Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Sex, Lies and Oil Spills
A common spin in the right wing coverage of BP's oil spill is a gleeful suggestion that the gulf blowout is Obama's Katrina.
In truth, culpability for the disaster can more accurately be laid at the Bush Administration's doorstep. For eight years, George Bush's presidency infected the oil industry's oversight agency, the Minerals Management Service, with a septic culture of corruption from which it has yet to recover. Oil patch alumnae in the White House encouraged agency personnel to engineer weakened safeguards that directly contributed to the gulf catastrophe.
The absence of an acoustical regulator -- a remotely triggered dead man's switch that might have closed off BP's gushing pipe at its sea floor wellhead when the manual switch failed (the fire and explosion on the drilling platform may have prevented the dying workers from pushing the button) -- was directly attributable to industry pandering by the Bush team. Acoustic switches are required by law for all offshore rigs off Brazil and in Norway's North Sea operations. BP uses the devise voluntarily in Britain's North Sea and elsewhere in the world as do other big players like Holland's Shell and France's Total. In 2000, the Minerals Management Service while weighing a comprehensive rulemaking for drilling safety, deemed the acoustic mechanism "essential" and proposed to mandate the mechanism on all gulf rigs.
Then, between January and March of 2001, incoming Vice President Dick Cheney conducted secret meetings with over 100 oil industry officials allowing them to draft a wish list of industry demands to be implemented by the oil friendly administration. Cheney also used that time to re-staff the Minerals Management Service with oil industry toadies including a cabal of his Wyoming carbon cronies. In 2003, newly reconstituted Minerals Management Service genuflected to the oil cartel by recommending the removal of the proposed requirement for acoustic switches. The Minerals Management Service's 2003 study concluded that "acoustic systems are not recommended because they tend to be very costly."
The acoustic trigger costs about $500,000. Estimated costs of the oil spill to Gulf Coast residents are now upward of $14 billion to gulf state communities. Bush's 2005 energy bill officially dropped the requirement for the acoustic switch off devices explaining that the industry's existing practices are "failsafe."
Bending over for Big Oil became the ideological posture of the Bush White House, and, under Cheney's cruel whip, the practice trickled down through the regulatory bureaucracy. The Minerals Management Service -- the poster child for "agency capture phenomena" -- hopped into bed with the regulated industry -- literally. A 2009 investigation of the Minerals Management Service found that agency officials "frequently consumed alcohol at industry functions, had used cocaine and marijuana and had sexual relationships with oil and gas company representatives." Three reports by the Inspector General describe an open bazaar of payoffs, bribes and kickbacks spiced with scenes of female employees providing sexual favors to industry big wigs who in turn rewarded government workers with illegal contracts. In one incident reported by the Inspector General, agency employees got so drunk at a Shell sponsored golf event that they could not drive home and had to sleep in hotel rooms paid for by Shell.
Pervasive intercourse also characterized their financial relations. Industry lobbyists underwrote lavish parties and showered agency employees with illegal gifts, and lucrative personal contracts and treated them to regular golf, ski, and paintball outings, trips to rock concerts and professional sports events. The Inspector General characterized this orgy of wheeling and dealing as "a culture of ethical failure" that cost taxpayers millions in royalty fees and produced reams of bad science to justify unregulated deep water drilling in the gulf.
It is charitable to characterize the ethics of these government officials as "elastic." They seemed not to have existed at all. The Inspector General reported with some astonishment that Bush's crew at the MMS, when confronted with the laundry list of bribery, public theft and sexual and financial favors to and from industry "showed no remorse."
BP's confidence in lax government oversight by a badly compromised agency still staffed with Bush era holdovers may have prompted the company to take two other dangerous shortcuts. First, BP failed to install a deep hole shut off valve -- another fail-safe that might have averted the spill. And second, BP's reported willingness to violate the law by drilling to depths of 22,000-25,000 feet instead of the 18,000 feet maximum depth allowed by its permit may have contributed to this catastrophe.
And wherever there's a national tragedy involving oil, Cheney's offshore company Halliburton is never far afield. In fact, stay tuned; Halliburton may emerge as the primary villain in this caper. The blow out occurred shortly after Halliburton completed an operation to reinforce drilling hole casing with concrete slurry. This is a sensitive process that, according to government experts, can trigger catastrophic blowouts if not performed attentively. According to the Minerals Management Service, 18 of 39 blowouts in the Gulf of Mexico since 1996 were attributed to poor workmanship injecting cement around the metal pipe. Halliburton is currently under investigation by the Australian government for a massive blowout in the Timor Sea in 2005 caused by its faulty application of concrete casing.
The Obama administration has assigned nearly 2,000 federal personnel from the Coast Guard, the Corps of Engineers, the Department of Defense, the Department of Commerce, EPA, NOAA and Department of Interior to deal with the spill -- an impressive response. Still, the current White House is not without fault -- the government should, for example, be requiring a far greater deployment of absorbent booms. But the real culprit in this villainy is a negligent industry, the festering ethics of the Bush Administration and poor oversight by an agency corrupted by eight years of grotesque subservience to Big Oil.
- Posted in


58 Comments so far
Show AllSioux Rose
Here is my fantasy for the day:
Obama gets hit by a lightning bolt and instead of dying, has an epiphany whereby he institutes a national JUSTICE week, and begins to tackle the most insidious breaches of law in our land.
I'm sure I'm not alone in a wish to see the followng:
Cheney and Halliburton PAY for the damages their failure to implement the $500,000 maintenance device caused.
BP and its shareholders also pay for damages to the Gulf.
Wall ST and the hedge fund phonies pay to repair the nation's economy from a similar black hole.
The MIC's weapons' contractors AND the darling dark (Eric) Prince pay reparations for war crimes.
All offshore prisons are closed down. Any who advocate for them get to play "guard and prisoner," whereby they take turns torturing each other.
All money allotted to weapons' development is shifted to initiatives in support of Green technology.
Monsanto's doors are shut. Its leadership indicted with war crimes (against nature and the Vietnamese and Columbian farmers, for starters).
All drones are grounded until they are refitted to drop bags of rice, flour, and seeds on those impacted by flood, earthquake, hurricane, etc.
Please add to this list.
Adding 4 anti-corporate anti-military justices to the bench and tilting the court some?
Restoring the constitution?
"Restoring the constitution?"
Technically, the Constitution is still there but subverted.
and bush said that the constitution was "nothing but a goddamn piece of paper"
once..
by the way, he also got caught on tape with that one..
bush and cheney....both oilmen..
where is bush's comeuppance on your wishlist?
where is bush's comeuppance on your wishlist?
Sioux Rose
If this was directed at my "wish" list, I already wrote out my fulfillment of Bush's karma in a short story. Instead of him dying when Air Force One is sabotaged, he lands in the Atlantic near the coast of Brazil and is discovered by members of an indigenous tribe. They keep him alive and force him to ingest powerful psychotropic plants that open the cellular gates to his repressed empathy. Due to the drug's expanded vision, the "unfeeling (X) prez" thereby witnesses and FEELS the catastrophic impacts of his decisions and policies, sadistic items done under his reign and in his name.
Sioux Rose; Great list!
I would add that the 1996 media deregulation is reversed! And, that net neutrality is NOT lost, or given away.
I'd just be happy to see the end of the current paradigm based falsely on paranoid-schizophrenic John Nash's Game Theory: To wit, humans are automatons whose actions are predicated entirely on self-interest.
Somehow, we need to progress quickly from, "Trust no one" to "We are all inter-connected".
Game Theory, self-interest, is at the root of the US and Israeli demise, economically politically and socially.
Central to it is the idea that the aim of a game is to destroy your opponent, because his aim is to destroy you. While this works on the game field within the rules of a particular game and is subsequently the source of great friendship off the field, it does not work in human relations because it denies there are any.
Game Theory off the field of play is the Devil's work and many have been doing His work for some time.
Sioux Rose
JAMES: It's the reasoning of Mars rules, that the only thing that's important is the FIGHT, regardless of its costs or consequences, a blind ethos that makes battle itself holy. The U.S. has fallen for this diabolical plot and that's why I often bring up the counter-balancing archetypes (from the celestial template) to suggest a far more holistic plan (and model) with powerful insights into humanity's intended (survival and) evolution.
KAY: Thanks!
Thanks Kay for bringing up that 1996 act. That same 1996 Telecommunications Act also wiped out most of the smaller telephone companies and put us workers economically under the mercy of the larger telephone companies. I have done what I could to not work for the controversial ones and have been usually successful but ever since that act kicked in, layoffs and having to hop from one company to another became the norm. There was and still is no job security for most of us telephone operators out there.
Speaking of net neutrality, you might want to add killing the Patriot Act and restoring the Fairness Doctrine. I had a chance to read the Fairness Doctrine a few years ago when I heard about it. That bill was the best thing to put limits on corporate control of the media and would have spared us the worries on losing net neutrality if it hadn't been repealed or if it had been at least restored.
I don't think most people understood, in 1995, how many people would be effected by the repercussions caused by passing the media deregulation. At the time, I was working in radio -- but those opportunities no longer exist. Deregulation always means downsizing and firing employees, and I commend you for making an effort to work for independent phone companies versus the controversial corporations.
At least, in 2003, people from the right, the center and the left came together to stop that attempt at more deregulation. Now, we're fighting for net neutrality and any number of other issues -- and currently, Comcast wants to merge with NBC. Our work never ends.
Kay, I do remember those years when there was a lot of division among people on what to expect of this rising "New Economy" back in the 1990s. I was totally neutral about this and I regret that. Some were gung ho enthusiasts while others were very skeptical about the doomed to fail us all TCA of 96. I was shocked when I would first learn about how even the right would actually agree with us on some issues but I think I am getting used to it and hope I can capitalize on it and get them out of the brainwashing even if I can't on the current set of O-bots.
Universal health care for all, provided by the government!
No more logging of old growth forests!
The "extraordinary renditions" program is stopped and all officials who have taken part in it are brought to justice. World renown U. of Illinois law professor, Francis Boyle, is preparing a complaint to the ICC against Obama and other high officials. A couple of months ago he filed against Bush and Co. The ICC has acknowledge the filing.
Mountain top removal is immediately haulted and the dirty coal companies are forced to repair the damaged environment. All coal mines are shut down and the dirty coal companies are forced to provide comprehensive health care to all miners for occupational illnesses for life.
Obama publically states there's no such thing as clean coal and rescinds his pledge to build the next new generation of coal plants.
Obama rescinds his pledge to build the next new generation of nuke plants.
Obama rescinds his pledge to drill new offshore oil rigs all around North America.
Obama orders the Justice Department to investigate environmental and energy crimes commited by Bush Co, and hold them accountable.
A full and open investigation into the fraudulent investigation done by N.I.S.T. into the collapse of Building Seven at 5:20 p.m. on September 11, 2001.
Over 1,800 professional U.S. architects, engineers and professional fire fighters have publicly asked for this investigation based on their examination of the evidence that Building Seven fell that day due to a controlled demolition at free fall speed, and NOT (as N.I.S.T. has reported), by "fires" that weakened "one" steel beam.
Since this information was already published in The Washington Times, I see no reason for this comment to be questioned by anyone.
Secondly, I feel, based on these two articles, that President Obama and his entire administration need to recuse themselves from any response to the on-going Gulf of Mexico oil spill disaster. According to these articles, Obama was the TOP recipient of money from BP:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0510/36783.html
And the federal government exempted BP's Gulf of Mexico drilling from environmental impact study last year, which obviously falls under the watch of the Obama administration:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/04/AR2010050404118.html?hpid=topnews
Considering that this may prove to be the Mother of all Gushers:
http://pesn.com/2010/05/02/9501643_Mother_of_all_gushers_could_kill_Earths_oceans/
And that BP had a history of problems:
http://www.gainesville.com/article/20100430/ARTICLES/100439938?p=1&tc=pg
http://blog.al.com/live/2010/05/fire_boom_oil_spill_raines.html
I feel Barack Obama is not in a position to be in charge of this disaster.
He has seriously compromised himself, along with the Bush administration.
Since Cuba and other countries may well be impacted by this disaster, I suggest the United Nations take over and seek the help of ALL countries who feel they have the expertise to cap these gushing wells (the main one and one other small one).
Even Iran has offered to help:
http://www.presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=125303§ionid=3510203
But because of our "allegiance" to Israel (and apparently NOT to the citizens of Texas, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana and Florida), Obama will not be taking Iran up on it's offer.
This is criminal negligence, IMHO, and eventually, Obama will be held to account for the fact that he did not do ALL he could to stop this environmental catastrophe.
"Over 1,800 professional U.S. architects, engineers and professional fire fighters have publicly asked for this investigation based on their examination of the evidence that Building Seven fell that day due to a controlled demolition at free fall speed, and NOT (as N.I.S.T. has reported), by "fires" that weakened "one" steel beam.
Since this information was already published in The Washington Times, I see no reason for this comment to be questioned by anyone."
What examination of the evidence? Did these 1800 people have access to everything that was learned about the disaster? Not likely. Or did they get their information from The Washington Times? If the latter, I have to wonder why anyone would believe anything published in Reverend Moon's paper?
Regarding the claim about a "controlled demolition," did the Washington Times also claim that that was what destroyed the Pentagon? I think some people have been reading Umberto Eco's novel, Foucault's Pendulum, whose plot is built around just about every conspiracy theory one can think of. Reading it and believing in every possible conspiracy theory.
I only made the point that these 1800 architects, engineers and professional firefighters laid out their results of a world-wide scientific investigation into the collapse of Building Seven and that the press conference was "covered" by The Washington Times (and no other MSM outlet, I believe).
I would LOVE to share the information with you, but because of the policies not allowing discussions of 9/11 I am not at liberty to do so.
You can always try Googling the information.
Good luck.
Sioux Rose
ABBY: I am ALL for a TRUE investigation and as Minitrue put it, seeing an international council weigh in on LOTS of things that have gone awry in the U.S., like an expensive train filled with expensive executives taking the rest of us over a number of senseless cliffs... none of these decisions make cents/sense, but they make tons of money for a small group of sociopathic insiders.
Anyone who believes the official 911 story NOW is either working for the government, brain dead, or a natural-born authoritarian who can't follow where lots of evidence (or intentionally rendered missing evidence) would lead. Don't sweat the few in the forum who want to reverse the accusation making those of us who smell the rat the loose screw party. That's the oldest trick in the book when the powerbrokers have something to hide... try to tarnish the witness and abjure their testimony!
Sioux Rose, I saw your article on the 9/11 response from your website and I must say that you did a great job of making the case on warning of such catastrophes 2 years prior to that horror tragedy. Unfortunately, just like elections, the public didn't listen and we're still in the mess. Furthermore, given the debate I had seen between jakenewton and erroll on this issue, I am afraid that we are nowhere close to being out of the woods on the matter. To be fair, both sides should be given equal chances to make their cases on how they can prove how 9/11 happened.
P.S.: Here is the article I was referring to:
http://www.siouxrose.com/article.mystic.response.htm
Sioux Rose
STANLEY: It's been years since I read that essay. I should re-read it, as I don't even remember what I said! But thanks for the reference.
Thomas Jefferson: Glad to have you back, and thank you for your always gracious compliment.
RALPH 441: Thank you for filling us in on the speech problem. I didn't know about that, but then I don't watch TV.
I would guess that a few wind energy platforms in Nantucket Sound are not looking so bad.
Wow
Great article and thanks for this information. I just can't fathom how the deregulation crowd can continue. Explosion after explosion rocks the economic and ecologic world, and still they continue. The Tea Party movement, sadly the most visible populist uprising in America today, screams about taxes and takes a fundamentally anti-regulatory tone. Are they all taking crazy pills? The CORPORATIONS you idiots! Look what they do to you!
The Tea Party is simply Republican astroturf. Nothing grass-roots there. They will all vote Republican in the general or I'm Alice in Wonderland.
Hi Sioux Rose,
An excellent list, but perhaps a Nuremberg style trial for all who broke the UN Charter by preemptive war, black ops, overthrow or attempted overthrow of non-cartel controlled governments.
Election laws that allow We the People to elect actual representatives instead of industrial cartel toadies.
Keep adding!
Steve
Interesting article on how prevention might have saved the day.
But depending on the pressures down there, even the devices described may not have stopped the blowout.
And as Bush weakened regulation, why did Obomber not close those loopholes when he took office ?
And why did Obomber open up offshore leasing, something that even Bush did not do.
Conclusion:
Obomber is nothing more than a cheap Chicago con artist and corporate ho".
And why trust a Kennedy ? Much of the family fortune is tied to bootlegging and alliances with organized crime.
Good point at the end but a pathological liar sometimes tells the truth, even if only as part of a bigger lie. Moreover we all have our baggage.
"And as Bush weakened regulation, why did Obomber not close those loopholes when he took office ?
And why did Obomber open up offshore leasing, something that even Bush did not do"
Even when there are new guys at the top of an agency, it takes time to clean out the Augean Stables that Bush left behind - after 8 years of filling them with manure.
Regarding opening up offshore leasing, the reason should be clear. He hoped (as naive as he seems to be) that it would help convince people that he is not really trying to triple everyone's energy costs with the cap and trade energy bill he is pushing.
You kinda got it right, just keep on workin' with it.
"And why trust a Kennedy ? Much of the family fortune is tied to bootlegging and alliances with organized crime."
Ad hominems are not useful arguments. His family has nothing to do with it. God, I would hate to be judged by some in my family.
Wouldn't want to be judged by many in my family, either.
Nicest guy you could ever have wanted to meet: my (late) grandfather - a former bootlegger.
rvwalker and photon,
I am sorry to hear about the way some in your family would judge you. All I can suggest is try to have some confidence and get them to focus their judgment of you where you can appeal to them the most. I think both of you can do it. Don't give up your self confidences and good luck.
P.S.: Photon, Alternet hasn't been as crowded as it used to be although it is picking up. I hope we can meet there. Thanks and glad to see you back.
Hi, Stanley. Thanks for the kind words. Sorry if I didn't make myself clear. I wouldn't want to be judged by others, based on what some of my relatives are. (How about a jerk who spent years telling me what great ideas Hitler had?)
This is not to say that you're wrong about my family. They think I'm more than a little weird, at best - but that's far better than what I think of many of them! I subscribe to the old adage: consider the source.
AlterNet can go to hell! I'm told I have to register with Disqus or some idiotic 'networking site' like Twitter. Just how many registrations does it require to post a single comment? No reply from those at AlterNet. TWITter sounds like a great place for them. Third party cookies? My computer guy says it's not a good idea in general. (Why not? Je pas. Keine Ahnung. Not the vaguest idea. But I trust this guy, as he has never steered me wrong.) I have unsubscribed.
The upside: I have been spending a lot more time doing things that are healthy. Currently, I have been immersing myself in the works of Wolfgang Holzmair. Just recently purchased his (fairly) recent CD, Spritual Resistance: Music from Theresienstadt. (The Nazi camp, that is.)
The reviews state that it is a remarkable endeavor. Haven't heard it yet: have to nip out to Oak Park to pick up my copy. (Yeah, that Oak Park: the suburb bordering Chicago that will forever be entwined in people's minds with Ernest Hemingway and Frank Lloyd Wright).
Photons, I understand. My niece had the same fear when she was young because she would be so different from her parents, politically and culture wise. I am glad that you were able to rise above that fear on your own and it can be tough.
As for Alternet, logging on can be such a pain. Even after I log in, I have to hit Ctrl-F5 a couple of times just to get the site to accept my login. If the recent news on net neutrality means anything, I believe that Alternet is preparing to go pro-corporate because they must know that NN is coming to an end. I hope that this wonderful site stands as it is one of the few last bastions of progressive discussions unlike places like Fluffy Post and Daily Hoax. Another thing that frustrates me about Alternet is on the archived posts before the new system came up, it's so hard to see the entire thread. I asked Alternet 8 times and no response. That site must be going the way of Fluffy Post. I suspect that everytime they are asking for a donation because they supposedly need money, Washington must be bailing them out. The reason I suspect that is for the amounts they ask, they can't have received it so fast. I wished that some of the good folks such as Quannah and DrClaw would come on over to this site. I know that they are practical and might find most people here a little too harsh for their tastes but I think that they know where to draw the line on politicians who cross the line and try to subvert the meaning of "practical" and "liberal".
I'm also glad to hear that you are doing more healthy things. I am afraid that this is all we can do especially with this regressive scam that passed back in March.
Well, Stanley, as you know, one of the basic lessons in life is that you have only two real choices: you are true to yourself, or you risk suffering in any of a multitude of ways for pretending you are anyone/ anything else. No matter how/ who/ what you are (or pretend to be), there will be many people who are different and who will disagree with you to varying degrees - so why add to your discomfort needlessly?
For instance, I'm mildly dyslexic. Not bad enough to impede my learning to read, (which means it wasn't diagnosed for years), but enough to make for minor yet persistent difficulties. For a long time I tried to hide my deficiencies, but eventually had to ask myself some serious questions regarding the price I paid. So, by my first or second year in high school I had become quite comfortable using my finger (or thumb) reading in public. If anybody had a problem with that, well, I had another finger just for them. (Literally or figuratively, depending upon my mood and the exact circumstances.)
Ah, you refer to the recent health (insurance and pharmaceutical company) care bill... Yes, I need to do a bit more that is physical. Right now, I am concentrating on improving my spirits. Thus Holzmair - and looking for a new flat! I am (literally) sick of living surrounded by lunatics. The people downstairs run in their apartment, every day, at almost any hour between 7 am and 9 pm. Their kid recently learned to walk - and then to run. I think he chases the dog. This I expected, as his mother did so long before he came along. The woman upstairs also runs occasionally. Too self-involved to get an earlier start on getting ready to leave the house without rushing around at the last minute. Both the crazies upstairs move furniture around nearly every day - and doing so past midnight is a common occurrence. Sometimes, I think, it's the table and chairs in the dining room - but sometimes it's other things. Not sure what possesses people to drag furniture around that way, or why they are not capable of picking up a chair to move it. I'm looking for a flat on the top floor, would even consider an attic; or, alternatively, perhaps a basement ("garden apartment" - ha!). At least I'd be sure that noise would come from only one direction at most. What a ridiculous way to live...
Quannah and DrClaw... Who knows? They may both tire of AlterNet, too. Quannah and I have over time both crossed swords and been in complete agreement, and found ourselves at many places between those extremes. Wherever she stands in relation to me, she usually comes up with some good points. Dr Claw and I have had some interesting exchanges, as well. Longdream, too, a fellow bird-lover. If enough migrated over here, the tone of this site would naturally change.
I know what you mean about the archives - and the lack of response. It's frustrating. Or rather, it was frustrating. I simply won't deal with it anymore. Ah, relief...
I read a lot of Longdream's posts in the past late last year and I did see a lot of disputing between him and JB in the past though in his last dialogue with her, they both reconciled. I understand that his support of Barney Frank and Obama would not sit well with most posters here.
I do some gardening myself and I do it with my neighbors at least when the weather isn't wintry. We also look out for each others' gardens. I know that it is virtually impossible to garden big when living in apartments and I was told about those HOA rules and how difficult it can be to get the people in charge of the complexes to ease up on the rules.
Nobody's support of most in Washington sits well with me. There are quite a few things posted here that I don't like or agree with or find helpful, etc. That's what discourse is - or should be - all about.
Not under HOA rules, myself. Just trying to deal with lousy Chicago building standards: no privacy in large apartment buildings. (Don't know about the really expensive ones, but those most of us live in are the pits.) Have thought of a small town, but not all have easy access to the city via mass transport. The closest thing to a vehicle I've ever owned is a bicycle, and I'm not switching over now.
As for gardening, there simply isn't enough unpaved land in the yards of many larger buildings. Or the landlord has his own idea of what ought to be grown. (The amount of land - not to mention water - wasted on lawns is disgusting.) Best case scenario: I find an apartment on the top floor of a building whose owner and other residents are very disinterested in yard work. Cross your fingers for me, eh?
I have been to Chicago so many times and I can understand completely. Chicago would make even the most crowded parts of the St Louis and Kansas City areas "rural" in comparison to Chicago. With the way more public schools are closing and I'm sure you heard about the Kansas City ones, I am worried that as more young people move into apartments, townhouses, and condos what with the housing crisis getting worse, their interest in gardening let alone farming will be zilch. It is bad enough that schools don't teach students the basics of gardening and that could be done during recess break. I guess that people living in apartments not interested in gardening does match in some ways. In this kind of a capitalistic society, it can be too easy to give up self-confidence in trying out constructive hobbies such as gardening and biking. In Europe, people take interest in these things even in their darkest days on unemployment. In this country, even among some of the best progressives I privately talked to, a few of them would stun me by telling me that they were victims of "conspiracy teams" and so team confidence is bossy and authoritarian in nature. They would end up repeating the conservative mantra "I can do it all by myself and I'm an independent thinker." I respect and encourage both individual and collective efforts to put great progressive and liberal causes to work.
If there is one thing Illinois and Missouri state governments have in common, it is their refusal to provide extending metro trains further into the suburbs so that the gas guzzlers just might go down significantly in both the suburbs and inner cities. I don't live too far from work as it takes only 10 minutes to drive to work from where I live at but I suppose I could give bike riding a try. My only fears are sweating on the way, trying to avoid rude drivers on the road, and unpredictable weather. I think I need to find some ways of building self-confidence past my typical two mile bike rides in the neighborhood.
School closings is always a difficult topic. There are so many reasons, and they vary from place to place. (Well, you know this.) Overall, our society seems to have abandoned succeeding generations, which is about the stupidest thing a society can do.
I can't say that all who live in apartments are disinterested in gardening - but where would you do it? There are a few community gardens, though; and several years ago, I read about burgeoning community gardens in traditionally black neighborhoods. This crossed all generational lines, with very young children working alongside pensioners or taking instructions from some who were no longer able to do such physical tasks. Private property in my neighborhood (NW side) appears to be mainly devoted to lawns and ornamental plants. Can't say for certain, though, as I've seen very few *back* yards.
I used to live near the University of Illinois, and for about 7 years worked downtown. During some of that stint, I was in school; but on the days I had no classes, as well as the few years when I was not in school, I ran to work. Actually, I started at a scout jog and worked my way up to a (roughly) 3-mile run. Talk about sweating! (Not to mention freezing.) I made it a point to arrive early, so I could have a quick wash-up and put on a dry shirt (and sometimes more). If I was returning at anything resembling a decent hour, I also ran home. (Couldn't run to and from school, as I went to Northeastern Illinois U, on the northwest side - near where I now live - and not to the wicked UIC.)
We have quite a few bike messengers, plus Mayor Daley is a keen biking enthusiast and has marked quite a few miles of bike lanes, besides the addition of more bike trails/ paths; so drivers are becoming increasingly accustomed to bikes being on the streets.
Ad hominems are not only not useful to arguments, they are logical fallacies whose use invalidates an argument. I too am disappointed in Obama's continuation of Bush regime policies, but this "Obomber" bullshit has got to go. The people who hypocritically use this kind of disrespectful crap took great exception to any nick-naming of Bush, and insisted that a frat-rat legacy, dry-drunk, coke-snorting, ANG deserting, insider trading, lying, 9-11 warning-missing, citizen-spying, treasury-looting, war-crime-committing, election-stealing usurper (and btw, none of the preceding characterizations of the former occupant of the White House is an ad hominem, because they are all true) be afforded unquestioned respect because "he's our commander-in-chief." BFD. In the first place, the CiC designation is largely ceremonial, and if you are a civilian, you have no business using the term. Civilians in republics don't have commanders, they elect representatives and presidents to serve them and their best interests, not command them in an illegal war. Bush is very lucky that Obama seems to have an OCD-like commitment to bipartisanship, holding his hand out to the GOP, regardless of how many times they bite it. If he weren't, Bush and Cheney would be defending themselves against multiple felony charges, including war crimes and treason, both of which carry the death penalty.
The Lard Bucket Fix empirePie May 5th, 2010
The lard bucket is in a fix;
from the pigweed super weeds to the revenge of the Bayer bath.
Give the baron larders a oily 2-4-D enema
to join the confused bees with the fat injected populous
of botoxed Boomer addicts, the common carp of the CARP;
oily skinned, leather donning, noxious nerds who
we elect to bomb us and our home back to the stoney ages
as the oily river of life becomes the sea.
It started with Joe McCarthy. Except for a brief hiatus in the '60's, it runs through to Reagan, who really uncorked the Right, including the Fundamentalists as a political force. Grant that the second Bush was an apotheosis of sorts, what has Obama done but continue the game?
Almost forgot, Obomber was in office when the feds gave BP a “categorical exclusion” on drilling in the Gulf. Thus, they didn’t even have to do an environmental analysis, let alone an environmental impact statement.
Of course Obomber took money from BP for his campaign. This should be seen as a bribe to enhance Big Oil profits while placing the public at risk for the consequences.
And this is change we are supposed to believe in ?
It's just more disorganized crime Washington style in collusion with their corporate masters.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/04/AR2010050404118.html?wpisrc=nl_headline
excerpt:
U.S. exempted BP's Gulf of Mexico drilling from environmental impact study
By Juliet Eilperin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, May 5, 2010
"The Interior Department exempted BP's calamitous Gulf of Mexico drilling operation from a detailed environmental impact analysis last year, according to government documents, after three reviews of the area concluded that a massive oil spill was unlikely.
The decision by the department's Minerals Management Service (MMS) to give BP's lease at Deepwater Horizon a "categorical exclusion" from the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) on April 6, 2009 -- and BP's lobbying efforts just 11 days before the explosion to expand those exemptions -- show that neither federal regulators nor the company anticipated an accident of the scale of the one unfolding in the gulf."
That's it. The smoking gun. Exemptions. Too big to regulate.
RFK Jr. writes well and he should stick to that. Several months ago when the the mtr issue was heating up he was interviewed at length by a local WV broadcasting conglomerate and he was exasperatingly ineffectual. I was wishing that I was the one answering the questions instead of him. He did make those with a mind toward environmental responsibility look confused and out of touch-incoherent.
I'm not hammering the guy, but stick to what you're good at. The legal counsel for Green Peace that appeared on the "News Hour" the other night is very good on his feet and is a much better spokesman for environmental responsibility.
Granted, the (JFK Jr.)interview was hostile territory as the entire establishment in WV is gung-ho coal, oil, gas. The other day the same broadcasting entity interviewed Don Blankenship at length in an attempt to burnish his image as a "corporate powerhouse." I couldn't watch it though, as my stomach didn't feel strong enough to take it just then.
Of course RFK jr. doesn't appear "media polished" in any interview because he has a rare vocal cord disorder called spasmodic dysphonia. Many people with this disease shun society because speaking is so much a part of our total persona. With spasmodic dysphonia there are often certain beginning letters of words that one can't pronounce and thus their already difficult speech becomes even more halting because they try and avoid words with these letters.
In this day of plastic surgery, t.v. perfection and shallow superficial looks our arguably greatest 20th century president: FDR would have never even made it into a cabinet position with his polio paralysis handicap. Hussein Bolt would have a better chance of being elected president as he looks so much more striking on the Leno show, etc.
To me, RFK jr. no matter what his pedigree or wealth, is a countless blessing to the earth, it's people and environment which he works tirelessly for without seeking huge rewards or favor.... Just looking to do the right think.
Only a question: If the agency supposed to monitor oil drilling was so corrupt due to Bush appointments, then one year and a half after his inauguration, why has not Barack Obama fired the incompetents that administer policy? This article fixes blame on Cheney and friends, but that doesn't work for me. There has been plenty of time to set things right and nothing has been done. This is a "Katrina" moment, at least for me.