Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Advocacy Groups Fear New Wave of Homeless
ATLANTA, Georgia - Homeless advocates in the United States say if the new Congress and the Barack Obama administration do nothing, many more low-income people already teetering on the brink could end up living on the streets over the next two years.
Abraham Tate, 53, left, answers survey questions at a Milwaukee soup kitchen Wednesday, Jan. 28, 2009 as part of a national effort to count the homeless. Survey taker Kamyia Leflore asked Tate 22 questions about his living conditions and about the services he would need to find permanent housing.(AP Photo/Dinesh Ramde) "The numbers, unfortunately, are expected to rise and get worse before it gets better," Michael Stoops, executive director of the National Coalition for the Homeless, told IPS. "It's going to get worse unless people come to the bargaining table."
"We've projected there [will] be an additional 1.5 million people who experience homelessness over the next two years if we don't do anything," said Nan Roman, president of the National Alliance to End Homelessness (NAEH).
The NAEH broke down statistics that show homelessness decreased from January 2005 to January 2007, based on snapshot counts collected by homeless services agencies that are required by the government to count their client populations every other year on one night in January.
The count fell from 744,313 in 2005 to 671,859 in 2007. Overall, 34 states and the District of Columbia reported decreases in homelessness.
But more recent figures signal a reversal of this trend. In December 2008, the U.S. Conference of Mayors found that of 25 cities surveyed, 19 reported some kind of increase in homelessness between Oct. 1, 2007 and Oct. 30, 2008.
The report concluded that it is "unclear" how the economic crisis and foreclosure epidemic will affect homelessness in the next two years. "However, with the economy in a recession and unemployment rising, it is likely that the need for homeless services will remain steady if not increase," it said.
Foreclosures are pushing many people into the streets who were already close.
The National Low Income Housing Coalition (NLIHC) reported in December 2008 that more than a fifth of the properties facing foreclosure nationwide are rentals and because rental properties often are home to multiple families, renters make up nearly half of the families facing eviction.
As a result, very low-income families and low-income and minority communities bear the brunt of rental foreclosures.
"The way the economy is with foreclosures, people are in unstable housing situations," said Danilo Pelletiere, research director with the NLIHC. "They will end up on a neighbour's couch or something. As they run out of options...they are going to end up on the street."
"There is this lag period [between] when the jobs dry up and when people become homeless," he added.
Twelve of the 25 survey cities in the Conference of Mayors report blamed the increase in homelessness on foreclosures. Additionally, 60 percent of cities said a lack of affordable housing caused homelessness while 72 percent said the shortage caused homelessness for families.
"You look at people who have already lost their homes - where are they?" Stoops asked. "They move in with family and friends. They will move in to their RV and park it in a state campground. In reality, whether you are rich or working class, no one is immune from becoming homeless."
When asked if their cities had adopted policies aimed at preventing homelessness among households that had been living in foreclosed homes, only 13 cities - barely half - replied that they had.
"Many Americans are now losing or facing the prospect of losing their homes as both homeowners and renters feel the impact of the foreclosure crisis, and millions more Americans are likely to fall into deep poverty in the coming months as a result of rising unemployment and declining state and local funding for safety net programs that assist people who are unable to find work," said Deborah DeSantis, president of the Corporation for Supportive Housing.
"Among them will be thousands of vulnerable and disabled people who will need supportive housing," she added. "Congress and the new president need to commit even more federal help to our efforts to combat homelessness in every community."
To target chronic homelessness, groups like NAEH have encouraged cities to enact long-term policies to end homelessness, often referred to as "10-year plans to end homelessness."
The Conference of Mayors reported that 24 of 25 cities surveyed had developed a 10-year plan to end homelessness and many of these focus not just on ending homelessness for chronically homeless disabled adults but also on preventing family homelessness.
Still, 16 cities reported an increase in family homelessness while only six reported a decrease or no change.
"The presence of a 10-year plan is not a guarantee that anything is going to happen," Roman said. "You have to implement the key strategies. You have to do prevention. You have to move people faster out the back door through rapid rehousing. It's [really] whether you're changing your system and making the investment."
"There's nothing wrong with a plan or 10-year goal," Stoops said. "[But] unless there is additional commitments from the public and private sectors, the plan is meaningless. There will be some cities that come to the end of their 10 years and there will still be homelessness."
The NAEH recommends Congress and the Obama administration create 400,000 new housing vouchers, invest 2 billion dollars in homeless prevention and rapid rehousing, and invest 10 billion dollars in the National Housing Trust Fund.
The NLIHC believes a similar investment in the Trust Fund will allow the nation to rehabilitate or build 100,000 rental homes for the lowest income households using green standards over the next two years.
"We believe that those three things together would be enough to really stop an additional 1.5 million from becoming homeless," Roman said. "Longer term, we need a solution to the affordable housing problem. People feel like there is so much housing and there is so many foreclosures but [housing is] still not affordable [for poor people]."
To create more affordable housing, the NLIHC recommends investing 5 billion dollars in public housing capital funds and 3 billion dollars for the preservation of urban and rural federally assisted housing.
"There certainly is not enough money for public housing," Pelletiere said. "There's this real underinvestment."
The group also recommends 2 billion dollars for relocation and temporary housing assistance for tenants who are evicted from homes that are foreclosed upon.
"We've been pushing very hard to get extra funding for those federal programs," Pelletiere said. "The moment someone is destabilized in their home and turned out... if we can avoid that or give sufficient notice, that's going to lessen the damage significantly."



26 Comments so far
Show AllWho cares about homelessness when there is the military to fund, bases all over the world, invasions and occupations, Israel to arm, etc? It's a question of priorities, of values!
I mean, the homeless can look at the stars, smell the flowers, commune with nature, can't they? What more do they want?
If they know that the U.S. is still trying to run the world to suit its rich 5% then the poor'll be happy to sacrifice.
Just issue them with sleeping bags and tin begging bowls with the Stars and Stripes on them and they'll sleep snug.
America is built on inequality, hypocrisy and bullshit!
www.dangerouscreation.com
Good points. Besides our various occupations, we should close the 800 bases we support. I believe most people in the US have no idea about the extent of our permanent military presence around the world.
Can we use this crisis to get what we want? You know, kind of a Naomi Klein move from the other side. Publicize where our money goes. Force them to provide a public cost / benefit justification for having so many military installations.
Joe
"I believe most people in the US have no idea about the extent of our permanent military presence around the world."
I believe you are correct. But I'd suggest that 43-55 of our bases should not be closed because they do actually represent strategic value and intelligence sites.
The rest are mainly left overs.
But be aware though that you will meet stiff resistance from the host countries when you try to close these bases.
We need a Wealth/Power Cap decided by a yearly binding referendum. It would spread the wealth without involving corruptible administrators of any kind.
It's already happening--has been for years. "Homeless" is just another caste in our unjust society. And, DavidG. is right--who cares until it happens to you, or someone you know?
Here are a few websites that saw all of this coming:
http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1140523
http://www.wikihow.com/Live-in-Your-Car
http://www.donrearic.com/homeless.htm
Now the American public have a choice: get used to making do with significanly less (adapt) or crawl into their NINJA 'Liar Loan' McMansions and commit suicide by either mundane means (poison, gas, firearm) or try to hold off the police who are sent by the bank to re-possess the bank's property (suicide by cop) in a mini Ruby Ridge/Waco blaze of tax resister/Limbaugh 'ditto head' glory (die).
As upbeat and happily propagandistic as the MSM are, there is no light at the end of this econiomic tunnel.
France is having it's share of the spreading European riots, Germany just announced it's exports have tanked, Japan is in dire trouble (Toyota has shut down all but one of it's production lines), and England just cut it's national loan rate to 1%. California (touted as the eighth largest economy in the world) has stopped issueing student loans and welfare cheques, is no longer paying it's celebritised CHP, forcing state employees to take two unpaid days off per month, and is using IOU's to 'pay' it's bills. And the rest of the states are only weeks away from doing the same. Many of them have already run out of money to pay the new 'extended' unemployment benefits.
This doesn't even touch on the $50 Billion Madoff/SEC scandal. And the SEC, by the way, is now under congressional investigation for failing to catch Madoff's Ponzi scheme. Something one man did EIGHT YEARS ago in five minutes!
Now, Obama (Mr. 'Change You Can Belive In (tm)') wants to pump 920 BILLION dollars of fiat currency into a wounded market, all while cowing to demands for even more tax cuts. Isn't that exactly what Bush did? And how much did it help?
The days of 'happy motoring' and Walmart consumption are over.
You want a plan? Here it is.
Get the books 'When Technology Fails', Readers Digest 'Back to Basics', 'Square Foot Gardening'. Learn to garden. Learn to do basic repairs yourself. Learn to sew and knit. WALK. Ride a bike. And get to know your neighbors.
Walk in peace.
I'm loving it; can't wait for the bloodshed to begin.
So what will America's trickle down gurus do? Tax cuts for the homeless and jobless?
Why do you think random violence and arson are on the rise, as well as 'anthrax' style threats against various banks?
When you leave a man nothing to lose, he has nothing to fear.
Walk in peace.
In New York City "Landlord Lightning" is a tradition in tough economic times. Landlords torch the speculative buildings they had bought on credit and then planned to "flip" for a profit. When things go downhill and prices fall, they torch and collect the insurance.
Meanwhile, the Mayor is reducing shifts for fire fighters.
Joe
"So what will America's trickle down gurus do? Tax cuts for the homeless and jobless?"
I've heard endlessly that tax cuts will solve everything and anything. So why not try it? It will certainly lower all those taxes they pay.(lol)
The only effective social program that America has is it's jail and prison system.
The flip side is "ghost suburbs". Entire suburbs near Fort Meyers, Florida and in the inland shadow of Los Angeles are mostly vacant. Some are streets without houses, some are streets of houses without people. Thieves rip the pipes out of the houses to sell. The banks and insurance companies have no choice but to wait until the price goes way up again, and preferably soon, because if the banks and insurance companies sold the houses immediately they themselves would be bankrupt immediately. It's better to have a fig leaf sometimes. So now the insurance side of AIG, supposedly the safe side, carries toxic insurance policies that they can't pay off. The Hartford's stock dropped 80% last year. That's what Pres. Obama is scared of -- the next wave of collapses.
It's so sad that millions of people have to live outside of these abandoned houses rather than inside where it's always dry, never windy, and warmer even without turning on the heat. For that matter I'd be glad to move into an abandoned bank vault and take up residence, if the rent was low enough.
In California, the disabled are facing a real prospect of not getting their little bitty pittance checks from the Governator. How can someone who lives on $9000 a year afford to miss a month of income? How is it that education and health are the first to go? "We have no monnnnney", they whine. But the money flows for the military, the banks. It is grotesque.
We have an old friend with serious disablities who may not get her check. Where are our priorities? As friends, we manage to send some help from our limited income. One reason we can afford to send anything is that we live in sensible middle-income housing that was built 40 years ago with government tax breaks and since has provided modest but decent housing for 10,000 family-years. Good use of money and incentives.
But what about all the high taxes we pay? Does it all go to banks, no questions asked? I see there is a limit on executive salaries. What about junkets, options, etc. Where is the cash for people in need? How much of the 2 or 3 billions of dollars of MY MONEY that we are spending has reached anyone on the ground?
I guarantee that if we give the money to my friend, she will support farmers by purchasing food, support the energy industry by keeping her lights on and heating her home. She will pay her rent and not be homeless. Not a bit of it will be sequestered in emeralds, for instance. It will all trickle up into the economy.
Time to go down the list of spending and remove waste. We need accounting for every penny we are giving out. No more "I don't know where it went". Unacceptable. We should engage in some enhanced interrogation of the gigantic expenditures that are never questioned: Military bases and expeditions, interest payments, low tax rates for the wealthy etc. Bailouts.
A little bit of money, well spent, can stimulate the economy while providing some security for ordinary folks. We have to be more like the working mom who accounts for every penny, down to milk and cookies for the kids.
Joe
jclientelle
"In California, the disabled are facing a real prospect of not getting their little bitty pittance checks from the Governator."
You are confusing Federal money with State money here. California cannot pay its bills because they have chosen to spend their money differently.
Her check may be funded by Federal money, but its the State thats at fault here.
"We have an old friend with serious disablities who may not get her check. Where are our priorities? As friends, we manage to send some help from our limited income. One reason we can afford to send anything is that we live in sensible middle-income housing that was built 40 years ago with government tax breaks and since has provided modest but decent housing for 10,000 family-years. Good use of money and incentives."
Truer words were never spoken. And God bless you for helping her. You are one more example of the fact that its not the American people that are the problem.
"Time to go down the list of spending and remove waste. We need accounting for every penny we are giving out. No more "I don't know where it went". Unacceptable. We should engage in some enhanced interrogation of the gigantic expenditures that are never questioned: Military bases and expeditions, interest payments, low tax rates for the wealthy etc. Bailouts.
A little bit of money, well spent, can stimulate the economy while providing some security for ordinary folks. We have to be more like the working mom who accounts for every penny, down to milk and cookies for the kids."
Well said, and what our government should be doing. A no brainer guide to good governance.
Squat! If homeowners are being urged not to vacate their foreclosed homes, let the homeless occupy homes that have been vacated. Justice and the rule of law have obviously crumbled from the top down in this country, and Obama ain't gonna change that, so fuck the property owners and the ruling class. Why should the homeless, especially those who were simply screwed, obey property laws? Let the revolution begin!
Not exactly a formula to restore justice and the rule of law in what you are suggesting. Theft is theft, no matter the justfications offered.
I know. I shouldn't BWC (blog while cranky). It's just that I don't expect that justice and the rule of law will be restored, at least not for the wealthy anyway, and apparently not by this new administration. So I'm just pissed off and ready to lash out and tear shit up. Too many Americans are too weak-minded to revolt anyway, so there's little to worry about other than the good ole status quo.
Maybe we can convince the banks to pay "squatters" a bit of a stipend to protect vacated properties?
Gotcha!
"Maybe we can convince the banks to pay "squatters" a bit of a stipend to protect vacated properties?"
Now theres an idea.....
I'm following the story on this gal that put down 40,000 on her 147,000 home and still ended up with a sub-prime mortgage. Her Senator told her and others not to vacate but squat and get good legal representation. My mother put me on to it, she watches Lou Dobbs. Very interesting......
Democracy Now did a piece on that yesterday or the day before:
http://www.democracynow.org/2009/2/3/rep_marcy_kaptur_d_oh_urges
P.S. Your BS detector is still working just fine!
Thanks very much for the link. I prefer to follow it there. But I must admit the things I've heard about Lou Dobbs here and elsewhere, I've not seen at all on his show.
I don't watch Dobbs, so haven't tracked what people are saying about him.
I hadn't either, but the two I saw looked like Democrascy Now....he was giving government, Corporations and the US Chamber hell.
In Britain, your argument would not hold water since squatting there isn't illegal. But in America, we have to shut up, be homeless and like it, while the thugs that ran the economy into the ground laugh all the way to the bank with our tax dollars.
True....but have you seen the buildings and neighborhoods that squatting have produced?ritain is in far worse trouble than we are. Over 50% according to a report I saw work for the government.
I hope you are wrong about how much laughing these bastards are going to be doing. Early days yet.
If foreclosure is looming, the dwelling should be DESTROYED from within when vacating. If it were to happen to me, that is exactly what I would do. I am no longer interested in subscribing to, nor maintaining the type of "justice and rule of law" that only exists to keep the status quo.