EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- One American Who Isn't For Sale
- Transcript: Today's Live Q&A With NSA Leaker, Edward Snowden
- Remembering Satyajit Ray’s Hirok Rajar Deshe: On Edward Snowden, Resistance and Inverted Totalitarianism
- Obama Cans Regulator Who Crossed Wall Street
- Pentagon Bracing for Public Dissent Over Climate and Energy Shocks
Popular content
Today's Top News
Cochabamba, the Water Wars and Climate Change
COCHABAMBA, Bolivia—Here in this small Andean nation of 10 million people, the glaciers are melting, threatening the water supply of the largest urban area in the country, El Alto and La Paz, with 3.5 million people living at altitudes over 10,000 feet. I flew from El Alto International, the world’s highest commercial airport, to the city of Cochabamba.
Bolivian President Evo Morales calls Cochabamba the heart of Bolivia. It was here, 10 years ago this month, that, as one observer put it, “the first rebellion of the 21st century” took place. In what was dubbed the Water Wars, people from around Bolivia converged on Cochabamba to overturn the privatization of the public water system. As Jim Shultz, founder of the Cochabamba-based Democracy Center, told me, “People like a good David-and-Goliath story, and the water revolt is David not just beating one Goliath, but three. We call them the three Bs: Bechtel, Banzer and the Bank.” The World Bank, Shultz explained, coerced the Bolivian government, under President Hugo Banzer, who had ruled as a dictator in the 1970s, to privatize Cochabamba’s water system. The multinational corporation Bechtel, the sole bidder, took control of the public water system.
On Sunday, I walked around the Plaza Principal, in central Cochabamba, with Marcela Olivera, who was out on the streets 10 years ago. I asked her about the movement’s original banner, hanging for the anniversary, that reads, in Spanish, “El agua es nuestra, carajo!”—“The water is ours, damn it!” Bechtel was jacking up water rates. The first to notice were the farmers, dependent on irrigation. They appealed for support from the urban factory workers. Oscar Olivera, Marcela’s brother, was their leader. He proclaimed, at one of their rallies, “If the government doesn’t want the water company to leave the country, the people will throw them out.”
Marcela recounted: “On the 4th of February, we called the people to a mobilization here. We call it ‘la toma de la plaza,’ the takeover of the plaza. It was going to be the meeting of the people from the fields, meeting the people from the city, all getting together here at one time…. The government said that that wasn’t going to be allowed to happen. Several days before this was going to happen, they sent policemen in cars and on motorcycles that were surrounding the city, trying to scare the people. And the actual day of the mobilization, they didn’t let the people walk even 10 meters, and they started to shoot them with gases.” The city was shut down by the coalition of farmers, factory workers and coca growers, known as cocaleros. Unrest and strikes spread to other cities. During a military crackdown and state of emergency declared by then-President Banzer, 17-year-old Victor Hugo Daza was shot in the face and killed. Amid public furor, Bechtel fled the city, and its contract with the Bolivian government was canceled.
The cocaleros played a crucial role in the victory. Their leader was Evo Morales. The Cochabamba Water Wars would eventually launch him into the presidency of Bolivia. At the United Nations climate summit in Copenhagen, he called for the most rigorous action on climate change.
After the summit, Bolivia refused to support the U.S.-brokered, nonbinding Copenhagen Accord. Bolivia’s ambassador to the U.N., Pablo Solon, told me that, as a result, “we were notified, by the media, that the United States was cutting around $3 million to $3.5 million for projects that have to do with climate change.” Instead of taking U.S. aid money for climate change, Bolivia is taking a leadership role in helping organize civil society and governments, globally, with one goal—to alter the course of the next major U.N. climate summit, set for Cancun, Mexico, in December.
Which is why more than 15,000 people from more than 120 countries have gathered here this week of Earth Day, at the People’s World Conference on Climate Change and the Rights of Mother Earth. Morales called for the gathering to give the poor and the Global South an opportunity to respond to the failed climate talks in Copenhagen.
Ambassador Solon explained the reasoning behind this people’s summit:
“People are asking me how this is coming from a small country like Bolivia. I am the ambassador to the U.N. I know this institution. If there is no pressure from civilian society, change will not come from the U.N. The other pressure on governments comes from transnational corporations. In order to counteract that, we need to develop a voice from the grass roots.”
Denis Moynihan contributed research to this column.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...




15 Comments so far
Show AllI want your job, Amy Goodman! Thanks for reporting from the field on Haiti, Bolivia, etc.
Joe
Joe, yes Amy does a great job, so I'm voting to keep HER there.... BUT, don't forget that she ALSO got arrested and hastled covering the political convention... Amy reports on a lot of issues with national and global implications, but the fight goes on locally in just about every local. I'm from Maine and we're trying hard to keep water out of corporate hands, while other areas of the country do the same and/or fight to clean up contaminated ground water from corporate mis-use. You don't have to be a national reporter to notice local issues and send in letters to the editor of local papers, or submit guest editorials, or support local political action groups. Perhaps you do so already, if not, perhaps think about doing so. Many of the national issues came to light because of local activists shouting out.
peace.
I am not implying that Amy has it easy. She is fearless. She is tireless.
I'm out there too - and vocal. Just my venues are not as inspiring and beautiful as some of Amy's. And it is not my paying job.
Joe
Late last year Amy was detained and questioned by Customs while entering Canada through the Interstate 5 Peace Arch border crossing on her way to appear in Vancouver BC.
Corporate pressure on governments around the globe make life difficult for real journalists like Amy.
It's great for a crusading journalist to get arrested, looks fantastic on the resume, makes for a great story to dine out on, establishes street cred, and helps you see (I imagine) that running afoul of the law isn't the same thing as being a bad person. I'm still not always 100% clear on that.
Andrew
*Comment deleted by site administrators for violating our Comment Policy*
see: http://www.commondreams.org/comment-policy
I do not understand this comment. Thanks.
Joe
Cochabamba blog
Peoples World Climate Conference:
http://pwccc.wordpress.com/
Satisfaction is payment enough.
Thanks to Old Goat for the link to people's World Climate Conference.
http://pwccc.wordpress.com/
Of course, no mention in the MSM about this most important conference, shameful as usual here in the US. I honor Amy G. for her endless good work and enlightenment.
I fear for Morales. Unlike Chavez, who will go down in a U.S.-sponsored coup, he's too far away, and we'll just take him out in a hail of gunfire. How much longer will he have? We don't tolerate dissent for long in our colonies.
Thanks Amy!!! Your the man!!,,ahem, I mean...woman.
Marcela Olivera's account is from the perspective of the citizen's mobilization. Wikipedia has a more detailed and nuanced summary of the players, the issues, and how things have played out since 2000. Here are is a quote from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000_Cochabamba_protests :
In the end water prices in Cochabamba returned to their pre-2000 levels with a group of community leaders running the restored state utility company SEMAPA. As late as 2005, half of the 600,000 people of Cochabamba remained without water and those with it only received intermittent service (some as little as three hours a day). Oscar Olivera the leading figure in the protests admitted, "I would have to say we were not ready to build new alternatives." SEMAPA managers say they are still forced to deal with graft and inefficiencies, but that its biggest problem is a lack of money (it can not raise rates and no international company will give them a loan). Luis Camargo, SEMAPA’s operations manager in an interview with the New York Times said they were forced to continue using a water-filtration system that is split between “an obsolete series of 80-year-old tanks and a 29-year-old section that uses gravity to move mountain water from one tank to another.” He stated that the system was built for a far smaller city and worried about shrinking aquifers. A system to bring water down from the mountains would cost $300 million and SEMAPA’s budget is only about $5 million a year. The New Yorker reports "in Cochabamba, those who are not on the network and who have no well, pay ten times as much for their water as the relatively wealthy residents who are hooked up", and with no new capital the situation can not be improved. A local resident complained that water-truck operators "drill polluted water and sell it. They [also] waste a lot of water.” According to author Frederik Segerfeldt, "the poor of Cochabamba are still paying 10 times as much for their water as the rich, connected households and continue to indirectly subsidize water consumption of more well-to-do sectors of the community. Water nowadays is available only four hours a day and no new households have been connected to the supply network." Franz Taquichiri, a veteran of the Water War and an SEMAPA director elected by the community, said "I don't think you'll find people in Cochabamba who will say they're happy with service. No one will be happy unless they get service 24 hours a day." Another Cochabamba resident and activist during the unrest summed up her opinion of the situation by saying, “afterwards, what had we gained? We were still hungry and poor.”
Does anyone have knowledge about more recent developments?
It's all good. Amy, Evo, Cochabamba, Pachamama- go Bolivia! go Indigenas!
*Comment deleted by site administrators for violating our Comment Policy*
see: http://www.commondreams.org/comment-policy