Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
My Lai Photographer Ron Haeberle Exposed a Vietnam Massacre 40 Years Ago Today in The Plain Dealer
Forty years ago today, black-and-white photographs of slaughtered women, children and old men in a Vietnamese village shocked the world -- or that portion of the world willing to believe American soldiers could gun down unarmed peasants and leave them to die in streets and ditches.
The Plain Dealer, in an international exclusive, was the first news outlet to publish the images of what infamously became known as the My Lai massacre, which had taken place on March 16, 1968.
"A clump of bodies," read the description on the front page of The Plain Dealer's Nov. 20, 1969, edition. At first some people were in denial about how these South Vietnamese civilians were killed, even after seeing the pictures.
| Photographer remembers My Lai Massacre |
It was too hard, too painful, to comprehend.
But the atrocities committed by soldiers in the U.S. Army's Charlie Company were captured by combat photographer Sgt. Ron Haeberle, a Fairview High School graduate who'd been drafted after college.
The Army did not begin investigating My Lai until the spring of 1969, a year after the killings, after a former member of Charlie Company sent a letter to government officials, including President Richard Nixon and numerous members of Congress.
Army investigators came to Cleveland to interview Haeberle in August 1969. Upon his honorable discharge from the Army the previous year, he'd returned here and was occasionally giving slide-show talks to Kiwanis and Lions clubs about his war experience in general. Those groups would never expect the horrific scenes he'd documented.
"First, I showed all the good we did there, what the medics did, and photos of Vietnamese people smiling. And then I'd go to the My Lai photos, and there'd be dead silence," says Haeberle today, in one of his first U.S. interviews in many decades.
"They'd say, 'No, this can't have happened. That can't be true.' "
They didn't want to believe it, as many people didn't when the photos were published, but it was true.
Unbelievable massacre still reverberates
On March 16, 1968, American soldiers, "the good guys," who were not under fire, entered a village where residents were eating breakfast, rousted them from their homes, raped young girls and then killed them, their siblings, parents and grandparents. When the injured moved among the corpses they lay with, they were shot again until they were still.
The U.S. Army set the number killed at 347; the memorial in My Lai lists the names of 504 dead.
The story of the My Lai massacre became a significant part of our nation's history. Twenty-six soldiers of the 50-member unit were initially charged with criminal offenses for their actions, but only Lt. William Calley was convicted of premeditated murder. He served three years of a life sentence under house arrest after President Nixon reduced his sentence.
Calley was silent about My Lai for 40 years, until making a public apology in August.
But the term "My Lai" still reverberates: It's mentioned when there are civilian casualties at the hands of U.S. or allied troops in Iraq or Afghanistan.
The Plain Dealer got the explosive My Lai photographs in November 1969 soon after Haeberle, then 28, was contacted by Army investigators. He called the newspaper, because The Plain Dealer was his hometown paper and because he recognized one of the bylines -- Joe Eszterhas.
They had attended Ohio University at the same time, and Eszterhas had edited the college paper.
"I didn't have any connections, so Joe was the logical person for me to call," Haeberle says.
Earlier that same week, a story about the massacre, written by a free-lance writer named Seymour Hersh, was being distributed by a small news service. The story wasn't picked up by very many newspapers; it was met with incredulity, since neither Hersh nor his news service were well-known.
Still, it garnered some notice. Mike Roberts, then a Plain Dealer Washington bureau reporter who'd returned stateside after a year serving as the paper's Vietnam correspondent, remembers that copies of Hersh's story were slipped under office doors in the National Press Building.
"No one believed it," said Roberts, of Orange Village. "Bill Ware, the [Plain Dealer's] executive editor, called; he wasn't sure if we should go with it. Almost simultaneously, this kid comes forward with these pictures -- Haeberle's photographs legitimized the story."
Richard Conway, a retired Plain Dealer photographer in Solon, was working on the photo desk at the paper that night.
"This guy brought the slides in -- I took a look at them, and it was shocking," he says.
"They were in color. They showed the terror on people's faces right before they were shot."
Man behind camera never sought fame
The photographs would become historic in a war era that consumed a generation. But Haeberle quietly returned to obscurity. Forty years later, he continues to live a quiet life. After the war, he returned here to work at Premier Industrial Corp. in Cleveland, where he was a supervisor. For the rest of his career -- besides a brief stint as a photographer at Case Western Reserve University, which he found unexciting -- he worked as a supervisor at various manufacturing plants.
Today, he lives in a nondescript house in a new development in a far western Cleveland suburb. He's 68, divorced and has a grown daughter. On his mantel, there's a Rube Goldberg sculpture trophy from 1969, a journalism award for his photos that ran in Life magazine. On his coffee table, there's hero pilot Chesley Sullenberger's book, "Highest Duty."
Haeberle is fit and athletic -- he works out every day, whether at a spinning class, on the Pilates reformer he's got at home, or on ultralong bike rides. He also skis and kayaks.
In the spring, he often heads West and cycles through Utah -- "In Moab, I feel like an ant among the mountains" -- and California. The only things he documents with his camera these days are his travels and the beauties of nature he finds during his travels.
In contrast to today's celebrity-seekers, Haeberle is a throwback. A low-key man by nature, he has almost never -- until now -- talked to reporters about 1969 and how those photos affected his life. He did give a straightforward interview to the BBC in 1989 and will be part of a documentary about My Lai slated to run on PBS next year.
He doesn't talk much about his moment in history. But if the subject comes up, he'll talk about those terrible four hours and why he kept shooting photos.
"That was my job -- I was walking around with two cameras strapped around me, mine and the Army's, and my job was to document wherever we went, what the unit did," he says.
When Charlie Company landed in My Lai and began shooting people, Haeberle shot photos. "It was reactive," he says.
"I was trying to figure out, 'How am I going to capture the event and go back to headquarters and show them what we were doing?' "
But, he says, "I didn't make it to certain parts of the village where other things were going on, the rapes and the cutting of tongues and scalping and all that stuff. I didn't see any of that.
"Later on, when I was interviewed by the CID [the Army's Criminal Investigation Division] and they explained everything that happened there, I said, 'You've got to be kidding me.' I didn't know it was quite that bad."
Photographs changed lives, perceptions
On that night in 1969, when Plain Dealer editors were considering publication, the evidence looked very, very bad.
"It was such a horrific idea that American troops could do this, to women and children," says Conway of The Plain Dealer. "I thought it was amazing we had these -- such a big story out of Vietnam."
Of course, it wasn't a fait accompli that the photos would run. First, the paper had to verify that Haeberle was who he said he was. That was confirmed when an Army prosecutor named Aubrey Daniel strongly suggested The Plain Dealer not publish Haeberle's photos.
Conway was just one of many people who thought the images "might be a little too much for the paper." Publisher Thomas Vail had to approve publication, and he did. Eszterhas later said that Plain Dealer editors were hopeful they'd win journalism prizes for the incendiary scoop.
Eszterhas, speaking from his home in Bainbridge Township earlier this month, well remembers the intensity of the hours leading up to publication.
"Daniel told us, 'You have no right to run those photos because [Haeberle] was using an Army camera," Eszterhas recalls. "And we told him he'd had his own camera, too."
Eszterhas wrote the news story that accompanied the photos, and told of Haeberle's experiences at My Lai. He and Haeberle then sold the photos to Life magazine, sharing less than $20,000.
"It was a huge scoop," says Haeberle. "It changed my life a little -- I got to travel a bit. It changed Joe Eszterhas' life a lot."
Within a few years, Eszterhas had fallen out of favor and was fired from The Plain Dealer. But he went on to write for Rolling Stone magazine and then became a successful Hollywood screenwriter who made millions.
Haeberle has never wanted to dwell on the events at My Lai. But he has read books and watched several documentaries on My Lai, wanting to learn more about what happened in that village.
"My understanding was the company [which he joined the morning of My Lai] had been taking losses right and left, seeing their buddies killed by mines, and they'd become hardened.
"But what happened that day did not have to happen. No. No way."
Does Haeberle feel his decision to share the photos with the newspaper changed history, or people's lives? Quietly, nonchalantly, he says: "Oh, I'm sure it did. I've talked to people over the years, Army people even, who did mention it helped bring a turning point to the war, bring about the end of the war, maybe.
"At least that part, that makes me feel good, that part coming out."
Eszterhas, too, points out that the publication of the My Lai photos, coupled with the Kent State shootings six months later, which he also covered, began a critical shift in Americans' perceptions of the Vietnam War.
In Vietnam, a shocking memorial
In 2000, Haeberle went back to Vietnam for the first time. He bought a number of original works by Vietnamese artists, which hang in his living room today. Most are abstracts; one is a black-and-white, delicately needleworked portrait of a woman, gracefully reaching one arm toward the sky.
He and a group of cyclist friends biked 775 miles from Hanoi to Saigon, now Ho Chi Minh City, with stops along the way.
One was at My Lai, where women still push and pull water buffalo alongside green rice fields and where there is now a museum and peace garden memorializing the dead.
Haeberle's traveling friends knew of his role in My Lai's past. "But we just kept it quiet. They were protective."
He walked into the small museum -- "It's beautiful," he says -- and was shocked to see the 16-by-20-inch photos on the wall. The massacre photos were all his, some color, some black-and-white; there was even a black-and-white shot of him.
"I never gave them the photos," he explains. "So the Army must have."
He won't say he got choked up, exactly, but he was affected by being in that space, his own powerful images of horror looking back at him from the walls.
"I found myself making an apology for what happened," he says. "I walked around by myself. No one else was around, and I was making silent amends.
"For something that didn't have to happen, but did."



25 Comments so far
Show AllMy Lai will NEVER happen again...
...because the USA now will kill any journalist that ties to take pictures like these.
That's what embedded means, doesn't it? The only pictures will be put on Arab TV. And we will wonder why they hate us.
Well of course one could always go on youtube for atrocities. I especially recommend the "depleted uranium" footage of children born in iraq after the invasion!!!
So we dont put it on the newspapers, the newspapers are a DEAD ISSUE!
I sure miss the way black and white photos treat rotting bodies though.
Digital is so glossy.
We have all the images of horror that we need to justify a peace movement.
Couple responses to the above:
There is no need to kill any reporters, just ignoring them does the job just fine! There have been plenty of latter-day Mi-Lais in Iraq, Afgnaistan and Gaza, and reporters reporting and photographing them. Thay have all been totally memory-holed.
And, as far as xorloc's assertation that youtube is a suitable replacement venue for the publishing and mass consciousness-raising of atrocities, the results are already in. They sre buried and forgotten among the millions of pieces of trivial junk in youtube.
Has public consciousness been raised yet? Are there masses of indignant people yet?
Youtube or other "do-your-own-thing" forms of internet media are absolutely NOT a suitable replacement for a mass-distributed newspaper, broadcast television or radio news program. In fact, they are so insidious at completely isolating and diluting public anger of the sort that the Mi-lai, or Kent State, or napaum-bomb photos successfully elecited using old-fashoned newspapers and TV, that it HAS to be deliberate.
It is indeed deliberate. Starting with the first Gulf war, the military was extremely aware of what the images of war for both sides had done to end Vietnam and were determined not to let that happen again. So the whole notion of "embedded journalists" and controlled access was born. There were plenty of independent photographers and journalists feeding images and commentary back to the states for consumption on the evening news during the whole of Vietnam. Having that beamed into most Americans living rooms every night brought home the horrors and costs of war. Even though some of the politicians and talking heads were still doing a similar job then to cheerlead and downplay the horror there was still some integrity to journalism and some outstanding, not to mention brave, photographers. Things might be very different if Americans were forced to look upon the gruesomeness of what their "troops" are doing and having done to them. Need we really wonder why the torture photos are not being released?
But it goes way beyond just the military's treatment of reporters and the reporting of military events. The whole media syatem, operating under Herman/Chomsky propaganda model, prevents ALL inconvienient truths from getting out. this syatem has become is even more refined than when they wrote "Manufacturing Consent".
Since then, the internet has come into being, but the system has adapted to the internet brilliantly. By encouraging individual highly personalized reporting in the form of blogs, youtube, social network sites and to some extent, even sites like CD or Counterpunch, they are able to dilute significant galvanizing news down to harmlessness. Meanwhile, the great majority of USAns still just go to Fox, CNN, or their local mainstream ISP's for news on the intenet.
Sometimes it really gets obvious. A short time after the big, boy-in-a-balloon story, there was the equally titillating, tragic story about three missing young women in North Dakota who were eventually found in a sunken vehicle in a pond. They had been driving an SUV through tall grass and accidentally, drove into the pond. The vehicle was found sunk, right side up, windows closed, with the drowned bodies of the women plus their dog. What was really tragic about it (and one would thing, titillating and talk-provoking) was that their friends reported panicked cell-phone calls on the night they went missing while vehicle was apparently sinking. Instead of doing everything they could to open or break the windows and get out, their first instinct, in a situation where it clearly would not help, was to call for help from their friends in distant towns, one up in Winnepeg, for help!
This story got national coverage and discussion in Canada (one of the women was Canadian) but zero coverage, ins spite of its "squirm" factor, outside of short stories in the local N. Dakota media. Why? The answer is obvious. It would have raised a discussion over how cell phones are affecting our culture in negative ways. With billions invested in promoting ever more fancy and addicting cell phones. We can't have that!
Ordinary citizens using their cellphones to capture events and disasters like this one replace the prohibited pro journalists presently (take Iran's post-elections example) for as long as Internet and YouTube or Twitter and media like that are still a totally free place for people to upload their pix and vids.
And please remember:
"... for as long as Internet and YouTube or Twitter and media like that are still a totally free place ..."
Dream on...
The internet is brilliant diluter of effective action. Go ahead, put that atrocity video on the youtube monopoly it it doesn't get removed for "intellectual property violation" it will be viewed by all of maybe 100 or 200 people, out of 300 million.
Yes, take the much-propagandized Iran twitter action. Now, compare it to how it's use in Pittsburgh was reported and received by the public.
Case in point:
The following, very moving antiwar piece on youtube, put on 3 weeks ago:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-c1UY35gQA
Has been viewed by 5990 people 19 ratings, 13 comments. Optimistically, based on the low number of comments and ratings perhaps 50% all the way through.
Meanwhile, this odd piece of teenage puerility, one of many thousands, put on just two weeks ago, has 916,000 views, over 9250 ratings, and 7330 comments.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1glNuQiE77E&feature=fvhl
And you can be assured that if the anti-war video reaches any comparable level of popularity, it will be pulled for copyright violations, even though the movie excerpts it uses are clearly within the guidelines of Fair Use.
At least back then we got to see the photos--and many responded to those atrocities and eventually the war was ended--today there is no true press and there will never be an outrage--this evil will continue unabated.
Good comment. I'm afraid, though, that if the press was not so corrupt and actually did bring current atrocities to the attention of the public, the result would be a vast indifference. The American sense of outrage seems now to apply only to the characters on "reality" shows or to NFL players.
Lucky for the US that there are no embedded journalists in drone bombers.
There were lies being told by the US government back during the Vietnam War, just like there are lies being told about the Iraq/Middle East War.
But the one thing that isn't changing is the constant call for war, imperial or otherwise. These wars aren't protecting liberty, but the profits of the corporate elite.
I am not an absolute pacifist, but clearly the wars that are being fought are counter to the basic tenets of liberty and justice.
Obama has become just another one of a long line of people who committed / authorized war crimes.
www.NotOneMore.US - The Pledge for Peace
"Oh, when will we ever learn?
When will we ever learn?"
[Pete Seeger - from "Where Have All the Flowers Gone?"]
/cm
A good article regarding the massacre that occurred at My Lai. What the article does not say, however, is that there could have been even more bodies photographed in those ditches if not for the valiant efforts of Warrant Officer One Hugh Thompson, Jr. who ordered his helicopter crew to open fire on the American soldiers if those soldiers shot at any Vietnamese civilians. Thompson and his crew were able to save about 17 Vietnamese civilians from being shot and killed by the Americans. Because of their heroism, Thompson and the two members of his crew were proclaimed to be traitors to their country by their Congress members, received death threats and hate mail, and had mutilated animals placed on their doorsteps. They finally received recognition for what they had done when they received medals in 1998 for saving the lives of those Vietnamese civilians.
As historians such as Stanley Karnow, Marilyn Young, et al have noted, there were other atrocities that had occurred in Vietnam that were similar to My Lai. The difference is that what happened at My Lai became known to the public, albeit a year after it had happened [though Colin Powell tried to downplay the incident]. One has to wonder if there are any Hugh Thompsons today who will perform such courageous acts in Afghanistan and Iraq by saying NO to U.S. aggression. One also has to wonder why there are no parades given for people like Hugh Thompson and his crew while the American military is constantly lauded and honored for the terror that they have inflicted upon third world countries.
thank goodness 0 has the sense not to release the current batch of photographs.
This is absolutely a shame for humanity. To the outside world US was once considered to be a civilized nation but the aggressiveness and atrocities of the country really startled all. Only the educated class of citizens within the country can prevent that in future. But unfortunately a large section of them are very divided. So the possibility of another war in future stays even in current condition when the economy is in worst phase and the joblessness is running extreme high.
"To the outside world US was once considered to be a civilized nation"
but the inside world of the indigenous knew better.
My lai was one of the few Massacres committed by US troops that was reported on. Had it not been for that letter to Congress apologists for the US Military would be claiming today that anyone who suggested a My Lai had occurred was "Anti_American"
The US Military acknowledges some 300 like incidents which the pentagon and Military either covered up or refused to investigate. These are the ones that were deemed as "Highly likely a massacre and or war crimes were committed" based upon preliminary investigations by the Military.
This does not include allegations that the Military refused to look into.
My Lai, one of the many tragedies that should shame this ungodly place called the United States of Americans. Perhaps to commemorate the occasion, the Justice Department has announced that it will drop manslaughter and weapons charges against one of the Blackwater security guards involved in a deadly 2007 Baghdad shooting. This, no doubt, is their way of reminding the world that the US can do what it wants, when it wants, however it wants and nobody can stop it. These are the self-appointed saviors of the world, the ones hell bent on bringing democracy to every country (particularly those with oil). This country will forever live in infamy!
They say that war is hell. but according to the believers in hell only the guilty go to hell. In war the innocent suffer the horrors and deaths of war, which makes war much worse than hell. You would think that all the Religious Leaders would be protesting war. Recently the Catholic Bishops lobbied to prevent health care for pregnant women who need an abortion for their mental or physical health. The Pope and Bishops get their followers to demand that no tax money or federal funds go to health care for these girls or women because they think that an embryo is a human being with a body and soul more important than the body and soul of the pregnant girl or woman and abortion is murder regardless of the therapeutic need. They never ask that no tax or federal funds go to the war industry because it is immoral, after all, war does kill children,disabled, elderly,men women and even pregnant girls and women. They are afraid of the men and corporate crooks who run the mass horror war machine.They may loose their tax exempt status or their collection money will decrease. The Catholic Bishop, cowards, know little girls and women are easier targets. They are willing to risk the lives of Americans (45,000 per year)to kill a health bill rather than allow good people to help save the lives of girls and women with a crisis pregnancy. With this sick obsession against girls and woman's sexual reproductive choice, how can we expect them to get their minds off sex and focus on the many real evils in the world such as war, pollution, corruption,sex slavery, oppression,greed ect..
What about the Me Lies of Obama in the Middle East EVERY DAY, NOW?
Regarding most of the above comments:
You all seem to think the internet is an accurate representation of reality.
I suggest that it's the greatest propoganda medium that the world has yet encountered.
As an old teacher of mine used to say "dream on mcduff".
It is amazing that so many Americans had trouble believing that their troops could commit these atrocities. Although most of the American atrocities in Vietnam were never exposed these acts were certainly not the first. Americans tortured and killed thousands of innocent Philippinoes. Before these killings there was the 'American Holocaust' in which many, perhaps millions, of innocent aboriginal peoples died.
The list is a very long one and added to annually. Any American who believes that their country is a force for 'good' is clearly brainwashed.
Bring America Back !!!!
****Did I miss something here, or did the article not even mention that only one US Lieutenant--William Calley, was tried and convicted of the Mi Lai massacre ??
****The Court would not entertain evidence that Calley's superior US Commanders had any guilt or culpability in this war crime !!!!
****Calley took one for the Team, served his time and is once again a free man.
****If the Mi Lai massacre involved 350 victims, how would the Israeli Zion Genocide of 1500 GAZAns, in Jan 2009, stand in comparison==that also involved 300 to 400 innocent children. Team Obama and Team Bush stand in silence and will not even comment on the human collateral damage at GAZA !