World Consumption Plunges Planet Into 'Ecological Debt', Says Leading Thinktank
Consumption exceeds Earth's annual 'biocapacity' today amid warnings of dependence on overseas food and energy
Rich consumers are still voraciously gobbling up the world's resources, despite the worst recession in a generation, with their appetite pushing the planet into "ecological debt" from today, according to a report by think-tank the new economics foundation.
This "ecological debt day" marks the point in the year when consumption around the world exceeds the Earth's annual "biocapacity" — so for the remainder of the year, we will be eating into environmental resources that will not be replaced, according to nef's calculations.
Andrew Simms, nef's director, said the deep recession had delayed this "ecological debt day" by only 24 hours compared with last year, when it fell on 24 September. He warned that as G20 leaders gather in Pittsburgh to discuss global finance, there is a risk that the world economy will be kick-started again, without learning the lessons of the "consumption explosion".
"Debt-fuelled over-consumption not only brought the financial system to the edge of collapse, it is pushing many of our natural life support systems toward a precipice. Politicians tell us to get back to business as usual, but if we bankrupt critical ecosystems no amount of government spending will bring them back," he said.
In the UK, nef warns of increasing dependence on overseas energy, declining self-sufficiency in food, and the proliferation of "boomerang trade" — sending goods to foreign markets and receiving almost identical items back.
The research also underlines the yawning gap between the energy consumption of the world's poorest people, and the rich. Just 7% of the global population produces 50% of greenhouse gas emissions. A typical American will by 4am on January 2 have produced as many emissions as a Tanzanian generates in a year.
Nef argues that while the arrival of reliable electricity and other energy resources could bring enormous improvements in life expectancy and quality of life in developing countries, when consumption increases above a certain level, it will stop improving people's health or happiness.
Beyond this point, they say, "to increase human well-being, the focus should shift away from a quantitative focus on income and consumption, towards more qualitative improvements in the human environment to do with culture, civic, community and family life, long-term learning and those other dimensions that contribute to relatively long and happy lives."
The analysis suggests many countries have passed far beyond saturation point, into wasteful "overconsumption".
In the past 50 years, the report argues, people in the rich world have changed their lifestyles radically, and "in doing so, we have generally assumed that the resources and energy these activities rely on are limitless and cheap." In the 1970s, the average household in the UK had 17 domestic appliances, for example - but that had almost trebled, to 47, by 2006, and is expected to continue rising. Yet in fact, consumption has begun to gnaw away at natural resources at a rate which cannot be sustained.
Concern about the damage caused by the unrestrained pursuit of economic growth echoes a call by President Nicolas Sarkozy last week for politicians to look beyond GDP, to wider measures of the quality of life. Sarkozy published a report from Nobel prize-winning economists Joseph Stiglitz and Amartya Sen, advocating a broader approach to assessing the health of an economy.
These arguments have been given added urgency by the financial crisis, which undermined the arguments for unfettered consumption-fuelled growth.
"For years, we proclaimed the financial world a creator of wealth, until we learned one day that it had accumulated so much risk that it plunged us into chaos," Sarkozy said last week.
Simms calls for a radical redistribution between the millions of "underconsumers," in the poorest countries, whose lives could be transformed by small amounts of energy a year — and the bloated overconsumers in the rest of the world.
"We need a radically different approach to 'rich world' consumption. While billions in poorer countries subsist, we consume vastly more and yet with little or nothing to show for it in terms of greater life satisfaction. Defusing the consumption explosion will give us the chance of better lives," he said.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
19 Comments so far
Show AllYes to sex ed, birth control, and to help them reduce their footprint, TAX THE RICH! (If you're not a part of the solution, there's good money to be made in prolonging the problem ~Larry Kersten)
Veggies are super if grown nearby, but hunting and gathering for home or community tables leaves little or no footprint, much like the the locals once did in "GM's Money Trees- In Brazil, people with some of the world's smallest carbon footprints are being displaced--so their forests can become offsets for SUVs" - on: www.motherjones.com/environment. Also see "The Carnivore's Delima www.nytimes.com/2009/10/31/opinion/31niman.html?ref=opinion (and while in the NYT site, "Building With Whole Trees" www.nytimes.com/2009/11/05/garden/05tree.html?_r=1&ref=garden)
So "Give forests back to local people to save them .. concludes a study that's tracked the fate of 80 forests worldwide over 15 years http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17937-give-forests-back-to-local-people-to-save-them.html - Keedo
7 Billion vegetarian pedestrians could fit our ecosystem...
Birth control (free and voluntary), eat less meat (or none), education (especially for girls and women), don't encourage large families - all good ideas.
But you know that one American uses something like 40 times the resources of one person from India? So we have to reduce both population growth and consumption.
Some of the problems is personal piggishness. Prosperous people have houses that are way too big and have too many bathrooms for any imaginable use. Also, what other country could have several TV reality programs based on clearing out and endless supply of houses stuffed with over-purchased goods? I can think of none. And we eat too much bad food.
Another part of the reason is not personal, but how we are structured. Most people live in places in which each individual has to fuel up and haul around a 3000+ pound automobile to buy a loaf of bread. We need to improve public transportation and organize communities in which bikes and walking are common and which do not require so many cars for everyday activities.
Finally - I wonder if our military production, deployment and transport on a massive scale gets figured into the average carbon footprint. If so, living peacefully will reduce our consumption.
Joe
One practical way to urge people to think about the size of their families every year is to stop the exemption for dependents after two children on Federal Income Tax.
the #1 thing people can do to "save" the planet is become a Vegetarian! Or better yet vegan.
And, use birth control!!
Good start ... I'm right there with ya ;=)
Amen.
Breeding ourselves into extinction.
The key problem is concentration of wealth.
Central to that is the CORPORATION.
The CORPORATION has been gifted with human rights.
That boosts commercial activity into hyper-drive, attracts sociopaths to run it, and metastisizes into the system we see today eating the planet and the future.
REVOKE CORPORATE "PERSONHOOD".
CORP IS BORG.
In every case about every problem we face now and into the illusory future, personal necessity will be the disciplinarian/prime mover of coming into harmony with ourselves and our benevolent planet.
Moratoria on massive infrastructure projects of hydroelectric dams that support heavy extractive industry for import export
Moratoria on privatization of water resources
Massive investment and public awareness of options to favor small scale regional energy and food production and human rights
Implementation of long and short term downscaling and conversion of CAFO operations and mass monoculture
Moratoria by industrial agriculture giants such as ADM, Cargill, Monsanto etc. on global growth of their operations.
Question being what will awaken shareholder awareness of the role played by that sector in the momentum of globally manifest profit/power oriented problems?
Add to the list:
Global land reform to allow widespread ownership of 3-50 acre farmsteads, cultivated and cared for by people, not mined by mechanized profiteers.
He just answered that.
But there's more.
A lot of the motives behind large families are economic: the kids grow and provide retirement and an emotionally rich old age.
Asking people to have fewer children might make more sense were the "developed" countries to stop expending resources to arrange circumstances that force people to have huge families.
Free education for all.
(i know i'm a linguistic snot...)
To continue with the plural "moratoria" in place of the singular "moratorium"...
How about a moratoria on people having kids? We could take a year off, see how it goes...
Oooh, now we'll get attacked for being racist NAZI genocidal malthusian eugenicists... probably for being socialistic fascist commies too...
Just sayin...
old goat asks:
"Question being what will awaken shareholder awareness of the role played by that sector in the momentum of globally manifest profit/power oriented problems?"
shutting off electricity?
stopping garbage service?
marijuana?
psilocybin?
starvation?
Global Start Date: September 22, 2012...acoustic, agrarian life...let's get those gardens growing...
Bravo!!
and hip, hip hoary
deleted double post
Joe