Warming Triggers 'Alarming' Retreat of Himalayan Glaciers
KAROLA PASS, Tibet - The glaciers of the Himalayas store more ice than anywhere on Earth except for the polar regions and Alaska, and the steady flow of water from their melting icepacks fills seven of the mightiest rivers of Asia.
Now, due to global warming and related changes in the monsoons and trade winds, the glaciers are retreating at a startling rate, and scientists say the ancient icepacks could nearly disappear within one or two generations.
Curiously, there's little sense of crisis in some of the mountainous areas. Indeed, global warming is making the lives of some high-altitude dwellers a little less severe.
Here at the foot of the towering Nojin Gangsang mountain, an ice-covered 23,700-foot peak, herders notice the retreat of the glaciers but say they feel grateful for the milder winters and increasing vegetation on mountain slopes in summers.
But for people living in the watershed of the Himalayas and other nearby mountain ranges along the Tibetan Plateau, glacial melt could have catastrophic consequences.
Himalayan glaciers release water steadily throughout the year, most critically during the hot, dry, sunny periods when water is most needed. Once they vanish, major lifeline rivers such as the Ganges and Indus could become more seasonal, and large tributaries may dry up completely during non-monsoon periods.
"The presence of glaciers is very vital to the Himalayan river systems," said Anil Kulkarni of the Indian Space Research Organization, who has used satellite data to measure the glacial retreat. "It is really alarming. We have to be really concerned."
The pace of glacial retreat around the Himalayas varies. Smaller glaciers fragment and melt faster than bigger ones, and those facing south are also receding more quickly.
In a stark forecast, the United Nations body studying global warming, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, warned in early May that the glaciers in the world's highest mountain range could vanish within three decades.
"Glaciers in the Himalayas are receding faster than in any other part of the world and, if the present rate continues, the likelihood of them disappearing by the year 2035 and perhaps sooner is very high if the Earth keeps getting warmer at the current rate," the report said. The total area of glaciers in the Himalayas likely will shrink from 193,051 square miles to 38,600 square miles by that year, the report said.
While some scientists dispute the assessments of the U.N. body and the rate of retreat is highly variable, experts on glaciers in China, India and Nepal already see the short-term impact of glacial melting.
As the glaciers recede, lakes on the Tibetan Plateau are rising steadily, and experts foresee floods, landslides and mudflows from mountain lakes overrunning their banks.
"They can cause tremendous loss of property, or even lives. They can destroy bridges, villages and roads," said Yao Tandong, one of China's premier glacier scientists and director of the Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, in China's capital, Beijing.
Yao said that from 1960 to 2000, China's 46,298 glaciers retreated by 7 percent, not a hugely significant loss. But the pace of retreat is picking up.
"It's accelerating. The retreat is more rapid now. We see it from satellite photos and in situ observation," Yao said. "All scientists agree now that it is from warming."
In India, a team led by Kulkarni recently completed a study of satellite images that determined some glaciated areas had retreated 21 percent from 1962 to 2004. It described potentially catastrophic effects on cities and towns relying on fresh water from melting ice for irrigation, drinking and hydroelectric power.
Glacial runoff in the Himalayas is the largest source of freshwater for northern India, and provides more than half the water to its most important river, the Ganges.
Glacial runoff also is the source of the headwaters for the Indus River in Pakistan, the Brahmaputra that flows through Bangladesh, the Mekong that descends through Southeast Asia, the Irrawaddy in Burma, and the Yellow and Yangtze rivers of China.
Scientists say 1.3 billion people reside in areas affected by glacial retreat, either in flood-prone areas or in locales that rely on year-round supplies of fresh water from glaciers rather than from the monsoon rainfall of only three or four months.
The retreating glaciers are occurring across an area that's the largest high-altitude land mass on the planet, bordered by the Himalayas to the south, the Tian Shan range to the north, and the Pamirs and the Karakorum mountains to the west.
Throughout the area, experts say, dwindling glaciers may lead to unstable mountainsides, greater sedimentation in rivers and disrupted irrigation systems, in addition to threatening water supplies to large populations.
China issued its first ever report on climate change in late December, saying average temperatures will rise two to three degrees Fahrenheit by 2020 and up to 6.4 degrees by the end of the century, unleashing more frequent "extreme weather events."
Scientists say glacial retreat will bring a feast-or-famine cycle to the Himalayas.
In the near term, accelerated glacial melting will bring a bonanza of water flow, perhaps even intense flooding, with great impact on biodiversity.
"The flooding events will scour the species that live in the river areas," said Dr. Lara Hansen, chief scientist for the global climate change program at the World Wildlife Fund. High-altitude plants and animals that are highly dependent on the glacial melt during the non-rainy season also will be affected, she added.
As climate change intensifies, she said, humans growing desperate for year-round water are likely to pay less attention to the needs of protecting biodiversity.
Small villages in Nepal, Bhutan, India and Pakistan that rely on glacier-fed water "are already feeling the pinch of this," Kulkarni said.
Far from the highest peaks in Tibet, large lakes fed by glacial runoff are rising by as much as 30 feet, experts said, submerging new areas and displacing some nomads. Experts say permafrost, or perennially frozen ground, is also beginning to melt.
"Sometimes when we camp out, we see water seeping up from the tent floor," said Bendo, a senior engineer with Remote Sensing Application Research Center of the Tibet Autonomous Region, who goes by only one name.
The Himalayas, with 17 percent glacial cover, have far more extensive glaciers than other ranges, such as the Alps, which have only a 2 percent cap of glacier and icepack.
The rocky debris that often covers Himalayan glaciers can bring an earlier demise - or a reprieve, said professor Jeff Kargel, of the University of Arizona, who heads the 28-nation consortium that monitors glaciers around the world. If it's thick enough, the rock insulates the glacier and slows the melting, but a thin cover absorbs more heat and speeds up the melting.
Glacial retreat in the Himalayas may have a surprising impact in extremely arid areas far from the mountains.
Yao said oases in China's far western deserts, such as the Taklimakan, get their underground water from glacial runoff. Towns are usually built around the oases.
"If the glaciers disappear, then the oases will also disappear," Yao said.
McClatchy Newspapers special correspondent Fan Linjun contributed to this report
© 2007 McClatchy Washington Bureau and wire service sources.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
17 Comments so far
Show AllArguments about how fast and why climate is changing are mostly a waste of time.
1. Consumption of over 20 million barrels of oil , plus ? tons of coal, plus ? cubic feet of natural gas that we don't have and are expending fantastic levels of effort to get affects SOMETHING, probably EVERYTHING. Anyone with minimal sense realizes efficient use of resources and conservation is better for the earth and the population of every living thing on it.
2. Untapped energy in farm waste, industrial waste, and household waste are potentially rich sources of profit and pollution reduction.
3. We spend billions of dollars on business and individual subsidies every year. Lets divert that money to 1&2 above.
4. Distributed energy sources and conservation efforts are poor terrorist targets and are unlikely to all fail at once.
5. Looking for THE answer to the energy situation is like trying to find and cure THE source of all injury and disease in people.
6. Drilling and mining our way out of energy shortage is like moving into a liquor store to cure alcoholism.
Some candidate will mention a simple solution that convinces just enough voters or distract enough voters with BS that they will be elected. Odds are the next president will snap into action when forced to by political considerations. Whatever is done will not work.
Cheer up though, when cornered by enough disaster and suffering some effective things will be done. Then we can worry about the blow back and logical results of those actions. Automobiles were lauded as THE answer to all the pollution caused by horses. (22lbs. of horse manure per day)
Realists know this.
We are running out of natural resources at the same time we are suffering from population explosion and dramatic loss in habitation.
There were two ways to work with this inevitability.
1) The world in a spirit of sharing to avoid conflict would work out a plan to share diminished resources and at the same time find solutions to both controlling population and alternative sources of energy.
2) Or do what we've always done. Seek out what we needed and crush with the use of deceit and brutal force any and all that would get in our way not really caring that the consequences of our actions would seal the world to a horribly, miserable fate.
We picked #2 - again. I've never been a big fan of mankind.
So, we've blown it. We crawled out of the cave and never let go of the club and we wound up beating ourselves to death with it.
It's why I drink and spit on SUV's.
Good peaceful discussion. Good first step towards a solution! I have a 4 year old daughter. Giving hope is essential as someone has already voiced.
I often tell her that we can't go to such and such a place because we'd need to drive a car and we have to be careful about driving a car unnecessarily because it hurts the Earth and takes away clean air from so many animals, including humans. She listens.
Many people in my community are talking about the issue of global warming and the connection with personal lifestyles including car usage. Some of us are starting to take bold action. We are giving away one car and I will use only a bicycle or bus to get to my work. I will use a bicycle trailer to get my daughter to kindergarten when she starts in the fall.
Never give up hope...
yo iwarrior... i am also a nobody... but we nobodies who ride publc transit are mitigating global warming and they are forcing us to PAY a fare, while cars get free roads...
let's fight back
http://www.freepublictransit.org
wdmax3:
This technology you speak of that will be unveiled in London come July... whatever it is, the more progress and possibilities, the better. Personally, to go back to what iwarrior was saying, I sometimes just try to forget about global warming, and then I read more news about it, being pulled right back into the blunt reality of it all. I think so much about it sometimes I expect to wake up and it's 2050, right in the thick of climate collapse.
One of my favorite wide-eyed fantasies to cling onto is the utilization of hyper-advanced alien technologies. A former Canadian Minister of Defense has implored governments to do so, for the reason that their advanced technologies may help save humanity. Zero-emission energy and transportation, things like that, who knows what else. Sounds so far-fetched, huh? (And this is coming from someone who was TERRIFIED of aliens throughout childhood after seeing E.T. at age 2 at the drive-in.) Aside from the potential of such information, it would also be nice to humble us humans into realizing we're not the heliocentric, divinely bequeathed masters of the universe (yes, that is a He-Man reference). We don't seem to pay much attention to being good stewards of God's creation on Earth, so perhaps knowing there are lifeforms out there MORE advanced than us would put us in our place. Very curious information, worth diving into if you have a little time. The truth is out there(?).
http://www.treehugger.com/files/2007/02/ufos_can_solve.php
I am no longer an alarmist. I am a long time environmentalist and tree hugger that has been interested in ecology for most of my life. So read the following comment with that in mind.
Information about climate change was missing from our media and most denied that global warming was a problem, due to the lack of public information nothing was done. Now, we are getting more information concerning climate change and some Americans say that it is too late to change and make a difference.
Himalayan glaciers will not pose an immediate problem for many Americans. But, Americans need to be concerned about the recent Kansas tornado and Katrina type hurricanes that will increase in size and frequency as well as the current drought in southern California and how it will affect the agricultural economy. Severe weather is not something any world power has control over and yet it can kill, devastate an economy and create food shortages.
Weather controls life on this planet. Climate change is a new term for what we called crazy weather patterns 15 years ago. We need to prepare for an inevitable lifestyle that will be mandated by climate change. Anything you do to prepare for climate change now will reduce the severity of climate change in the future. Please understand that we loose nothing by making changes now.
Just think of global warming as the big bad wolf. You can prepare for climate change by building your house out of straw (business as usual), sticks (minimal changes) or brick (major changes).
Human evolution is an slow ongoing process that is regulated by natural selection. History will decide if we did what was necessary to prevent the catastrophic decline of our ecosystem. Will we be regarded as the Neanderthals of "Historic" man by our future generations because we failed to prevent or prepare for climate change?
All may not be lost… A demonstration of a new form of inexhaustible clean energy is scheduled to debut in London on July of 2007. This new technology may only postpone the enormous demands humanity places on the Earth or at least give us more time to evolve.
Reality is creeping up on humanity one ecosystem at a time. By the time reality reaches the American consumer enough feedback loops may already have triggered as to make any mitigation efforts futile.
The only way to guarantee that it doesn't get worse is to completely restructure the economy itself to minimize unnecessary consumption and promote the wide distribution and universal affordability of life's necessities.
Information services and many other services can fuel a post-industrial economy.
Re-investment away from defense/oil/auto and into public transportation and alternative energy.
Decentralization of agriculture. Promote multi-crop small-scale organic agriculture with local distribution.
Any takers?
ceecee_em,
Spoken with the wisdom of motherhood. Thank you.
Asking a sincere question, and not just trying to be a smarta**, honestly...
If all is lost, then why spend your remaining time posting here? Yes, I think it is a genuine problem, but who knows what will happen tomorrow? Some idiot starts a nuclear war, an asteroid hits the earth, a massive volcanic eruption occurs, and the climate could go the opposite way. We have today to try to do the right things for the future as best we know them, to speak up and try to change others' opinions, and the political systems, and to enjoy the many good things in life. All we can do is all we can do.
On this Mothers Day, I reflect on being a mom. My sons are young adults. I am sorry for the mess the world is in, and I worry for them. But, they look to me for answers, and the worst thing I can do for them is to leave them without hope.
The changes already at work in our climate are long term and even if we stopped driving completely today, it wouldn't be noticed for many years, this is the culmination of years of burning fossil fuels and not just recently. The real problem will come when the temps reach critical for the methane hydrates that are trapped in the permafrost in the northern reaches like siberia and canada. Already there are reports of massive lakes in siberia bubbling methane gas which is hugely more important than CO2. You are right to be terrified, and should be thinking about alternatives to what you are doing now. I mean survival possibilities not just lifestyle changes it is already too late for that. Plus how is anyone going to convince the huge populations in China and India to give up that dream of living like the US when it seems within their grasp? Not going to happen. Nope a natural progression of things, the human race is pushing against the sides of the petri dish and it will end like all of those biology experiments did, with collapse of the lifeform that is depleting the environment. Just like the bacteria in that experiment, we are acting like virus. So prepare personally for your future and do not depend on anyone else. You might make the wrong choices but at least you will have a chance. If not then wait for the government to do something and see how that works out for you.
iwarrior
It will get ugly for a lot of people. It will get ugly for a lot of Americans. However, the advantage of having the world's largest economy and military is that it won't be as bad for us as others. A dirty little secret many Americans know intuitively and use it to justify their complacency. Like the recent poll in England, there is a general unwillingness to do more than minor or minimally hard corrections if more interferes with lifesyle or standard of living.
what will they say to their children who must make the really hard choices?
I get tired of the "choosing to change our lifestyles" line. Changing our lightbulbs isn't going to do squat if the source of energy doesn't change. I have no choice but to drive to work in the absence of public transportation. I do buy organic food and "green" products but it doesn't slow the production of cheaper tainted goods and many can't afford to buy anthing else. Our only real choice is not just to "change our lifestyles," but to change the system that defines our options. All of our good choices are easily countered by one bad factory or one week of war.
Again, I REALLY wish this was all a hoax. I also really wish there was a way to totally reverse this. Banning cars or coming up with clean alternative fuels is a good thing, but it seems at times to not be enough. We can think of new ways to kill one another, but we can't think of ways to reverse global warming. We need a real-life Reed Richards.
I'm gonna sound like an over-imaginative child here, but you mean there isn't a way to repair the ozone layer? We can't think of a scientific way to make the Arctic, Himalayas, etc, colder so as to repair the damage. There are so many ways to burn the earth and create fire, but we can't create more ice and snow? I don't know if we can count on Mother Earth to heal herself. People get lung cancer 20 years after giving up cigarettes.
Before people laugh, I am a NOBODY. I am not a scientist. I didn't finish college and work in a warehouse. :) I'm just saying. I'm really terrified of our future. Even in the past ten years I've seen so much extreme weather yet relatively mild winters or at least winters that start late or finish early.
Tornados! We've had them in my area. We never had them before. And we never seem to have light rains anymore. We get droughts and then hard-hitting thunderstorms which end up resulting in floods.
Btw, has there been a more active era for hurricanes?
But Mike Crichton, the same guy that wrote Jurassic Park, says it's all B.S.
Why aren't full size SUV's banned and made illegal to produce, if their emissions are 2 or 3 times that of regular autos?
What can one say? Once this starts, all bets are off!
iwarrior,
I agree - I wish it wasn't real, too, but I think people still have time to prevent the worst of the damage, if they choose to change their lifestyles - which is a big IF. I'm going to keep doing the best I can personally, and work for social and political change...
As for Michael Crichton's book on global warming, "State of Fear"... well, suffice it to say that I had the misfortune of being required to read it, and it was the most egregious case of cherry-picked facts to support a position that I had seen in many a moon. Not to mention that one of the "nature-lovers" in the book met his demise by being killed by cannibals in a particularly gory scene - just to prove that "natural" = "bad".
If you want to see a good review of Crichton's use of scientific information, see the RealClimate website at http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=74.
But, you know, that book made him a darling of the extreme right-wing political sites... Go figure.
That is right! You cannot forget your mother on Mothers Day or any day. As the custodian of this place we have a lot to do really. If we let it all go even in the backyard it would result in damage. If you just left it alone it would grow and then burn at some point taking your house with it. Unfortunately, Hope will be our fall if it doesn't go hand in hand with action. A mothers hope has done nothing like her work. She can always use a hand. Smack you own hand as we all are the rot eating our planet like it was an apple, right to the core. Thanks Mom!