Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Bush Quietly Passes Dozens of New Rules
UXBRIDGE, Canada - As the world community meets in Poland this week to find solutions to the climate crisis, the George W. Bush White House is chaining the United States' tiller to prevent a change of course by President-elect Barack Obama by passing new anti-environmental rules and regulations at a furious pace.
President George W. Bush speaks as he participates in the Saddleback Civil Forum on Global Health, Monday, Dec. 1, 2008, at the Newseum in Washington.
(AP Photo/Ron Edmonds) Nearly a million hectares of public wildlands in Wyoming and Utah are being opened up to oil shale extraction, the Endangered Species Act is being gutted, as are regulations regarding factory farm operations, the Clean Air Act, and removing mountaintops to dig for coal and more, said a coalition of environmental groups.
"There are many last-minute changes and some are draconian," said Josh Dorner of the Sierra Club, an environmental NGO.
The White House can make such changes arbitrarily without approval or consultation with Congress, the Senate or the public. Known as "midnight regulations", more than 60 were passed in November with the intent of tying the hands of the Obama administration.
Some of these will be difficult to reverse, but many of the worst ones will almost certainly be overturned by Obama, Dorner told IPS.
"The Bush administration [officials] are not as clever as they think they are," he said.
There will be an entirely new atmosphere in the White House in 2009, says a coalition of 29 leading environmental and conservation groups. They met with the Obama transition team last week and presented a 345-page "roadmap for presidential action on economic stimulus, energy, climate change, and other pressing environmental issues".
"The new administration's priorities on energy, the economy, and the environment jibe well with our roadmap," said Margie Alt, executive director of Environment America.
President-elect Obama has said he wants to reduce U.S. emissions of greenhouse gases to their 1990 levels by 2020 and reduce them by an additional 80 percent by 2050. Most environmental groups favour tougher targets, originally recommended by 2,000-plus scientists on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which would see the U.S. reduce its emissions by 25 to 40 percent below 1990 by the year 2020.
However, there is broad agreement that the solution to the country's current economic crisis is to rapidly move towards a green economy powered by clean energy, said Frances Beinecke, executive director of the Natural Resources Defence Council.
"We can solve three problems at once -- the economy, energy security and the environment," Beinecke told IPS.
Five million new jobs can be created with investments in energy efficiency and renewable power generation. Introducing a carbon cap-and-trade system will generate the funds for investments in energy efficiency retrofits of buildings and clean energy sources like wind and solar, she said.
The Obama administration is working on an economic stimulus package that is rumoured to exceed 500 billion dollars, and environmentalists expect that there will be a big green component with massive investment in mass transit, improving the country's antiquated energy infrastructure and more, said Beinecke.
"Twenty-five percent of the energy generated in America is lost during transmission," noted Kevin Knobloch, president of the Union of Concerned Scientists.
"Building a smart electrical grid would be far more efficient and less prone to failure," Knobloch said. Moreover, a new gird is needed to maximise the benefits of alternative energy generation. Building a smart grid would create quality jobs that can't be outsourced, he said.
"The best thing the government could do for people is to lower their energy use so they will save money in this economic downturn," said Larry Schweiger, president and CEO of the National Wildlife Federation.
"[Otherwise] higher energy costs will return," Schweiger told IPS.
After eight years of neglect and exploitation, the United States' lands and waters -- and especially the Arctic -- are in need of enhanced protection. The coalition has proposed a 450-million-dollar Land and Conservation Fund to protect wilderness, create more parks and enhance recreational opportunities, he said.
"Nature needs help to adjust to climate change," Schweiger stressed.
Restoring and enhancing the health and diversity of natural landscapes and creating corridors for species to move as conditions change are crucial to protect the nation's natural capital. Water conservation and measures to protect the Arctic are urgently needed, he said.
The coalition wants the leasing of oil and gas drilling permits in Arctic waters to be suspended immediately and a new precautionary approach taken for any industrial activity in the region, which is being hit first and hardest by climate change.
"We're confident that a new Obama administration will take us in the right direction," said Dorner of the Sierra Club. "Now is the time for change, and that change is the green economy."



15 Comments so far
Show AllHere is the first and foremost reason Obama was the right choice for President in 2009. We can argue all day about his choices for his "War Cabinet" and the Pro-Deregulation economic personnel choices, but for the entire world we needed a president who was for extended Green Energy.
I have heard plenty about Obama's support for "Clean Coal" and Nuclear, and I am sure that he has shown in the past that he supported those enterprises. But when a "coalition of 29 leading environmental and conservation groups", including Sierra Club and Environment America, say "The new administration's priorities on energy, the economy, and the environment jibe well with our roadmap." It gives hope to those of us who care about the Environment.
The MIC may only gain power, and the Bankers may make more money, but Obama is bringing us towards a better environment and more energy security. Take away our need for Oil and you take away the reason we so desperately need to control the Middle East.
This is the most important issue of today and that is why Obama needed to win. Had 5% more people in key states voted Nader or McKinney, a nobel choice, McCain would have won the election and the destruction of our earth would have continued for 4 more years. Remember this when we talk of Obama.
I agree his choices for some appointments are not only disappointing, but also frightening. And while we must never blindly follow him, constructive criticism is far better for a man who has yet to make any policies or changes.
“Hope has two beautiful daughters: their names are anger and courage. Anger that things are the way they are. Courage to make them the way they ought to be.”
-- St Augustine of Hippo
I completely agree. I'm glad to see not everyone on this site is an Obama-basher.
This should be a time of joy and hope. It's sad that more people can't celebrate that with us. Oh well, you can't please everyone.
Obama's faults have been greatly exaggerated. I seriously doubt he supports nuclear energy, and of course, the smear that Obama supports coal is a lie, he supports clean coal which is not the same thing.
I also agree on how important it was that we defeated McCain. People act like Obama and him agreed on policy issues. But nothing could be further form the truth. Obama and McCain were polar opposites. McCain would have destroyed the earth, whereas Obama will save it.
I also like your point that if we criticize Obama we should be constructive. I'm so sick of drudging up issues from the past that can't be changed. Yes, I know Obama voted for telecom immunity, I know he voted to fund the Iraq war, yeah, I know he strongly supported the bailout, and yes, I also am aware he has placed Republicans in his cabinet. I'm tired of being browbeaten like this. I get it already. But if Obama did not appear (in public) to be a centrist, then he never would have been elected. Can't we move forward? Obama may have done a few things that some people disapprove of, but no one is perfect. I will be so angry with the Left if they start organizing protests on day one of his administration. Give him a chance. Work for him, not against him.
Best of luck, Joe Hope. Hope you don't have to change your moniker.
The criminal cabal that is the Bush administration will never be brought to justice, and that in itself demonstrates the absolute decline of the Republic.
It would appear as if Dubya, Cheney, & Co. wish to leave as big a mess as possible for Obama to clean up. Is that really a surprise?
www.wunderman-comics.com
Thanks to Presidebt Bush and THE COAL INDUSTRY Appalachia has become Third World America. See pics ---> http://www.wisecountyissues.com
Of the many changes the Bush administration brings about hopefully the ones with the most impact will be the precautions that no one ever has the kind of power that has been given this president, someone who is absolutely unqualified to yield it; will not happen again. Otherwise how much longer can this great nation with stand this " fools parade " or any others like it?
I don't get it. Bush is on his way out of office and our next president is Democrat and Congress is even more Democrat than the current one. So what's to stop them from undoing Bush's rules. Raygun and Bush II were successful at undoing Carter's and Clinton's last minute rules. Why not Obama and the Congress?
Bush succeded in giving away our country to his saudi masters
Criminals in Congress don't want to see an impeachment because a successful one would put them ALL at risk. Presidents are reluctant to reverse the evils of their predecessor because that might open the door to THEIR last minute pronouncements being reversed.
Status quo, tit for tat, business as usual, with window dressing for the peasants. Anything to keep the sheeple asleep until they are finally shorn.
As quick as Boy George and his evil minions have enacted these measures is as quick as President Obama ought to revoke them. There ought to be a joint commission tasked to review all executive orders, signing statements, and new federal rules passed in the last 8 years with an eye towards revoking them. Now that's downsizing government and change that I can believe in.
Poet
Bush has signed over 600 signing statements, exempting executive power from the law.
Yes, they all should be reviewed and all overturned. However, I doubt if any future American President (including Obama) will give much thought to reigning-in executive power. After all, the game of American politics is all about "he who rules with the most power, wins".
What specific regulations regarding factory farms are being gutted?
That is the picture of a delusional idiot being self conscious of the power he wields and having not a clue about what is going on.