EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Groups Galvanize Against US Senate with 24 Hour 'Signature Bomb'
Senators will not get a pass from anti-tar sands activists
Beginning at noon today, a coalition of over a dozen environmental groups, progressive organizations, and socially minded businesses -- including 350.org, NRDC, Sierra Club, MoveOn.org and companies like Patagonia and Northface -- are launching a 24 hour “signature bomb” with the goal of sending the Senate over 500,000 messages opposing Keystone XL and urging Senators to block any amendments that reverse the President's pipeline rejection.
UPDATE: (4:35 PM EST) According to reports:
Senate Republicans officially filed an amendment Monday afternoon to the transportation bill that would authorize the Keystone XL pipeline. The amendment is sponsored by Sens. John Hoeven, Mitch McConnell, Richard Lugar, David Vitter, Mike Johanns and Orrin Hatch.
And 350.org reports:
Click here to add your name to our growing movement wide petition to stop Keystone XL -- there are over 300,000 signatures and counting: 350.org/kxl
Earlier:
The action has been planned to combat an expected amendment that could be added to the Senate transportation bill which will be under consideration over the next several days. If successfully tacked onto the Senate bill, the provision would force approval of the Keystone XL pipeline even after President Obama rejected it last month.
Bill McKibben from 350.org, on a press call this morning, said members of the coalition cannot hope to compete with the oil industry when it comes to campaign contributions to Senators and don't have illusions about a level playing field when it comes to money. "What we do have is numbers," he said. "What we do have is people who feel passionate about this issue. And in this fight 'money power' may find itself coming out on the short end of the stick against 'people power.'" Citing the political upheaval that has now been generated by the pipeline, McKibben credited the bold vision of activists, especially young people in his organization and others, in elevating the issue of global warming and climate change by challenging US energy policy. "We have spent our bodies. We have spent out time and energy," he said referencing previous actions at the White House and in local districts. "Now [with this action] we are spending our pixels and our keystrokes to get this message out."
Twitter updates show that the numbers are growing rapidly:
Suzanne Goldenberg, at The Guardian, reports this morning:
Some inflated estimates have put the number of pipeline jobs as high as 50,000; an analysis by the State Department, which oversaw the project, put the number at 5,000.
Meanwhile, Republicans in Congress are due on Monday to introduce a new measure that would force work to begin on the pipeline, essentially overturning the White House decision.
Republican Senators plan to file a measure on Monday that would link the pipeline project to a bill that would authorise more than $100bn in long-term transportation spending.
Michael Keischnick, from the CREDO Action network, described the battle of the Keystone XL pipeline as a very "clean line" for his members and that US Senators "would not get a bye" if they voted for an oil pipeline that would "despoil America in order to export dirty oil." Full development of the pipeline, he added, would "offset all the other gains" made by any of Obama's other environmental policies.
And Susan Casey-Lefkowitz, International Program Director at NRDC, called the Senate action a "political gambit" and that forcing congressional approval of a pipeline that the US State Department has found "not in the national interest" would be a clear sign that the Republicans and some Democrats continue "to play politics with dirty energy policies."
Take action here.
###
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


28 Comments so far
Show AllWhat an awful accusation! Obama's going to have to prove them wrong.
China owns a controlling interest in the Alberta Tar Sands.
China wants TWO pipelines (Keystone XL in the US, and the Enbridge pipeline in Canada) to be built to supply them with the raw Tar Sands bitumen extract to be processed in China.
China holds the MAJORITY of US debt in the form of US Government bonds.
The pipeline(s) WILL go through.
Not so good at following the dots are we?
- The US has been sold out >TO< the Chinese >BY< US Corporations and the US Government.
-The US >OWES< most of it default currency debt to China, which is holding the majority of the bonds the US uses to prop up it's fiat currency.
- The Chinese government run oil company Sinopec paid a record 4.6 BILLION dollars to buy out Coneco-Phillips share of Canada's Petrocan Tar Sands operation. With that deal came voting authority, and the ability to FORCE the US and Canada to build a pipeline STRICTLY for the use of exporting Tar Sands bitumen extract TO China for processing. This all legal under The Multi-lateral Agreement on Investment (MAI), which both the US and Canada signed back in the late 80s.
- This entire deal is going through whether you or I like it or not. The real power behind the deal, the world's financial Elite have already ensured that it will.
This has nothing to do with racism. This is Economics 101 in action. You don't like it? Then get out in the street like they are in Greece and Egypt.
I'm not debating that technically some Chinese capitalist interests are also behind this, although I do not believe that this will not profit Western power interests (American and Canadian) primarily. What I absolutely dislike (and I may have unjustly generalised this to you, sorry for that) is for Americans to constantly shift the blame to other parts of the world. This is what it looks like to me: another whiny American blaming not his own system of power but external forces. The idea that an American pipeline and Canadian tar sands use depends mainly on Chinese interests sounds absolutely ridiculous.
Yes. Because of the MAI, the average North American citizen has NO say in the actions taken by Government on behalf of profit seeking Corporations. The same MAI language was also buried in NAFTA to prevent concerned citizens from being able to protect their schools, libraries, etc. from undue Corporate influence.
"The idea that an American pipeline and Canadian tar sands use depends mainly on Chinese interests sounds absolutely ridiculous."
Agreed. But the financial Elite who control the Political class will do anything to satisfy their short term profit driven schemes.
"tj"
NOT your bad.
The rubbish which keeps repeating itself, that Obama "rejected" the pipeline is the worst kind of veal pen (as Jane Hamsher once said) self-delusion.
If Obama had rejected this crap, it would NOT be in the senate.
The most disgusting aspect of this is the way McKibben and Co. want us to "support" the president.
Please remember that the Sierra Club is now a 'feel good' greenwash run by professional PR industry flacks.
Sending 500,000 signatures is a token of popular discontent, but without actually preventing the pipeline from being built, it is symbolic and meaningless in the face of the Financial Elite who want this deal to go through.
We've seen this movie over and over again.
1. Obama says he's against something (either during his campaign or after large protests in front of the white house).
2. The Senate (Harry Reid) and the Republican house attach whatever he's against to the bill to increase a debt ceiling or a defense appropriations bill.
3. Obama signs the bill and complains the Republicans forced him to capitulate because he couldn't shutdown the government or weaken defense.
4. Harry Reid (ditto what Obama said)
I remember a Simpson's episode where Lisa explains the process of attaching bills to other more important bills that must pass.
Obama could have pushed back and waited a bit longer to get "the more important bill" passed without the offending attached bill. But that would mean that Obama will fight for the 99% of the voters instead of 99% of his campaign dollars.
Didn't Obama just delay the decision on Keystone XL, stating it was too rushed?
That didn't stop Bill McKibben from praising Obama and claiming victory.
Maybe Bill doesn't really know how a bill is really passed.
AND it's not just the "1%". Most of the Western "99%" acts IN THE EXACT SAME FASHION towards the rest of the world.