Organizer in Chief
You could almost hear the world’s collective sigh of relief. This year’s U.S. presidential election was a global event in every sense. Barack Hussein Obama, the son of a black Kenyan father and a white Kansan mother, who grew up in Indonesia and Hawaii, represents to so many a living bridge—between continents and cultures. Perhaps the job that qualified him most for the presidency was not senator or lawyer, but the one most vilified by his opponents: community organizer, on the South Side of Chicago. As Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin mocked: “This world of threats and dangers is not just a community, and it doesn’t just need an organizer.”
But perhaps that’s just what it needs. Obama achieved his decisive electoral victory through mass community organizing, on the ground and online, and an unheard-of amount of money. It was an indisputably historic victory: the first African-American elected to the highest office in the United States. Yet community organizing is inherently at crosscurrents with the massive infusion of campaign cash, despite the number of small donations that the Obama campaign received.
Sen. Obama rejected public campaign financing (sealing that policy’s fate) and was flooded with cash, much of it from corporate donors. Those powerful, moneyed interests will want a return on their investment.
A century and a half earlier, another renowned African-American orator, Frederick Douglass, an escaped slave and leading abolitionist, spoke these words that have become an essential precept of community organizing: “If there is no struggle, there is no progress. ... Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will.”
There are two key camps that feel invested in the Obama presidency: the millions who each gave a little, and the few who gave millions. The big-money interests have means to gain access. They know how to get meetings in the White House, and they know what lobbyists to hire. But the millions who donated, who volunteered, who were inspired to vote for the first time actually have more power, when organized.
Before heading over to Grant Park in Chicago, Sen. Obama sent a note (texted and e-mailed) to millions of supporters. It read, in part: “We just made history. And I don’t want you to forget how we did it. ... We have a lot of work to do to get our country back on track, and I’ll be in touch soon about what comes next.” But it isn’t enough for people now to sit back and wait for instructions from on high. It was 40 years ago in that very same place, Grant Park, that thousands of anti-war protesters gathered during the 1968 Democratic National Convention, demanding an end to the Vietnam War. Many from that generation now celebrate the election of an African-American president as a victory for the civil rights movement that first inspired them to action decades ago. And they celebrate the man who, early on, opposed the Iraq war, the pivotal position that won him the nomination, that ultimately led to his presidential victory.
Another son of Chicago, who died just days before the election, was oral historian and legendary broadcaster Studs Terkel. I visited him last year in their shared city. “The American public itself has no memory of the past,” he told me. “We forgot what happened yesterday ... why are we there in Iraq? And they say, when you attack our policy, you’re attacking the boys. On the contrary ... we want them back home with their families, doing their work and not a war that we know is built upon an obscene lie. ... It’s this lack of history that’s been denied us.”
The Obama campaign benefited from the participation of millions. They and millions more see that the current direction of the country is not sustainable. From the global economic meltdown to war, we have to find a new way. This is a rare moment when party lines are breaking down. Yet if Obama buckles to the corporate lobbyists, how will his passionate supporters pressure him? They have built a historic campaign operation—but they don’t control it. People need strong, independent grass-roots organizations to effect genuine, long-term change. This is how movements are built. As Obama heads to the White House, his campaign organization needs to be returned to the people who built it, to continue the community organizing that made history.
Denis Moynihan contributed research to this column.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
25 Comments so far
Show AllGreat article. Yes, Obama used a lot of his money to mobilize and activate people. People are geared up. People are ready to take the next step. But what is it.
Ralph Nader and United for Peace and Justice are focusing on congress. Excellent.
But how. I disagree with the legislative action page at UPJ. We need real organizing, the kind ACORN does, not activism. "Don't just do something, organize." I recommend Shel Trapp's booklets (online) Dynamics of Organizing and Basics of Organizing. Also must reading is Beyond Machiavelli by Roger Fisher, though he fails to call for the group approach of organizing, and his Coping with International Conflict. (Ok, yes, UPJ and Nader know who makes the decisions, who to confront. So yes, they're correct about step 1, and better than many peace "action" groups on step 1.)
Progressives have not understood what to do, as described in these books and booklets. Post 9/11 and back during Vietnam, or in the 80s, the organizing usually has not been that good. Much more could have been won. These ongoing failures need to be addressed first. Those who have been successful against corporate power have faced coalition barriers, other groups haven't been on board on the methods. Other groups squandered their mobilizations on ineffective methods.
There is no wonder, none at all, at the massive cynicism and fatalism following Obamas victory and various calls for action on progressive web sites. Yes, Obama is not on board and if we do what we did post 9/11 we will fail. The fatalists are right about that. But yes, Amy Goodman and David Sirota are correct that now is the most important time for effective action in decades. Organizers, real organizers: carpe diem! The rest of you: DO YOUR HOMEWORK! (Learn what to do, as in the sources I've listed.)
I wish Amy's website had a way for users to post and share ideas.
Until then here is another way to say what Amy said:
David Brower once observed that “Politicians are like weather vanes and
our job is to make the wind blow.”
Put your politicians in your cell phone.
http://www.tinyurl.com/makewind
“Roger Eugene Ailes (born May 15, 1940) is the president of Fox News Channel and chairman of the Fox Television Stations Group.”* It is well passed the time for him to be replaced. For too long we have put up with his shenanigans. We expect him to resign by the end of the year.
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Ailes
Just a thought, perhaps, Howard Dean could replace Rodger Ailes as the President of the Fox News Channel and chairman of the Fox Television Stations Group.
Bring America Back !!!! Say Remy, how could Howard Dean join up with the radical
right wingers, the faux unfair and unbalanced war cheerleader FOX ?? He would
almost have to change stripes, become a Republican and swear allegiance to
Murdoch and NewsCorp !!! Unlikely !
****Now that everything Howard Dean has worked for , 8 years, has successfully
been achieved==looks to me like he will be on the high line for a nice Obama
Team appointment. Don't you think so, too ?
Bring America Back !!!!
***Some very astute and pertinent comment on this short piece, and I
am happy as a relative newbie to be sharing the blog with some who
are frequent core contributors. Amy Goodman is a topic herself as well
as an author. I hope you will consider my 'new-kid-on-the-block' words.
***I know that Glen Greenwald would prefer "Organizer" to "Commander"
since, in his article here 3 days ago, he cringed mightily when picturing
"W" taking the title unto himself then making carrier landings in his
tight little jump-suit, while declaring "Mission Accomplished" !!!
***But as Amy Goodman quotes Studs Terkel when interviewing him, he asks:
....'why are we in Iraq...'then the unreported answer to 'Studs' had to be:
September 11, 2001 ! And as Saddam would say ..9/11 was the mother of all
Pearl Harbors...Nancy Klein in her yesterdays piece would concur that 9/11
was the shocking electrode, the nerve shattering jolt, the shock & awe which
got us into Iraq, the so-called Patriot Acts, the debacle of Homeland Security
caution traffic signals, and the marvelous Boogieman Bin Laden !!!!!!!!!!!!
***Amy Goodman knows something about 9/11! She is on live video tape in NYC
reporting that Building #7, World Trade Center (Saloman Brothers Building)
had collapsed !!! EXCEPT, that there in the video background can be plainly
seen that indeed Bldg #7 was still standing proud & tall, right over Amy's
shoulder !! Afterwards, sure 'nuff, at 5:35 pm Bldg #7 did fall very neatly
into it's own construction footprint,jack-sprat neat as pie. Nine hours
earlier the Twin Towers of WTC had done pretty much exactly the same thing.
***Ms Goodman has never divulged, to my sense, WHO gave her the info piece
about Bldg 7 collapsing. That WHO holds the answer to what many of us in
here refer to as the TRUTH of the 9/11 Attacks. The CNN and BBC networks
also reported on the collapse before it happened, and on point their heads
are still in their corporate ostrich holes !! So is Amy Goodman's !
**Particularly and especially Vital, Crucial, and Important to NOW, Amy
Goodman's sources identity(s) need disclosure. Because a certain young
President Elect has swallowed the 9/11 Neocon fantasy--hook==line==and
sinker ! Barak Obama has pledged to conduct a Holy Crusade to the mountains and caves of Tora Bora to extract Boogieman Bin Laden and do him in !!Slay the Dragon! Off with his head, crucify him, run him thru shout the first time
voter knaves.
***Obviously, Pres-elect Obama still thinks a cave-dwelling boogieman and
19 airline pilot flunkouts pulled off the technical genius that was and is 9/11.
If Amy Goodman would only divulge her WHO to , at least, Obama, then she
could single-handedly ward off the pending Tora Bora Crusades--saving us
untold millions of $$$, saving lots of breaths, troops lives, and wasted
printers ink !!!! Obama thinks or states that because of "W",s failed
policies , he just neglected to look in the right caves !!!! I, like
Greenwald get cringed when worst we can say about war criminals is their
"failed policies"===that is the sickening adopted anthem of the Democratic
party all during their campaign=="failed policies"==so then I guess when
they captured Hussein and hung him by the neck until dead==that was a
'successful policy'==?????????? A third rate dictator in a defenseless nation?
***What a Pulitzer candidate Amy Goodman may become if she divulges her
big, big WHO sources from 9/11. Not a Nobel candidate since she has
withheld that vital info way, way too long. !! And surely not this Right
Arm Peace Tidbit for Swedish Verbal Massage, or whatever ! But, Pulitzer
perhaps !
***So you fellow Progs won't find me in Democracy Now, or at the Swedish
Hall of Shame, until such time as Amy Goodman comes forth with the 9/11
TRUTH !!!!! So to repeat the fellow blogger below, let us PUSH, PUSH,
PUSH the incoming Administration, and Amy Goodman for the TRUTH !!
And could some of us remind our new Leader-Elect that there never were any
Dragons, just fairytales about them from past Crusaders who merely wanted
to curry favor with the populace, and with the KING !
Truthtroller (oops,did I get your name wrong?) It's Naomi Klein I think you mean.
Amy Goodman has been doing great work for a couple of decades. I'm familiar with all of her radio work (WBAI), pre and since onset of DemocracyNow. Your slay the dragon approach to Amy Goodman is sort of funny. As Earl Caldwell, journalist on WBAI (www.wbai.org), "Caldwell Chronicle" says, "You are what your record says you are.". Amy Goodman's record is superb, from being attacked (along with Allan Nairn) and people attending a funeral in E. Timor by the soldiers in the l990s. Include her now famous interview with Bill Clinton on WBAI when he called a Latino music show to get people out to vote on election day of his second election. She was still working out of WBAI then (on the morning show "Wake Up Call")and someone got to her, and she got on the air and interviewed Bill Clinton,with some really tough questions: including Leonard Peltier and bombing on Vieques. He was impressive in the amount of facts he knew, but he got really irritated. Amy Goodman's records is great. I don't know what ax you are grinding.
You're acting as if Amy Goodman has some big secret about 9-11 that she's just not sharing. She doesn't, and neither do I and neither do you.
Bring America Back !!!!
*actually: Thank you for the read & comment. Please consider then, who, where
and when supplied Amy Goodman with the "NEWS" she reported on 9/11 that Bldg 7
had "collapsed" when , in real life, it had not happened yet?? If it is not a
secret as you say, she just needs to tell us WHO, we then will confirm it, and
it no longer is a question. She got the report from somewhere, someone, did she
not ?
*The other thing I can offer you is, now that King George's control is on
the wane, the information on Building 7 is going to come out !! We are going
to have our 'Deep Throat' where 9/11 is concerned.
*If I were on live video tape when the real Patriots emerge with the TRUTH,
I wouldn't want the question hanging out there===exactly WHO ????
You haven't proved your first sentence.
OK, Amy, time to roll up our sleaves. The struggle continues. My burning issue is preventing a a planet from going into environmental catastrophe due to our own economic activity. So let's get started and let 1 Thousand wind turbines bloom!
Obama: "We have a lot of work to do to get our country back on track, and I’ll be in touch soon about what comes next."
Who is writing this guy's lines, Karl Rove? Anybody waiting to hear what comes next is completely out of touch. If we the people don't tell Obama "what comes next," then fuck us.
Good article. Amy Goodman thank you for your role in providing information during the elections. I look forward to seeing your news reports and commentaries about how we can continue to move forward.
Joe
All due respect. Yeah for Obama. Lots of optimism. All the good stuff... but, can we please stop with the stupid, bushian nicknames for the presidency? Unless and until B.O. becomes a flippant jackass and starts making them up himself? I had looked forward to an era of accurate nomenclature in govt. ( rant alert )First thing I see in the morning is a gdamn article "Organizer in Chief"... Is that cute?...Do we want to draw any equivalancies here? Is it all because I just needed 15 more minutesof sleep ? Grrrr.... I'm going back to bed.
Grappa
If he doesn't provide for the care of the masses that supported him , I fear for our Republic, and a peaceful future. The cities and the large urban areas will not suffer in silence.
And his first selection is, as Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel.
suckerbeagle
The DN coverage was wonderful. I especially appreciated Jeremy Scahill's consistent questioning the interviewees on Obama's backtracking during the campaign. Most people are saying we have to hold President Obama to his promises. I am not so sure that his positions are something we actually want to hold him to. At any rate, most agree we need to put the heat on. Please visit http://november5.org This is an exploratory website to see if there is interest in forming citizen organizations in all the congressional districts to keep the heat turned up high on the politicians whose ears we can get on the issues that we care about. Unfortunately, it's kind of hard to talk directly to the president once he's elected. The site, www.november5.org will take your name and zip code and respond later after seeing if something like this can be put together.
I just watched the video at november5.org and signed up. Everyone should get on this. As the guy in the video says, this is not about moving on, it's about moving in!
Watched the video. I am not sure who this is, but I agree with the message, the view toward local organization, and saw Ralph Nader speaking, so gave it a shot and joined up. We shall see. I am energized to use this moment to push for economic justice, peace and environmental responsibility.
Joe
Thank you for saying it, Amy. I've been feeling a little too swept away by all the Obama hoopla to remember that he still got much of money from corporations. Here's to grassroots hope and that the people who voted for him just don't sit back and say, "Our job is done now, he got in the white house."
The 'first 100 days'email campaigns have begun. Just Foreign Policy, Union of Concerned Scientists, Transportation for America.
Anyone know of others?
This is where Nader shines - keeping the proverbial toes of the administration to the fire.
The CIA has been rebuked in court for the absurd stonewalling of the Freedom of Information Act thanks to the National Security Archives sustaining constant legal pressure. If you want to fill in Howard Zinn's efforts, try subscribing to the NSA email alerts.
Push People Push!!
Obama was the first president to give an HONEST victory speech pointing out that nothing will be solved overnight and that yeah, we're going to run into opposition hell but that despite all of that will give it his best to reach out across the spectrum. I hope he doesn't screw up like LBJ and Carter or do another NAFTA or gun control or Obama won't be able to sustain his policy. I think he'll be a cool and smooth moderate Democrat for the next 4, hopefully 8, years. I also hope he can unite the Democrats for a change and maybe even bring in moderate to liberal Republicans still out there.
Terrance Mitchell
Redfield, South Dakota
"Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will."
This is why we must not disband the opposition to corporatist rule.
Want a reality check? Take just a quick peek at the talking points that are flooding the communication channels... It is all about "position adjustment" - for American taxpayers, you had better get intimately familiar with lowered (zero) expectations.
Translation: I got mine... you're on your own... and oh, yeah... I'm going to need another trillion or so for my "banking" buddies.
The honeymoon is over.
- the loyal opposition
And I saved the Email from Obama. And I totally appreciate the Election Night coverage and Morning After coverage programs from DemocracyNow. I listened on WBAI (www.wbai.org)after emailing everyone I know who I wasn't sure knew about it being on CD or other places. Thanks CD and DemocracyNow.
~Kem Patrick~
As usual you are right on ~AMY~
I am glad you are well Mr.Patrick. I was concerned not seeing you around.................lizard