EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- As Death Toll Rises Beyond 500, Garment Factory Disaster 'Worst in World History'
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Survival of the ... Nicest?
Popular content
Today's Top News
US Seeks Reins in New Set of Climate Talks
WASHINGTON - The United States hopes to take the reins of international efforts to battle global warming next week with a meeting of major economies aimed at facilitating a U.N. pact to cut greenhouse gas emissions.
An undated handout photo from the Center for Northern Studies shows the Ward Hunt Ice Shelf disintegrating. REUTERS/Denis Sarrazin/Center for Northern Studies/Handout President Barack Obama, a Democrat who took office in January, called the meeting last month to relaunch a process that began under his Republican predecessor, George W. Bush, whose commitment to curbing climate change was viewed with skepticism by much of the world.
The stakes are higher now. The Kyoto Protocol, which caps greenhouse gas emissions, runs out in 2012 and leaders from around the globe will gather in Copenhagen in December to forge a successor treaty. Environmentalists hope renewed engagement by the United States and Obama's push for U.S. leadership on the issue will result in a deal.
The White House views next week's meeting in Washington, which groups 16 major economies including the European Union and the United Nations, as an avenue toward securing a broader pact -- a goal that many believed Bush did not share.
"The Bush administration obviously had a completely different approach to this issue than we do," Todd Stern, the U.S. Special Envoy for Climate Change, told Reuters, adding Obama wanted to invigorate the forum with more substance.
"They were not fundamentally looking for an international agreement," he said of the Bush administration. "We are looking for an international agreement and we're looking for cooperation at a significant, we hope, transformative level."
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is scheduled to make opening remarks on Monday. Officials said participants would discuss cooperation on technology and other issues.
Bush began the major economies forum in 2007, but the initiative was marred by concern among participating countries that he was trying to circumvent wider United Nations talks.
"Nobody took him seriously because he spent eight years pretending climate change didn't exist," said David Bookbinder, chief climate counsel for environmental group Sierra Club, referring to Bush.
"Obama, on the other hand, obviously is taking climate change very, very seriously and wants, reasonably enough, to talk to everyone about what to do ahead of Copenhagen."
FACILITATING U.N. TALKS
James Connaughton, a former top environmental adviser to Bush, said the former president's motives were also focused on facilitating a U.N. pact.
"The point of this was to be able to inform and help accelerate progress in the UN," he told Reuters.
Obama hopes to cut U.S. emissions by roughly 15 percent by 2020 -- back to 1990 levels -- tougher than Bush, who saw U.S. emissions peaking as late as 2025.
European governments and many environmentalists want Obama to go further.
Energy Secretary Steven Chu indicated on Saturday in Port of Spain, Trinidad, that Washington was not interested in retooling its percentage goal for 2020.
"I think that rather than debating a few percent, the best thing we can do is to get started as soon as possible," he told reporters at the Summit of the Americas.
But the April 27-28 meeting, and follow-ups in other countries, are expected to pave the way toward Copenhagen and work out some of the disagreements that remain.
The major economies include: Australia, Brazil, Britain, Canada, China, the European Union, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Russia, South Africa and the United States. Denmark, which is hosting the U.N. meeting in December, was also invited.
"The presence of the major economies forum increases our chances of success for getting an agreement at Copenhagen," said Annie Petsonk, international counsel for the U.S.-based Environmental Defense Fund.
"The more that those countries can come together around a framework, the greater likelihood that they can pour that into a larger agreement."
One stumbling block, however, may lie with some poor countries and other developing nations not present and what contribution will be demanded from them.
"We do not see the most vulnerable countries included in these discussions and that is what we would like to see," said Kim Carstensen, head of environmental group WWF's Global Climate Initiative.
Additional reporting by Deborah Zabarenko; Editing by Eric Walsh
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

14 Comments so far
Show AllIs birth control on their agenda? Or do they deny the cause like Bush denied climate change?
LOL
Birth control the only subject of the talks.
"The United States hopes to take the reins of international efforts to battle global warming ..."
So, after decades of stonewalling, obfuscation, and neglect of scientific concensus, now the United States wants to be put in charge. From non-participation and obstruction straight to control. How freakin' typical! Others have been leading this issue for some time. Can't we show a little humility and just fall in with the others, learn from them, and play catch up?
Nope. This is definitely a move to control and dictate obstensible compliance which conceals actual stonewalling, obfuscation, and neglect of scientific concensus. And that is the idea of wanting the 'reins' of the actual pollution of this planet so that our and other's industrial sectors don't have to increase costs by having to monitor and control the wastes they pump into our air, water and land. Corporate america will forever fight this as it is not in their or their investor's best interest. Climate be damned. Health be damned. And if obama goes and pushes for this american control, he will have pretty much proved his allegiance to the corporations of america over the people of this world. w in different clothing.
http://www.rabble.ca/news/2009/04/declaration-cuman%C3%A1-capitalism-threatens-life-planet
We, the Heads of State and Government of Bolivia, Cuba, Dominica, Honduras, Nicaragua and Venezuela, member countries of ALBA, consider that the Draft Declaration of the 5th Summit of the Americas is insufficient and unacceptable for the following reasons:
2. Capitalism has caused the environmental crisis, by submitting the necessary conditions for life in the planet, to the predominance of market and profit. Each year we consume one third more of what the planet is able to regenerate. With this squandering binge of the capitalist system, we are going to need two planets Earth by the year 2030
To hell with giving the reins to the US, they should be given to Anote Tong, the president of the South Pacific island nation of Kiribati, which is being flooded by rising sea levels. He and other island nation leaders will institute real change because they will be the first to die or emigrate if climate change is not reversed soon.
"The leader of the South Pacific island nation of Kiribati laid out an extraordinary plan Monday (Sept. 22) that would scatter his people through the nations of the world as rising sea levels submerge the islands they have called home for centuries.
"President Anote Tong said the half-meter sea level rise projected by climate scientists over the next century would submerge a significant proportion of the land on which his people live. Salinization of ground water due to rising seas would render even more land uninhabitable."
http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/2008/09.25/13-kiribati.html
(Note to Common Dreams: Please turn on live linking. Why make things hard for us?)
The US will take the reins and then drive the wagon off the cliff.
Tell the USofA,my country,to stuff it.Tony
Last time the US grabbed the reins they immediatly said "Whoa Nelly"!! and have probably damned us all to an environmental hell.
"The only means of strengthening one's intellect is to make up one's mind about nothing, to let the mind be a thoroughfare for all thoughts." - John Keats
Tell the Eeeeeeeeeuuuuuuuunited States to collectively kiss the rest of the worlds ass! What have those stupid sons of bitches done in the past decades other than manage to foul our nest to the point that we may not be able to stop the catastrophe that we are facing.... No, let them advise and if they have any good ideas incorporate them into the scheme of things. But being an ex 'murican citizen and now a citizen of France and French Polynesia, I wouldn't want the average American to do any green project on any of our islands...
Perhaps they can prey errrrr Pray themselves into a green garden of eden, but I personally think they couldn't even brainwash themselves to that point...
Just this old Chief's 2¢
Look what uncontrolled climate change has done to poor innocent sheep -- oh the horror !
And this conspiracy even includes da Vinci's masterpiece !
Video: Extreme Sheep LED Art
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2FX9rviEhw&feature=player_embedded
There's even a nice " V " type REMEMBER celebration
Namaste
Having only read the following article, not the ones it links to, so far, I don't know if this at all relates to climate changes on Earth, but will provide the copy of this piece anyway. Perhaps there is a relationship to climate change, here and/or on other planets. After all, this is about very unusual activity or inactivity of the sun.
http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2009/04/
scientists-have-no-idea-whats-up-with.html
QUOTE:
Tuesday, April 21, 2009
Scientists Have No Idea What's Up With the Sun
Last October, the Telegraph reported:
(indented) The protective shield of energy that surrounds our solar system, has weakened by 25 per cent over the past decade and is now at it lowest level since the space race began 50 years ago.
(indented) Scientists are baffled at what could be causing the barrier to shrink in this way and are to launch mission to study the heliosphere.
Today, BBC is reporting:
(indented) The Sun is the dimmest it has been for nearly a century.
(indented) There are no sunspots, very few solar flares - and our nearest star is the quietest it has been for a very long time.
(indented) The observations are baffling astronomers, who are due to study new pictures of the Sun, taken from space, at the UK National Astronomy Meeting.
(indented) The Sun normally undergoes an 11-year cycle of activity. At its peak, it has a tumultuous boiling atmosphere that spits out flares and planet-sized chunks of super-hot gas. This is followed by a calmer period.
(indented) Last year, it was expected that it would have been hotting up after a quiet spell. But instead it hit a 50-year year low in solar wind pressure, a 55-year low in radio emissions, and a 100-year low in sunspot activity.
(indented) According to Prof Louise Hara of University College London, it is unclear why this is happening or when the Sun is likely to become more active again...
(indented) No-one knows how the centuries-long waxing and waning of the Sun works.
The bottom line is that scientists really have no idea what's up with the sun.
There's a lot we don't understand about our galactic neighborhood, either.
END QUOTE
'hotting up', eh? It seems that more than only climate is changing these days. I wish people would keep us clued in on changes to language.
FYI: I prepended or inserted '(indented)' to indicate which paragraphs are those quoted from the BBC and Telegraph, UK.
Also, the closing sentence in the article is linked to a NASA.gov article, btw.
"One stumbling block, however, may lie with some poor countries and other developing nations not present and what contribution will be demanded from them"
The structure under propaganda is always irony. Reuters wants to make hierarchy an implicit assumption. What Reuters ignores is that the worldwide progressive/peasant movement is stronger than ever today. Nobody heeds the demands of the USA any longer. If the USA wants to lead then let it lead with unilateral emissions cuts. Normally there is an interconnecting web of politics between states, that makes concensus more relevant, but the USA slashed that. So we no longer care for bogus excuses from the USA.