bastardized by the uninitiated... The literalist fools soon found themselves building huge congregations and justifying their acts of terrorism against the State, which in turn threw them to the lions... Eventually, the empire embraced the hollow shell of Christianity to justify the conquests of foreign lands and conformity of the vassals of empire... They perverted the "crucifixion" story to say "don't fuck with empire, we will even torture and kill the son of god!"... And they selected only a few books for the biblical canon, and stripped them of any meaning that did not suit the needs for empire...
Sioux Rose
ELAINE & GOLDEN: I don't have much to add to this. We know that records are kept at the Vatican and secret, and that the Bibles have been rewritten many times to reflect the penchant of the king and the deals he made with the Vatican.
Edgar Cayce's "Story of Karma and Reincarnation" speak of the Council of Nicaea as the seminal event that expunged all accounts of reincarnation from the Bible. The earlier faith was far more spiritual and esoteric than the shallow, Calvinistic, overtly-materialistic semblance that passes for Christianity (for most) today.
Initiates have had a tough time as anyone born ahead of their time (in terms of their lucid understanding) generally turns into a martyr or isolated soul. As the Hindu count of time (related through the cycle of Yugas) suggests, this is a very dense phase in mankind's collective experience. Depending on how we navigate the next 11 years determines what percentage of persons survive. Either way, a very different world order will emerge from the ruins. I don't think the global financial tsunami (its reverberations hardly finished), climate instability, or war will act alone; but this trio taken in concert does not bode well for the continuation of life as we know it. I try to honor the precious gifts of my daily life realizing that we may one day look back on these times and recognize how lucky we were.
Christians are all too likely to argue that non violence as practised by Jesus is only for fools and the naive. They argue strenuously for might to assert right - what is the point of living by your principles if you are dead, they will query, and then procede to attack as anti Christian those who object to this. More trickily they will worry at translations, trying to transform a straightforward injunction against taking life into a partial endorsement of divinely sanctioned massacre, torture, execution, assassination and slaughter. This isn't just about the military, this is about the public which finances the military and idolises it. The rot runs to the core of our society and only honesty can even start to cure it.
Jesus did put a Spiritual Curse on this world by saying he did not come to bring peace to this world but to take peace from this world. Jesus was talking about a Spiritual Sword to divide out his followers from the world of man as Jesus taught his Father's/Creator's Spiritual Kingdom that is not of the world of man, this world.
Jesus was instructing his original disciples that they were still going to have to live in this world under the world of man's Govts, & religions no matter what worldly govt of men they were born under or conquered by as time continued on as prophecy continued to be fulfilled or which one is God/Creator stating they will be killing thinking they are doing him a favor.
Just as the Religious Leaders of the Temple, not all, thought they were doing God a favor by killing Jesus. This is not necessarily limited to any one religion, nation's or people's of the world of man.
Without judgment in the historical context on the large scale in what is called, Christianity it began with the Catholic Church who just began murdering, stealing, theiving, and torturning in Jesus's name instead of Caesars.
There wouldn't be any shortage of other so called Christian Denominations that split off & did the same thing & would do the same things when they got to this land, but there were Sects out of Europe who did their best to try & not do such things so at least they were trying.
The Puritans killed off anyone who got in thier way as they merely leveled all their own self-righteous judgments on Native peoples & their own people, too, as they thought they were doing God some big favor by killing people.
Love your friends. Love your enemies. When you love your enemies you don't seek out your own personal self-venengence upon them, you forgive them. Forgive & you will be forgiven. In returning good for evil done to you one can state to their enemies, well you can think about things this way, too, as their are always alternative ways of thinking about things upon planet earth.
God saying they will be killing thinking they are doing him a favor may tie into God saying he will send strong delusion upon this world so they will believe a lie & they will all be damned as they think by killing they are doing him some favor.
This may tie into that they will be worshipping the Beast & the Image of the Beast. They may be think by doing all this killing they are doing God a favor & this Beast of Revelation composed of many Beast Kingdom's & Mystery Babylon is doing God's work when it is doing the work of the devil/evil.
God has already cast his Judgment upon any who worship the Beast & the Image of the Beast. Mystery Babylon may be the key that builds this globalist system of the Beast often refered to as the New World Order/Same Old Crap/One World Govt. Many prophetic researchers consider the U.S. may be Mystery Babylon as she fornicates with all the Kings of the earth possibly through the U.N., Trade Agreements, Secret Societies, Banks & Corporations.
A large part of this may be her Religious System that supports & loves all these things she offers to them thinking Mystery Babylon that is an utter abomination before God made them free as they believe in their illusionary freedom & they say, Oh, yeah, we have to go into these other people's lands & kill them.
Prophecy states that is what is going to happen but it doesn't state one has to make these things happen as prophecy states that is what the Beast will be doing.
Just as the Hopi Prophet foretold man made fire pretty much burning this land off the face of the earth that became a possible reality in the 1940's. Even though the Hopi Prophet foretold this thing the Hopi didn't set out to learn the knowledge to invent such weapons & would have thought anyone who would invent such weapons to be pretty stupid.
And yet the prophecy of Mystery Babylon states that God is going to put it into the minds of men to burn Mystery Babylon in one hour. That sounds quite a bit like man made fire to do this thing in one hour's time.
So if, and I use the word, if, the U.S. turns out to be Mystery Babylon then God doesn't have any love for her at all. Kind of really strange paradoxically when you think about things.
From there in Rev 19 Jesus returns as he & those with him rejoice over the destruction of Mystery Babylon. Jesus will be in his Spiritual Body then, and not in one these human bodies that are usually more trouble than they are worth anyways. Up keep on them sure keeps going up on them all the time, too, in the moola hoop of the Mammon worshippers.
But for me just another day closer to the completion of my journey through this world of whatever this world is?
Life is good. What an experience! It's always best to forgive.
I love your posts, shadowdancer...
Especially your tagline at the end...!
Paz, Luz, y Amor...
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
Voltaire
Check out this on Alternet:
http://www.alternet.org/politics/140221/bush%27s_shocking_biblical_prophecy_emerges%3A_god_wants_to_%2...
GWB actually thinks god was speaking to him. And he used his conversations with the almighty and his version of Biblical prophecy to urge Jacques Chirac to join the coalition of the willing. It is no wonder that France declined. Pity Chirac did not divulge the content of his negotiations with Bush at the time. I think most of the rest of the world, and perhaps enough Americans, would have recognized the insanity, the lack of real justification. Maybe the US desire for war would have been sufficiently discredited to have aborted it before it was born.
Rumsfeld's use of biblical passages was a cynical manipulation of Bush's mental disability. He knew W would be impressed by the pictures and quotes in large print on the cover and would probably never bother to read the contents.
Sioux Rose
JH: Interesting assessment. Your conclusion makes sense, sadly.
Interesting string with interesting opinions. The civility was encouraging and welcome. No one here but good people today.
But I believe we can all agree to honor the folks that this day was set aside for. All those kids that didn't come home. No matter whose side they were on.
Perhaps the Lord will grant some sanity to us someday and we can reach that state where soldiers and policemen aren't needed.
God grant us peace soon.
Good one TM! I wasn't quite sure about you, but you've redeemed yourself with this one. You've been absolved of all thine sins, brethren. Enter thou into the kindom of blissitude.
Sioux Rose
THOMAS: Wow! I hear evolution here! Your kindness is opening your heart, and that's a good thing. I like what you said here! "Enlightenment Happens!" (The CD bumper sticker du jour.)
That was the Great War for Civilisation. This is the Great War on Civilisation.
Wars, agression, slaughter - what a wonderfully hate filled "How To Do It" manual is the Bible.
It's perfect reading for a charnel house.
When Cheney and his band of Neo-Cons started Bush's lie based assault of Pipelinistan I bought a Bhagavad-Gita and, like Arjuna, argued with the 'chariot driver' until he was blue in the face. It seems that we are doomed to slaughter our fellow man and be slaughtered in return.
The Whitehouse has become a great grinning bleached skull. With the tick of time all is lost but never fear nothing is happening. Why worry? Life is short and nations, like worlds, come and go without end.
Pipelinistan is a neocon wet dream. I still refer to it as Bandanastan. You know, that part of the world where everyone wears bandanas. (waggy tail)
I can't help but think that right wing Christianity is becoming the great defender of capitalism.
amazing, really. paul said "the love of money is the root of all evil." how does that square w/these bible thumpers, jesus goblins, christ potatos, defense of capitalism? how can you have a society where all your public institutions (except church) are based in utterly ruthless greed, yet somehow the individual, and his/her radioactive family, w/the aid of a church, are supposed to live out "xian virtues" (forgiveness and all that)?
anyway, the real issue w/religion is not the way american society, w/its veneer of sickening religiosity, violates this or that tenet of some religion, but how religion is used to instill an ethos of blind obedience.
Sioux Rose
RUSH: Good post. The love of money or greed is ONE of the "deadly sins" as is anger which can lead to aggression. It's not an either-or situation. The flaws of human nature which have been fanned like a great bonfire of the vanities by modern culture lay equal homage to mammon and Mars. In my view, these are the great dangers to humanity and right now, their marriage is anathema to the basic viability of necessary ecosystems. EVERY sacred thing is being sold out, or brutally fought over. Those who show patience, love, grace, kindness in this dog eat dog milieu are the lights and saints among us. I wish there were more persons so-directed, but unfortunately a Darwinian-style "survival of the fittest" is doing its utmost to breed out the better elements, the higher angels of our collective natures. The elites sponsoring war and engineering unfair economic systems while replacing a justice system with a right wing pro-corporate battalion of rubber stamping sychophants all adds up to the "law" of the jungle. Hard to be kind when you're forced to fight over the last banana.
Hey SR...
Please read my may 24th 2:01pm post on David Sirota's article...
about "US torture not being a new thing" to paraphrase the title...
Bummer I missed out on much of this conversation...
My comment on the other thread has much to do with this topic...
How "religion" is perverted by empire to justify torture and murder...
I would like to hear your perspective on this...
Also, check out "Jesus & the lost goddess"... A brilliant and well researched book about the mystery schools and initiation rites...
Sioux Rose
Sounds like an interesting book. I am almost caught up on the ones I had not had a chance to read, and will put this one at the top of a new list!
ELAINE: I think you and I see things in a parallel way as per how religion has been used. Have you ever read, "The Mists of Avalon" by Marion Zimmer Bradley? Absolutely transports one to the times when instead of the Druid rites and those of the nature-based mystics, the Christians arrive and start their purges to get rid of any who don't walk the authoritarian walk or talk. Imagine if you had your eye on a certain someone and by the mere accusation that your rival was a witch, you get rid of the competition. I'll bet some of the Miss America types tried that scenario on for size in another life and time.
I agree that we have a similar understanding. You usually are a lot more ladylike in expressing yourself, however!
I will have to check at the library to see if they can get that book. It sounds familiar, but didn't they make a movie out of it? I would much rather read the book than watch the movie in almost every case I know.
The era of the Christain conquest of the British Isles (and wherever else they consumed the locals) is shameful to me, just as the behavior of Christian manipulation is today. That's why you have to throw out the garbage and try to concentrate on the truly meaningful and humanitarian advice in the Bible.
Today we may be called "unpatriotic" instead of "witch", if we don't blindly follow the dictum of the day.
Somebody above quoted Jesus as saying he came with a sword, and I think what he meant there was "my way is HARD, it will be difficult and painful for you to follow, you will have to sacrifice to live the life I propose, you may even have to die", because so many will be against the truth.
AAAck, wish I could stay and chat but must go to work now. See you tonight!
Not sure what SR will say, or what your other comment was, but I was about to propose that the idea of Christianity being co-opted to suit the power elite has a long and sorry-ass history. As the juggernaut of empire rolled through the countryside, many religions were eaten up and regurgitated as something new (with just enough of the old to seem familiar) to control the people with. The root of such control being Fear and its lapdog, Guilt.
Back in the day when the ten commandments were supposedly handed down by moses, people knew exactly what "no killing" meant. It didn't mean no chicken for dinner, or don't swat that fly, it meant no killing EACH OTHER. I don't know for sure, but I'd be willing to bet that the Hebrew word for "killing" and the Hebrew word for "self defense" were two different things.
Thanks for the reply...
Please read my post on Sirota's article...
It will explain so much more...
I have a hand held device, so I can't cut & paste it...
Sorry
Hi GM, that was on "Torture Is Not a New US Foreign Policy Tool" by Cesar Chelala, not Sirota. I can copy and paste below if you'd like?
An interesting thread after that article, and you gave details on what I said above.
On the subject of torture being central to the Christian mythology, I have often wondered what we would wear around our necks if Jesus had been drawn and quartered or stabbed. Do we realize that we are displaying an instrument of gruesome death, even if in gold or studded with diamonds. Even worse are the crosses with the crucified body on them. Yikes.
Embrace the philosophy, reject the mythology would be my opinion.
Thank you for the clarification... I was trying to go by memory alone, hence the paraphrased title...
Please go ahead and paste my Chelala post below... For it will cycle off the main page by tomorrow morning, and this article will be here a couple of days...
"Embrace the philosophy... reject the mythology"... I love that...! Did you coin that...? If so, i'd like to borrow it from time to time...
ElaineM... I really value your contributions to this forum... You have an honest perspective on life, and I always take the time to read your viewpoints... Thanks for the dialogue...
I put the Chelala post below; I was afraid it would turn into a long ribbon if we kept it going on this line. I don't like the new way they have the comments section so narrow now.
Anyway, you're so welcome. Sorry I didn't get it on last night. I was pooped out.
I'm pretty sure I coined that phrase myself! It is what I have come to after 50 years on the planet, a Dad that's a (fantastic) Christian pastor, and lots of strange and wonderful life experiences. Feel free to adopt the philosophy as well as the phrase. Looks like you probably have done the former anyway!
I wish I could stay and discuss but must go to work this morning. Will check back this evening.
Echoes of the past. I was a campus minister from 1968 to 1975--the VietNam years. During the first few years any poor boy who turned 18 and could not stay in college for whatever reason, or who did not know somebody who could keep him out of the draft, was headed, often against his will, to Vietnam. We spent many long hours discussing the morality of having to kill or being shot for mutiny. We also wondered about the morality of many churches supplying chaplains for the military who were officers and, as such, had to walk the company line. There is no clear answer. Killing is killing, and no matter how it is legally justified, no matter what moral defense is provided for the act, the person doing it later has to pay a horrible price in terms of PTSD and even greater horrors. The veterans of WWII, this nation's last clear cut act of self defense, experienced the horrors of the action until their deaths 60 years later.
You can parse, cut and dice the verbage--kill, murder, slay, destroy--but an unseen moral force pushes its way into the intellect of man and makes its appearance in a written code such as that of Hamarabi, or Moses, or Mohammed. Killing is bad. St. Paul referred to this moral force as the law written on fleshy tablets of the human heart. Individually we know it is wrong. But society will find a way to keep the killing going. Be glad if you somehow escaped the role of the executioner.
Sioux Rose
PPETERS: Thank you for sharing these wise words of Truth.
And how is this any different from Jihad?(which I believe is the fight in everyones own mind>right vs. wrong, good vs. evil) Time for an evolutionary quantum leap in thinking before we are all extinct. oh yeah, LOVE, LOVE, LOVE...(not rationales for hate and destruction).."You'll know we are Christians by our LOVE...!!!!" Hello? Anyone out there?
It should be pointed out that using religion to justify killing is exactly what Al-Qaida does. Against the moral outrage of moderate Muslims, Bin Laden has forced his brand of religious extremism to 'represent Islam' to the rest of the world. So, if we want a modern-day example of how dangerous the mix of religion and warfare can be, we need look no further than our enemy.
Yet, many Americans are taught that the problem with the enemy isn't the extremism, its the religion itself, and therefore that problem couldn't attach itself to us. Although Bush tried to say that Islam isn't the problem, that isn't what most American warriors are hearing every Sunday. This further excuses their own growing religious extremism, since 'it can't happen here'.
I don't care what your religion is: People heading for 'eternal damnation' are incredibly easy to objectify. They become 'cardboard people', whose feelings, fears, and loves 'don't matter'. Many religions try to fight that objectification by saying 'love your neighbor as you'd love yourself'. But this is equally dangerous: for it implies that the right to humanhood of the nonbeliever resides in the believer. So, even though you're heading for hell, I'm still going to treat you AS IF YOU WERE HUMAN. Hooray for me! Such conditional humanhood leaves open the danger of relapse in the believer: 'I made you and I can unmake you just as well'. The intrinsic humanity of the non-believer is lost, regardless of the teaching. That humanity can only be regained, I believe, by a sense of doubt in the believer, the humility of 'not being sure'. Once such a sense of doubt is internalized, other human beings can be more easily seen as the tragic figures they often are, worthy of our compassion, if of nothing else. The problem, of course, is that that sense of internal doubt comes at a tremendous cost. People who doubt are personally wounded, incapable of being the force that true-believers are.
Sioux Rose
UBREW: Interesting comments. Some people want guarantees and need strict rules to live by. They also tend to come apart the most when having followed these mandates they still experience a traumatic event, like a spouse getting fired or a child becoming addicted to drugs. I believe these situations force them to gain greater empathy as so many who live behind rules are cold and nearly incapable of demonstrating compassion for those who don't live by narrow constraints.
Persons who realize life is an open equation, that there are both undeniable universal laws but also other aspects that seem open to chaos, are not wounded, rather they are "works in progress." They don't need their world to be held together like Humpty Dumpty prior to his fall. Jesus spoke of sin as the factor that should make for empathy and compassion. "Who among you is without sin that he may cast the first stone." That seems a wiser route than who owns doubt, versus who adheres to a philosophy that thus far has proven bullet-proof. And apart from this duality, there are endless shades of gray that find their way into belief and behavior.
Any small group of organized, highly dedicated people can dominate any sector of society. They join and then recruit like-minded people and generally create a clubhouse environment where they all feel good. When any one of them rises, s/he brings his "team" with him.
There's nothing surprising about this, it's the way of the human race.
When things turn, though, and the group abuses its position and turns the power of the larger organization towards furthering the goals of the group, you got problems. For example, who cares what religion the officers practice as long as they serve the military and the military's goals? However, if they seek to use military power to serve their own goals, it's a problem.
How to correct it? Counter-organization.
All you Buddhists, yoginis, progressive Unitarians, Muslims, Jews -- get out there and enlist! Apply to West Point and Annapolis. And when you get inside, get together for meditation sessions, yoga sessions, bowing toward Mecca sessions. Recruit and advance your like-minded friends
If you abandon the clubhouse, don't complain about who moves in and takes over!
"If you abandon the clubhouse, don't complain about who moves in and takes over!"
But what if the clubhouse is actually a death squad that you never belonged to?
Please don't tell us we also have to join every organization from AIPAC to the KKK.
Well, those organizations remain true to their original intentions. The military grew out of the very real need for well-regulated defense. Once upon a time, the military did not poison its own or put soldiers in harm's way for no good reason. (Yes, I know there are many exceptions. No need to jump all over me.) Once upon a time, young men did not return from military service with their humanity burned out of them. (Again, lighten up with the exceptions.)
So the idea here is to restore balance, as opposed to imposing it where it never existed.
""Once upon a time, the military did not poison its own or put soldiers in harm's way for no good reason. "
Which wars are you referring to?
We have not fought a defensive war since 1812 (or the Civil War). WW2 was more complex, but hardly "defensive" (except for defending our empire).
After well over 100 years of using the military ONLY to expand and protect our empire we must call the military what it is in reality, not how it may have been originally conceived. Especially because as Chomsky pointed out recently, we were always imperialists, even before the Spanish American War.
"So the idea here is to restore balance, as opposed to imposing it where it never existed."
A simpler idea would be that we can no longer fight in wars of aggression and that the US military can only be used to defend the US, not our empire or financial interests abroad.
You make my point better than I did.
Why not start by trying this in the Democratic Party?
Joe
Sioux Rose
COYOTE: What I don't like about your post is that it grants subliminal legitimacy to the military itself. Why ask the peace advocates to join the machine of death? Rather help society become educated enough to recognize all the things it sacrifices in the name of militarism. Security being one of them since violence ensures more of same which may make a KILLING in profits for a few, but savagely destroys everything else.
Maybe if we had some more Buddhists in there, it would become less a machine of death.
Military, defense, however broadly we want to define it, is a part of human nature and has its healthy expression. A lot of kids like to play army and regimentation provides a healthy balance to anarchic running around. Yin and yang, the play of opposites. That's how dualities work, checks and balances, healthy interplay.
So in a healthy society, military DOES have its legitimate and appropriate place. Think about the old school militias heading out to the village green for a few hours of target practice, marching in formation, and so on. Every farmer ready to be a soldier if the need arises, then lock up the muskets in the armory and head for the tavern.
Right now, there's a severe IMBALANCE in the military. It's eating up too many resources and has taken the humanity out of killing one's enemy (which again is part of the play and drama of the human condition and experience). It's one thing to be a warrior going into battle and confronting the possibility of your own annihilation and quite another to press a button on a console a thousand miles away.
So we can look for balance two ways: get the peacemakers into uniform and ultimately decision-making positions or wait until the present situation collapses of its own corruption, imbalance, and sheer weight.
The former would test the peacemakers and push them along in their own spiritual journey; grist for the mill. The latter would be messy messy messy, like the collapse of the Soviet Union (which we will be feeling for many decades still).
In the meantime, if you cede military and defense decisions to hard-core Christian jihadists, don't expect much to change.
"Maybe if we had some more Buddhists in there, it would become less a machine of death."
Thinking this through a bit deeper, one of the tenets of Buddhism, one of the steps in the Buddha's Eight-fold path is Right Livelihood. I claim no authority to discuss this in depth, but according to the commentaries I've read by Buddhists monks, engaging in a military vocation is not practicing Right Livelihood.
So from my understanding one cannot practice Buddhism and be a soldier. One cannot serve 2 masters, can he? On the other hand, Tibet, a Buddhist nation (before Chinese invasion and occupation) always had an army. Were those soldiers defending the Dalai Lama Buddhists or not? Who can say?
Ask the Tamils whether Buddhists can be soldiers or murderers. Every religion can play out in various ways.
Joe
Sioux Rose
EXACTLY, Moon Doggy.
The idea of having peaceful persons in the military is like asking vegetarians to gain employment in cattle slaughter houses.
I agree the balance is off, but teaching peace and putting $ towards diplomacy and giving women and Indigenous citizens more "seats at the table" is the path to balance, not putting Buddhists into the military!
Boy you guys really took like one sound byte and ran with it!
The point is, if you cede the military to the hard-core Christians, don't be surprised if they take it over and usurp its power to further their own ends.
Also, if you think asking vegetarians to work in a slaughterhouse is devoid of spiritual opportunities for said vegetarians, you have a lot of sitting still to do. If you think in *shoulds* at all, you have even further to go.
Seats at the table are not handed out. They are seized! You want power (which a seat at the table implies) be ready to play power games.
Teaching peace. Remember, just as there is no yin without yang, there is no peace without war and no war without peace.
Wheel in the sky keeps on turning...
"So from my understanding one cannot practice [your religion here] and be a soldier. One cannot serve 2 masters, can he?"
Technically, that would also be the case with Christianity, so we're back to square one in this discussion.
Exactly. I don't see how any religious or spiritual person could engage in military activities. If I were, say, drafted, I would have to consciously object. I would rather help out in the infirmary or the kitchen. Or go to Canada and grow barley.
I'm a different kind of warrior. One that doesn't believe in violence.
"I don't see how any religious or spiritual person could engage in military activities."
There no athiests in fox holes. Haven't you heard?
That an old expression that is pretty much true.
i don't know. some of our own revolutionary forbears. T. Paine eg could only very loosely be described as "religious", and i'm sure you can think of a few million commie types who bit the bullet on the eastern front in ww2 who were, officially anyway, "atheists." (you could say the state was their religion and stalin their messiah, but then, that's fudging the word "religion" isn't it?)
Good point trickster! Aaaaawoooooooooooooooooooo!
You think I'm kidding. You don't think the militaristic environment would improve if ameliorated by the presence of true pacifists? By people who really understand the revolutionary principles behind "turning the other cheek" among other Jesus-spouted ideas??
Who me? No man, I wasn't making fun of you at all. That was the sound of a howl of excitement. A coyote howl of agreement. You call yourself coyotebreath. Well what do you think a Moondoggy is? We are kin. Oh, and trickster is another name for coyote. Did you know that? So no, I don't think you're kidding bro. Woof!
(edit) ...but Sioux Rose makes an excellent point (see below).
Am I the only one who instantly thought of this line from "Dr. Strangelove", uttered by the POTUS when high-ranking military officers begin squabbling in the shadow of imminent nuclear apocalypse?:
President Merkin Muffley: Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room.
· Yr Obd't Servant
Um, I think pretty much everybody got the extremely obviously intentional allusion to Dr. Strangelove.
Oh, good! Thanks for clearing that up.
· Yr Obd't Servant
...and Obama is a veiled christian zealot.
The "evangenerals" rise to power in the military is a really interesting story. I remember clearly in the 80s that as the generation of Vietnam-forged leadership began to retire and retreat from the highest ranks, the younger officers appeared to be more "corporate"--that is, their personal behavior was thoroughly sanitized along the social lines of the ascending Reagan era.
I don't think that there was necessarily a religious conspiracy to evangelize senior leadership. I do think that the behavioral emphasis on the "squeaky clean" officer that emerged with the undeclared war on bad soldierly habits--a cleaning up of the ranks in order to both cut costs and make the military more organizationally stable--led to this moment, by emphasizing the desirability of the "family man" officer over what was seen as the less disciplined,hard-charging officer corps of the past. Promotions were going increasingly to officers who valued organizational blandness and excelled at fitting into a highly bureaucratic system than those who exhibited uniquely personal quirks and suspect social skills.
We RIF'd out a lot of good command material in the late 80s and early 90s, and kept the corporatized officers in droves at the company grade and lower field grade ranks. Now these are the generals, and they are largely dominated by Day Runners, not Blade Runners. These aren't warriors, but technocrats, and their personal views of character hygiene are perfectly compatible with the sanitization of purpose that evangelism has given many of their kind over the years.
Us NCOs who were there during the transition used to often refer to the "Old Army" versus the "New Army", and it turned out we were probably right. We wouldn't have been caught dead taking prayer groups seriously.
Interesting perspectivefrom within the machine...
Thank you...
if that was to me, you're welcome. I'm a firm believer that most good conspiracies are actually accidents resulting from unintended consequences of policy actions. that is one law I completely believe in.
It's also why "truthers" hate me..:) after more than a decade of MI work, I already know that there's no way our government could have pulled that off without either divine intervention OR, more accurately, they were actually trying to run those planes into Giants stadium and an oopsie happened.
If there were a Latin word for "oopsie!", it would probably be a great motto for the US intelligence services.
Skip, Skip...
The Infamous "Five Dancing Israelis," the Mossad agents apprehended after filming the impacts while dancing and singing? Tripods, cameras, set up ahead of time....? One went on Israeli TV and said they were "just documenting" 9-11. This absolutely proves prior knowledge by the Mossad of 9-11.
What was their prior knowledge a function of in your opinion?
A. Intuition?, a phone intercept, or,
B. They, (w/ cheney aipac elements,) perpetrated 9-11.
AQ had a real plot, they got wind of it and facitated it by a factor of a 1,000 instead of stopping it.
Oh yeah, bldg seven was only hit by smoke.
The Laws of Physics, The Law of Conservation of Momentum and the Law of Conservation of Energy, if valid, make the official version of 9-11 impossible. The buildings fell into their own footprint at free-fall speed only because their was NO resistance on the floors below the impact points (once the Demolition was initiated).
People that thought Kennedy was killed because of a shadowy plot were ridiculed.
Yes, ST... It was directed at you...
I value your perspective, even though I disagree with some of the conclusions you have come to...
You have walked a different path in life than I... And we each come to our own version of truth based on our personal experiences and intentions... I have great respect for certain parts of the military, like the Office of Naval Intelligence...
Who were investigating various covert crimes being carried out by the CIA and their mafioso and banking and foreign intelligence collaborators...
There were thousands of ongoing investigations into securities fraud, to the tune of hundreds of billions $$$, as well as trillions of $$$ that had disappeared from the Pentagon prior to 9-11...
When you stop and think about what the CIA and Mossad and MI6 and Saudi intelligence have been able to accomplish over the last 60 years, virtually unknown by most people... it is not that hard to imagine them pulling off a stunt like 9-11...
The Banksters that created the private Fed Reserve and profiteered on WWII by selling steel and technology to both sides of the war wanted to get their hands on the thousands of tons of Japanese gold and jewels looted from the Asian continent, and was hidden in the phillipines... Once they were able to depose of Marcos and acquire the gold, they used it to destabilize the Ruble and bankrupt the USSR by emptying their treasury of all hard currency, leaving behind worthless securities (same thing they have done to our own treasury)... The CIA set up multiple banks to launder their stolen gold and drug trafficking money to provide funds for terrorist organizations around the world, like arming and training the Contras and Al Qaeda... They created the muhajedeen with saudi oil dollars and CIA training to draw the russians into a war of attrition in Afghanistan... The CIA and Mossad and Saudi gunrunners were able to pull of the October Suprise by cutting a deal with Iran to delay releasingbthe hostages until after the 1980 election, and provided weaponry to Iran and Iraq to fight each other... They have organized military coups around the world, installed brutal dictatorships, and have mastered the art of propoganda through various media fronts, like RadioFreeEurope... They have deep ties to financial insurance corporations like AIG and banks like BCCI that they created with Pakistani intelligence to launder the heroin money...
All the evidence of the ONI investigations were in the WTC and the newly remodeled offices of the ONI which was in the wing of the pentagon that was hit...
While planes were used as the middle, the FBI offices in The WTC were also set with explosive charges, as well as in the securities receipts in the basement of WTC... Neil Bush's company was doing security for the WTC prior to the attack, and had set the charges... Cheney was running several similtanious war games scenarios at the time of the attack to confuse the air defence command, and ordered the fighter jets to stand down... Atta was a Mossad agent teaching his jihadists how to fly in a flight school owned by a Saudi intelligence operative...
Thousands of people died that day, and hundreds have been killed since to keep them silent... Check out Collateral Damage part I & II by ep heider on scribe.com
Sioux Rose
SKIP: I am not so sure. As John Dean delineated in "Conservatives without Conscience" there is a type of individual who is naturally of the authoritarian bent. Religious orders tend to push conformity to strict rules and teach the devotee not to question authority. Coincidentally these "values" work well in the military. Since most persons must be conditioned to bypass their own consciences to kill others, that's where military training comes in. Of late, it has pushed the agenda that this war is for GOD. Remember Boykin, "I knew my god was a real god and his was not..." And Truthout published stories on the evangelizing efforts inside the air force. Entire congregations were told to vote for Bush, that he was one of them, a man of god in the White House, a born again.
Any who truly was inspired by Christ would do anything in his or her power NOT to kill another human being. Thus to see the military, the machine OF death and destruction identifying with Christ is an outright blasphemy of the Prince of Peace's fundamental teachings. This to me is an outrage and an incredibly dangerous one. It also falls into synch with the twisted views of suicide bombers and radical Islamic fundamentalists and their Jewish/Zionist rivals. Of particular dark irony, these zealots have more in common with one another than they are positioned to realize, and they all put their larger societies into jeopardy due to their arrogance, ignorance and intolerance. A three-part reliable recipe for disaster.
I will never tire of pointing out that ANY religion that advocates for the death or destruction of other bears Creator false witness. The only god these violent agendas serve is Mars, the god of war, and dominant archetype in US culture and foreign policies (a good number of which are now being redirected towards the homeland security state.) Armed, off-balance, and dangerous! (ought to be the US motto today!)
I appreciate your post, and I'm assuming that the Skip in question is me. I just don't see where the connection is at all. I was simply replaying my perspective of *how* we got here in the military, and I don't see that engaged in here at all.
as for authoritarian bents, that's nothing new. And authoritarianism in and of itself is not the explanation at all here. Every army is authoritarian (as is almost every organization on the planet, including where I work). But not every Army (or authoritarian organization) is out to kick start a modernist version of the crusades.
I knew guys like Boykin when they were captains and majors (like, for example, Ralph Peters, the recipient of a blast on another piece here or on Alternet or someplace). They are not an impressive breed of officer, and our military has been promoting these guys for years.
Putting aside my current politics completely; from a purely institutional standpoint, we should probably shut down our academies and give them a huge, secular enema for about 3-4 years. That's if we could even find enough decent senior cadre uninfected by the "Colorado Springs flu" to even run the places.
Maybe it is time to turn the grind stone over on our bronze age paternalism.
This is Heaven (and Hell) so where is our Goddess?
On the money. Rumsfeld types. You don't really need that equipment, the computer tells us you'll meet no resistance. Why wait because we don't have a plan for occupation? We can whip one up at the club after lunch.
I understand that Rumsfield was offering a big bonus for any recruiter who could sign up Joshua along with his band of trumpeters. Only problem was that "the enemy" was out there in plain sight, not hiding behind the city walls.
THOU SHALL NOT KILL!
-YHVH, to Moses on Mount Sinai (Torah)
THOU SHALL NOT KILL!
-YHVH, to Moses on Mount Sinai (Torah)
- - - followed by page after page of exceptions - - -
You are right. I had to read the Bible from cover to cover as a child. The gleeful tribal violence, murders and family deceptions were rampant in the early books. I could not figure out whether we were supposed to admire these people, and if so, why? It was confusing.
Joe
So true.
I was raised a Catholic, and Catholics aren't particularly encouraged to read the bible - particularly the old testament. We also use a rather sanitized version of the ten commandments compared to what Protestants and presumably Jews use. None of that stuff about god being "a jealous god" and punishing every descendant of an offender to the seventh generation. How terribly unfair!
This more authentic, and disgusting, version of the Ten Commandments is displayed on the Allegheny County, PA courthouse - not exactly a rural backward county. Can't be sure how it got there or if there have been efforts to remove it.
I only learned about ho violent the old testament is when I took a "bible as literature" course back in high school - I was repulsed. You are right - we are supposed to admire these blood soaked genocidal "Israelites"???
Next our statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon the nation we attacked, and every man will be glad of those conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep he enjoys after this process of groteque self-deception. Mark Twain 1908
Sioux Rose
FOURWARD: Apt quote, so true; and thanks for posting it.
Or "murder" depending on the translation.
>Or "murder" depending on the translation.
What, are we splitting hairs here?
Hardly. "Murder" is *ileagal* homicide. I can't believe you don't understand this distinction.
crimes against the peace are war crimes. every death after the start of an agressive war is a murder (much less the innumerable rapes, the plundering, the non-fatal casualties, etc.)
if you need a legal principle for what is obvious, you could start w/the nuremburg principles, the un charter, the geneval conventions, the un convention against torture, all of which the us either drafted, helped draft, and/or is signatory to.
therefore every death in iraq, afghanistan, columbia, pakistan, et alibi, that the US military is responsible for is legally MURDER.
even if you (wrongly) believe that the invasion of afghanistan and/or iraq (and/or pakistan and/or....) was justified, those conventions & treaties all specify that the targeting of the non-combatant population is a war crime. targeting infrastructure w/non-military use (which the US did w/the sanctions regime in iraq, and in the NATO campaign in the Balkans) is a war crime (e.g., electrical grids, water treatment plants, etc.)
by those standards, the US gov't/military has murdered several million people in iraq alone in the last 20 yrs.
i know you jake newton and thomas more are not gonna like that, but it's the law.
"crimes against the peace are war crimes. every death after the start of an agressive war is a murder"
Can you cite a legal ruling supporting this? Or is it just your opinion?
"if you need a legal principle for what is obvious, you could start w/the nuremburg principles, the un charter, the geneval conventions, the un convention against torture, all of which the us either drafted, helped draft, and/or is signatory to."
"therefore every death in iraq, afghanistan, columbia, pakistan, et alibi, that the US military is responsible for is legally MURDER."
Can you cite a legal ruling supporting this? Can you cite the relevant passages of "nuremburg principles, the un charter, the geneval conventions"? Or is it just your opinion?
rush limbaughs
Targeting a non-combatant...ie knowingly killing a civilian that offers no threast to you has always been a crime and murder without a doubt.
Many here argue legality but in the end, its what we say it is. Thats the honest truth. And hopefully the people of my country will start saying something else.
Peace my friend.
"Many here argue legality but in the end, its what we say it is."
if by that you mean, there are no legal consequences, b/c 'what we say it is' becomes in fact "law" b/c of our military power and all that, well, of course you are right. that's always been the problem w/the whole concept of international law/laws of war/etc.: who will enforce it? but it is a funny concept of "law" when you don't want your own actions to set any kind of precedent (we don't want other countries doing what we do, a la the whole russian/georgian fiasco from a few months back).
anyway, peace to you as well
Nope. There is a vast difference between kill and murder. A great, great difference.
What was the original intent of the commandment? And can you give proof?
(This should be interesting)
It's a matter of interpretation, and there is a long going conversation as to what that commandment means. Google and you will see that right away.
Which commandment do you mean? the interpretation "kill" or the original writing "Murder"
I suffer under the handicap in this discussion of knowing exactly what it means to me and that I accept the original writing in Hebrew as the true commandments.
I think both the interpretation of the word and the meaning of the commandment have been in dispute.
According to Strongs Exhaustive Concordance, the Hebrew word used here (7523) is ratsach (raw-tsakh) which literally means "to dash in pieces", found only 3 times in the Old Testament, example: to kill a human-being.
The primitive root of the word means to dash in pieces. Go figure.
I can't "figure" it in that respect. But I don't believe the Bible is literal. Its intent is what I value in the end.
Wouldn't it be great if everything came with written instructions and a warranty?