Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Deficit Reduction Requires Shared Sacrifice
The rich are getting richer. The middle class and poor are getting poorer. What is the Republican solution to the deficit crisis? More tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires. Savage cuts in programs that are desperately needed by working families.
There is another approach, which is why I've just introduced legislation imposing a surtax on those households earning a million dollars or more and the elimination of tax loopholes which the big oil companies take advantage of.
Everyone agrees that this country has a major deficit crisis, but few discuss how we got there. When George W. Bush inherited the White House from Bill Clinton we had a significant surplus. Now we have a $1.5 trillion deficit. How did that happen?
First, against my vote, Bush and Congress launched a war in Iraq. By the time we take care of our last veteran that war will end up costing us some $3 trillion. When the war drums were beating do you recall any of our Republican friends wanting to know how that unnecessary war was going to be paid for? I don't.
Second, Republicans for years have pushed for huge tax breaks for the wealthiest people. I didn't hear them ask how that was going to be paid for.
Third, under President Bush and a Republican-run House, Congress passed a $400 billion-plus Medicare prescription drug program. Written by the insurance companies and the drug companies, it barred the government from negotiating better prices. It drove up drug costs, padded pharmaceutical company profits and added to the deficit.
Fourth, again over my objection, Congress voted for a massive bailout of Wall Street. I didn't hear too many people talking about how we would pay for that $700 billion to bail out Wall Street. I didn't hear them worrying that it would drive up the deficit. Wall Street, having destroyed the economy through their reckless and illegal behavior, needed a welfare check and Congress provided it. End of story.
Those are some of the reasons we now have a deficit crisis, reasons Republicans don't talk much about when they provide soaring rhetoric about the dangers of large deficits.
The corporate media have been very lax in describing the devastating and unprecedented pain that the Republican House passed budget bill, HR 1, would bring about for low and moderate income families. Let me briefly mention just a very few of their cuts.
The Republicans want to decimate the Head Start Program. Every working family in America knows how hard it is today to find affordable childcare or early childhood education. At a time when we have the highest rate of childhood poverty in the industrialized world, the Republican solution is to slash Head Start by 20 percent, throw 218,000 children off the program and lay off 55,000 Head Start instructors.
The cost of college education today is so high that many young people are giving up their dream of going to college, while many others are graduating deeply in debt. The Republican solution? Make a bad situation much worse by slashing Pell grants by $5.7 billion and reducing or eliminating Pell grants for 9.4 million low-income college students.
Social Security is another target. We get calls in my office every week from senior citizens, people with disabilities, widows who are having a hard time getting a timely response to their Social Security claims. It takes much too long to process the paperwork today. What is the Republican solution? They want to slash the Social Security Administration, the people who administer Social Security, by $1.7 billion. That means half a million Americans who are legally entitled to Social Security benefits will have to wait significantly longer to receive them. (Become a citizen member of the Defending Social Security Caucus)
When it comes to health care, we have 50 million Americans with no insurance today, and 45,000 Americans die each year because they don't get to a doctor in time. Last year, as part of health care reform, I worked very hard to expand community health centers so that more and more low-and moderate-income people could walk into a doctor's office, get health care, dental care, low-cost prescription drugs, mental health counseling. What is the Republican response to the health care crisis? They want to drastically cut-back funding for community health centers and deny primary health care to 11 million Americans.
For the poorest of the poor in our country, the Community Services Block Grants provide the infrastructure, the mechanism to get out emergency help for food, heat, housing and other very basic necessities of life. With homelessness and poverty increasing, the Republicans want to slash $405 million from the Community Services Block Grant Program.
In cold weather states like Vermont, where the weather can get to 20 below zero, home heating assistance is critically important. In fact it is a life and death issue. At a time when home heating oil costs are soaring, the Republicans want to cut $400 million from the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program.
After decades of progress cleaning up our air and water, and preventing much illness, the Republicans want to slash the EPA by 30 percent and undercut enforcement of the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act.
Republicans also want to cut the WIC program, which provides supplemental nutrition for women, infants, and children. They want to cut that by $750 million.
Everybody understands we have problems with education right now, including large dropout rates. At a time when states are laying off hundreds of thousands of teachers, Republicans want to cut $5 billion from the Department of Education.
On and on and on it goes.
In my view, we do need to boldly address our deficit crisis, but we need to do it in a way that is fair -- that is not on the backs of the sick, the elderly, the children and the poor. In other words, we need shared sacrifice. The wealthiest people in this country, who are now doing phenomenally well, are also going to have to help us with deficit reduction. That is why I introduced legislation which would place a 5.4 percent emergency surtax on income over $1 million. The revenue would go into an Emergency Deficit Reduction Fund. Just doing that - asking millionaires to pay a little bit more in taxes after all the huge tax breaks they have received -- will bring in up to $50 billion a year.
I think that is a good idea, but it is not just me. An NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll recently asked the American people about the best ways to go forward on deficit reduction? Eighty-one percent of the American people believe it is totally acceptable or mostly acceptable to impose a surtax on millionaires to reduce the deficit. My legislation also would eliminate tax loopholes that enable the big oil companies from avoiding their fair share of taxes.
The American people get it. They understand that we cannot move toward deficit reduction just by cutting programs that working families, the middle class, and low-income people desperately need. They understand that serious, responsible deficit reduction requires shared sacrifice. They know that at a time when the top 1 percent earn more income than the bottom 50 percent, that when the effective tax rate for the rich is now lower than at any time in recent history, that it is absurd not to ask the wealthiest people in this country to provide additional revenue to help us lower the deficit.
The federal budget is not just a bunch of big numbers. It is the document that speaks to the values of our country, our national priorities and our hopes for the future. At a time when the gap between the very rich and everyone else is growing wider, it is a moral abomination to give more tax breaks to millionaires and billionaires, while cutting programs for the most vulnerable people in our society -- the children, the elderly, the sick and the hungry. The Republican budget proposal must be defeated.

38 Comments so far
Show AllBernie you have lost me. Republican this and Republican that.
Where were the Democrats while all of it was going on?
Your only mention of them was a budget surplus while Clinton led the march to collapse.
This is completely disingenuous.
Democrats held the big white house, the house of representatives, AND a super majority in the senate.
What was the result? Fascist legislation requiring everyone to buy a defective product, increased war spending, increased corporate welfare, increased drone murders, continued torture program, and the travesty of Danielle Manning's imprisonment and torture.
I used to defend you. Never again.
I'm with you Buck - almost. We should not reinforce the idea that only the Republicans are behind the Shock Doctrine, for all the reasons you mention. It is disingenous to ignore what the Dems did and failed to do when they had majorities everywhere.
However, I think we should talk about taxing the rich and this may give some of us an opportunity. And we have a chance to talk about needing a real independent socialist party so Sanders will not be out there alone in a very weak position.
(Do you mean Bradley Manning?)
joe, (blush, yes Bradley) If I could think for a moment that the exclusion was an oversight, the reaction would be different. But, I can't believe that Sanders, a seasoned veteran, could just by chance shine all the accusatory light on the republicans, leaving the democrats in the light of protagonists.
Besides, all the things he spoke of were given in economic terms. He covered the aggressive war with figures from spreadsheets. No mention of the destructive economic system itself. Like dubet said, it's no more than begging for mercy from the masters.
This is a millionaire Liberal claiming to care about the pauper's piece of pie, not addressing why they have none.
"I used to defend you. Never again."
A little harsh don't you think?
IMHO Senator Sanders is one of the few people in Washington that still cares about the average person, and demonstrates it by taking the time to write pieces for readers of Common Dreams. How many other major politicians do you see doing that?
You do know that if you republicans get their way, the wars, torture, drone murders, all will continue, AND they will slash social programs that will make the lives for many people much harder.
Look at Wisconsin and see what they will do to us if they get the chance. If you think things are bad now, just let the republicans have their way and see what happens.
Is the democratic party great, no, but at least they aren't bat-shit-crazy and hell bent on running the working classes into the ground as fast as they can.
Thanks, for fighting the good fight Senator Sanders, I for one really appreciate your efforts, and that you take the time to talk to us here. The people that "represent" me in NC never do (as far as I know).
NC-Tom,
From your posts over the years I have deduced that you are quite observant, intelligent and industrious. Based on the fact that you are quick on your feet, I just want you to honestly ask yourself this question:
How would you feel about our government if there was no one like Bernie Sanders in our government to voice outrage about the many injustices that we are forced to bear?
I'm sure Bernie is sincere. This isn't about Bernie. It's about the system USING Bernie to keep you at bay. They need you to keep believing so they can finish the transition from republic to fascist dictatorship.
Thinking this through is painful but necessary. I wish it wasn't so but Norman Rockwell is DEAD. The corporations killed him.
Im not believing in either party anymore, Im just saying that one is worse than the other as far as us little folk go. If you only had the choice of getting a third degree burn verses getting a fist degree burn, I figure most would choose the first degree burn, that's all Im saying.
I didn't vote in the Obama election, and the only reason I voted in the last election was that Virginia Foxx is my rep and I voted against her because she is an embarrassment to the state of NC, in my opinion.
Im not sure how much voting I'll be doing any more. Probably none for president because Obama is nothing more than Bush ever so slightly light, and if that is what hope and change is, then screw it.
I would be more than willing to vote for a Bernie Sanders if I'm ever given the chance. Because they make voting so damn easy down here in NC I may still vote AGAINST some of the far right wing nuts, out of some sense of civic duty.
Buck, nicely stated. Bernie has the same problem of a theme advocated in the film My Fair Lady. He really does not understand who his friends are. In the first paragraph of his missive he notes, "What is the Republican solution to the deficit crisis? More tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires. Savage cuts in programs that are desperately needed by working families." This - of course is only half right. Maybe Bernie is teetering on the verge of dementia. Not long ago, Obama and the Dems capitulated by EXTENDING tax cuts to the wealthist people on the planet. Maybe this slipped Bernie's narrow and myopic recollection. Bernie is in the same boat as Obama: he talks left to move right.
Same points, too.
The Dems are equally guilty as the Republicans.
Obama is even worse than Bush because he's smart and knows what he's doing.
He's doing all that Bush did and more. His crimes in Afghanistan and Iraq are as heinous as Bush's. Although Bush started the wars (with Dem. support) Obama keeps it going. But remember, it was Clinton who started with the no-fly zones and the blockades, as heinous a war crime as ever one was written.
George Sr. knew how to wage a 'clean' imperial war. That's unfortunately why few include him in the list. Not me, though.
In defense of Bernie; we only have republicans. That being said, this one lone voice of reason in an age of unreason is correct. Sadly, naught will be done. To look at it another way; "They" won. 3 little planes into the eye(s) of the giant brought it to it's knees. It matters not which side "They" came from, the effect is still the same. Nose first into the dirt.
Wow, what's with the comments section? The essay is not about Democrats and their role in past bad moves that increased the national debt. It is about the present, and a party that is pushing unrealistic and devastating cuts, a few months after demanding tax cuts for the wealthy once again. Although I am sure Bernie would agree that Obama's deficit hysteria is also dangerous for the economy and for non-millionaires, that was not what he was writing about...I think we should take the essay for what it is, and let any representatives that vote yes on this crappy thing know that we will do all to see them lose in the next election-whether they are Rethugs or Dems is not really material.
If you wish to compartmentalize the move to fascism in this country by claiming the big picture (present AND past) is irrelevant, then I have to ask you to tell us if your net worth is greater than $300,000 (I'm pretty sure it is).
If you are going to defend a rotten system that permits token voices of outrage which never go anywhere in actual legislation, full disclosure is required.
Oh, and by the way, Senator Sanders: I will not be voting for Obama in the future; he might just as well go ahead and run with a big red "R," by his name, as far as I am concerned. I do not intend to vote for Democrats either, unless Al Franken or Russ Feingold are in the primaries in 2012. But who I would really like to be able to vote for is you, and everyone I know also wants to do that. Would you run as an Independent? We are really disgusted with the rightward lurch of the Democrats, most particularly the President, and will not stoop to enabling them further.
Paul Craig Roberts was an Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under Reagan. He claims, and I believe him, that our system of elections has been so totally penetrated by rigging from various directions (machines without paper trails, limited ballot access, message control through corporate media domination, etc.) that voting has become a corporate tool to present the guise of a democratic system.
If you cling to your view that voting works, then how in the blue blazes can the polls for the last several years say one thing and congress consistently be doing the other?
Google Paul Craig Roberts. He is a balanced, educated, patriotic voice of reason.
Someone remarked when electronic voting machines were 1st introduced their purpose would be to make the vote fraud faster. Guess s/he is right.
Just think. If Bernie runs for President, he can do to the Democrat Party what Barry Goldwater did to the Republicans in 1964, but on steroids.
Just think, Horrible Horace, if you had believed what I told you a while back about the mahket making a world class dive, you could have shorted it and gotten rich! Imagine that. A lefty giving a wallet lover financial advice.
Too bad for you, grasshopper. Your 401K is heading for 101K status. LOL
And another thing. Senator Sanders is not a Democrat. He belongs to that notable party revered in American history for giving our system the appearance of a democratic republic with free speech (the TOKEN party of independents).
You are going to be poor, Horace, baby.
Don't count on it.
Oh, DrInsulaa (and other naive ones)
I like Bernie too. But all his points are could be aimed at Obama and the Dems.
"First, against my vote, Bush and Congress launched a war in Iraq ... When the war drums were beating do you recall any of our Republican friends wanting to know how that unnecessary war was going to be paid for? I don't."
Sorry Bernie et al, I don't recall Kerry, Clinton or Dem leadership do much
questioning, in fact they voted for a war that they could have easily known to
be a lie.
"Second, Republicans for years have pushed for huge tax breaks for the wealthiest people. I didn't hear them ask how that was going to be paid for."
Hmmm.... didn't Obama and the Dems extend the "Bush (now Obama) tax
cuts?
"Third, under President Bush and a Republican-run House, Congress passed a $400 billion-plus Medicare prescription drug program. Written by the insurance companies and the drug companies, it barred the government from negotiating better prices...."
Wait, are you talking about Dems or Repukes? The above is what obama did
too. When Cheney meets behind closed doors with energy companies it's
bad, when obama meets behind closed doors with phrama companies that's
acceptable?
"Fourth, again over my objection, Congress voted for a massive bailout of Wall Street. I didn't hear too many people talking about how we would pay for that $700 billion to bail out Wall Street. I didn't hear them worrying that it would drive up the deficit. Wall Street, having destroyed the economy through their reckless and illegal behavior, needed a welfare check and Congress provided it."
While Bernie presumably doesn't deny dem cupability here, do you forget that obama was a the helm of this bailout for much of the time? Do you forget (as a favor to those same banks) obama hired their lackey Geithner as Sec of Treas? How does obama propose to fix this mess? Answer: "Austerity" (wait, isn't that a repuke solution?)
Bernie (and kucinich) proves that the dems every bit as much as the republicans are corporate lackeys.
We really need to distinguish between pointing out something actually engendered by Republicans and referencing a philosophy as Republican when it is shared by some Democrats, Blue Dog or otherwise. Bernie Sanders is an Independent. He has no real stake in shielding the Democratic Party from criticism. Therefore his mention of something dastardly done by the Republicans does not automatically assume contrast with an implied goodness from the Democratic side of the aisle. The measures he mentions in this column were put forward by Republicans as part of a Republican agenda. Some Democrats voted for them, but Republicans are setting the tone for this austerity. While most of us understand that the system as a whole is broken and both parties are tone deaf to the “of, by and for the People” refrain, it is still helpful to understand which section of the choir is creating the greatest cacophony.
So long as we buy this nonsense the repubs and dems are significantly different, they win.
Stop being a suckers and recognize that it's not just some dems but the democratic party is just as corrupt as the repubs (as demonstrated in this article).
Your in a fantasy world to think one is the good guys and the other the bad guys. that's just pathetic at this point.
"Your in a fantasy world to think one is the good guys and the other the bad guys. that's just pathetic at this point."
Who said that? I didn't. My point was simply that Sanders was stating facts and facts are useful. The assumption that the intention was partisan is just that, an assumption. But at this point people are being pilloried for simply calling a Republican a Republican, so I expected nothing less.
the fact that Dem Bernie Sanders blames repubs while he ought to be including dems is thoroughly partisan.
Repubs = Dems = corporate lackeys
Period.
It's not the informed individuals fault if some can't grasp this simple and obvious fact
Bernie Sanders (I) - Vermont.
It's not the informed individuals fault if some can't grasp this simple and obvious fact
You mean "The People's Republic of Vermont".
Bernie, you're the best. But rather than butt heads with the oligarchy, please consider joining Nader, Chomsky, Zinn and Senator Gravel in endorsing direct democracy even though (and because) it takes away power from politicians and gives it to the people, letting people make the laws:
https://votep2.us/login.php
Why don't we all get off our collective asses and do something!
Dogface Lansing Wed noon Mar 16 capitol bldg
Washington DC March 19 Mall March 20 Quantico
there's more, just look
we need to play our music so loud and scream so loud that they will hear us in timbucktoo. Non-violent noise. Make it so loud they can't hear themselves think, and in their neighborhoods too.
Sen. Sanders writes "The federal budget is not just a bunch of big numbers. It is the document that speaks to the values of our country, our national priorities and our hopes for the future." Is this really the case?
More than half the country wants Medicare for all health care, significant numbers believe we should stop spending billions on wars, millions on the war
on drugs, billions on bailouts and nothing to help
stop foreclosures. The nation's values are not being represented they're being abused.. The national debt is now 14.176 trillion and increasing at 4.09 billion a day. This is crazy as well as unsustainable. The Treasury dept. expects the debt to rise to 19.6 trillion by 2015. The workplace is evolving into a place where people are being replaced by machines. Education consists of teaching the test rather than imbuing a love of learning. How is this preparing for the future which arrives whether planned for or not?
Our congress does not represent us and acts with impunity against our interests. We are facing significant hazards - economic, energy, environmental - with no meaningful plan for the future. The current
system is not working. Renaming the same system won't change anything. The same people seem to be doing all the sacrificing. We need a new paradigm. Suggestions?
Echo.
21st century DEMOCRACY has the status of Sex Slave to 21st century CAPITALISM.
November elections have, and will remain, voting for different mouth washes and lubricants.
There is no answer inside-the-box.
Trylon
go get em, Bernie.....and get em good.....because "we the people" have had our collective lightbulb go on, and we realize that NEITHER "PARTY", (which is a good name for them because they "party on our dime")..cares a rat's a** about us....we either get ourselves a true AMERICAN party and throw ALL these democrat/republican mouthpieces out, or we are doomed to repeat this ....Albert Einstein said, "the definition of insanity is to repeat the same thing over and over and expect a different result....TIME'S UP!!!...we need totally NEW blood in Washington...or there will be bloodshed on Mainstreet.....at this point some tomatoes tossed at few wallstreet banksters in Times Square in shackles sounds like a great way to spend a spring day!...Anybody else in???
"It is time for reparations and justice, not sharing." Agreed!
When a bank is robbed does the town get together with the robbers to pay it back?
We all know including Senator Sanders that our so called Representatives almost to a person are no more then shills for the Big Corp. $$ that it takes to get elected these days and he also knows that this same $$ owns the Court system and the rest of the Gov't as well. Why he doesn't mention this is beyond me . He knows damn well that the recent Citizens United case has tipped the playing field in such a way that it will take nothing short of a Revolution in this country to ever get things righted again. What he wants all of us to do now is beyond me?
The staggering reality of what you advocate is so overwhelming it is incomprehensible to at least 90% of the American public whose forced contribution, withholding taxes, are used to repress, steal, lie, murder, corrupt, bribe, from them. The American taxpayers are paying for their race to the serfdom bottom and don't even know it. It's mindlessness instilled propaganda of happy talk, sociopathic, psychopathic, optimism, psychobabble institutionalized by government, business , pretend christians[biblical harlots], giving it legitimacy and creating peer pressure for mindlessness.Keeping and creating fears. All this wrought by 19 hijackers on 3 airplanes.
bogi666 interesting statements
There is COMPLETE collusion and partnership ,between the Democrats and the Republicans, serving the Finance/Corporate power elites, in their war against the common people , and anything else is pure theatrics and make-belief posturing and bullshitting to deceive the people.
Sanders knows this and he is a bullshit artist and not sincere. He is part of the problem.
I recall some cartoon with some business looking type with his kid on his lap saying..
"You see billy everything goes in cycles, sometimes the Rich get richer and the poor get poorer and sometimes the rich get richer and the poor stay poor and thats the magic of Capitalism!"
Until we (as in the American people) decide this vicious cycle of our representatives in state and federal government cutting taxes to those who give campaign contributions is unacceptable we will have to deal with it. But how we deal with it should be the real question. I like the recall option myself. We (the taxpayers) should be outraged that the rich and corporations are not paying their share and the burden is on us to make it up. Let me state again as I have previously in other posts: Exxon Mobil did not pay any federal taxes to the USA on over $311 billion in sales but instead pays a lower tax rate in other countries. How about GE that made $157 billion and earned a $1.1 billion credit instead of paying any taxes to Uncle Sam? The quote from Forbes Magazine says, "GE Capital has displayed an uncanny ability to lose lots of money in the U.S. and make lots of money overseas, where tax rates are lower." When will it stop? Probably when we get off our asses and decide enough is enough.
http://www.forbes.com/2010/04/01/ge-exxon-walmart-business-washington-corporate-taxes_slide_5.html
And btw, anyone know where Jeffrey Immelt, the CEO of GE is right now? He took the helm of the President's Council on Jobs and Competitiveness replacing Paul Volcker. Nice. Too bad we couldn't have a CEO who believes in shared sacrifice.
Keep writing for CD Bernie. We all need to hear you.