EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
Government Workers Tasked With Gulf Oil Industry Oversight Accepted Gifts
WASHINGTON, DC - Staffers in the the Lake Charles, Louisiana district office of the Minerals Management Service accepted sport event tickets, lunches, and other gifts from oil and gas production companies and used government computers to view pornography, finds a report by the Department of the Interior Inspector General released today.
Sunlight illuminates the Deepwater Horizon oil slick near the Mississippi Delta. May 24, 2010. (Photo courtesy NASA)
Some of these same staffers were tasked with inspections of offshore
drilling platforms located in the Gulf of Mexico, states the report on
ethical lapses at the MMS between 2000 and 2008 written by Acting
Inspector General Mary Kendall.
Several of the people mentioned in the Inspector General's report have resigned, been terminated, or referred for prosecution. Those mentioned in the Inspector General's report for questionable behavior who are still with MMS will be placed on administrative leave pending the outcome of a personnel review, said Interior Secretary Ken Salazar.
"The Inspector General report describes reprehensible activities of employees of MMS between 2000 and 2008," said Secretary Salazar. "This deeply disturbing report is further evidence of the cozy relationship between some elements of MMS and the oil and gas industry."
"That is why during the first 10 days of becoming Secretary of the Interior I directed a strong ethics reform agenda to clean house of these ethical lapses at MMS," Salazar said.
"I appreciate and fully support the Inspector General's strong work to root out the bad apples in MMS and we will follow through on her recommendations, including taking any and all appropriate personnel actions including termination, discipline, and referrals of any wrongdoing for criminal prosecution," he said.
"In addition," Salazar said, "I have asked the Inspector General to expand her investigation to determine whether any of this reprehensible behavior persisted after the new ethics rules I implemented in 2009."
Salazar has also asked the Inspector General to investigate whether there was a failure of MMS personnel to adequately enforce standards or inspect the Deepwater Horizon offshore facility and look into whether there are deficiencies in MMS policies or practices that need to be addressed to ensure that operations on the Outer Continental Shelf are conducted in a safe and environmentally sensitive manner.
Meanwhile, the nonprofit Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, which represents government workers in natural resource agencies questions whether anyone in a responsible capacity even read BP's official response plan for oil spills in the Gulf of Mexico.
The plan is "studded with patently inaccurate and inapplicable information but was nonetheless approved by the federal government," PEER said today, suggesting that no regulator ever read it.
The "BP Regional Oil Spill Response Plan - Gulf of Mexico" dated June 30, 2009 covers all of the company's operations in the Gulf, not just the ill-fated Deepwater Horizon, which exploded and caught fire April 20 and sank two days later, leaving the well it had been drilling open and gushing oil into the Gulf of Mexico.
The plan lists "Sea Lions, Seals, Sea Otters" and "Walruses" and "Otter, Beaver" and "Mink" as "Sensitive Biological Resources" in the Gulf of Mexico. While none of these animals live in the gulf, they do live in the Arctic, so PEER suggests that this portion of the BP plan was "cribbed from previous Arctic exploratory planning."
In fact, according to Louisiana's Department of Wildlife and Fisheries 600 animal species are at risk from the massive Deepwater Horizon oil spill - 445 species of fish, 45 mammals, 32 reptiles and amphibians, and 134 bird species.
BP's oil spill response plan gives a website for a Japanese home shopping site as the link to one of its "primary equipment providers for BP in the Gulf of Mexico Region rapid deployment of spill response resources on a 24 hour, seven days a week basis."
The BP plan directs its media spokespeople not to make "promises that property, ecology, or anything else will be restored to normal."
The plan does not contain information about tracking sub-surface oil plumes from deepwater blowouts. It lacks any oceanographic or meteorological information, despite the relevance of this data to spill response.
"This response plan is not worth the paper it is written on," said PEER Board Member Rick Steiner, a former University of Alaska marine professor and conservationist who tracked the Exxon Valdez spill.
In 2009, Steiner lost a $10,000 grant from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for being an outspoken critic of the oil industry's activities in the Bristol Bay region. Steiner filed a grievance and, in October, lost. He then resigned from the university.
Steiner observes that the BP plan is almost 600 pages largely consisting of lists, phone numbers and blank forms. "Incredibly, this voluminous document never once discusses how to stop a deep water blowout even though BP has significant deep water operations in the Gulf," he said.
Commerce Secretary Gary Locke Monday declared a "fishery disaster" in the Gulf of Mexico as oil continues to leak from the wellhead.
Political anger is rising over consequences of the oil spill. Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal calls the response effort "disjointed" and says Deepwater Horizon oil is damaging his state while he pleads for the resources to fight it.
"Yesterday, we went out on a boat to Cat Island in Plaquemines Parish and we saw islands covered in oil where our brown pelicans nest. Many of the birds we could see were oiled, some to the point where they could not fly," governor Jindal said.
"The brown pelican, of course, is our Louisiana state bird - and it was just recently removed from the Endangered Species List. The oil on those islands yesterday may kill off much of the island in addition to damaging the bird population."
"Just a few days ago, we took a boat out to Pass a L'Outre and saw thick black and brown colored oil covering much of the perimeter of the marsh out there. Again, wildlife experts tell us this marsh may die in five to seven days after the oil hits it."
"It is clear that the resources needed to protect our coast are not here," Governor Jindal said. "Boom, skimmers, vacuums, and jack up barges are all in short supply. Every day oil sits and waits for clean up more of our marsh dies."
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

27 Comments so far
Show AllThe plot thickens! Just when you thought it could not get an uglier someone gets caught viewing porn at work. Why can't we rely on professionals to act professionally?
None of this matters of course. What matters is that there is a hole in the ocean turning the Gulf into a Superfund site!
And it is getting worse every day.
Aimlow Joe was here.
http://www.aimlow.com
This is a clear case of gross criminal negligence on the part of MMS, BP, Halliburton, and Transocean. The investigation will 'discover' that it was a complex accident and no one is to blame. Sound familiar?
Send somebody to jail for 10 years for growing pot, but for destroying the coastline of 4 states, a fishing industry, potentially the coastlines of other countries like Cuba, Jamaica, etc.--no criminal prosecution! Just like 9/11. There's no case that will go to trail because this crime is too big to prosecute.
Ken Salazar and previous MMS reps should go to jail for criminal conduct in their lack of oversight and failure to require stricter protection (acoustical switches for example) for any off shore oil drilling. The Obama administration should face an inquiry about why they approved more permits for offshore drilling as the spill was happening! Oil company executives and some of their flunkies should have all assets taken from them and used to pay reparations. Some of those in positions of decision making should face jail time for their 'cutting corners' and striving to save money when so much was at risk. BP, as some have argued, could be nationalized just as any insolvent business 'too big to fail' might be.
"Send somebody to jail for 10 years for growing pot..."
great point! canada just extradited marc emery to the us to serve possibly 5-10 years in jail for selling marijuana seeds!!!!!!!!
welcome to the world of monty python without the yuks....
we are not making this up...
If I were a betting man I'd wager that this is yet another one of those situations where President Obama will choose to "look forward - not backward" when it comes to holding anyone of consequence responsible.
"go to jail"? You can't be serious.
As always in cases like this, in the end the guilty weasels will go unpunished and for the most part, untouched financially. In 5-10 years, we'll get the usual "if you thought this man was in prison. guess again" story on 60 Minutes, where the guilty party is shown, once again, making more money working for, you guessed it...THE OIL COMPANIES!
There is no "oversight" of anything in this country that hasn't been bought out, sold out, or totally compromised.
Our federal government is, for all intents and purposes: useless. Too bad we have to pay for it.
You're being too kind.
Our federal government is colluding with mega corporations by issuing them license to do us harm.
Just a digressive mini-rant about a mini-meme:
Personally, even before my employer installed draconian Blocking Software on their computer system, I was never tempted to seek out Internet porn at work. Even in a private office during lunch or other free time, I never felt the impulse to become sexually aroused.
So I don't militantly advocate viewing porn at work or anything.
However, with all due respect to esteemed commenters here who abhor and revile porn with Robert Jensen's fervor, I hope that the revelation that Irresponsible Employees Watched On-line Porn During Work Hours doesn't become TOO popular.
This is the third time I've read implicitly pearl-clutching, hand-wringing references to government regulators wasting time this way when they're supposed to be pretending to regulate various bankster or corporate activity.
Like making Personal Phone Calls, or Pilfering Office Supplies, it can't be defended.
It's just a hunch, but it strikes me that emphasizing "porn" rather than merely noting "excessive/unauthorized personal use of computer resources" is itself unnecessarily prurient, and intended to sharpen public outrage and sensationalize what is already a truly sensational scandal.
IMO, this emphasis contains the goofy implication that there's a cause-and-effect relationship involved, i.e. that lapses in regulation enforcement are the result of low-life porn addicts indulging their sordid hobby instead of busting on the bad guys-- sort of a white-collar version of cops sitting at the donut shop instead of catching criminals. But it's just as likely that the porn-watching is a consequence of management not giving the guilty parties enough real work to do in the first place.
BTW, does anyone really not understand that employers rely upon IT Big Brother to dig into computer use histories AFTER employees are on the chopping block for whatever reason, and invariably find SOME kind of excessive and illicit use to further justify disciplinary action and termination?
Some companies actually use it as a form of "downsizing"-- even too many "glurge" e-mails to Great-Aunt Minnie in one's cache can justify discharge for "willful misconduct", saving the cost of severance packages and even unemployment insurance. It happens.
If Obama spent time viewing porn instead of pushing boatloads of pro-corporate, anti-worker, anti-environment legislation we would be better off.
Do-nothing politicians are better than do-harm politicians.
Very intelligent, very perceptive, very much on the mark. Every point you make is right on, IMHO, and you could have gone further. Like you, I could easily indulge at work in whatever and I don't (don't watch porn at home either, BTW, for all kinds or solid reasons), but this focussing on porn appears like changing the subject to me.
Not condoning it obviously, but nothing is easier than to know PRECISELY what employees are up to with their work station (I work in IT). So somebody didn't care or was setting up these employees. Agreed, they shouldn't have done it. Still...
Absolutely right that some companies allow certain inappropriate things to happen, because it's relatively harmless, but things that will come in handy and will stick like crazy glue when comes the time to 'downsize'--fire people.
At the top are the culprits who didn't do their work, while others willfully bought off people, etc. Let's focus on the people with a real stake in having no regulations applied... They're not a handful of lowly clerks and agents watching a bit of T&A on the web.
You are absolutely correct. The management sets the tone. If it's goal is to take up space, collect a paycheck and make sure that nothing is done, then the employees act accordingly.
Joe
If I were a third generation Gulf fisherman who just lost everything probably forever, I'd be making up a list of government and corporate officials responsible, and in the absence of "justice" I'd be creating my own form of "justice."
-30-
hmm... this is actually a concern of these ceo's. many have bodyguards (blankfein for one) and blackwater needs some new contacts. i'm sure they'll be happy to provide security for corporate amerika.
Joe Stack picked the wrong target.
Lets just call it bribe takers at MMS.
And typical corporation policy of offering bribes.
A third world act.
"600 animal species are at risk from the massive Deepwater Horizon oil spill - 445 species of fish, 45 mammals, 32 reptiles and amphibians, and 134 bird species.'
Correction - those are only the vertebrate animals. It does not include crabs, lobsters, crayfish, tubeworms, corals, jellyfish, clams, oysters, etc., and my favorite, the enchanting and intelligent octopus. No plants are mentioned either.
The elusive but powerful interdependencies will be broken.
Joe
Each and every one of the MMS employees who accepted bribes/gifts/gratuities from BP before this debacle are now and forever accomplices in this atrocity.
And deserve to be charged, tried and convicted as such.
Not that it will ever happen....
CARBON REDUCTION--NO OPTIONS
The current Gulf of Mexico tragedy is only another event that underscores the crucial need to reduce our carbon footprint.
Through extensive lobbying and fabricated science, the energy cartels have impeded progress in carbon reduction, as well as safety regulations. Their alligations that such measures would cripple our economy has been their classic claim for decades.
In reality, carbon reduction can only improve our economy. There are no reasons why we cannot expeditiously employ our idle work force and assembly plants here to fabricate wind turbines, solar panels, etc--rather than outsourcing this work as is the current trend. Even if subsidies were required to keep the work here, their costs would be eclipsed by the resulting benefits in employment, our security, and our environment.
Our planet cannot sustain its billions of inhabitants undercurrent trends. As the nation most responsible for global warming, we have a mandated duty to reduce our wasteful contributions of these toxins, which can only increase the divide between nations most responsible for warming and those most harmed by it.
Amen to all you say, Bob. The word "reform", as it has been used lately, makes my skin crawl. But what you describe is the kind of reform that we should get behind.
Joe
live cam of the disaster:
http://tinyurl.com/368ll3a
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndKx6bkhLCc
Things get interesting/scary as hell about the four minute mark.
BP is now being accused of looping the tape to hide what has happened.
Was that a giant "Kem" (methane burp)? If it was, above-water photography should show a bubble breaking the surface as the gaseous portion of the emission rises.
As for any subsequent looping or doctoring: Photographic evidence in the hands of the suspect being monitored, how reassuring.
Joe
This is basically old news uncovered during the Bush years.
So, why didn't Salazar clean house?
Becasue he is one of the biggest supporters of selling off America to energy giants. He is NOT an advocate for a shred of protection for parks, wildlife, or the environment.
Most suitable for our committed corporatist in chief, Obama.
"The plan lists "Sea Lions, Seals, Sea Otters" and "Walruses" and "Otter, Beaver" and "Mink" as "Sensitive Biological Resources" in the Gulf of Mexico. While none of these animals live in the gulf, they do live in the Arctic, so PEER suggests that this portion of the BP plan was "cribbed from previous Arctic exploratory planning."
Copy and paste is very convenient. But when students copy and paste without thought in order to fill up space, it is an automatic failure, in my book. Whatever BP drones put together this document, possibly between games of Free Cell or visits to Boytoy.com, must be fired and prosecuted. Their supervisors up the line too. Their carelessness, their reckless endangerment, has contributed to the death of a giant ecosystem and the economic ruin of people who depend on it.
In my experience, this kind of workplace atmosphere can be very bad for smart women, competent minorities and people with ethics and standards of any kind.
Joe
I heard this story on NPR last night and -- I have to say -- for NPR they did a pretty good job. I wasn't surprised, of course. And this was also not surprising:
"Democratic Senator Debbie Stabenow of Michigan took pains to point out at today's hearing the conduct occurred well before President Obama took office." I think lines like this are now required by the Administration.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=127118195
The report before this is, actually, much more interesting because this is squarely on Obama, the lawyer. Again, not surprising that a lawyer wouldn't want this mandate put in writing:
"Freeze On Offshore Drilling Was Verbal Order"
http://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=127114044
Horror is very popular in American books, films, and current events. They have been working hard at spreading it all over the world for a long time. It is about as lovely as a cancerous tumor sucking the life out of healthy cells as fast as it can.
A huge percentage of Americans have been led to believe that theirs is the greatest country in the world. They are totally blind to the fact that countless millions with a clearer view see the USA as something like a big insanely greedy teenage bully on steroids & crack, or as something like a rabid dog that should be put to sleep for the good of the world community. The lack of justice is most appalling.
What can be done?
Obomber appealed and won to prevent an injunction by an Environment Organization to stop this well because of lack of environmental impact study.