Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
US Could Continue Afghan Detention
US detention commmander says his military may control part of Bagram complex after prison is handed over to Afghans.
The US military has drawn up plans to continue holding Afghan prisoners it deems a threat in a "unilateral" prison complex on Bagram airbase even after it hands control of the main detention facility to the Afghan government next year.
An empty room is prepared for a prison at a newly built US run Parwan Detention Facility in Bagram north of Kabul, Afghanistan on Friday, Aug 27, 2010. (AP Photo/Musadeq Sadeq) US military authorities are expecting to retain control part of the existing Bagram prison to hold "security threats," as well as prisoners who were arrested outside the country and flown into Afghanistan on rendition flights, according to the admiral in charge of overseeing US detention operations in the country.
Vice-Admiral Robert Harward, the head of Joint Task Force 435, which runs US detentions in Afghanistan, was quoted on Wednesday by the Wall Street Journal admitting that the handover of Bagram was not expected to include all the prisoners currently being held there.
"I anticipate having a subset of unilateral US detention operations, including Pakistanis we can't repatriate and enduring security threats," the admiral said.
The prisoners would be held in one of Bagram's blocks which would remain under the control of the US military. The proposal has been slammed by legal campaigners, who say that it would effectively see dozens of prisoners held beyond the rule of law with no clear means of challenging their detention.
"This proposal for a US 'prison within a prison' at Bagram reveals that the operative principle at the heart of Obama's overseas detention policy is to maintain a clear continuity with the worst practises of the Bush-era," said Clara Gutteridge, deputy director of the secret prisons and renditions team at the legal charity Reprieve.
The plan is also likely to be met with opposition in Afghanistan, where there is a widespread resentment at the US military detention of Afghan citizens. In June's government-run peace jirga, delegates demanded that prisoners being held by the US military were either charged with a crime or released.
The handover plan is part of an initiative to bolster the government of Hamid Karzai, the Afghan president, amid criticism that not enough has been done by Afghan authorities to answer concerns that many of the US military's prisoners are being wrongly held.
Detention overhaul
The past year has seen a substantial overhaul of US detention operations in Afghanistan, with improved mechanisms for prisoners to challenge their captivity, and full trials in Afghan courts. More than 200 detainees have been released from prisons this year, and it was widely assumed that many more would follow after the handover.
But with many of the prisoners held on the basis of a classified evidence, which the US refuses to submit to Afghan courts, concerns have been raised that for some, no regular legal proceedings will take place.
Harward has said that under proposals for a continuation of American detentions, these prisoners are to either be handed to Afghan authorities, unilaterally released by the Americans, or, if they are deemed a "continuing security threat," kept in the American-controlled wing of the prison. US officials say they expect to maintain control of up to 100 prisoners after the handover.
Harward said earlier this year that any continued US control of prisoners in Afghanistan would only occur if the government of Afghanistan "desired" it, and suggested that only foreign prisoners, who could not be handed over to the Afghans, would remain under US control.
The prospect of continued long-term American detention in Afghanistan has raised the possibility of a new round of renditions into the country involving prisoners taken by the US military on secret operations against Al Qaeda-linked groups in places like Yemen and Somalia.
Gutteridge told Al Jazeera that Obama has never ruled out using rendition to move prisoners between countries, adding that there there was confusion over the details of his administration's detention policy, which the president pledged to make public soon after taking office.
"Despite commitments to transparency over a year ago, Obama's detention policy still remains almost entirely secret," she said. "Obama must publish the results of his detention review that he promised last summer, and come clean on his increasingly worrying detention policy."
- Posted in

13 Comments so far
Show AllSo, we bring democracy to Afghanistan, not by example but by fiat? Cannot a majority of ordinary Americans see the farcical nature of this war?
Jill, i am not certain on this at all, so anyone who can, please correct me.....
But i recall that part of Homeland Security had something to do with taking those who are deemed threatening, to a location that may not exist as part of any particular government.
I know that i heard or read about this happening in a specific room of the L.A. airport. People who were working for some human rights group were detained and they were told they didn't have 'rights' in that room. I am quite serious. I predict that these types of detention centers may be deemed outside the laws of any one known government. Actually, doesn't it appear that those are and have been the facts on the ground?
Eighty abandoned houses burned down the other night here in Detroit during a very real wind storm. Nevertheless, the national economy isn't our biggest problem, DISTRACTION is, i.e., one social need always made to seem competing with another. Afghanistan is what is transforming us into moral and intellectual midgets. We need some self-respect. Becoming pro-active on this issue is the only possible solution.
Any reasonable principle of triage dictates that the president should withdraw our troops from Afghanistan right away. That act alone could conceivably restore his moral authority. Pretending to oppose war when you don't is unsatisfactory.
Until the president gets us out of Afghanistan, where we clearly are irrelevant, our other current affairs will remain meaningless since we will continue not to have any moral leadership. The war in Afghanistan is also irrelevant to "the war on terror" unless we're planning to pour more gas on it.
Bottle, i say this respectfully. We are anything but "irrelevant" there.
We are torturing, terrorizing and destroying human beings. This is highly 'relevant', i would say.
And folks in the Obama Administration wonder why progressives lack enthusiasm in supporting them. What a continual betrayal of those of us who backed him. (I use the past tense pointedly, not casually.)
...And at the same time the CIA is 'hands-on' in running the next Al Quaeda in Afghanistan.
*Confirmed* reports acknowledge that the US/CIA is openly operating a para-military 'counter-insurgency' group in Afghanistan. Armed, trained and equipped by the tax money paid by good ol' Joe Sixpack of Dogpatch, USA.
Blowback on this one in three, two...
Non Serviam - I will not serve.
IN THE WAY
How many hearts and Souls on this planet are “in the way” of aims , goals and wants that must be dealt with by any and all means short of humanity?
Were not the Abu Ghraib bodies, minds and souls tortured and disappeared with the whole of the government in on the scoop and none would help or heal the , oh so many, that were “in the way”?
What has been the outcome of the change of the devil incarnates that give any observer a view that anything had changed for the “in the way” but a few names? Where, in any of this, is sanity?
T’ is a different day and yet there is no justice for the many in lands that are “in the way” of the few that would steal any and all that would feed the never, ever full greed tray.
Tony 10/22/2010
I hope like hell that I am there the day that Bush and Obama discover the meaning of the word KARMA! What goes around, comes back around like a big honkin BOOM-A-RANG with their names on it! Or, at least a couple of cells with their names on them, at the Hague!
"Father," he asked, "are the rich people stronger than anyone else on earth?" 'Yes, Illusha," I said. "There are no people on Earth stronger than the rich." "Father he said, "I will get rich, I will become an officer and conquer everybody, the Tsar will reward me, I will come back here then no one will dare..." Then he was silent and his lips still kept trembling. "Father, he said, "what a horrid town this is."
–(Dostoyevsky, "The Brothers Karamazov.")
"It is not to be thought that the life of darkness is sunk in misery and lost as if in sorrowing. There is no sorrowing. For sorrow is a thing that is swallowed up in death, and death and dying are the very life of the darkness." –(Jacob Boehme)
"Your ideas are terrifying and your hearts are faint. You acts of pity and cruelty are absurd, committed with no calm, as if they were irresistible. Finally, you fear blood, more and more. Blood all the time." –(Paul Valéry)
"Ain't no life nowhere!" –(Jimi Hendrix, "Manic Depression.")
USA: besotted in the excrement of its own evil. A mad, demonic monolith, soulless, heartless, screaming ruthless obscenities as it rages mindlessly and violently wreaking death, darkness and despair globally. Remember, all 5,113 thermonuclear cards are on the table. Is you listening Iran?
"Indefinite detention"... often without charges... often no access to lawyers... A violation of human rights under UN statutes... a war crime... crime against humanity?...
So embarrassing that our country is engaging is such illegal activity! So embarrassing! So discouraging... considering the supposed "enlightened" state of world politics!