Be Happy Anyway
"The pursuit of happiness." It's so American that it's in our Declaration of Independence, where it's listed alongside life and liberty as an inalienable right.
But how successful have we been in that pursuit? And now that the global finance system is imploding, how likely is it that we'll be happy in the coming months and years?
Can't Buy Love
Since roughly the 1970s, Americans have been buying things madly, whether we could afford them or not. We were promised that a bigger car, a more trendy purse, or a flat-screen television would bring us happiness, and we've been acting accordingly. We were promised that an ever-growing economy would make us all rich. But while our gross domestic product increased more or less steadily from the 1970s until the onset of the current financial crisis, most of us did not see a rise in our standard of living or our wellbeing. Wages stagnated, while the costs of basic needs-like homes, medical care, food, and energy-climbed rapidly. Those in the top 20 percent increased their net worth by 80 percent over the last 25 years, while the bottom 40 percent actually lost ground.
Few families today can make it on a single wage-earner's income, and a health problem or a job loss can send a middle-class family into poverty or even homelessness.
Yet we continue to buy the products that are supposed to make us happy, driving many of us deeply into debt. Families are carrying an average credit card debt of $5,100, with interest rates that often make payoff nearly impossible. In recent years, home equity reached record lows as people borrowed against the value of their homes. In 2004, the most recent year for which Federal Reserve figures are available, debt secured by real property exceeded $290,000 per household, almost three times what it was only 15 years before.
All this debt makes life more precarious. It also increases our dependence on long work hours, which-if we can find work at all-combines with long commutes to eat up the time we might otherwise have for things that research shows actually would make us happy.
It's easy to fall into the trap of believing that having more stuff will lead to happiness, because there's an element of truth in the advertiser's promise. We do need a certain amount of food to live, after all. Shelter is good. We need clothes, tools-a bit beyond the bare necessities can be nice. And having stuff has always been a way to show that you are successful and entitled to respect. But after the novelty of a new outfit or laptop wears off, we're left with a hole in our wallets and an empty feeling, which-advertisers tell us-we should fill by shopping for yet more new and improved stuff.Following this advice may keep the corporate economy humming, but has it made us happy?
Many figures suggest the answer is: not really. Broad standards of wellbeing like the Genuine Progress Indicators show that our health, quality of life, economic security, and environment, taken together, stayed flat, although we worked harder. A 20-year study by the OECD found the United States has the highest rate of inequality and poverty among the developed countries, and the income gap has grown steadily since 2000. A recent Gallup poll found that just half of Americans live free of worries about money or health, compared to 83 percent of those in Denmark. When the World Health Organization and Harvard Medical School studied rates of depression in 14 countries, the U.S. topped the list.
How Many Planets Does it Take?
It's not only Americans who are taking a hit from an economic system that puts money and growth ahead of real wellbeing. People around the world are losing access to their own natural resources and economic sovereignty.
Corporations seeking to profit by stimulating and feeding our appetite for stuff have trampled on the livelihood and ways of life of Mexican farmers, indigenous rainforest dwellers, African miners, and Thai factory workers. When land buyouts or subsidized agricultural imports make traditional lifeways impossible, many of these people arrive in crowded cities with no choice but to work for rock-bottom wages or attempt an arduous migration to a higher-wage country.
Champions of globalization like Thomas Friedman tell us that in a few generations these workers will have a standard of living similar to ours in the United States. But ecological footprint analysis shows it would take more than six Earths to give everyone in the world the level of consumption Americans "enjoy." Of course, we have only one planet, and this one is overheating.
The Pursuit of Happiness Is this what Thomas Jefferson had in mind when he substituted "the pursuit of happiness" for the phrase contained in the earlier Continental Congress draft, "life, liberty, and property?"Jefferson's ideal was an economy based on small farmers who produced for themselves most of what they needed. Their happiness was not something they trusted corporations to provide for a fee, but rather something they created themselves, through their work and human relationships within a community. The economy of the time was founded, in part, on a slave-owning society built on land often stolen from native peoples, but Jefferson's ideals had a strong influence on the young country. Freedom, independence, and self-sufficiency were all popular values.
The U.S. has moved a long way from the Jeffersonian ideal. Today, we produce little of what we use. We exchange our work for money, and buy food, clothing, and other necessities from big box stores and purchase child care and elder care from corporate chains.
Since we no longer have the time, skills, extended families, and access to land that were commonplace just decades ago, we have become completely dependent on money. That dependency leaves us at the mercy of those who control the economy and the money supply. And those who accumulate the money have inordinate influence over our government. It is the precise opposite of the Jeffersonian ideal. It's also a departure from the way humans have lived for most of history.
Life After the Crash
So maybe it's just as well that the crisis is finally upon us. Maybe this time of creative destruction offers us the chance for a fresh start, a chance to build a society that puts ordinary people first and provides the conditions for their happiness.
After the shock of the crisis wears off, maybe we'll look around like characters in a Fellini movie who come outside at dawn after a debauched night of excess. We'll turn off the television, log off the internet, notice the bright colors of sunrise, and speak to the neighbors who we've never found time to meet.
We may spend less of our lives working as the cash economy shrinks and companies close their doors.
But maybe we'll learn to share the work and reclaim time for the aspects of our lives that research tells us contributes to real happiness-time with families and friends, civic involvement, exercise, creativity. It wouldn't be the first time. During the Great Depression, for instance, the Kellogg Company cut employee shifts from eight hours to six to extend the number who had jobs. Productivity went up so much that the company could afford to pay the same for the shorter shift. Meanwhile, civic organizations, adult education, and family life in Kalamazoo blossomed.
Maybe we'll find ways to trade among friends and neighbors-some winter squash or homemade pie for some child care or home repair. Maybe we'll reclaim the skills we used to have, and teach each other how to grow food, fix things ourselves, sew and knit, and pass skills along to our children and grandchildren.
Somehow, in the exuberance of the economic bubbles of the '80s, '90s, and '00s, we lost track of something. Money exists to serve us as a tool, not the other way around. Our lives and society do not have to be turned over to the rulers of high finance and their hired representatives in Washington, D.C. We the people can reject the economic orthodoxy that has served us so poorly, and rebuild our economy on a different foundation.
Rebuilding
What sort of society do we want to rebuild? What will expand our life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness without diminishing the chances for other people, now and in the future, to have the same?
Here are some of the things we'll need to do:
- Economic policies for the future must assure that everyone is included, and that we lift up those at the bottom. When we allow inequality to burgeon in our society, we create crime and violence and hate, which damage everyone's ability to find happiness. We can no longer afford nine-figure paychecks for CEOs and double-digit returns on speculative investments. To paraphrase Gandhi, we have enough for everyone's needs, but not for everyone's greed.
- The environmental overshoot game is up. The next economy must function within the present production of our environment. We can no longer afford to live off the bounty of the past, like the millions of years of fossil deposits that make up today's diminishing oil reserves. Instead we must turn to solar energy, wind, and other renewables, and grow food and fiber by building the soil, not by dumping petroleum products on it. We can't continue to use our atmosphere, oceans, aquifers, and soils as dumps. No amount of "Runs for the Cure" will solve the cancer problem if we continue to poison our food, water, and air. And the climate is reaching a dangerous tipping point.
- We can no longer allow the money economy to grow like a cancer on our society, until it takes over all facets of life. The economy needs to serve people, communities, and the health of natural systems, not the other way around. Instead of relying on footloose unaccountable global corporations, we can turn to local and regional production to serve our needs and provide sustainable employment, including small and medium-sized businesses, co-ops, farmer's markets, and so on.
- As we do that, we'll get much clearer on real sources of happiness. Research tells us that the sources of the good life are in loving relationships, mutual respect, meaningful work, and gratitude, and as we discover the power of these qualities, the lure of advertising and materialism will no longer fool us. Overconsumption will take its place alongside other passing fads.
As we begin to relearn the skills and rebuild the relationships we lost in the pursuit of money and things, we will begin to find a happiness that we are in charge of; one that is not dependent on the fluctuations of the stock market or the amount of stuff we own.
Painful as it may be in the short term, we can emerge from this crisis healthier and wealthier, with the sort of wealth that really matters: strong communities and relationships with loved ones, healthy ecosystems, and the skills to make a living and enjoy life.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
YES! Magazine encourages you to make free use of this article by taking these
42 Comments so far
Show AllHappiness is often considered to be the freedom to do what you want to do, which is often equated with economic power. However, to paraphrase the warmongers, Real Freedom isn't free. Real Freedom comes from doing the difficult work of learning to listen to our feelings, listen to others' feelings, and listen to nature and the Universe. When we do those things, our fear of abandonment will dissolve, and we will truly be free. The fear of abandonment underlies our rules to not talk, not trust, and not feel, which are ways of keeping ourselves numb. Those rules, in turn, create the most violent forms of self-abuse and other-abuse we know. When we are truly happy, we are free not to be rich and powerful economically, but free to be humble and rich in relationships.
The evolution of humanity demands that we take a leap into a non-rational state of being, a non-analytical state of mind in which relationships define us, and we are no longer materialistic individualists. We are on the cusp of the touted "paradigm shift," and I am excited to be alive and part of this piece of history. There is a rebirth in progress: the house of rigid, hierarchical, authoritarian, institutional, and male-dominated structures is being replaced by flexible, horizontal, nurturing, familial, and female-guided networks.
The revolution, the nonviolence revolution, in my opinion, has already occurred, and most people haven't seen it coming. At the beginning of this United States, John Adams wrote to Thomas Jefferson, and I quote:
“What do we mean by revolution? The war? That was no part of the revolution; it was only an effect and consequence of it. The revolution was in the minds of the people, and this was effected from 1760 to 1775, in the course of fifteen years, before a drop of blood was shed at Lexington.”
This time, there will be no blood. I think the military-industrial-media complex will simply dry up and blow away, useless and unwanted. Tears will be shed, many tears of regret, many tears of joy.
NYCartist
"The pursuit of happiness" as far as I know has only been expressed formally as a part of a political statement by America.
They aren't bailing you out are they????? Lot of these folks have a lot to answer for.
The local Fire Department has helped us out by appeals and door to door collecting. The paper wrote an article when I asked that day and we are getting more in! Not bad! And the women are delighted!! (did you catch that?)
Thomas More: "Ladies" to women (I caught it). It does lack the charm of your original. About your question of "they aren't bailing you out are they?????". I went through personal bankruptcy due to illness before the law changed making it more difficult. And no, they haven't bailed me out: for example: my medicare deductible goes up a lot in 2009 (along with all the other seniors/disabled on medicare), and my medigap just went up, along with our rent. The nicest bailouts for people who are hurting, living in this country, after a halt on evictions, mortgage defaults, would be the known list (housing for all, health care-single payer, food, education, safety...) would be to forgive/abrogate all interest on student loans, past and present. We can't live long enough to pay off spouse's sci PhD school loans, with the creative interest compounded over the years. There's a lot of folks "in the same boat". Someone posted on a political blog that he's got over $100,000 school loan debt from law school. Finally, I'd like to bail out the people in nursing homes who are there because it's money for nursing homes, when it's cheaper to live in folks' own homes, apartments than in a nursing home. See www.adapt.org ADAPT is a fabulous activist group, political activists of disabled people. (Thomas, they have blocked NYS legislative office doors and it wasn't "pretty" but it got the new Gov. David Paterson to talk with them.)
NYCartist
I'm not against blocking doors per se. It can be useful. My main problem is the selfish personal agrandizement, the self satisfaction stunts like going to Iran, thats all.
You are right about the student loans. But I would also make them a bit harder to get for the schools to keep them from taking any warm body they can find. The drop out rate is almost as bad as high school for illegals and their children.
Home care will come on strong I believe because folks are going to demand it. In home costs less and is proven to deliver better results. But the nursing home lobbies are strong. We have a very good program in Texas but its filled up right away as money each year is limited.
Thomas More: On school loans. No, I don't think they should be harder to get. I think the schools shouldn't get kickbacks from the companies. (There was a scandal not long ago.)
My suggestion: NYC had a free City University system of colleges during the Great Depression. Along with singlepayer health care that works so well in so many places, I'd have free education from "birth to grave". Many countries have free education.
Thanks for supporting home health care. Did you know that Medicare doesn't cover attendant care, it's under Medicaid. I'm glad there is something good to be said about Texas. There's proposed legislation by ADAPT www.adapt.org that would address the issue of Community Choice for where people want to live:attendant care at home (cheaper as you noted) or nursing home.
Education and undocumented students, who came with parents is a whole other topic. I would educate every child in the country. There are a lot of reasons why kids have to drop out, one of which is fear.
And lastly, are you opposed to Col.(retired) Ann Wright going to Iran?
"As we begin to relearn the skills and rebuild the relationships we lost in the pursuit of money and things, we will begin to find a happiness that we are in charge of; one that is not dependent on the fluctuations of the stock market or the amount of stuff we own.
Painful as it may be in the short term, we can emerge from this crisis healthier and wealthier, with the sort of wealth that really matters: strong communities and relationships with loved ones, healthy ecosystems, and the skills to make a living and enjoy life."
Nice sentiments. And I believe we have a chance to achieve some of the things mentioned by the writers, not as they envision everything, but some.
Thomas More: I like the line about including everyone in economic policies planning. As I read this, I was wondering: when in the history of our species, did "happiness" become part of the mix? (Aside from the original compromise of "the pursuit of happiness" instead of the "pursuit of property" or what the original version was by the Founding Men of the US)
Love is great when one can find it. (I've been lucky.) How can one not be dependent on the fluctuations of the stock market? I never owned stock, but my spouse works for a city institution and they are threatening cutbacks..... I wait to see the ripples of all the messes. The BailOut is ......(fill in any nasty word). My rent just went up and we're fighting to get some local control "home rule" for NYC in re rent regulations now that the NYS legislature has finally gotten a State Senate with a Dem.majority to join the State Assembly Dem. majority. The State gained control over NYC in re rent laws in the 1970s. Everything does start local. So, how's the food pantry?
The power grabs for natural resources in Latin America, Asia and Africa continue. There are calls from the majority civil sectors for basic reform of land use, regulation of import/export that does not bulldoze entire populations, force them into slave labor for ethanol/biofuel production for export, and deisplacement to urban overcrowding - which is where urban overcrowding comes from.
Regional scale production, reduction of transport distances, health education and sustainable local economies of scale, rejection of GM crops, cooperative regional responses to human rights to land to farm, protection of biomes/biodiversity.
Renewable energy - simplification - you don't get depresssed working with and helping others... there is the persuit of happiness.
"Pursuit of Property." Geo Washington was a surveyor. Thom Jefferson was a surveyor. Lewis & Clark were surveyors, etc.
I bought my Happiness Machine from Circuit City and it too blew up but when I tried to git my money back the store was gone.
-30-
On this Thanksgiving Day, I'd like to take a moment to thank Common Dreams. All too often people like myself, who are Left-wing, but not extremists, are not represented by the media. On one extreme you have FOX news and the other extreme you have CounterPunch. So thank you Common Dreams for providing thoughtful analysis that does not oppose the mainstream simply by rote. I finally feel I have news source that shares my values (apart from all the Obama-hating spammers). I finally feel I am not alone. Thank you.
Joe Hope, we can't have our cake and eat it too. Either we fully resist the elites' relentless class war aggression against the people or we support it. The far left, where we fully resist the elites' class war aggression against the people, is the only completely ethical place in the political spectrum. All other places represent ethical compromise to some irrelevant degree. We can either be completely ethical or not completely ethical. We can't justify murder, rape or robbery by mixing in some good deeds. The good deeds become spoiled.
It isn't feasible, and not even ethical, to try to enforce completely ethical behavior among the people. The people are not the perpetrators of the mega-catastrophes and hyper-destruction. The elites are the perpetrators and the government is their instrument. It is however most feasible/ethical to enforce completely ethical government policies. And this is one of the progressive goals. We WILL enforce the Hippocratic Oath in the public policies.
Of course you are not alone, there are millions of delusional types sucking down the kool aid.
Naturally no thanksgiving should be given for such a sorry state of affairs.
I'm trying to be thankful and all you can do is insult me.
You are hopeless. I have hope.
nothing insulting about pointing out delusional tendencies, harsh for sure, but hey i don't live in a fantasyland when supporters of a corporate militarist claim to be 'left wing'.
If you don't like the way things are in Washington, I suggest you pay attention to your local and state level elections where making the difference starts. Why aren't you paying attention to those elections? If you and more people in more places would pay as much attention to your local and state level elections as you do to presidential and select Congressional elections, the corporate militarists wouldn't have the kind of control in Washington they now have. Call me what you want but it's how the system works and the only way to change it is from bottom up.
P.S.: Much as I regret voting against my heart and mind by choosing Obama, I realized Nader had no chance at getting anything he had in mind done even if he were to win the presidency. I don't believe that this nation is center-right but I don't believe that the rightwing delusions plaguing this dysfunctional electorate are going to disappear so fast.
"Much as I regret voting against my heart and mind by choosing Obama, I realized Nader had no chance at getting anything he had in mind done even if he were to win the presidency."
Next time do us all a favor and vote for the candidate you actually support. I am so sick of all these Obama-haters saying they voted for Obama because he's the "lesser evil". Yet they still voted for him. I voted for him because I support him. I am proud of my vote. I wish you were too.
In a contest between Bush and Cheney, I wouldn't vote for the "lesser-evil". I won't vote for evil. And I'm no advocate of third parties (they are ridiculous to put it mildly), but the argument that you voted for Obama because Nader couldn't win just doesn't hold water. Any moron can see that a candidate can't win if no one votes for them. I wonder how many (genius) third party supporters did exactly what you did and then whined that Nader had no support (talk about a self-fulfilling prophecy). But it's also true that when you hold such fringe beliefs, by definition, you won't be able to create a popular movement. So maybe at some point you realized you had nowhere to go, except to join the Obama camp, tail between your legs. And although it was nice to have those extra votes to use against McCain, I find your insincerity disgusting. I guess to people like you I'm just some old-fashioned fool because I actually respect democracy. Of course, if everyone behaved like you instead, our democracy couldn't function at all. It would be like if every McCain supporter voted for Obama at the last minute when it became clear that McCain would lose. Or if the whole country only rooted for the baseball team most likely to win the world series. I shudder to think what would have happened in McCain was ahead in the polls, would you have voted for him?
Well said. I voted for Obama and I am also proud of my vote.
Some people deny themselves even the slightest glimmer of hope because they get more attention by criticizing.
"Some people deny themselves even the slightest glimmer of hope because they get more attention by criticizing."
What? I'm pretty sure you too came across reluctant voters who pulled the lever for Obama or Mccain even when they had issues with their candidate. Nader lacked a well-planned well-organized campaign so only the know-it-alls ready to give him their vote he won. You should have tried helping Nader get a better exposure just like I did earlier on. More of us voters wouldn't have given up and abandoned Nader but what's done is done. As for people denying themselves any hope by criticizing, the same could be said of all 3rd party candidates who did not even bother to go on the offensive. How many voters in your neighborhood even knew Nader?
Uh, no. It was more than that. I switched my vote on the last minute realizing that in this system where the status quo is so deeply entrenched that it's hard to change, I realized a different lesson. I realized that if I wanted a Nader-esque candidacy that I would start out by voting for pols just like him at the local and state levels and spread the word on it. In time, we'd get to the federal level hence I start from bottom up. Regardless of who I vote for in the end, all those running for office should be given a chance to present themselves rather than be shut out and then limit the election between the lesser of the evils. Call it a "democracy" but shutting out 3rd parties from even debates and even from the media in general is RIGGED "democracy". If Nader, Barr, Mckinney, and Baldwin were not choked out of the media, the results would have been far different. There are plenty more reluctant voters who don't like to have to pick between D and R but feel that there's no hope. I'll tell you what though. Obama has 4 years to show us his worth.
Carla Waters:I pretty much agree. I did vote for Obama knowing what his record was. I know Rosa Clemente's good work from her having been on WBAI www.wbai.org in the past, with show host, Sally O'Brien, on "Where We Live", a show about political prisoners, police brutality and more. It's archived but not as far back as when Rosa Clemente was co-hosting.
Nice comment. But I would point out that if a third party shows less than 1% of the population in support, they are unlikely to get a hearing. we can't listen to everybody.
Your point about starting from the local level for any change is the only way to accomplish any movement, even if its in the Democratic or Republican parties. Thatse future candidates come from.
"I would point out that if a third party shows less than 1% of the population in support, they are unlikely to get a hearing."
I don't understand how you can say that we cannot listen to everybody when 3rd parties are pretty much shut off from being heard, be it the TV or even the Internet and as a result get 1%. I felt hopeless and I watched even potential Nader supporters earlier on switching to voting Obama in my neighborhood in addition to Nader's campaign going into diminished mode as he never had an infrastructure to even be relevant. That's why I thought it was a bitter pill to swallow voting for Obama despite the fact that Obama flipped on just about everything and pissed me off big time.
On the issue of local/state level candidacies, did you notice that even on the Internet, you won't find much to look up on local/state elections and pols? Try finding youtube videos on your local or even state level pols and you'll be lucky to find even one whereas there are plenty more for presidential candiates and even select Congressional races. It pisses me off that no attention is being given to those elections that matter the most. Furthermore, every time someone complains about a local/state level pol being so mean on some policy or other, I ask him or her if they voted and when they say no, I hate having to tell them "Well, that's tough. You should have voted when you had the chance."
P.S.: You should check out the level of corruption in Louisiana politics on both sides. Turnout is very low to begin with, at least that was the case when I used to live there although I moved years ago while my parents still live there.
"I don't understand how you can say that we cannot listen to everybody when 3rd parties are pretty much shut off from being heard, be it the TV or even the Internet and as a result get 1%."
I mean by the time you get to National "debates" you can't have everyone in them unless they show a bit more support than about 1/2 per cent or less, even 1%. There has to be some sort of narrowing of the field.
I'd say you simply can't make people pay attention because you want them to.
Your comment on local elections is on the money. But think of the opportunity that gives for a smaller group to impact the election.
P.S. I didn't know Louisana had any other kind of politics but corrupt! They say Jindal is making some inroads there though.
"I mean by the time you get to National "debates" you can't have everyone in them unless they show a bit more support than about 1/2 per cent or less, even 1%. There has to be some sort of narrowing of the field."
First of all, those polls are based on sampling and are often very easy to fudge from what I've been told by a former employee who worked for one of the major polling firms. I still suspect that Ross Perot's powerful showing in the debates in 1992 was why they further rigged the debates field against 3rd party candidates. He was marginalized in 1996 and voter turnout decreased. The least that could be done is let all the candidates do the first major debate and then do the polling. I am so sick and tired of the corporate media turning these national elections into soapy operas. It's a waste of taxpayer money IMHO.
"I didn't know Louisana had any other kind of politics but corrupt! They say Jindal is making some inroads there though."
The state is still a very miserable mess from what my parents told me a few months ago. My parents voted for him as they too begged for change. However, they don't see him much different from most governors. I don't know his actual level of corruption but I do know that he's not what the corporate media tries to make it out to be. He has his share of corruption. Interestingly though, he did support the idea of swapping some sales taxes for income tax increases. It doesn't matter who's in office in that state at this point as nothing is bound to be fixed there other than for the elites. Just look at the gentrification of New Orleans. The way the poor and the minorities are being pushed away from their homes and not even allowed to collect their stuff is just like Israel smashing the Palestinian homes or the militants in Pakistan brutally kicking out non-Muslims and destroying their buildings and foundations.
"The least that could be done is let all the candidates do the first major debate and then do the polling."
I see absolutely nothing wrong with that. And I'd hope the League of Women voters would become involved again. We had real debates when they were running things.
As much as I find the article very useful, the authors fail to mention the fact that all these ideas cannot happen without people participating on local and even state level elections. If you want to fight for better policies for a better economy and a better environment, start out by taking on your local level pols and people who are in influential positions and convince others to do the same. In time, we'll have a better chance to have a government that we can actually trust and be truly proud and happy about. Until then, this article looks like another wishful thinking tab.
Is it time to retire to a little Ted Kaczynski sized cabin and watch the Rat Race go by?
Target had a sale on a Happiness Machine, so I got one. It blew up when I plugged it in. Brought it back and the guy just laughed at me and yelled at his buddies in the back, "hey guys this idiot is trying to bring back his Happiness Machine". I didn't appreciate the snickering I heard coming from the back room, dammit.
I bought one of those too and the same thing happened. I looked at the back of the box and saw it was manufactured in China by Mission Accomplished, LLC, of which Cheesedick Cheney is a major shareholder. Don't bother calling the Consumer Product Safety Commission; they won't treat you any differently than Target did. The woman at CPSC with the pleasant voice told me to eat shit and direct my complaint to Brock Alabama. I presume she meant the president-elect.
Other things we have to do is change our ancient, corruptible, destined to fail, centralized representative system of government for a technologically advanced, incorruptible decentralized system of direct democracy. This would be direct democracy by referendum.
http://ni4d.us/
or:
Incorporate We the People for profit. Give each American citizen equal non-transferable shares of stock in our public treasure and equal voting power in annual stockholder's meetings. This would be direct democracy by incorporation.
. . . system of direct democracy. This would be direct democracy by referendum.
Right now that sounds really good. The Big Picture doesn't seem to work anymore. Perhaps The Little Picture would.
I read somewhere that the phrase 'pursuit of happiness' originally read 'pursuit of property'
(which makes more sense in the context of the white landowning males who authored this work)
but sort of like more recently the phrase Operation Iraqi Liberation was realized to boil down to the self explanatory acronym of OIL and got chanted to Operation Iraqi Freedom . . .
'pursuit of property' got changed to 'pursuit of happiness'
and in the process we lost an important perspective as to how those founding authors mentally conflated those terms. . .
The phrase “an unalienable right to life, liberty and property” occured in the constitution of the Virginia colony. The substition of “pursuit of happiness” was from the essays of John Locke. Had Jefferson used the phrase of his native state, the which meaning he undoubtedly had in mind, for the Declaration of Independence, it would have made the document seem to be a mandate for a class uprising. Its meaning, in fact, was that the independent nation intended to protect slavery from the anti-slave forces rising in Parliament. The Somerset Decision of June 1772 banning slavery in England had raised alarms among slave owners in all the colonies causing the wealty plantation owners of the South to enroll in the cause of independence previously championed only by a few Yankee radicals.
"the phrase Operation Iraqi Liberation was realized to boil down to the self explanatory acronym of OIL and got chanted to Operation Iraqi Freedom . . ."
You got that right. This is why we need to get our pols to remove the 70+ year ban on hemp. Obama was for removing it before he flipped but it still is possible albeit difficult to get him to change back his mind. Hempseed oil can replace crude oil 100%. Just ask Henry Ford and Rudolf Diesel. If we can be given the freedom to grow our own oil, we won't feel the need to be addicted to foreign oil and then it will be easier to force the oil and military interests to pull out of Iraq. I know this proposition sounds wierd but think about it. It is NO coincidence that USA fights resource wars over oil while at the same time PROHIBITING farmers from growing one of the worlds most oily (seed and resin) plants!
"It's easy to fall into the trap of believing that having more stuff will lead to happiness..."
Nonsense - anyone who "falls into the trap" in this day and age has chosen total denial over reality. Stuff=happy has been repeatedly exposed as a falsehood for decades now, centuries even, and nobody can claim ignorance on the subject.
It's not the ones who equate materialism with happiness who bother me. The amount of 'stuff' owned is an indirect measure of power. Those who are aware of this and that have and pursue more defecate on the rest of us that only subconsciously realise this relationship.
It's nice that amidst all this doom and gloom there are still optimists out there! I too have faith that the economic downturn will bring us closer together and teach us to show better respect for the environment. We all have too much stuff anyway. Ever notice how in poorer communities people actually seem happier? It's because they're not slaves to consumerism. They have more time for their friends and families. They are more connected to nature.
Inquisitive, thoughtful folk, it's true, really have no claim to ignorance as an excuse as the madness continues. However, one only has to visit a WalMart, a mall or other venue of mass consumerism to see that that there is a VAST amount of ignorance out there, as well as a large helping of denial. Can the ignorant masses (not intended as a pejorative) be counted on to behave in an intelligent, civilized manner when it all falls apart?
"Can the ignorant masses (not intended as a pejorative) be counted on to behave in an intelligent, civilized manner when it all falls apart?"
When the prices of oil skyrocketed, the answer then was a clear NO. Then again, even when the price of oil skyrocketed, there were no massive demonstrations. Consumerism is such a disease that people laugh at those who are frugal and sometimes don't even realize it. If I choose to sew and repair a dress or shoe of mine instead of buy a new replacement unless it's beyond repair, I get looked down at but understanding this mentality, I just turn the other cheek and just put it past me. Ignorance in this country is deeper than most people realize it. It'll take at least a generation or two for society to overcome deep ignorance.
Can the ignorant masses (not intended as a pejorative) be counted on to behave in an intelligent, civilized manner when it all falls apart?
I believe there is one gun for every citizen in this nation. That is the answer to your question about what happens if it all falls apart here.
emaho--I agree with you. (I am agreeing a lot here today).
I believe that a profound transformation will be needed, consciousness-wise. What will that take? We need to radically re-envision what it means to be a human being. Nothing less will do.
frank, I totally agree with you.
I think the same old message is trite at this stage. That is obviously not the deeper lesson we need to learn.