Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Noisy, Acid Oceans Increasingly Harmful to Whales
ROME, Italy - Oceans and seas are becoming noisier with more vessels, increased seismic surveys for oil and gas, off-shore construction and recreation, and a new generation of military sonars, an alliance of wildlife groups said today. They warn that the cacophony is intensifying threats to marine mammals that use sound to communicate, forage for food and find mates.
The largest animals on Earth, blue whales are vulnerable to noise and ship strikes. This blue whale died in September 2007 in the waters off Santa Barbara, California. (Photo courtesy Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History) The groups, attending the United Nations Environment
Programme's Convention on Migratory Species conference in Rome, are
urging governments and industry to adopt quieter engines for ships,
tighter rules on the use of seismic surveys, and new, less intrusive
sonar technologies by navies.
At the conference, the International Fund for Animal Welfare issued a report, "Ocean Noise: Turn it Down," showing that the distance over which blue whales can communicate is down by 90 percent as a result of intensified noise levels.
Ship noise in the Pacific Ocean has doubled every decade over the past 40 years and the global shipping fleet is expected to double in size by 2025, after doubling between 1965 and 2003, the report calculates.
Airguns used in seismic surveys generate "colossal" sounds peaking at up to 259 decibels and can be repeated every 10 seconds for months. These sounds travelled more than 3,000 km from the source. There are 90 seismic survey ships in the world, the report states, and a quarter of them are in use on any given day.
In addition, there are an estimated 300 naval sonar systems worldwide able to generate pressure sound waves of more than 235 decibels. Pings this loud are over one billion times more intense than the 145 decibel upper limit deemed safe for humans.
Veronica Frank, an attorney with the wildlife group, said, "We are calling for wide-ranging action, including a requirement that builders and owners of all vessels, from super-tankers down, working with the competent international body, factor noise reduction measures into vessels' design and operation at the outset."
The news of noisier oceans is emerging alongside new concerns that rising levels of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide may be aggravating underwater noise levels.
Researchers at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute in the United States published a study in October showing that rising ocean acidity can make the marine environment noisier.
Conservative projections by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change suggest that by 2050 the chemistry of seawater could increase in acidity by 0.3 pH units.
In the October 1, 2008 issue of "Geophysical Research Letters," Monterey Bay's Keith Hester and his co-authors calculate that by 2050 this change in ocean acidity would allow sounds to travel up to 70 percent farther underwater.
The more acidic the seawater, the less low-frequency and mid-frequency sound it absorbs, said Hester and his team. The changing chemistry of seawater may mean that currently it is 10 percent less absorbent of low frequency sound than it was prior to the Industrial Revolution.
Unless greenhouse gases emissions are cut - the key issue this week in Poznan, Poland at the annual UN climate conference - the rising ocean acid level will increase the amount of background noise in the oceans and could affect the behavior of marine mammals, said Hester.
Mark Simmonds, science director of the Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society, who is attending the Convention on Migratory Species meeting in Rome, said, "Underwater, man-made noise, is already triggering a kind of acoustic fog and a cacophony of sound in many parts of the world seas and oceans."
There is now evidence linking loud underwater noises with some major strandings of marine mammals, especially deep diving beaked whales, Simmonds said.
When cetaceans are startled by loud noise, they exhibit unusual diving behavior and suffer something similar to a human diver getting the bends, he said.
"Now we are confronted with cutting-edge evidence that fossil fuel burning and the buildup of C02 may pose a new and even louder threat unless urgent action is taken to cut emissions over the coming years and decades," said Simmonds. "There clearly needs to be a comprehensive and joined-up response to noise pollution in the underwater world."
Robert Hepworth, executive secretary of the UNEP-Convention on Migratory Species, said climate change is set to make parts of the ocean that were once relatively tranquil and inaccessible, much noisier.
"The retreat of the ice in the Arctic is leading to a scramble for drilling and oil and gas exploration which is likely to increase underwater noise exposure for species such as the beluga whale and the bowhead whale," warned Hepworth. "This increase does not include the rise in noise as passages around the Arctic open up to ship traffic."
The European Union and its 27 member states submitted a draft resolution to the governments attending the Convention on Migratory Species this week, which urges consideration of a wide range of measures to quiet underwater noise.
Suggestions include noise protection areas in enclosed seas and sea basins, greater monitoring of noise levels, noise databases that list where man-made sounds originate, and a set of guidelines on better managing noise sources.
- Posted in



17 Comments so far
Show AllAbsolutely NOTHING will happen regarding this issue as our leaders are so busy worrying about all the man-made problems (ie. the economy) to do anything about marine mammals, which they could care less about. Hell, we can't even treat each other decently, let alone other species that we share this world with.
Years ago, when Lovelock came out with his "Gaia Hypothesis," I tried to figure out man's place in the theory. Cancer cells are very resilient and hard to kill off, they continually multiply, devouring the host until the host dies.
"Aha!" I thought, "Man is brain cancer in Gaia."
Unfortunately, I've seen nothing to change my mind in the past decades.
Gotta suggestion for you, since you think that all human being are is "brain cancer".
You be the first one to help save the world. Find a nice bottle of scotch and wash down about 100 Seconal. Your removal from this planet will be one less cancer cell it has to deal with. Meanwhile, the rest of us will try to heal the planet rather than making such asinine comments about humanity.
Many cancer cells turn out to be benign, but speaking generically, do you see humanity benefiting the planet and the environment, or just consuming it as long as it can? The benign cells are the small number of "We the People" that are trying their best to turn it around, but the real power on the planet belongs to those addicted to greed and power. They are not benign, thay are totally malignant. An operation is necessary to excise it and cauterize the deep wound, but I don't see it coming.
Of course from your name, I guess you feel it is wonderful and Godly to breed until there is not room to lie down, or food to feed the population.
One thing I just love about liberals is how they appear to feel that gratuitous insults are on a par with having an actual exchange of ideas with another person.
Hey, you are going to find mostly liberals and leftists on this site so if you really dislike us / them maybe it is not the place for you. But seems like you are the one who is painting us all with one insulting brush. Don't I get some credit for having a decent conversation with you on another article? There are lots of respectful disagreements and exchanges on Common Dreams. It keeps it interesting.
Joe
C'mon, Joe, I can be as respectful as the next guy. I'm sure you sense that. But when I see idiot comments that don't call for respect, I usually answer in kind. To call human beings "brain cancer" is beyond idiotic. On the other hand, I won't try to justify how many human beings act either.
Yeah, I'm on a liberal site. Why? Because first of all, I come here to listen and learn about things that are not reported in the media. Stuff I won't hear from that blowhard Rush Limbaugh (whom I listen to in order to hear about how liberals lie). In other words, I am looking for the Truth in this morass of lies and deceit from both the left and the right.
And also, I'm just a contrarian by nature, and a bit of a rabble rouser who enjoys upsetting apple carts. It's a real vice with me, and there is no more fun place to do so than right here where the level of self-righteousness is astounding. Some people, when you skewer their golden cows, go absolutely ballistic. Terribly good fun to watch!!
And, of course, who knows, perhaps I'll say something that might give someone an actual pause for thought!
I guess your answer to my comment above was a reasoned response? Scotch? Seconal? At least I don't have a religious leader telling me that birth control is a sin on an already overpopulated planet.
OMG!
Save the whales?
Are you serious? We're going back to that?
Time to get out my Mondale buttons...
Why can't people understand that as the oceans and the mammals and other species who live in them go--so do humans. We can't survive without them, not healthily, anyway. Mr. Hope, your comment is idiotic. I suggest you do some research and enlighten yourself!
We can't go back to that. It's too late. Expect all the whales not in a Seaworld Aquapool to die within 50 years.
Your comment shows a low level of understanding of the importance of oceans to our lives and is not particularly constructive or witty.
The Other Joe
Here's another idea, why don't you go fu*k yourself.
Why can't people understand that as the oceans and the mammals and other species who live in them go--so do humans. We can't survive without them, not healthily, anyway. Mr. Hope, your comment is idiotic. I suggest you do some research and enlighten yourself!
NotesfromtheEdge
2 years ago I spent the year building a small cabin on a piece of land I have in Hawaii, 2 miles from the Ocean. There were days when my eyes stung so much I could barely see. My skin seemed to have a tendency towards breaking down, cuts got infected easily. I do not think it was solely due to being in the subtropics. I was doing alot of reading then as I do now, on not just the political situation in the world, but also the state of the environment, that includes the oceans. It seemed the prognosis at that time was that the oceans were 30% more acidic than at the turn of the 20th century. When you consider what it would mean if it were 50% more acidic this % would be absolutely alarming.
Regardless of whether my afflictions were due to the acidification of the oceans or not, almost no one talks about this aspect of the effect we are having on the environment. The ocean is the biggest carbon sink for hyrdrocarbons in the atmosphere. It is at capacity for carbon sequestering. Therefore it is becoming more and more acid, which in turn affects the ability of coral reefs to create the carbon 'skeletal' structure necessary for their existence, and as this article points out, the oceans will not carry lower frequency sound as they become more and more acidic. Whales make both high and low frequency sounds, so eliminating the ability of whales to hear both high and low sounds could doom them to extinction as they use these sounds during mating and birthing seasons indicating their ability to reproduce. {Think of it in terms of human mating, and attracting a suitable mate}.
It is strange that humans would still question whether we have instigated 'Global Warming'. The effects of our carbon burning activities are staggering. The state of the oceans are only one symptom among many, ie. extreme weather being another, and the release of methane gas bubbles from the once frozen continental shelves off of Siberia yet another {which in turn has released an uncontrollable 'feedback loop'}.
I don't know if we are the 'brain cancer of Gaia', perhaps, but we certainly are like a drug with lethal side effects. Side effects that will surely kill us if we do not gain control of our addiction, or perhaps more accurately, of the corporation's addiction to the wealth that corporate CEO's have garnered off the sale of the petroleum molecule, and absolutely everything tangentially, 'down river', from there to do with that sale {of oil}, including war.
Until all the connections are made, in our brains, to the effects of this on the web of life, marine life and our life, in other words, life, we will be facilitating our own extinction along with the extinction of the marine mammals. And in that respect, we Are indeed, the 'brain cancer of Gaia'.
Too many people like frightened, neurotic, psychotic rats in an overpopulation experiment, consuming, fighting, polluting and destroying their environment.
Simple population ecology.
Survive or succumb?
When will succumb cease to be our goal for others and death cease to be our product for compliance?
When will recognition of our ability to survive be understood in terms of responsibility for our actions and for the results of contributing through our presence?
When will Faith begin to fathom and Hope shed the apathy of past failure?
As long as we conceive survival through terms of other entities surrendering in servile homage to our will, then we arrogantly seek only to garner the slavery of all symbiotic life in servitude to our blind individual survival. If that isn't a description of the host serving the malignancy then I don't know what is. And the host dies: the product is death.
Unless we increase our awareness of all life and livingness and come to recognize and assume the symbiotic responsibilities we are all in the middle of then we are our own death wish.
Stop reacting in the worn out ways of fear and war, wishing and prescribing harm and death to that which seemingly disagrees with our immediate view. Turning the other cheek is about the failure of force and hate; each is temporal by their need to have sustained energy exerted in their behalf over the failure of those who wield it to understand, comprehend, and reach the spirit and intellect necessary to resolve conflict while coming to know or be enlightened.