Millions Lose Homes, As Families Plead for Help
BOSTON - Bank crashes in Iceland, an International Monetary Fund (IMF) bailout of Ukraine and volatile stock markets the world over -- it all links back to the U.S. communities where hundreds of thousands of families are losing their homes with no let up in sight, those on the frontlines say.
'Foreclosure has been a
huge issue, a ballooning, mushrooming issue for at least two years.
We've been inundated with phone calls for help,' said Tracy Garrett, a
housing advocate with Community Action House, a non-profit in Michigan.
Recent reports point to a global economy that is tumbling downward. On Sunday, Ukraine negotiated a 16.5-billion-dollar bailout from the IMF, and Hungary is next in line for help. On Monday, more U.S. banks lined up for a slice of a 125-billion-dollar handout from the government, while the U.S. stock market slid further.
Many experts and advocates agree that foreclosures are at the root of the global financial mess, but so far Congress and the George W. Bush administration have focused attention and dollars on banks and Wall Street.
'If the foreclosures of these past four years can drive the U.S. economy to the brink of a depression, what can we expect from a dramatic increase in those numbers?' said John Taylor, president of the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, an organisation of housing advocates.
Today, foreclosures are happening at an alarming rate.
Data released last week from RealtyTrac shows that foreclosures during July, August and September of this year rose 71 percent over the same time last year. In those three months, 765,558 U.S. households were in foreclosure or in trouble with their banks, according to RealtyTrac, which compiles home sale data.
U.S. officials estimate that 2.5 million more households will face foreclosure in the next 12 months.
Many of the foreclosures are the result of questionable loan terms, made by financial institutions at a time when housing prices were rising and interest rates were low. These sub-prime mortgages were made into investments by the financial institutions and traded as highly risky packages around the globe. Millions of families are now proving unable to meet the mortgage terms and are defaulting on their loans, and the value of the houses has plummeted to far below what they paid for them.
Banks and financial institutions worldwide own the credit default swaps and other unregulated investments that were fashioned from the mortgages, and are unable to sell them due to fear on the market that they are worthless.
Former Treasury Secretary Alan Greenspan has faced criticism for embracing an extreme free-market ideology that allowed the mortgage and financial industries to lead the world into a global financial mess.
Speaking to a Congressional panel last week, Greenspan took no responsibility for the crisis and instead reported his observations of what has happened and what is likely to happen.
Sub-prime mortgage loans were 'undeniably the original source of the crisis,' Greenspan said. 'Given the financial damage to date, I cannot see how we can avoid a significant rise in layoffs and unemployment.'
'A necessary condition for this crisis to end is a stabilisation of home prices in the U.S.,' he said.
The government has some programmes in place to assist struggling homeowners, including a 350-billion-dollar plan that got underway Oct. 1, which has strict eligibility requirements. So far the Bush administration has encouraged, but not required banks to re-negotiate unfair mortgages with homeowners, even banks that have received billions of dollars through a 700-billion-dollar Wall Street bailout programme approved by Congress.
'We expect all participating banks to continue to strengthen their efforts to help struggling homeowners who can afford their homes [to] avoid foreclosure. Foreclosures not only hurt the families who lose their homes, they hurt neighborhoods, communities and our economy as a whole,' said Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson on Oct. 20.
Sheila Bair, a top administration official as the chair of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, told a Senate panel last week that the government should do more to help homeowners.
'Some of the voluntary efforts have helped but we are falling badly behind,' Bair said.
Some interpreted her comments to mean that the Bush administration will soon put forth a plan to further encourage or mandate that banks modify loans for struggling homeowners, something Taylor and other housing advocates have recommended.
'Assisting homeowners to stay in their homes would have been a more effective and equitable way to prevent the collapse of financial institutions and seizure of the credit markets,' Taylor said.
Banks are not voluntarily modifying problematic mortgages, experts and advocates say. In Massachusetts, virtually no lenders have voluntarily modified mortgages, according to Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley.
'In the last three months, lenders issued 4,721 new foreclosure notices in Massachusetts. During that time, only 144 loan modifications were filed,' said Coakley in a letter to the Boston Globe.
'We have reviewed those 144 modified mortgages and found that virtually none reduced the monthly payment owed by the homeowner,' Coakley said. Unless payments are lowered, most homeowners in trouble will default, she said.
'Many families struggling to hold onto their homes and savings are not looking for charity or a bailout, and that is not what loan modifications are about,' Coakley said.
In U.S. neighbourhoods, non-profit groups say they are scrambling to help people facing foreclosure.
The mortgage bureaucracy is 'a tangle' and extraordinarily challenging to navigate, Emily Rosenbaum, executive director of A Coalition for a Better Acre, told IPS.
Typically a mortgage has been bought and sold many times, and it may no longer be obvious which bank is the owner. If a homeowner wants to negotiate a loan, many phone calls must be made just to reach the current holder of the mortgage, Rosenbaum said.
'It might be someone in Ohio and they don't even know the value of the property. It's quite a nightmare,' Rosenbaum said.
And if finding the bank that owns the mortgage isn't enough, 'Getting to the right person at the bank is a problem,' she said. 'In America you don't get a person on the phone anymore,' she said. Instead, calls are directed to a recorded message.
Once reached, and asked about re-negotiating the mortgage, the bank takes time to consider the request, Rosenbaum said.
'No one makes a decision. We wait three to four weeks for the case to be assigned in the bank, then another six weeks about the decision,' she said. 'This hurts the homeowner because they get further and further behind. It's essentially hurting the whole lending system that's breaking down.'

Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
18 Comments so far
Show AllThe 'freedom' based economy will go into full mode selling crack and meth out of some of the homes while their customers raise some of the needed funds by ripping plumbing and such out of the rest.
Thousands of vacant homes and millions of homeless people is the PERFECT market system 'solving' the economic crisis.
Do not count on Obama to help the U.S. population with this economic crisis. The following article provides a very good and quick reference.
"The Elections and the Responsibility of the Intellectual to Speak Truth to Power
Twelve Reasons to Reject Obama and Support Nader/McKinney
by Prof. James Petras
Global Research, October 30, 2008"
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=10749
That covers both national and foreign policy groups of "advisers" on Obama's team, and I'd like to provide some links to articles supporting what Prof. Petras says, given he didn't, but not at this hour. If it was earlier, then I would.
His whole outfit is extremely corrupt, even, we can justly say, [evil].
WAKE UP, all of the 'crackpot realists' who keep pretending that Obama and his "advisers" are some sort of honest outfit. I have well learned that his foreign policy team is rotten, to say the least, and bodes perhaps worse for the world than what the Bush-Cheney or Cheney-Bush cabal has shown, but hadn't realised that his national policy team is equally rotten, ...! Prof. Petras explains.
NOW, there are also the congressional elections, as Norman Solomon recently reminded readers at CD and other websites about. Along with supporting Prof. Petras with the above article, I'll add that voters need to pay careful attention to electing, preferably only, truly qualified candidates to Congress, and we have Cindy Sheehan, who must be elected so that [traitor] Nancy Pelosi will be OUTED (and hopefully never seen or heard from ever again within the borders of the USA). I don't know about other candidates for other districts, or whatever they're called, but Norman Solomon told readers about an apparently strong candidate from the Dem. Party. I would not be prejudiced against that candidate just because he's with a party as rotten (as hell) as the DP is, for truly qualified candidates of any party are simply and truly qualified, imo.
His article, for readers who didn't read it yet, especially people in northern California, is the following.
"In the Battle for a Progressive Congress",
by Norman Solomon, Oct 22 2008
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2008/10/22
Btw, I recently read that while Obama has promised to never allow Iran to develop or produce uranium, McCain has, as long as it's done within Iran. That, however, is not to say that I support him for U.S. president, for I do [not]. The man has acted like a quack too much, imo; but he's better than Obama is on at least some important issues. If that's true, and it evidently is, then pro-Obama people really are '[crackpot] realists'! They actually [are].
The article by Prof. Petras is the most I've read of truth on Obama's national policy team, at least for a long time now; but there are good and also important recent articles at Uruknet.info, f.e., on Obama's foreign policy team, and this is 'must know' info. I posted links to articles a number of times this week for articles at Uruknet, and the following will provide most or all of these, though through or with more than only one post. If interested in the articles, but not going through multiple links in my posts, then people can just do a Web search at Uruknet on, f.e., Obama and Powell for search terms.
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2008/10/28-5#comment-1066525
Readers wanting to use the post and not loading all of the posts in that page, which is now 96 of them, can just change the setting to the next highest number of posts to display, above this 96, and then the above link will jump directly to the post, else it won't.
These are 2 different and only tangentially related problems.
One is the mortgages that became unaffordable when the payments went up. I have seen a figure of $500 billion for this.
The other is the massive Ponzi scheme built on these mortgages. Estimates range as high as $1,000 trillion for these bets.
Obviously, even if every homebuyer paid off their loans, the bets would still not be covered. And the $700 billion isn't going to make much of a dent.
We need to let the gamblers take their losses, refinance the mortgages of the homebuyers, and let the chips fall where they may.
By the way, you never own your home. Property taxes, if not paid, enable local government to seize your home.
For a better way of running the economy-
http://www.opednews.com/articles/FINANCIAL-MELTDOWN-The-Gr-by-Ellen-Brown-J-D-081018-23.html
Here's what I don't get. We got a lot of families without homes. We got a lot of empty houses that no one's buying, why aren't they just squatting in their own homes? (At first I was going to suggest that banks forgive the loans and let the people stay to prevent homelessness, then I laughed at myself. I seemed to have forgotten we live with corporate capitalism.)
When the banks approved or purchased the toxic mortgages they represented themselves as competent at determinig the value of the collateral. Homeowners are not expected to have that expertise. If Congress wasn't complicit in this crime, they would require the banks to revalue the mortgages and absorb the loss.
There are so many toxic mortgages that a 2 year moratorium on repossession is the only thing that will restore trust in the banking system. The market for purchasing repos will tank if all of the toxic mortgages result in repossession.
Paper is worthless, no one could have foreseen that. Does that sound like a Bushism? It was meant to.
What did they think would happen when they sold all those "trick mortgages" to people?
Either they're complete fools, or they had a plan. I think these mortgage lenders had a plan to "redistribute wealth" right back into their own pockets!
"Screw 'em! There are PLENTY of bridges in Amerika! Pass me the champagne, Mr. Paulson."
Scratch Open A Cynic And You Will Find An Angry Idealist.
twelvepax October 29th, 2008 1:03 pm
Damn, finally someone who actually knows something about the problem and is not spouting a bunch of talking point garbage! Good for you!
To get a handle on this mortgage problem, what we needed was not a trillion $$$$ bail out but an "unbundling" of mortgages. The problem occurred when banks bundled their mortgages, the performing, the iffy and the non performing all together and sold them to fanny and freddy to insure and sold them around the world as investments, this caused all the bundles to become "toxic". What congress needed to do was force fanny, freddy and the banks to go over all their loans, put the performing loans to one side, and work on the iffy loans. In many cases the borrower has an ARM and the interest is now higher then they can afford. The banks should be "FORCED" to work with these people, forgive a loan payment or 2 so they can catch up, lower the interest rate to say 5% - 30 year fixed non-transferable. This should move almost all the iffy loans to the performing pile and very few to the non performing pile. As far as the non performing loans, most should not have been given out in the first place and the banks will just have to eat them and take a write off, sell them at their current value or auction them off. This will cause home prices to come down even more but the up side is more people will actually be able to afford a home.
Congress LOVES to give YOUR money away, they just gave away a trillion $$$. Vote all incumbents out of office and enact a constitutional amendment, term limits on congress - just like the president 2 terms 4 years and you are out.
The last two posts were very good. The hardest part is going to be seperating out the home loans that should never have been made. Those 100% loans to folks that can't afford the house in any case.
Alan MacDonald
The only logical conclusion to be reached about this scandal, that the big banks (and other financial organizations like Hedge Funds) are not using their free money 'bailout' from our government for the purposes claimed by all private and government big shots as the "urgent reason" for the 'bailout'/'rescue', is that this scam was all along PLANNED to be a 'bank job' --- a robbery, a heist, or as US Nobel economic laureate George Akerlof said early in the Bush administration, "this is not normal government policy, but a form of looting".
A NYTimes editorial today, “Loans? Did We Say We’d Do Loans?”, noted that:
“Now, lo and behold, with $250 billion in bailout funds committed to dozens of large and regional banks, it turns out that many of the recipients of this investment from taxpayers are not all that interested in making loans. And it appears that Mr. Paulson is not so bothered by their reluctance.”
“In his column on Saturday, The Times’s Joe Nocera told about a conference call that he had listened in on recently between employees and executives of JPMorgan Chase. Asked how an infusion of $25 billion of bailout funds would change the bank’s lending policy, an executive said the money would be used to buy other banks.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/29/opinion/29wed1.html
The Boston Globe ran an editorial yesterday, “Still waiting on Main Street”, saying that, “The economy can't turn around until the housing market stabilizes.”
http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/editorials/articles/2008/10/27/still_waiting_on_ma...
But, the economy has already turned around ---- it’s just turned around for the corporate Empire’s looters.
Editorials and articles should be reporting the really harsh truth that it's not our Congressional law, nor our Constitutional law, but the corporate Empire's higher 'contract law' that prevents any hope for the American people.
The ‘big banks’ and hedge funds have not just “advised their mortgage servicers to steer clear of government-sponsored efforts to renegotiate delinquent loans”, as is often the ‘sugar coated’ MSM half-truth, but that they have threatened legal action if any contract terms are changed. The corporate power of contract law trumps Congress and the Constitution --- and dooms homeowners and average Americans from getting any consideration in any part of this ‘bailout’ heist.
This article plays linguistic dodge ball throughout. People are NOT losing their homes. They're losing their mortgages, blowing their equity and witnessing a deflating bubble. So long as real estate is price-fixed or speculated out of reach in relation to earnings, so that a critical mass of ordinary people can never really get on top of ownership -- so that the usury industries always keep their lien on it -- we'll continue to have problems.
The chief issue is whether people are losing their EQUITY of real estate. The market was speculated WAY out of proportion since the 80's. And the government did nothing while the bubble was being inflated.
Let's be VERY PRECISE in our English; homeowners CANNOT BE FORECLOSED UPON. If you own a home, that means you've made the last payment, no longer have a mortgage, and no lender has a lien on it. Until that point, one is simply NOT a homeowner.
twelvepax said what I was going to say, sort of.
I don't believe that stopping the price fall is the solution, in fact keeping prices artificially high and out of reach of most Americans to ever pay off, is contributing to a bubble and keeping the problem alive. Despite the fake equity many think they have/had, prices have to come down to reality. twelvepax is right that these people do not really own their homes unless they are paid off. This whole "dream of homeownership" thing is a marketing ploy, a crock. Falling for it has gotten a lot of Americans in a lot of financial hot water.
There is no pain free way out of this. At least the solution shouldn't continue to harm those who had nothing to do w/contributing to the problem.
The industry, particularly, was the root cause of this, when they created these loan products, coerced appraisers to meet the number, aggressively pushed risky loans, approved loans for those who could not afford them, then sold them as sound investments. Investors, too, played a role; they failed to pay attention to warnings that were going off all over, and blindly believed the ratings agencies. Our govt was right on board with all of this despite a rise in mortgage fraud that the FBI itself warned back in 2004 could cause this economic mess. Little if anything was done about the thousands of mortgage fraud incidents. Home owners were told it was their problem. Only when the banks and investors got burned by their own greed did the govt finally step in, then the govt helped all the wrong people.
Professionals should bear most of the pain here; they had the most ability and duty to have averted this fiasco. Many consumers were simply duped and some were victims of outright fraud. At worst consumers were foolish, with only a few actually committing fraud. Most of the fraud was done by the industry, as the FBI has said. (It found 80% was done by insiders.) Anyone, whether a consumer or industry CEO, should be going to jail for the kind of fraud that took out the U.S. economy.
Years ago when I was little, we'd be driving into the city and my Mom would point at the city and say look .... "Who has the biggest and the fanciest buildings?" It was the banks. A rather obvious lesson there.
The banks will screw you coming and going. The last sentence is classic. Of course they'll delay helping out the homeowner while both the amount behind and the late fees mount up. That's just more money in their pockets eventually.
And long term, of course they'd rather foreclose on the property rather than re-negotiate the terms. If they can survive the current downturn, they'll make a killing selling those properties later.
So, here's a radical idea. Why don't we stop electing the candidates that the banks support? Why don't we stop electing the politicians who constantly screw us over but give bailouts and goodies to the banks? Why don't we elect politicians who would halt foreclosures, force renegotiations, and bailout homeowners instead of the banks?
Don't vote the candidates who have the money. If you like the ideas in the paragraph above, you need to vote for the broke candidates that never run TV ads. You need to vote for the candidates that the corporate media ignores or derides.
If you vote for the candidate with $600 million in contributions in his accounts, you'll just keep getting screwed.
----------------------------
"To know, and not to do, is not to know"
Boy, I'm sure glad we elected a Democratic Congress in the last election. That way, these homeowners have a Congress that's fighting for them instead of giving big bailouts to the bankers.
Oops.
----------------------------
"To know, and not to do, is not to know"
Alan MacDonald
Samson, the ruling elite 'corporatist Empire' which controls our country behind the facade of their two-party, 'Vichy' sham of faux-democracy doesn't care who we vote for as long as it's one of the two phony parties that they control.
Just like the Nazi Empire that occupied France in WWII didn't care if the French people liked the more obvious, single-party 'Vichy' government which that more obvious Nazi Empire had installed.
Americans' problem is that they simply don't recognize the same trick being pulled by an Empire again because this new 'corporatist Empire' is not based in an enemy foreign country, like the Nazi Empire was, AND because most Americans don't even recognize that the government is really a 'Vichy' regime, since this newer, more sophisticated corporate Empire has simply installed a TWO-PARTY 'Vichy' regime instead of the Nazi's more obvious one-party 'Vichy' regime.
Just goes to show, that if they hide the Empire as part of society, and they hide the 'Vichy' regime in the simple disguise of two parties, instead of just one, they can "fool all the people all the time", by just using a modern version of the old Nazi trick on the French people.
And who said Americans are smarter than 'the French'??
Nietzsche
There will be no help from the Bush/McCain leadership for anyone earning less then $250,000. In a materialistic society where wealth is God poverty is proof of punishment for sin, and any attempt to help a sinner being punished by god is blasphemy.
Besides, anyone with a net worth of less then ten million dollars is not fully human.
Corporate media's dirty little secret. Good on you Howard Zinn for voting Nader. I bet you would have felt bad had you voted for Obomber!