Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Egyptian Tanks Enter Tahrir Square
CAIRO - The Egyptian army deployed troops in Cairo's Tahrir Square on Monday and fired shots in the air to disperse remaining pro-democracy protesters.
Protesters challenge a military vehicle during an operation to clear protesters from camping out in Tahrir Square in Cairo, Egypt, Monday Aug. 1, 2011. Egyptian troops clashed Monday with a small group of protesters camping out in Cairo's Tahrir Square to press demands for faster change and justice for demonstrators killed in the uprising that toppled President Hosni Mubarak. The operation brought an end to nearly a month of renewed daily protests in the central square that was the birthplace of the 18-day uprising that overthrew Mubarak in February. (AP Photo) A few hundred demonstrators were staying put, state television reported, showing army vehicles in the square and people taking down tents and canopies.
Local authorities say they asked demonstrators to allow traffic to move through the square, after local shopkeepers clashed with protesters for interfering with their businesses.
Demonstrators reportedly refused, so the military and riot police moved in.
The protesters responded by throwing stones and rocks at the security forces and several protesters were injured in the clashes, officials said. Activists said several protesters had been arrested.
Members of the April 6th protest movement say the military did not just storm the square, but attacked the mosque where protesters had sought shelter.
Al Jazeera's Sherine Tadros, reporting from Tahrir, said: "There was a split when it came to protesters who wanted to stay and those who wanted to move out.
"There were a good 200 to 300 people who were still camped out earlier. Now it's filled with tanks and army soldiers.
"They've essentially driven out all the people. There do seem to be some civilians moving around but the army is continuing to move out anyone trying to get back into the square."
"People have been telling us, 'They can do what they want but we will just come back once they leave'."
Ramadan suspension
Egyptian protesters had said they would suspend their sit-in at the square during the Muslim fasting month of Ramadan, which began on Monday, but would return to the square to press for reforms after the month was over.
Activists have been occupying Tahrir Square, the epicentre of protests that toppled President Hosni Mubarak, since July 8 to denounce the military rulers' handling of the transition.
The crackdown comes two days before Mubarak goes on trial for his role in killing protesters during the uprising centred on Tahrir Square that drove him from power on February 11.
Twenty-six political parties and protest movements said on Saturday in a joint statement that their three-week sit-in had succeeded in achieving some of their demands, "pushing the Egyptian revolution a step forward".
"But based on our belief that sit-ins are a means, and not a goal, the political parties and youth movements have decided to temporarily suspend their sit-in during the holy month of Ramadan," they said.
The parties stressed that they "will return once again after Eid [feast marking the end of Ramadan] to protest peacefully in Tahrir Square so that the rest of the demands are met".

5 Comments so far
Show AllOn July 31 a coalition of twenty-six official “opposition” parties signed a joint statement announcing that they would suspend the sit-in on Tahrir Square in Cairo. They said that they would not occupy the square during the month-long Ramadan religious holiday. The statement was issued only two days after July 29 protests largely dominated by Islamist groups. Maybe that's why the secular tanks.
Undeniably the people of the world remain united throughout the revolution. But the target regime and its peer regimes are actually at odds with each other and simultaneously at odds with the people.
The implication is that when revolution occurs, in Egypt for example, revolution may occur in other places too. Because the world's people are united, while the regimes are necessarily disunited, at odds with each other, fragmented, fighting, greedy, unfulfilled, weak, vulnerable.
Given such a view, it is hard for USans, for example, to feel any solidarity toward their rulers. Instead it is quite valuable for USans to view their rulers as unhelpful, unproductive, obstructive, devious, exploitive and generally useless during such an event as this revolution in Egypt.
We see that our rulers have engaged in mutually exploitive relationships with the Egyptian regime and others for their own selfish ends, always looking to exploit a given situation, and so any outcomes are by definition highly volatile. We see our rulers thus contributing to instabilities, insecurities, danger, and destruction on the geopolitical stage. So we act accordingly. On course for our own revolution.
See "Pseudo-left parties end Cairo sit-in after Islamist protest" http://www.wsws.org/articles/2011/aug2011/egyp-a01.shtml
The Egyptians made a terrible mistake by allowing the military junta to retain power. Democracy and military rule are mutually exclusive. The military rulers and their Saudi and Washington backers have no intention of allowing democracy to take hold in Egypt. There will be no revolution unless the Egyptian people start organizing and fighting a lot harder than they have been. It's starting to look like the revolution that wasn't.