EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- How the US Turned Three Pacifists into Violent Terrorists
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Revealed: How US State Department 'Twists Arms' on Monsanto's Behalf
Popular content
Today's Top News
No Time Left to Adapt to Melting Glaciers
UXBRIDGE, Canada - The water supplied by the glaciers of the Cordillera Blanca, vital to a huge region of northwest Peru, is decreasing 20 years sooner than expected, according to a new study.
Melt water from the glaciers of the Cordillera Blanca forms lagoons that in turn feed rivers and streams. (Credit:Courtesy of Michel Baraer) Water flows from the region's melting glaciers have already peaked and are in decline, Michel Baraer, a glaciologist at Canada's McGill University, told Tierramérica. This is happening 20 to 30 years earlier than forecasted.
"Our study reveals that the glaciers feeding the Río Santa watershed are now too small to maintain past water flows. There will be less water, as much as 30 percent less during the dry season," said Baraer, lead author of the study "Glacier Recession and Water Resources in Peru’s Cordillera Blanca", published Dec. 22 in the Journal of Glaciology.
When glaciers begin to shrink in size, they generate "a transitory increase in runoff as they lose mass," the study notes.
However, Baraer explained, the water flowing from a glacier eventually hits a plateau and from this point onwards there is a decrease in the discharge of melt water. "The decline is permanent. There is no going back."
Part of the South American Andes Mountain chain, the Cordillera Blanca is a series of snow-covered peaks running north to south, parallel to the Cordillera Negra, located further west. Between the two ranges lies the Callejón de Huaylas, through which the Río Santa runs, eventually emptying into the Pacific Ocean.
The tropical glaciers of the Andes Mountains are in rapid decline, losing 30 to 50 percent of their ice in the last 30 years, according to the French Institute for Research and Development (IRD).
Most of the decline has been since 1976, IRD reported, due to rising temperatures in the region as a result of climate change. In Bolivia, the Chacaltaya glacier disappeared in 2009.
Even in the colder regions of the Andes glaciers are in full retreat. Chile's Centre for Scientific Studies reported this month that the Jorge Montt Glacier in the vast Patagonian Ice Fields receded one entire km in just one year. Historically glacial retreat is extremely slow: one or two km per 100 years.
Melting glaciers around the world present some of the strongest evidence that global climate change is underway, said Lonnie Thompson of Ohio State University, the world's foremost glaciologist.
Thompson warns that without sharp reductions in the use of fossil fuels, the impacts of climate change could come faster and beyond what humanity can adapt to.
Warmer temperatures not only melt ice but also have major effects on snowfall.
As cool seasons become warmer and snow turns to rain, the amount and duration of snow packs decrease and the permanent snow line moves upslope, according to the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI), an intergovernmental science organisation based in São José dos Campos, Brazil.
These changes have significant effects on the seasonality of stream flows, increasing winter flow rates while the availability of water during the summer declines when water in streams and rivers comes mainly from snow and ice melt.
In many High Andean tropical and subtropical valleys, spring and summer snow and glacier melt are critical for crops, livestock and human consumption. Several major Andean cities rely heavily on glacier and snow melt for their water supply, such as La Paz and Lima, with demand increasingly outstripping the supply, according to a 2010 IAI communiqué.
The Cordillera Blanca has the most glaciers of any tropical mountain range in the world. In the 1930s glaciers covered up to 850 sq km of the region and now they cover less than 600 sq km, reports Baraer and the eight other study authors from McGill University, Ohio State University, the University of California, the IRD and the glaciology unit of the Peruvian National Water Authority.
Most of the melt water from these glaciers drains into the Río Santa watershed. The researchers compared detailed water flow measurements from the 1950s to water flows in recent years, and determined that of the nine sub-watersheds of the Río Santa, seven have passed their peak water flow and are in decline, and almost all of the decline is during the dry summer months.
Changes in precipitation and the effects of La Niña and El Niño were also assessed and were not responsible for the declines, Baraer said.
Until now it was widely believed that such declines would take place 20 to 30 years from now, allowing time to adapt to a future with less water. "Those years don't exist," said Baraer.
The region is extremely dry, and the Callejón de Huaylas and especially the agriculturally important province of Carhuaz are completely dependent on water from the Río Santa to irrigate the extensive fruit and vegetable fields, he said.
The Río Santa is also the main source of drinking water for cities in the area, as is the case of many rivers in the Andean region. For instance, Lima, the world's second largest desert city after Cairo, depends on water from the Río Rímac watershed, also in the Andes.
"The northern Andes (in Peru) are close to being a desert. It is the water from the glaciers that has allowed people to survive here," Baraer said.
Last summer, researchers took measurements of the Río Santa's water volume from the estuary where it reaches the Pacific all the way up to its sources in the Andes. They found that less than 20 percent of the water reaches the ocean now. "Eighty percent of the water from the Santa is already being used," he said.
Projections into the future reveal that in the coming decades some Río Santa sub-watersheds will have 30 percent less water - a serious challenge to the entire region when 80 percent of current volumes are already being used, Baraer stressed.
"This water decline is guaranteed. The only question is how much and how quickly," he said. There is already so much carbon in the atmosphere from the burning of fossil fuels that it is "already too late for most of the glaciers in the Andes," he concluded.
*The writer is an IPS correspondent. This story was originally published by Latin American newspapers that are part of the Tierramérica network. Tierramérica is a specialised news service produced by IPS with the backing of the United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Environment Programme and the World Bank.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

10 Comments so far
Show AllGlaciers in the Andes, Rockies, and Himalayas supply water to hundreds of millions over the dry months. Whether in 5 years or 50, these people will need to move somewhere else. The article implies that, given a few more decades, some adaptation could be devised for declining glaciers. Not bloody likely.
In the Himalayas, there are artificial glacier experiments - ameliorating meltwater shortages which are already emptying mountain villages. But this looks like a short-term palliative.
Water security for hundreds of millions is already threatened by the current level of warming. The only way to preserve ecosystems and settlements dependent on meltwater is to turn down the thermostat by reducing greenhouse gases. But US and European climate negotiators just persuaded the world to delay emission reductions past the point where most glaciers, with the people and ecosystems dependent on them, are doomed.
Rubbish! India is about to join the SCO and become an ally of China!! See the following llink and google for many other references, http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-07-25/india/29811908_1_sco-india-china-observer-status
"decreasing 20 years sooner than expected[...]20 to 30 years from now, allowing time to adapt to a future with less water."
i don't think that's the way evolution works.
No, the article is talking about humans adapting by moving out of one area to one that has more water. I'm thinking he's optimistic about humans moving without resorting to taking pointy sticks with them to force the others to give them water.
Evolution will happen when the surviving lifeforms continue to breed.
The article may be ignoring the plight of species other than humans, but hummingbird's point is well taken. Evolution cannot cope with drastic rapid change, as the 5 great extinctions in Earth's past make clear. We're now causing another.
And, while those dependent on water from melting glaciers, suffer the consequences of global warming, people in arid regions of the USA such as Arizona, Nevada and Southern California, lounge around their swimming pools.
When the microbes have had enough, they'll just give up on their hosts and try something else. They sure as hell don't need us. "Top" of the food chain? What a joke! We ain't no different from algae when you get "down" to it.
"Top of the food chain" is a horrible speciescentic remark. Since the food chain is circular, it is also relative; there is no top.
What's happening is that in an effort to maintain AND expand the human population, so many efforts at geo forming are being considered and even going into effect if the commenter on playing with glaciers is correct. Very few if any will work. If people need water, moving to the coast and building desalination plants would most likely work for a time until the residue from the distillation process begins to come problematic due to build up and the filling of the sinks where humans hide their waste and poisons. That will turn into a race as to how fast will the wastes and poisons win the contest.
Right now we talk of 'saving the water' but that is only a part. If ,as some say, the reversal of human pollution is the agenda to put into play, I would really like to know how a bunch of miscreant psychopaths will give up their 'god given right' to pollute and destroy the whole of gaia. They don't care and they will hire other psychopaths to keep their agendas moving forward and anyone getting in their way, do so at their own risk.
RE: the occupy movement/revolution. We aren't really in any way different and will be treated the same way. Cast aside, booted, chemically sprayed and shot just so they maintain their exploitation of the earth's natural resources. They have every intention of maintaining their status quo. Of course everyone can open all the doors to their homes and businesses and open those doors to all the air conditioners, refrigeration units and try to chill earth that way. But that won't work and I doubt a subtle change from the current interglacial to the next glacial period would be any different from previous ones, wild, unpredictable, unstoppable.