April, 03 2009, 11:07am EDT
Family Farmers Fear Being Run over by Food Safety Juggernaut
Organic and Local Farmers Seek Protections in Washington
CORNUCOPIA, Wi.
Momentum is building in Congress for new food safety reforms aimed at
addressing the growing cycle of food contamination outbreaks. But
concerns are also being raised cautioning legislators not to trample organic
farmers, backyard gardeners, and consumers of fresh local foods in the rush to
fix the nation's food safety problems.
"There is no question that our increasingly
industrialized and concentrated food production system needs a new regulatory
focus," said Will Fantle,
Research Director for The Cornucopia Institute, a Wisconsin-based organic food
and agriculture watchdog. "No one disputes that our food safety
system is broken," Fantle added.
In the last several years, contamination of bagged spinach,
lettuce, tomatoes, peppers, beef, and peanuts have sickened thousands of
Americans. And currently a massive recall of food products containing
pistachios is underway.
After years of industry-friendly regulations and
deteriorating budgets for inspections, holes in the food safety net have
prompted some in Congress to push for new laws and increased oversight.
The legislative process, however, has sparked a flurry of
internet and email activity, with some warning the agribusiness and biotechnology
lobbyists are conspiring to pass legislation outlawing organic farming and home
gardens. One of the pending bills, The Food Safety Modernization Act (HR
875), sponsored by Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro (D-CT), has been a lightning rod
for criticism.
As a result of the blowback Congresswoman DeLauro is
scrambling to assure organic advocates that they are not the target of her
bill: "The purpose of this bill is to improve the safety of
food products derived from large industrial processing facilities by increasing
the inspection frequency and safety standards at these plants."
Attempting to quell concerns in the blogosphere, which is
going viral, Congresswoman DeLauro also stated, "Organic farmers have a
strong record in providing safe, high quality foods to American families and I
will continue to work toward making sure that organic farming continues to
thrive."
Hearings have already begun on food safety legislation in
the U.S. House of Representatives. Of the multiple bills being considered,
the FDA Globalization Act (HR 759), sponsored
by the most senior member of Congress, Congressman John Dingell (D-MI), appears
most likely to be voted on, with elements of the other bills, including
DeLauro's, possibly incorporated into the bill.
"We have closely examined the various legislative
proposals and have been talking with our contacts in Congress," said
Fantle. "We don't believe that harming organic and local
producers is the intent of these bills, but we must engage consumers and local
food producers in this process to clearly express our concerns that a
'one-size fits all' regulatory focus could very well seriously
damage some of America's best growers of wholesome, fresh food,"
Fantle stated.
After the 2006 spinach contamination outbreak in California, that
affected consumers across the country, the state adopted a regulatory model that
has economically injured growers producing a diverse selection of fresh foods
for local markets. It is also caused vast environmental damage as farmers
are required to quarantine large tracts of land, removing vegetation and
wildlife. California's
"leafy greens" program has attracted interest at the U.S.
Department of Agriculture for possible national use.
Organic farmer Eve Kaplan-Walbrecht, of Riverhead, NY, is
critical of this type of plan. "They are burdening produce growers
with the impossible task of 'sterilizing' their farms.We need good regulatory oversight
that doesn't penalize smaller-scale owner-operated farms of farmers and
marketers like me."
While some of the nation's food safety issues have
farm origins - largely due to the inability of huge industrialized
conventional livestock facilities to properly manage their mountains of manure,
contaminated with lethal pathogens - many E. coli and salmonella
outbreaks originate at processing facilities. This year's outbreak
of salmonella in peanut products has been traced to unsanitary conditions at a
massive processing plant. And now, the FDA has issued a warning
about contaminated pistachios, which appear to have also been tainted during
the processing or storage of the nuts or finished processed food products.
"We don't want organic family farmers to be made
scapegoats and lose their markets because of objectionable food treatment
practices or recalls put in place due to sloppy practices at giant food
processing facilities," said Dr. Jesse Schwartz, the President of Living
Tree Community Foods, a manufacturer of organic nut butters. "The
health and well-being of America,
its people, and the American land depend upon the stewardship of family farmers
who are the true husbandmen of their soil, plants, and animals."
The Cornucopia Institute is calling on
farmers and consumers to stand up for and protect organic and sustainable local
farmers. "Organic, local producers of high quality foods are part
of our nation's food safety solution-not part of the
problem," said Fantle.
Ronnie Cummins of the Organic Consumers Association said that citizens,
who are seeking safer and nutritionally superior food are willing to pay a
premium for organics, and, "In order for consumers to have continued
access to this high quality food family size farmers must be protected from
regressive regulation."
An action alert released by Cornucopia
provides talking points and guidance for consumers and farmers interested in
contacting their legislators to urge protection of organic and local food
production. It can be found on Cornucopia's web page at https://www.cornucopia.org/2009/03/action-alert-critical-pending-food-safety-legislation/
The Cornucopia Institute, a Wisconsin-based nonprofit farm policy research group, is dedicated to the fight for economic justice for the family-scale farming community. Their Organic Integrity Project acts as a corporate and governmental watchdog assuring that no compromises to the credibility of organic farming methods and the food it produces are made in the pursuit of profit.
LATEST NEWS
Grand Jury Indicts Top Trump Aides, 11 Arizona Republicans Over 'Fake Electors' Scheme
Had it succeeded, said the state's attorney general, the scheme would have "deprived Arizona's voters of their right to have their votes counted for their chosen president."
Apr 25, 2024
A grand jury in Arizona on Wednesday charged seven aides to Donald Trump and nearly a dozen Republican officials over a "fake electors" scheme in the state that aimed to keep the former president in power after his 2020 loss to President Joe Biden.
Trump, who is currently facing nearly 90 charges across four criminal cases as he runs for another White House term, was described as "unindicted co-conspirator 1" in the 58-page indictment, which was announced by Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes.
"The people of Arizona elected President Biden," Mayes, a Democrat, said Wednesday. "Unwilling to accept this fact, the defendants charged by the state grand jury allegedly schemed to prevent the lawful transfer of the presidency. Whatever their reasoning was, the plot to violate the law must be answered for."
The indictment names former Arizona Republican Party Chair Kelli Ward, sitting state Republican Sens. Jake Hoffman and Anthony Kern, former U.S. Senate candidate Jim Lamon, and seven others as the "fake electors" who sought to declare Trump the rightful winner of the state's presidential contest.
The names of other individuals indicted by the state grand jury are redacted, but the document's descriptions make clear that former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, former Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani, and top Trump legal strategist Boris Epshteyn are among those facing felony charges—including fraud, forgery, and conspiracy.
"In Arizona, defendants, unindicted coconspirators, and others pressured the three groups of election officials responsible for certifying election results to encourage them to change the election results," the document reads. "Discussions about using the Republican electors to change the outcome of the election began as early as November 4, 2020. Those plans evolved during
November based on memos drafted by [an attorney for the Trump campaign, Kenneth Chesebro]."
Mayes said Wednesday that had the fake elector scheme succeeded, it would have "deprived Arizona's voters of their right to have their votes counted for their chosen president."
"It effectively would have made their right to vote meaningless," said Mayes.
A state grand jury, made up of everyday, regular Arizonans, has handed down felony indictments in the ongoing investigation into the fake elector scheme in Arizona. pic.twitter.com/Nu8GcD4ZqJ
— AZ Attorney General Kris Mayes (@AZAGMayes) April 24, 2024
Alex Gulotta, state director of All Voting Is Local Action Arizona, said Wednesday that "the indictment of the eleven fake electors is one of the first steps required in holding these election deniers accountable for their alleged attempts to take power away from voters by disrupting our free and fair elections."
"Arizonans deserve to trust the election officials responsible for administering our elections and preserving our democracy," said Gulotta, "and this is a positive step forward as we continue to strengthen the foundations of our democracy and restore faith in our elections."
The Arizona Republicreported Wednesday that "several of the Arizona electors have previously claimed they were merely offering Congress a backup plan, though nothing in the documents they sent to Congress and the National Archives backs up that assertion."
"The indictment includes several statements the false electors made on social media that contradict those claims," the newspaper observed.
Jenny Guzman, director of Common Cause's Arizona program, said the indictment "marks the start of a new chapter for the fake elector scheme that has plagued Arizona."
"Arizonans are still dealing with the fallout from the false electors and the Big Lie about the 2020 elections," said Guzman. "We are relieved that the investigation by Attorney General Mayes has concluded and Arizonans can now know that what comes next is accountability. These efforts by these fake electors to undermine the will of Arizona’s voters have had implications far beyond their failed attempt to overthrow the 2020 election."
"This indictment can reassure all Arizonans that if anyone, regardless of their political affiliation, attempts to undermine their vote, consequences will follow," Guzman added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Watchdog Urges FEC to Investigate Trump Campaign Over Scheme for Legal Fees
"By not disclosing the vendors that actually provided legal services, the Trump-affiliated committees effectively blocked the public from knowing which attorneys and firms are being paid—and how much."
Apr 24, 2024
A campaign finance watchdog on Wednesday filed a Federal Election Commission complaint accusing former President Donald Trump's 2024 campaign, affiliated political groups, and an accounting firm of violating U.S. law in a scheme "seemingly designed to obscure the true recipients of a noteworthy portion of Trump's legal bills."
The Washington, D.C.-based Campaign Legal Center (CLC) said that "evidence appears to show an illegal arrangement between several Trump-affiliated committees and a compliance firm named Red Curve Solutions that is designed to obscure the identities of those providing legal services and how much they are being paid."
"Voters have a right to know how the presidential campaigns and other committees supporting presidential candidates spend their money."
CLC alleges that the Trump campaign, Trump's political action committee (PAC) Save America, and three affiliated organizations "violated federal reporting requirements based on a scheme in which the committees reportedly paid over $7.2 million—described as 'reimbursement for legal' costs or expenses"—to Red Curve.
The watchdog also said that Red Curve appears to be "making or facilitating illegal contributions that violate either federal contribution limits or the prohibition on corporate contributions."
According to CLC:
Red Curve is a domestic limited liability company that offers compliance and FEC reporting services but does not appear to offer any legal services. It is managed by Bradley Crate, who also serves as the treasurer for each of the five Trump-affiliated committees concerned in this complaint, as well as over 200 other federal committees.
According to filings with the FEC, Red Curve appears to have been fronting legal costs for Trump since at least December 2022, with Trump-affiliated committees repaying the company later. This arrangement appears to violate FEC rules that require campaigns to disclose not only the entity being reimbursed (here, Red Curve) but also the underlying vendor. By not disclosing the vendors that actually provided legal services, the Trump-affiliated committees effectively blocked the public from knowing which attorneys and firms are being paid—and how much they are being paid—through this arrangement.
"Voters have a right to know how the presidential campaigns and other committees supporting presidential candidates spend their money," CLC senior director of campaign finance Erin Chlopak said in a statement. "When campaigns and committees obscure that information from the public, not only do they make it difficult to determine if the law has been violated, but they deny voters the ability to make an informed choice when casting a ballot."
"The steps taken by the Trump campaign, its affiliated committees, and Red Curve Solutions concealed information about how campaign funds were used to pay former President Trump's legal expenditures, including the amounts and ultimate recipients of these expenditures—and the FEC must investigate immediately," Chlopak added.
Trump—who is the presumptive 2024 GOP presidential nominee—faces 91 federal and state felony charges related to his role in the January 6 insurrection and his organization's business practices. He is currently on trial in New York for allegedly falsifying business records related to hush money payments to cover up sex scandals during the 2016 election cycle. The twice-impeached former president has been open about his use of campaign donations to pay his legal costs.
The new CLC filing comes a day after the watchdog filed separate FEC complaints urging investigations into a pair of Trump-affiliated "scam PACs," which "pretend to fundraise for major candidates or issues while secretly diverting almost all of their donors' money back into fundraising or the fraudsters' own pockets."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'One Step Closer': Arizona House Votes to Repeal 1864 Abortion Ban
"With a total ban still set to take effect June 8, the Arizona Abortion Access Act is needed now more than ever," one state campaigner said of a November ballot measure.
Apr 24, 2024
Three Republicans in the Arizona House of Representatives on Wednesday joined with Democrats to advance legislation that would repeal an 1864 ban on abortion—a development rights advocates welcomed while stressing that the fight is far from over.
The 32-28 vote on House Bill 2677—with GOP Reps. Tim Dunn (25), Matt Gress (4), and Justin Wilmeth (2) voting in favor—was the third attempt in as many weeks to pass repeal legislation since the Arizona Supreme Court upheld the ban.
"The state Senate could vote on the repeal as early as next Wednesday, after the bill comes on the floor for a 'third reading,' as is required under chamber rules," according toNBC News. Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs on Wednesday toldThe Washington Post that "I am hopeful the Senate does the right thing and sends it to my desk so I can sign it."
Applauding the House passage of H.B. 2677, Planned Parenthood Advocates of Arizona president and CEO Angela Florez said that "today, Arizona is one step closer to repealing the state's Civil War-era total abortion ban. While the repeal still must pass the Senate, this is a major win for reproductive freedom."
"We must celebrate today's vote in support of abortion rights and harness our enthusiasm to spread the word and urge lawmakers in the Senate to support this necessary repeal bill," she continued. "Despite this step forward, Arizonans cannot stop fighting."
Florez noted that "even with the repeal of the Civil War-era ban, the state will still have a ban on abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy that denies people access to critical care. And lawmakers continue to attack Arizonans' ability to access reproductive healthcare. Our right to control our bodies and lives is hanging on by a thread."
"Thankfully, voters will have the opportunity to take back control if the Arizona Abortion Access Act is on the ballot this November," she added. "Abortion bans are out-of-step with the will of Arizonans and will force pregnant people to leave their communities for essential healthcare. Planned Parenthood Advocates of Arizona will continue fighting to ensure everyone has the right to make decisions about their health and futures."
The Arizona Abortion Access Act is a proposed state constitutional amendment that would prevent many limits on abortions before fetal viability and safeguard access to care after viability to protect the life or physical or mental health of the patient.
The coalition supporting the amendment, Arizona for Abortion Access, highlighted on social media that the House-approved bill "did not include the emergency clause required to stop the 1864 ban from taking effect on June 8," meaning H.B. 2677 wouldn't apply until 90 days after the end of the legislative session.
Coalition campaign manager Cheryl Bruce said that "with a total ban still set to take effect June 8, the Arizona Abortion Access Act is needed now more than ever. We remain committed to taking these decisions out of the hands of extremist politicians."
Arizona is one of multiple states where rights advocates are promoting abortion rights ballot measures this cycle. Reproductive freedom is also dominating political races at all levels, including the presidential contest. Democratic President Joe Biden is set to face former Republican President Donald Trump in November.
"Donald Trump is responsible for Arizona's abortion ban. Women in the state are still living under a ban with no exceptions for rape or incest and have been stripped of the freedom to make their own healthcare decisions," said Julie Chávez Rodriguez, Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris' reelection campaign manager.
While the presumptive GOP nominee has tried to distance himself from the Arizona Supreme Court's reinstatement of a 160-year-old abortion ban, he has also campaigned on his three appointees to the U.S. Supreme Court who helped reverse Roe v. Wade.
"Trump brags that he is 'proudly' the person responsible for these bans and if he retakes power, the chaos and cruelty he has created will only get worse in all 50 states," Chávez Rodriguez said. "President Biden and Vice President Harris are the only candidates who will stop him."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular