Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Growing Fire Advances on Nuclear Weapons Lab
Wildfire 'could soon double or triple in size'; Greatest concern are the 20,000 55-gallon sealed drums of plutonium-tainted waste
LOS ALAMOS, New Mexico -- UPDATE 8:38 PM EDT -- New Mexico fire managers scrambled on Tuesday to reinforce ground crews battling for a third day against a fierce blaze roaring out of control at the edge of one of the nation's top nuclear weapons production centers.
Flames from the Las Conchas fire near the Los Alamos National Laboratory, a nuclear weapons facility with over 20,000 barrels of plutonium-contaminated waste, June 28, 2011. REUTERS/Craig Fritz The fire's leading edge burned to within a few miles of a dump site where some 20,000 barrels of plutonium-contaminated waste like clothing and equipment is stored on the grounds of the Los Alamos National Laboratory, fire officials said.
Officials for the government-run lab said the stored waste is considered low-level radioactive material and remains a safe distance from the fire in an area cleared of trees and other vegetation.
Carl Beard, director of operations for the lab, said there has been no release of radioactive or hazardous materials into the environment and there was no immediate threat to public safety, "even in these extreme conditions."
Authorities have for now suspended routine removal of the waste drums for shipment to a permanent underground disposal site in southern New Mexico, said Los Alamos County Fire Chief Douglas Tucker.
"Because of the fire, they are not moving any of that. It is safer where it is," he said.
The fire, believed to have been ignited Sunday by a fallen power line, has consumed nearly 61,000 acres of thick pine woodlands in the Santa Fe National Forest, which surrounds the lab complex and adjacent town of Los Alamos on three sides.
Tucker said he feared the so-called Las Conchas Fire, whipped by high, rapidly shifting winds, could soon double or triple in size. The blaze remained listed as at zero percent containment and burning largely unchecked in its third day.
"I seriously believe it could go to 100,000 acres," Tucker told reporters at a news briefing on Tuesday. "We have fire all around the lab. It's a road away."
A small offshoot of the blaze jumped State Highway 4 onto the lab grounds on Monday, burning about an acre of property before it was extinguished about two hours later.
More than 300 firefighters, backed up by several water-dropping helicopters, battled the blaze on Tuesday, as fire managers scurried to bring in additional ground crews.
MORE FIREFIGHTERS
"We've been putting in orders to get as many firefighters here as we can," fire information officer Vanessa Delgado said. "We're trying to get them in as fast as we can."
Lab officials also called in teams late Monday to monitor air quality, with high-volume air samplers ready to deploy. Hundreds of National Guard troops have been dispatched to back up law enforcement in the area.
Both the town of Los Alamos, home to about 10,000 residents, and the laboratory, with a work force of about 12,000 people, were evacuated on Monday, and the lab will remain closed at least through Wednesday, officials said.
Situated on a hilltop 35 miles northwest of Santa Fe, the lab property covers 36 square miles and includes about 2,000 buildings, none of which has yet burned.
Established during World War Two as part of the top-secret Manhattan Project to build the first atomic bomb, it remains one of the leading nuclear arms manufacturing facilities in the United States.
John Witham, a spokesman for the anti-nuclear watchdog group Nuclear Watch New Mexico, said it is the only place in the country that produces plutonium pits that are carried in the core of nuclear bombs.
Three metric tons of highly radioactive weapons-grade plutonium is stored in concrete and steel vaults in the basement floor of a building near the center of the complex, with an air-containment system surrounding it.
Lab officials said the storage structures were fire safe.
Nuclear Watch New Mexico said on its website its greatest concern was for the 20,000 55-gallon sealed drums of plutonium-tainted waste stored at one corner of the complex, some stacked in the open on asphalt, some in tents, some buried underground.
Fire officials say if the blaze did manage to reach the area, they would use fire-retardant foam to douse the flames.
The watchdog group said it also was concerned about trace amounts of uranium that might remain scattered over an area in the path of the fire from decades of experimental explosions conducted on the site.
Lab officials say the facility overall is well-protected and note it survived a May 2000 wildfire that claimed some buildings and did more than $1 billion in damage.
The Las Conchas Fire has also destroyed about 30 structures southwest of the town of Los Alamos.
One major focus for firefighters has been to keep flames out of two heavily forested canyons in the area, at least one of which runs directly into town.
Writing by Steve Gorman; Editing by Jerry Norton

51 Comments so far
Show AllIt seems I read years ago the the production of 1 pound steel pollutes 8 pounds of water. Pollution is one of the reasons I'm not enthusiastic about photovoltaics. I like the concentrated solar power and the Stirling dish engine systems much better. http://www.trec-uk.org.uk/images/stirling_dish_engine_reduced.jpg If anybody has any idea, why are Stirling engines so expensive and so difficult to find.
"tromb (sp?) wall" Trombe
I really liked your comment. Energy consumption in the US could probably have been lessened easily by 10% if buildings had been constructed with solar gain in mind. Just simply having the longer axis running east to west with the south facing side using lots of glass and eaves of the right width to shade such windows during the summer would have saved tremendous amounts of energy over time.
I built a passive solar heater with about 3 sq. meters of collector area. It will keep the temperature in a 300 sq. foot area at about 70 degrees when it is below 40 outside for about 5 hours on a sunny day. I place a fan on the floor in front of the intake to extract more heat though so it is actually active but will operate passively. I estimate I get about 15 kW-h of heat on sunny days. It's not that much but it helps. I get at least 10 good days per month and I use it for five months per year. 750 kW-h per year at $0.10 per kW-h is a savings of $75 a year. I got the glass for free. I used 5V roofing metal leftovers for the plate and most of the wood I scrounged. I have about $50 in material in it plus about $150 worth of my labor for a $200 total. This will be the third year of use so it should pay for itself this winter.
"12-volt alternators that can produce electricity if hooked up to any number of devices designed to rotate by wind. For example, take a 55-gal. old oil barrel, slice it in half (vertically) and mount the two halves on a bearing-based post (like an old bicycle wheel) and you can generate electricity."
I've been thinking about this for a while now. Batteries, charge controllers, and converting to 12V DC lighting will take me some time, thought, and cash. I figure I can do without an inverter and use DC wherever possible. Lighting will be fairly simple and easy. Considering I'm poor, simplicity and low cost are unfortunately two of the most important factors to me.
"(Back during WWII, the Brits had small generators attached to bicycles.)"
And this too.
Plus I'd like a Stirling engine to attached to my wood stove.
One of these days, I'll get around to building a solar hot water heater. To keep things simple I'd only use it during the seven months that it doesn't freeze here. I'd cut the flow to it during the winter and drain it. Another simple heater is a well insulated box with a glass top with the inside painted black filled with stones or concrete. I'll pull air into the house from the stop of the box while air flows out of the house into the bottom the box. I'm broke so the costs of the insulation and ductwork are prohibitive right now, as is the cost of a water tank for a solar heater. Those two projects won't be done before I build a solar dehydrator for vegetables and herbs and a solar oven for cooking. Hopefully I'll get those done this summer.
"Today, can you name three?"
Gofman, Sakharov, Oppenheimer, and Einstein?