EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- The Bill of Rights Exists: An Open Letter to Dianne Feinstein
- Major Loss to Organic Farmers as Court Rules in Favor of Monsanto
- NSA Whistleblower Revealed: Q&A with Edward Snowden
- One American Who Isn't For Sale
- 'Reprehensible, Reckless, Illegal': Washington Officials Slam Heroic NSA Surveillance Leaker
Popular content
Today's Top News
Lawsuit Seeks Full Disclosure of Dispersant Impacts on Gulf’s Endangered Wildlife
SAN FRANCISCO - The Center for Biological Diversity today filed an official notice of its intent to sue the Environmental Protection Agency for authorizing the use of toxic dispersants without ensuring that these chemicals would not harm endangered species and their habitats. The letter requests that the agency, along with the U.S. Coast Guard, immediately study the effects of dispersants on species such as sea turtles, sperm whales, piping plovers, and corals and incorporate this knowledge into oil-spill response efforts.
An Air Force plane drops an oil-dispersing chemical into the Gulf of Mexico as part of the Deepwater Horizon Response effort. In theory, chemical dispersants allow the oil to be eaten by microorganisms and become diluted faster than it would otherwise. However, the effects of using large quantities of highly toxic dispersants and injecting them into very deep water, as BP has done in the Gulf of Mexico, have never been studied. (Photo: Technical Sergeant Adrian Cadiz) "The
Gulf of Mexico has become Frankenstein's laboratory for BP's enormous,
uncontrolled experiment in flooding the ocean with toxic chemicals,"
said Andrea Treece, an attorney with the Center for Biological
Diversity. "The fact that no one in the federal government ever required
that these chemicals be proven safe for this sort of use before they
were set loose on the environment is inexcusable."
Dispersants are chemicals used to break oil spills into tiny droplets. In theory, this allows the oil to be eaten by microorganisms and become diluted faster than it would otherwise. However, the effects of using large quantities of dispersants and injecting them into very deep water, as BP has done in the Gulf of Mexico, have never been studied. Researchers suspect that underwater oil plumes, measuring as much as 20 miles long and extending dozens of miles from the leaking rig, are the result of dispersants keeping the oil below the surface.
On May 24, EPA Administrator Jackson expressed concern over the environmental unknowns of dispersants, which include the long-term effects on aquatic life. Nonetheless, the federal government has allowed BP to pump nearly 1 million gallons of dispersants into the Gulf of Mexico.
"Pouring dispersants into vital fish nursery grounds and endangered species habitat simply trades one evil for another. Had the government first examined dispersants before the disaster, we would not be left wondering what sort of havoc BP is wreaking on the ecosystem just so it can make the oil less visible," added Treece. "We cannot and will not allow this to happen again."
Studies have found that oil dispersed by Corexit 9527 damages the insulating properties of seabird feathers more than untreated oil, making the birds more susceptible to hypothermia and death. Studies have also found that dispersed oil is toxic to fish eggs, larvae, and adults, as well as to corals, and can harm sea turtles' ability to breathe and digest food. Formulations of the dispersants being used by BP, Corexit 9500 and 9527, have been banned in the United Kingdom due to concerns over their impacts on the marine environment.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



14 Comments so far
Show AllOh, cool!!! BP screws up, billions of gallons of raw oil in the Gulf, BP uses toxic dispersants, sue the government. Yeah. Makes perfect AMERICAN sense. Every body else in the world giggles in disbelief.
As I understand the lawsuit gainst the EPA, the purpose is not to recover damages but rather to require they study the effects of the chemicals for future uses. This is not the last oil spill at sea. If you think otherwise, I have a bridge to sell you.
a lawyer suing what a shock
If this post is sarcasm, it is too clever by at least a half. Otherwise it belongs on FOX.
This is quite typical, not surprising at all. The EPA is colluding with industry, utterly fails to protect us and a third party sues after the fact. Meanwhile the damage is already done and the Legal Industry makes lots o money from it. That's how they roll. Nothin personal, just business
Here is the Material Safety Data Sheet
lmrk.org/corexit_9500_uscueg.539287.pdf
Notice anti-freeze (propylene glycol) is one of the ingredients. (1% by water weight)
Organic sulfonic acid salt: Highly acidic, used in detergents. 10%
Petroleum - 10%
Based on your posts, you must be a paid shill for the oil industry.
Put about a cupful on your fingers, rub it in really well, and then bring your hands together and pray that you get over you sick sense of humor. Also, you are shilling for Borden's Int'l by using their proprietary product name. I find this cheap, sleavy and an offense against the other posters who aren't pushing products from companies they work for. I know you work for Bordens' Glue Division by your comments here. Your damaged brain cells give you away. Don't try to deny it.
Corexit 9527:
Contains 30-60% ww, 2-Butoxy Ethanol
nj.gov/health/eoh/rtkweb/documents/fs/0275.pdf
Really Bad Stuff!!!!!
Far, Far worse than Corexit 9500
The chemical companies told the government it was safe, and then the government told us it was safe. Now there are a dozen diseases that Vietnam vets suffer, and many die from because of that "safe" Agent Orange they sprayed on us.
We can't trust corporations who tell us their chemicals are safe, and for sure we can't trust our government to make sure those claims are true. It is better not to spray chemicals at all, because we have no entity we can trust with our health and the Gulf's health either.
The current crime by BP is forcing workers not to wear respirators
Obscene in and of itself
Then accidently aireal spraying shiploads of cleanup workers with corexit
Then stealing the workers clothing when they are admitted to Hospital, so as to prevent chemical testing
Then the BP President says that the workers in three ships all got food poisoning simultaneously.
These workers are desperate because their shrimp season has ben destroyed by the gusher and they are all heavily in pre shrimp season debt.
Citizens have become just so much expendable trash in most of the "minds" of corporate Executives and Politicians.
Had the government (past and present) kept oil companies on a tight regulation leash instead of looking the other way, none of this would be happening. Just as guilty as BP! And lawyers having a field day for many years to come.