Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Massive Police Raids on Suspected Protestors in Minneapolis
Protesters here in Minneapolis have been targeted by a series of highly intimidating, sweeping police raids across the city, involving teams of 25-30 officers in riot gear, with semi-automatic weapons drawn, entering homes of those suspected of planning protests, handcuffing and forcing them to lay on the floor, while law enforcement officers searched the homes, seizing computers, journals, and political pamphlets. Last night, members of the St. Paul police department and the Ramsey County sheriff's department handcuffed, photographed and detained dozens of people meeting at a public venue to plan a demonstration, charging them with no crime other than "fire code violations," and early this morning, the Sheriff's department sent teams of officers into at least four Minneapolis area homes where suspected protesters were staying.
Jane Hamsher and I were at two of those homes this morning -- one which had just been raided and one which was in the process of being raided. Each of the raided houses is known by neighbors as a "hippie house," where 5-10 college-aged individuals live in a communal setting, and everyone we spoke with said that there had never been any problems of any kind in those houses, that they were filled with "peaceful kids" who are politically active but entirely unthreatening and friendly. Posted below is the video of the scene, including various interviews, which convey a very clear sense of what is actually going on here.In the house that had just been raided, those inside described how a team of roughly 25 officers had barged into their homes with masks and black swat gear, holding large semi-automatic rifles, and ordered them to lie on the floor, where they were handcuffed and ordered not to move. The officers refused to state why they were there and, until the very end, refused to show whether they had a search warrant. They were forced to remain on the floor for 45 minutes while the officers took away the laptops, computers, individual journals, and political materials kept in the house. One of the individuals renting the house, an 18-year-old woman, was extremely shaken as she and others described how the officers were deliberately making intimidating statements such as "Do you have Terminator ready?" as they lay on the floor in handcuffs. The 10 or so individuals in the house all said that though they found the experience very jarring, they still intended to protest against the GOP Convention, and several said that being subjected to raids of that sort made them more emboldened than ever to do so.
Several of those who were arrested are being represented by Bruce Nestor, the President of the Minnesota chapter of the National Lawyers' Guild. Nestor said that last night's raid involved a meeting of a group calling itself the "RNC Welcoming Committee", and that this morning's raids appeared to target members of "Food Not Bombs," which he described as an anti-war, anti-authoritarian protest group. There was not a single act of violence or illegality that has taken place, Nestor said. Instead, the raids were purely anticipatory in nature, and clearly designed to frighten people contemplating taking part in any unauthorized protests.Nestor indicated that only 2 or 3 of the 50 individuals who were handcuffed this morning at the 2 houses were actually arrested and charged with a crime, and the crime they were charged with is "conspiracy to commit riot." Nestor, who has practiced law in Minnesota for many years, said that he had never before heard of that statute being used for anything, and that its parameters are so self-evidently vague, designed to allow pre-emeptive arrests of those who are peacefully protesting, that it is almost certainly unconstitutional, though because it had never been invoked (until now), its constitutionality had not been tested.
There is clearly an intent on the part of law enforcement authorities here to engage in extreme and highly intimidating raids against those who are planning to protest the Convention. The DNC in Denver was the site of several quite ugly incidents where law enforcement acted on behalf of Democratic Party officials and the corporate elite that funded the Convention to keep the media and protesters from doing anything remotely off-script. But the massive and plainly excessive preemptive police raids in Minnesota are of a different order altogether. Targeting people with automatic-weapons-carrying SWAT teams and mass raids in their homes, who are suspected of nothing more than planning dissident political protests at a political convention and who have engaged in no illegal activity whatsoever, is about as redolent of the worst tactics of a police state as can be imagined.UPDATE: Here is the first of the videos, from the house that had just been raided:
Jane Hamsher has more here, and The Minnesota Independent has a report on another one of the raided houses, here.
UPDATE II: Here is the video we took from the second house as the raid was occurring. We were barred from entering but spoke with neighbors outside as well as with Bruce Nestor, the President of the Minnesota Lawyer's Guild, regarding these raids:
Over at FDL, Lindsay Beyerstein spoke with the property owner whose house -- the fourth one we now know of -- was being raided while the raid was in progress, and Lindsay has details here ("About an hour and a half ago 20 to 30 heavily armed police officers surrounded the house. One of my roommates said 'I want to see a warrant' and she was immediately detained"). Meanwhile, Indy Media of Twin Cities -- an association of independent journalists in the area -- just told me that several of their journalists have been detained while trying to cover these raids. Their site, with ongoing updates, is here.
The Uptake also has several reports of the various raids, including video of the raid at the property whose owner Bernstein spoke with as the raid occurred. That video includes an interview with a lawyer from the National Lawyer's Guild who was detained and put in handcufffs, explaining that the surrounded house is one where various journalists are staying. Additionally, a photojournalist with Democracy Now was detained at that house as well. So, both journalists and lawyers -- in addition to protesters -- have been detained and arrested even though not a single violent or criminal act has occurred.
UPDATE III: FDL has the transcript of part of my discussion about these raids with the National Lawyer Guild's Minnesota President -- here.
The Uptake has this amazing video interview with the Democracy Now producer who was detained today. As the DN producer explains, she was present at a meeting of a group called "I-Witness" -- which videotaped police behavior at the 2004 GOP Convention in New York and helped get charges dismissed against hundreds of protesters who were arrested. The police surrounded the St. Paul house where they were meeting even though they had no warrant, told them that anyone who exited the house would be arrested, and then -- even though they finally, after several hours, obtained a warrant only for the house next door -- basically broke into the house, pointed weapons at everyone inside, handcuffed them, searched the house, and then left. Here is a blog post from one of the members of I-Witness asking for help during the time when they were forced to stay inside the house (see the second post -- it reads like a note from a hostage crying out for help). This is truly repugnant, extreme police behavior designed to intimidate protesters, police critics and others, and it ought to infuriate anyone and everyone who cares about basic liberties.
- Posted in



133 Comments so far
Show AllMakes one wonder why anyone would ever spend any money in St. Paul.
The FISA Law and Patriot Act in action, folks! Pro-active arrest is illegal, any lawyers out there? I wish teh DNC didnt do a sim ilar (if somewhat lesser--bravo.....zzzz)action in Denver--we would be in such a better position to take action! It seems that, if you do these days (this isnt just CodePink , people--not that they dont fully deserve to speak), you are alone. Obama refused to meet with Iraq Vets against the War--some bs change this is.We all know that the GOP sucks--that is not he question. The question is, why is the candidate who won the Dem Primary on the "peace, change" platform, refusing to listen to protestors? This is so locked down, and its worse, because the people who would normally be helping them are all doey-eyes over Obama.
The Iraq vets marched to the convention and were prepared to get arrested if they were ignored. But guess what---their leader was allowed into the convention to meet with the candidates campaign and the protestors went away peacefully. I call that listening to protestors. Get your facts straight before you try your dissembling.
yesterdays republicans are todays democrats... and todays republicans are fascists
You are 100% WRONG! I wil find you the link--brb--I just watched it on YouTube this Am, and it still has me steamed.This is absolutely FALSE!They were NOT allowed in and they are stil waiting to hear form him!
I would suggest that if someone protests, there is no obligation on the part of anyone to listen to, cover the event or respond to whatever they are protesting.
If Obama did not meet with the Vets thats his decision and there is nothing wrong with it. If he hasn't gotten back to them in what they consider a timely manner, once again, there is no obligation to do so. Their votes are what they can use if they aren't satisfied with his response.
I'm trying to say that just becasuse someone shows up they don't automatically get a seat at the table or even help the situation at times.
I had understood that a representative of Obama had met with the Vet leaders. Maybe thats what he was referring to. Or am I wrong and that was a false report?
Of course you are right! Obama has no obligation to do anything! And I have no obligation as a life long Dem to vote for him. And more and more people feel that way. Listen or lose, sheeples. The VETS who fought this make the situtation WORSE?! I'l trust the video they sent me, thanks
It's one thing to be against Obama for ideological reasons---that's totally valid. It's another thing entirely to spread lies and disinformation about him because you have an agenda.
MY AGENDA! If I did have one--it would be MINE! Which is mopre tha I can say for Obama supportes who fal in line tlike Moonies! If you really cared if he won --an dwerwent just trying to make a political statemnt--youd listen. The fact remains thatr if the protestors at the DNC werew listened to--people would jsut brush off concerns about protestors there. They werent . That is my opinon. And, last ie I checked--I was stil allowed to have it. I statd where my opinion cam efrom --i gues the vetersns just dressed up and faked the video. Youre absolutely right. And so is Obama . About everything.
If you guys stop all criticism of Obama--I can guaratnee you that he wil lose. YOu have to stop this. If the Vetersna were treated fairly in the end--I'll know. I subscribe to their blog. Listen or lose.
So you are just fine with the ideological stances that Obama and te4h DNC are taking now--what areyou , some kind of neo-con??
I didn't say the Vets made it worse. I'll try to be clearer.
I saw it om YouTube. You read it on Democracy Now! Whichone is right? Who knows. Trust who you wish. In teh long run, its beside the point. Obama keeps changint he dates we wil leave. He enlargfes t4h war im ASfghanistan. He threatens Palestine and Georgia--and hes the "peace" candidate>
"In teh long run, its beside the point." It was your point originally. Can you say "agenda"
My point originally was NOT the Iraq vets. It was that the Dems could not speak out or act as freely bvecdause of the way protestors were treated in Denver. And I stand by that.
No, you are wrong---
This is quoted from the Democracy Now! website: "Iraq Vets Lead Antiwar March to Dem. Convention
Outside the convention, thousands of demonstrators marched through the streets of Denver to call on Democrats to back an immediate US withdrawal from Iraq. Members of Iraq Veterans Against the War led the march to the perimeter surrounding the Pepsi Center. A tense standoff ensued as police threatened to pepper spray and forcibly disperse the crowd. But the rally ended peacefully after Obama staffers agreed to meet protest leaders. In addition to an immediate withdrawal from Iraq, the demands also included paying reparations to the Iraqi people. The march began at a concert by the band Rage Against the Machine."
yesterdays republicans are todays democrats... and todays republicans are fascists
You'll have to fin it yourself (like you are interested) on YouTUbe-you know how to do it better than I do-I'm one of those old ladies you dont need--never felt old at 50 till this year!The internet is suposed to be so ionformative--but I think it has caused an entire generation to htink that they can change the system from within on the internet--wrong.So, the Dems are a little bit nicer fascists--what a LAME revolution ! I hope I die before I get THAT old!
WHhoooaaaa! 50 is the start of middle age! You are NOT old. Old age starts at 75 now.
Not accordin to Obama supporters--I USED to be one! Criticize ONCE--you are OUT of the "club".
Today's republicans and todays democrats are the same.
The War.
FISA.
NAFTA.
Fake Money.
They were VETS, they HAD to listen to them. It was in their SELF INTEREST to do so, Now, the dems will continue carry on their war, murder and looting.
Don't worry, you'll learn, KDelphi.
This is just another of the indicators in the decline of Democracy, and a moderned day SS Operation for sure. Read "The End of America" by Naomi Wolf.
May God help America!!
Did--great stuff!
"moderned day SS Operation"
Huh? SS operations?
Same reason people spent $$ in Denver--St. Paul is a nice city--Ive been there. The peopole of St. Paul arenot to blame. If we dont stop blaming individual citizens--our FELLOW citizens--and tackle the powers that be--we're all screwed!
As these ruthlessly authoritarian attempts to squelch dissent play out, we can't help but notice the lack - save for some mentions on websites - of coverage in the corporate media.
We also witnessed some police brutality in Denver but nothing even close to the scale of what we're seeing in the Twin Cities. The most appalling matter is the confiscation of equipment and materials.
This is Bush and Cheney's America - a police state in every sense of the word.
q
Yeah? Well, the Dems are supposesd to be the "good guys"--this is the 1960s al over again, except, this time, everyone thinks the Revolution will be YouTubed!
Re-read the post. He's saying the Dems suppressed speech in Denver but the press was all over it. There's nothing in the press about the Twin Cities.
Youre talking about it , arent you? The press was NOT all over he protests in Denver--I had to find it online --and most people dont!
What teh DNC did was somewhat less offensive (on a scale of 1 to 10?) ..what the problem is, is that it opems the gates--teh GOP can say, "Well, you did this and that in Denver". The DNC squealched all types of speech--anti-war, impeachment, FISA, etc. We expect the Dems to behave better. They did--but , just a little. Just enough to keep the "well its better than McCain" people feeloig "HOPE". What BS this all is.
Just a little? Breaking into a home and terrorizing the residents with automatic weapons---then taking computors and arresting on unconstitutional trumped-up charges is "just a little". If you really believe that, then all I can say is: you're blinded by your bias against the democratic party.
I can't wait to hear how samson and little brother and richm attack the democrats for this...
yesterdays republicans are todays democrats... and todays republicans are fascists
Isn't being a little bit repressive like being a little bit pregnant?
Or slightly dead?
Walk in peace.
Steady friends.
This outrageous behavior by police agencies is meant not just to intimidate but to provoke, to get us to do something which they can make a big national issue out of and which they can use to justify even greater repression.
Don't take the bait; and hold back anyone around you who is eager to take it or is trying to get you to. During the VietNam protests and in countless labor struggles the use of police spies to incite violence was common. It is entirely foreseeable that they will try that again.
Chris Horton
Yes, thats what people need to do --nothing! That will realy get them!!
The point is to stay peaceful and disciplined no matter what, but to keep going, not to give in. That takes courage and patience, and at times a willingness to take losses. Lashing out is a more natural and immediately satisfying reaction, but it usually plays into their hands.
Doing something, anything, to get attention from a corporate media that is determined to ignore us has a great emotional appeal; but that attention, if it allows them to put us in the wrong, will do more harm than good. Remember, we don't have independent access to the 95% to 98% of the people who get all their news from the mass media, so we don't get a chance to explain our side of the story. The story has to largely tell itself, in spite of the voiceover by the media hacks.
Find the movie Ghandi, and watch or re-watch it. Read a description of the non-violent tactics of the Civil Rights movement. Or watch the movie Matewan (a simply awesome movie) as the young union organizer tries to persuade the miners not to start a war they can't win, while the company finks work to provoke one.
This strategy only makes sense where the government and its agents have some kind of moral restraint, concern about public opinion and/or concern about the law. It wouldn't for example make sense in a context like Nazi Germany. While it is true that our country is being moved in that direction, we are a very long way from being there yet (tho in the moment when one is being attacked by police or goons it might seem that we were.)
In practical terms, when someone talks about planning violence, arming ourselves or attacking the police, talk them down if you can or, failing that or if there is no time, isolate or stop them and get them out of your ranks. And if someone shows up dressed as Che Guevara (or whatever the "militant fashion" of the moment is) and shooting off their mouths about revolution, judge them by their deeds but watch them like a hawk!
Chris Horton
Wow! So, this is what it's come down to? Be revolutionary as long as you don't alert the authorities? Come on!
I don't mean to offend anyone here but, a solid evolutionary uprising has been long overdue in this country as well as around the world. We've tried things their way for the last 10,000-12,000 years and our own planet is on the brink of catastrophe. Why should we cower before them and beg them to stop? Begging hasn't worked. Protesting doesn't work. Voting doesn't work. So, are we just supposed to hide in basements and talk them out?
Let them come for me. I will say, until they torture the last breath from my body, that it is time to fight and die if we have to for our freedom. Maybe, when it's all said and done, we'll never give our freedom away again for promises of bread and circuses. If my penchant for believing that we need to remove those monsters from power, by any means necessary, means that I can't be in your little club, then so be it.
"Society is in every state a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one." --- Thomas Paine, Common Sense
That's a great film on the civil rights movement and it's success using Ghandi's methods of non-violent resistence. I read an article very recently that showed the end results of movements that were done with civil disobedience and peaceful protest versus voilent tactics. In the end result, the movements done solely by peaceful means faired far better than those that used violence. Violence just begets more violence, it seems, and doesn't further the success of the cause.
Entirely possible or maybe they are just jumpy and someone said something stupid. But also don't make assumptions on how something looks I'd say...remember the Jena 6 and how it was presented at first. Looked entirely different when the truth came out.
I agree its better to wait and see what the real story is.
the disconnect between the internet generation (who have some access to real news, opinion and fact) and the majority of automatons still clinging to the corporate media has become so wide that only the gestapo can intercede
send out the brownshirts
this is classic nazism and quickly becoming american fascism modus operandi
i remember when there had to be probable cause before the government could break down the door
ok, i am getting nostalgic for a time that no longer exists but i do remember those times - and they were good times
hitler was elected, fair and square, in an open and free election in a democratic country of educated people
within 2 years of taking office he used the false flag event of the burning of the german parliament to introduce homeland security thereby restricting the rights and privileges of the german citizenry in order to protect them
sound familiar
then he started to round up the jews, the slavs whom he hated every bit as much as the jews, the unionists, the gays, the intellectuals, until everyone was afraid to speak out
sound familiar
i get the sense that most americans are waking up, in increasing numbers, to this new reality - the one whereby criticizing the government is enough to get you onto the watch list
i get the sense that a lot of american are now afraid of their own government - there was an article about this on cd last week
doesn't sound like a democracy to me
sounds like a fascist police state - one that exists simply to provide for the imperial death machine that is enslaving the world even as we speak - not in the name of democracy or freedom but rather in the name of bechtel, dynecor, haliburton, kbr, blackwater, raytheon etc
let's not forget the nwo/globalist/rothschild bank cabal either
its getting scary folks
and who i ask who has the courage to speak out
if you know anyone please forward their names to the nsa/cia/fbi - we need to protect the country from these few remaining terrorists
we need to protect the third reich, i mean the homeland, er i mean the constitution, er i mean..........well i think we are protecting something
aint we?
cheers, b
If you think the "internet generation" is in the know while anyone that doesn't use a computer is uninformed I must disagree.
In fact I'd suggest that the internet generation has a far harder time seperating fact from fiction simply because they tend to get everything from the internet. And there is a LOT of false information running around out there. There is also a tendency to pick up flawed analogies in my opinion.
They actually did do a study, though, a few years ago. They asked questions about current events to a number of people who got most of their news from the internet versus people who got it from TV. The people who got their 'news' solely from TV, scored horrendously (approximately 35% correctness) on knowing the true facts about current events while the people using the internet scored higher than 90%.
The police state marches on. First the police fought violent protesters; then police provocateurs instigated violence in protests, justifying violent police response; then police corralled protesters in "free speech zones"; now they're busting in doors of suspected protesters before they even get to the streets! I suppose the next step is preemptive arrests to prevent crimes.
Dave
http://daveeriqat.wordpress.com/
We now can never be certain about our free-speech rights.
Each party staging protests at the other's convention? Perhaps.
More likely nefarious false flag protests staged to create choas and allow for the expansion of the police state to knock down doors with semi-auto weapons, zip ties etc to chill any dissenting voices.
This is why I recommend all dissenting voices dress in business suits and look "average". The visual confusion for the police and media both will be extraordinary.
You Decide
Most of the protestors at he DNC were REPUBLICANS?! I find that a little hard to believe ...Iraq Vrts? Code OPINk? Greenpeace---al GOP. How strange. And I do not think the people in St. Paul would classify themselves as Democrats.
I've seen this sort of stuff occur in China and at the time I remember telling people there that this would never happen in the U.S. Of course this is before the Neo-Cons launched their post 9-11 program of fear and intimidation.
Studying the rise of Nazi Germany, scholars instantly recognize the lack of public protests back then compared to what is occurring here and now. Just like Hitler's crude propaganda machine in the thirties, the MSM has been very effective in cowing the populace nowadays. Fear rules. Meanwhile 'hate radio' programs like Hannity and Colmes either blame the 'Liberals' or applaud the 'fine efforts' our law enforcement agencies sending a clear message to anyone who is listening... 'blame the government, blame the liberals or even blame your neighbour for all your woes, but never point the finger at big business!'
For the American citizenry to wrest control of government from the corpocracy we live in, will require nothing short of a revolution. But I doubt this revolution will occur in my lifetime. The Neo-Con apparatus is far more sophisticated and well funded that anything Hitler could have imagined.
Well, the NeoCons are smart. They learned well the lessons of Goebbels and Himmler. Now, they are being applied to YOU, American citizens. I do not have it handy, but you should research Goering's statement from the Nuremburg trials. They explain EXACTLY what has happened in the USA since Aug of 2001.
'This would never happen in the US', huh?
Ever hear of the American Indian Movement? AIM was stalked, intimidated and harassed for years by the FBI in the Seventies, with member's homes raided and member's arrested on phony, trumped up charges. Several of them were effectively 'executed' during police and FBI actions.
But because these things happened to a bunch of Native Americans (or as the FBI called them 'uppity Indians') and not middle or upper class whites, there is next to no public recognition that these events took place. Cultural amnesia strikes again.
And what about the police intimidation in the South during the Sixties, of those who tried to ensure universal sufferage (the right to vote) for American Negroes?
Think about it.
These actions do happen. They are just conveniently ignored.
Walk in peace.
Exactly. Rights of the Native Americans and the rights of people of color have been violated from the get-go. What people did not realize is that if just ONE PERSON's rights are being violated, and we look the other way, WE ARE ALL IN TROUBLE. When a black man was thrown to the ground just for being stopped just because he was black, it was just a matter of time before this kind of Fascist treatment made its way to the whole population. Do we get it now? Fascist tactics have been occurring in this country for a very long time. It's only now when the whole populace is suffering do we realize it because the cancer was not stopped at its roots long ago. Now we all pay. And now we all have to fight for our rights for EVERYONE ALL THE TIME. No exceptions. Then we will be a democracy.
"Truthseeker58 August 31st, 2008 9:22 pm
Exactly. Rights of the Native Americans and the rights of people of color have been violated from the get-go. What people did not realize is that if just ONE PERSON's rights are being violated, and we look the other way, WE ARE ALL IN TROUBLE. When a black man was thrown to the ground just for being stopped just because he was black, it was just a matter of time before this kind of Fascist treatment made its way to the whole population. Do we get it now? Fascist tactics have been occurring in this country for a very long time. It's only now when the whole populace is suffering do we realize it because the cancer was not stopped at its roots long ago. Now we all pay. And now we all have to fight for our rights for EVERYONE ALL THE TIME. No exceptions. Then we will be a democracy.
"
QFT! When "Injuns" and "Niggers" were getting their teeth kicked in, the greater society didn't even blink. Now, little white kids are getting tazered and beaten and it's a tragedy. I'm no racist but, don't you guys think that it would've been easier to chop the hydra's heads off when it was wreaking havoc on your darker brothers? Now, it's full grown and about to be sated on the blood of all of us. Perhaps, when the smoke clears, we can let all this crap go that the tyrants have used to keep us separate and weak. Racism, religion, classism, etc. are all tools of our common slavemasters to keep the slaves from revolting. Why can we not see this?
"Society is in every state a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one." --- Thomas Paine, Common Sense
74 years and 3 months ago to the day was the Night of the Long Knives.
No warrants. No-knock raids. How can the police seize property without arresting the owner?
What next? Warrentless no-knock raids on CommonDreams readers?