EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- One American Who Isn't For Sale
- Transcript: Today's Live Q&A With NSA Leaker, Edward Snowden
- Remembering Satyajit Ray’s Hirok Rajar Deshe: On Edward Snowden, Resistance and Inverted Totalitarianism
- Obama Cans Regulator Who Crossed Wall Street
- Pentagon Bracing for Public Dissent Over Climate and Energy Shocks
Popular content
Today's Top News
US Steps Up Face-to-Face Peace Talks With Taliban
The United States has stepped up face-to-face peace talks with the Taliban, holding at least three meetings in Qatar and Germany in recent days with figures believed to be close to Mullah Omar, the group's leader.
Discussions were initiated before the killing of Osama bin Laden on May 2 but American and British diplomats believe that the death of the al-Qaeda leader could give added impetus to the talks and the drawdown of Nato troops, due to begin in July.
Taliban fighters pose with weapons at an undisclosed location in southern Afghanistan, May 5, 2011.
A Western official in Kabul confirmed the United States was in direct contact with the Taliban following a sea change in American policy this year. (REUTERS/Stringer)
President Barack Obama, whose hand has been strengthened by the successful operation to bring bin Laden to justice, is believed to be contemplating a withdrawal of several thousand American troops, some 100,000 of whom are in Afghanistan.
David Cameron has made clear he is prepared to follow suit with a withdrawal of a proportionately similar number of British troops. There are currently about 10,000 British personnel in Afghanistan, most of them concentrated in central and southern Helmand.
Previous talks broke down when a supposed Taliban leader flown into Kabul in a Nato plane was revealed to be a shopkeeper trying to make some money. Other attempts at dialogue have foundered because would-be emissaries could not be confirmed as genuine.
But American officials told the "Washington Post" that although these new talks were preliminary they were with Taliban officials with a direct line to Mullah Omar, the one-eyed leader of the Taliban's Quetta Shura rilling council.
A Western official in Kabul confirmed the United States was in direct contact with the Taliban following a sea change in American policy this year.
Marc Grossman, the replacement for special envoy Richard Holbrooke, has been nicknamed "Mr Reconciliation" and told to focus efforts on trying to facilitate a political deal which would ease a US exit.
"Those are no longer preconditions, they are being seen as negotiated outcomes," said the Western official. At the same time, the Taliban has weakened its demand that no talks can take place before foreign troops leave.
Speculation about talks has angered opponents of President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan, who say that they undermine Afghan democracy. Any peace deal with the Taliban is likely to involve some element of the group sharing power in Kabul. The Taliban has demanded the release of 20 prisoners from Guantánamo Bay.
American officials said that members of the brutal Haqqani network, based in North Waziristan across the border with Pakistan, have not taken part in the discussions.
In February, Hillary Clinton, the US Secretary of State, said the US would no longer insist on preconditions such as the need for the Taliban to renounce al-Qaeda and accept the Afghan constitution. Such declarations could be made after a deal had been reached.
The pursuit of "reconciliation" in Afghanistan will be high on the agenda in talks between Mr Obama and Mr Cameron in London next week.
Sir Nigel Sheinwald, the British ambassador to the US, said: "We are very keen to see the political track, the reconciliation track, given extra vigour in the months ahead along the lines of a speech given by Hillary Clinton in February when she talked about a diplomatic surge to follow the military surge."
The Foreign Office has long argued the case that a full handover of security to the Afghans by the target date of the end of 2014 will not be achieved without a settlement with the Taliban. By then, all 140,000 Nato troops currently in Afghanistan are due to have left.
British diplomats believe that the Americans have recently moved closer to London's position and have been encouraged by the efforts of Mr Marc Grossman.
"We believe the US will announce reductions in the months ahead and if that's possible the UK will be able to reduce some of its forces as well," said Sir Nigel.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



13 Comments so far
Show AllMaybe pushing Obama for peace talks with the Taliban is starting to work.
We'll See
How do you know when America is losing a war? America starts negotiating.
As we used to say back in Vietnam:
"We lost the day we started and we win the day we stop."
The same holds true in Iraq and Afghanistan and Pakistan. Viewed from this proper perspective, the sooner America negotiates the "stopping" of its bellicose contribution to American, Iraqi, Afghan and Pakistani misery, the sooner Americans, Iraqis, Afghans, and Pakistanis will all win. In short, everyone wins with Peace and everyone loses in War -- even Americans who usually prefer to start and continue losing by starting and never stopping needless wars of aggression against poor countries who never attacked or threatened to attack America.
As George Orwell said: "The quickest way to end a war is to lose it." So the sooner America "loses" these unwinnable and ruinous wars in order to end them, the better for the World..
the US has been 'negotiating' all along. the only difference is that the United States has now conceded al-qaida affilation is a bargaining chip. And in response; the Taliban have conceded US troop presence is a valid bargaining chip.
The goal of the terrorist was to collapse our economy. We lost that war by spending trillions of dollars on useless retaliation against their retaliation against us. Now the U.S. government is blaming the poor, disabled , elderly, teachers and other peaceful government workers for the deficit and treating America's most vulnerable as the enemy. They cut the safety net that protects Americans without ending the trillion dollar wars that were supposed to be fought to protect Americans. The U.S. just talks about talking but never does it. Somehow the Taliban will be responsible for breaking the talks or how many trillions of dollars will we need to bribe them to make peace?
Great post genie. The problem with the war mentality is that it profits only a few and lays waste to the country that the few have their headquarters in. When American citizens are forced into defense against their own government the collective retribution will not be civil. Our government, sensing the winds of change will take the steps to correct this imbalance knowing full well that eventually they will hit that tipping point. But in this game of social strategizing there are many, many wild cards and in my opinion the people making these damaging decisions are lost in the mine fields of their own deception, their own insane addiction crazed and manic propaganda. I am not sure they have the ability to save themselves and us from this looming tragedy. But we can save them and we can save ourselves. This option is the difference between having a shelter to hide in when the hurricane comes or not.
It is a really great option for all of us to prepare and make the changes necessary to create a human future that is desirable for us all.
US Steps Up Face-to-Face Peace Talks With Taliban
If you ask REAL nice, maybe they will let you surrender.
The US demands eternal US military bases in Afghanistan. The Taliban demands that all US/NATO troops leave the country immediately. Until the West agrees to leave, there is nothing to negotiate about. The US probably is just talking to another shopkeeper.
You're most probably correct.
If the taliban breaks it off with al-qaida and ends violence; the US has not lost the war. The mission was al-qaida and its allies. The taliban was an al-qaida ally.
So was the United States. And to judge from its recent behavior in Libya, the United States still is.
Don't be fooled. They've been using 1984 as a how-to manual. It is on to somewhere else, probably Iran-i-stan. Besides, the head of the IEA just admitted to Peak Oil.
Peace
The religio/petroleo-maniacs, aka the American government, are afraid of losing support for an eternal war, in the ignorant tradition of Nam, Iraq, or wherever....
The mindless creeps in the state department do not want peace, unless if affects their political ambitions and chess-board strategies...
Its all about oil, ie., the military machine.
This ''mother of all predators'' in the vernacular of the tyrant Saddam, ranges over the globe to steal/appropriate any commodity. It does this in the clever masquerade of ''democracy building.''
Countless dupes robotically cheerlead the military state, then march off to fight for a capitalism-gone-haywire, which routinely assaults human dignity.........