Ocean Acidification Rates Pose Disaster for Marine Life, Major Study Shows
Report launched from leading marine scientists at Copenhagen summit shows seas absorbing dangerous levels of CO2
The world's oceans are becoming acidic at a faster rate than at any time in the last 55m years, threatening disaster for marine life and food supplies across the globe, delegates at the UN climate conference in Copenhagen have been warned.
A report by more than 100 of Europe's leading marine scientists, released at the climate talks this morning, states that the seas are absorbing dangerous levels of carbon dioxide as a direct result of human activity. This is already affecting marine species, for example by interfering with whale navigation and depleting planktonic species at the base of the food chain.
Ocean acidification - the facts says that acidity in the seas has increased 30% since the start of the industrial revolution. Many of the effects of this acidification are already irreversible and are expected to accelerate, according to the scientists.
The study, which is a massive review of existing scientific studies, warns that if CO2 emissions continue unchecked many key parts of the marine environment - particularly coral reefs and the algae and plankton which are essential for fish such as herring and salmon - will be "severely affected" by 2050, leading to the extinction of some species.
Dr Helen Phillips, chief executive of Natural England, which co-sponsored the report, said: "The threat to the delicate balance of the marine environment cannot be overstated - this is a conservation challenge of unprecedented scale and highlights the urgent need for effective marine management and protection."
Although oceans have acidified naturally in the past, the current rate of acidification is so fast that it is becoming extremely difficult for species and habitats to adapt. "We're counting it in decades, and that's the real take-home message," said Dr John Baxter a senior scientist with Scottish Natural Heritage, and the report's co-author. "This is happening fast."
The report, published by the EU-funded European Project on Ocean Acidification, a consortium of 27 research institutes and environment agencies, states that the survival of a number of marine species is affected or threatened, in ways not recognised and understood until now. These species include:
• whales and dolphins, who will find it harder to navigate and communicate as the seas become "noisier". Sound travels further as acidity increases. Noise from drilling, naval sonar and boat engines is already travelling up to 10% further under water and could travel up to 70% further by 2050.
• brittle stars (Ophiothrix fragilis) produce fewer larvae because they need to expend more energy maintaining their skeletons in more acid seas. These larvae are a key food source for herring.
• tiny algae such as Calcidiscus leptoporus which form the basis of the marine food chain for fish such as salmon may be unable to survive.
• young clownfish will lose their ability to "smell" the anemone species that they shelter in. Experiments show that acidification interferes with the species' ability to detect the chemicals that give "olfactory cues".
The report predicts that the north Atlantic, north Pacific and Arctic seas - a crucial summer feeding ground for whales - will see the greatest degree of acidification. It says that levels of aragonite, the type of calcium carbonate which is essential for marine organisms to make their skeletons and shells, will fall worldwide. But because cold water absorbs CO2 more quickly, the study predicts that levels of aragonite will fall by 60% to 80% by 2095 across the northern hemisphere.
"The bottom line is the only way to slow this down or reverse it is aggressive and immediate cuts in CO2," said Baxter. "This is a very dangerous global experiment we're undertaking here."
Written for policy makers and political leaders, the document is being distributed worldwide, with 32,000 copies printed in five major languages including English, Chinese and Arabic. Every member of the US congress, now struggling to agree a binding policy on CO2 emissions, will be sent a copy.
Congressman Brian Baird, a Democrat representative from Washington state, who championed a bill in Congress promoting US research on ocean acidification, said these findings would help counter climate change sceptics, since acidification was easily and immediately measurable.
"The consequences of ocean acidification may be every bit as grave as the consequences of temperature increases," he said. "It's one thing to question a computer extrapolation, or say it snowed in Las Vegas last year, but to say basic chemistry doesn't apply is a real problem [for the sceptics]. I think the evidence is really quite striking."
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
17 Comments so far
Show AllGod we need an asteroid to wipe everybody out again. This might be an nice spot in about a million years after that.
It happened before.... it will happen again.
The list just keeps getting longer:
*Global Warming = warmer oceans = coral bleaching and reef habitat destruction.
*Fertilzer runoff = algae blooms = depleted O2 dead zones.
*Overfishing = possible extinction by population reduction.
Also = loss of predator ecosystem control.
*Sea level rise = loss of wetland habitats.
*Dams = loss of spawning fish.
*Coal burning = Mercury concentrated in the food chain.
*Oils slicks, human waste, plastics...
*US Navy sonar.
*And, of course, acidification. Miss anything?
Betcha someday some billionaire gets the winning bid for the last yellowfin tuna.
I've stopped discussing the global warming/climate change CO2 correlations-- its models are too complicated. I just focus on the ocean acidity. the CC deniers rarely have a comment.
1. they all admit that CO2 is increasing in concentration. no one denies that.
2. its a simple highschool chemistry experiment to demonstrate that as the CO2 concentration in the air is increased, the acidiy of the ocean necessarily increases. its a very simple equation, a much-sought-after "law of nature" (as the deniers are always seem to be in need of to believe anything).
3. anyone who has had a fish tank knows that acidity kills.
CO2 is a pollutant pure and simple.
btw I wonder where the 9 million missing BC Fraser River salmon went?
"Congressman Brian Baird, a Democrat representative from Washington state, who championed a bill in Congress promoting US research on ocean acidification, said these findings would help counter climate change sceptics, since acidification was easily and immediately measurable."
yeah, right.
These people are self deluded, they will not believe anything they do not want to.
...
"Ocean Acidification Rates Pose Disaster for Marine Life, Major Study Shows"
One more thing to be denied. OK guys lets hear why this isn't true or due to human actions. I simply cant wait to hear it...
...
Looks like the great re-enactment of the P-Tr mass extinction is underway! We know that good old 550 million year old Lingula sp. (a mussel-like bivalve) will survive just fine and be one of the few survivors in the sea. I wonder who will get to be the next Lystrosarus - the only large land animal to survive in significant numbers?
Hi pjd412. Aren't bivalve shells one of the things most threatened by ocean acidification? Is this mussel different? I agree that only a few very special life forms (such as sulfur eating worms, possibly, I don't know) are likely to survive the acidification. Sudden or significant ph changes in either direction set off a massive chain of death events in salt water environments.
Joe
Lihgula and other surviving surviving species of brachiopod are not related to bivalves. They evolutionarily predate them, even though Lingula looks superficially like a mussel. Their shells are chitin and apatite, not aragonite (polymorph of CaCO2) like bivalves, so their shells are not nearly as prone to acid attack.
well if it's homo sapiens, they won't last too long without their 'meat'.........
from the article:
"The bottom line is the only way to slow this down or reverse it is aggressive and immediate cuts in CO2," said Baxter. "This is a very dangerous global experiment we're undertaking here."
so, when do suggestions to terminate industrial activity and elctricity use stop being treated as lunacy? If continuing is detrimental, how is stopping, and quickly, worse?
Obviously, immediate preparation, in the form of planning and planting for local necessities, would be in order, but, then...
How about September 22, 2012? Let's get those gardens growing!
Good point, dubet. I suggest you join up with other Transition minded people in the Transition Network. While most people argue about whose fault all this is, and fantasize about techo-fixes that are not going to provide more than a fraction of the energy we use now, there are people who are busy localizing to meet the basic needs of their communities as much as possible, unplugging from the global industrial machinery and modifying their lives to use much less power. We have gardens and gardening clubs and community and neighborhood gardens, and mapping neighborhoods to locate isolated or vulnerable residents who may need help with food; we are learning how to keep chickens, and building bike trails, planting edible perennials all over the place, working with schools to teach horticulture and survival skills. We're creating local currencies, supporting local farms and farmers, and much more.
"So, when do suggestions to terminate industrial activity and elctricity use stop being treated as lunacy?"
No one, outside of the small minority of people with anarcho-primitivist agendas, are suggesting terminating industrial activity and electric power. It needs to be done in a radically different way, and deep reductions in energy usage is part of it in the short term, but people will still have electricity and heated houses, and buy manufactured goods.
The soil in my garden is frozen solid. Nothing will be growing until April. I'm thankful that natural gas will be cheaper this winter, but still keep the thermostat at 62F day, 57F night, except when higher in cold windy spells to keep the pipes from freezing.
I get the distinct impression that a lot of this zany stuff comes from people who live in subtropical or Mediterranean climates (i.e. the kooky Kalifornia koast or desert interior) and don't do a lot of traveling - at least in the winter months.
Have you thought that Sept 22, 2012 might simply be the date the "accident" will occur at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN? Grow a garden if you like, bit it won't do any good aganist an earth-eating black hole or a reorganization of the quantum vacuum and consequently matter and spacetime itself, spreading outward from the collision event at the speed of light - eventually destroying and re-creating the entire universe. Or maybe the creation of strangelets, which will have a similar but more local effecs.
Maybe our own universe is the result of a previous sentient being's physics lab experiment gone awry, 13.5 billion years ago.
At least the problem of global warming and acid oceans will be solved on our little dust-speck.
(disclaimer: I don't necessarily beleve this, but it is fun to speculate about)
yeah, that bloody collider thingy sure is dicing with the unknown........
agree; fun to speculate....................but i believe the 'madmen' operating this collider, are not speculating when they think they will create a 'mini' universe.....
what the fuck's one of those????..........and where will they put it?????.......
Well, other universes can exist in any of an infinite number of other spacial dimensions, so they can exist in the same space we occupy.
Think of a flat sheet of paper on your desk, with little two-dimensional beings existing on it. Those beings would go about their entire lives and never know of the desk, or you, or the room, anything else in the third dimension outside of the plane of the paper. Fourth, fith, sixth...n dimensions work the same way.
it was a joke actually, but thanks for the clarification...........