Senate Sends Big Spending Bill to Bush To Sign
WASHINGTON - Automakers gained $25 billion in taxpayer-subsidized loans and oil companies won elimination of a long-standing ban on drilling off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts as the Senate passed a sprawling spending bill Saturday.
The 78-12
vote sent the $634 billion measure to President Bush, who was expected
to sign it even though it spends more money and contains more pet
projects than he would have liked.
The measure is needed to keep the government operating beyond the current budget year, which ends Tuesday. As a result, the legislation is one of the few bills this election year that simply must pass. Bush's signature would mean Congress could avoid a lame-duck session after the Nov. 4 election.
White House spokesman Tony Fratto said the bill "stands as a reminder of the failure of the Democratic Congress to fund the government in regular order." But, he said, it "puts the United States one step closer to ending our dependence on foreign sources of energy" by lifting the offshore drilling ban and opening up huge reserves of oil shale in the West.
The Pentagon is in line for a record budget. In addition to $70 billion approved this summer for operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Defense Department would receive $488 billion, a 6 percent increase. The spending bill also offers aid to victims of flooding in the Midwest and recent hurricanes across the Gulf Coast.
Such a huge bill usually would dominate the end-of-session agenda on Capitol Hill. But it went below the radar screen because attention focused on the congressional bailout of Wall Street.
The measure settles dozens of battles that have brewed for months between the Democrats who run Congress and the White House and its GOP allies.
The administration won approval of the defense budget. Democrats wrested concessions from the White House on $23 billion for disaster-ravaged states, a doubling of low-income heating subsidies, and smaller spending items such as $24 million more for food shipments to the elderly.
The loan package for automakers would reward them with $25 billion in below-market loans, costing taxpayers $7.5 billion to subsidize the retooling of plants and development of technologies to help U.S. carmakers to build cleaner, more fuel efficient cars. Companies would not have to begin repaying the loans for five years, drawing objections from Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., who predicted they would return for more help when the money is due.
Republicans made ending the coastal drilling ban a central campaign issue this summer as $4-plus per gallon gasoline stoked voter anger and turned public opinion in favor of more exploration.
The action does not mean drilling is imminent and still leaves the oil-rich eastern Gulf of Mexico off limits. But it could set the stage for the government to offer leases in some Atlantic federal waters as early as 2011.
Also in the bill is money to avert a shortfall in Pell college aid grants and solve problems in the Women, Infants and Children program delivering healthy foods to the poor.
In addition to the Pentagon's budget, there is $40 billion for the Homeland Security Department and $73 billion for veterans' programs and military base construction projects. Combined with the Defense Department's spending, that amounts to about 60 percent of the budget work Congress must pass each year.
Democrats came under criticism from the GOP for short-circuiting the normal process for a spending bill after it became clear that Republicans would force difficult votes on the drilling ban.
Democrats also wanted to avoid an election-year clash with Bush that would have played in his favor. They are willing to take their chances that Democrat Barack Obama will be elected president in November and permit increases for scores of programs squeezed by Bush each year.
Bush had threatened to veto bills that did not cut the number and cost of pet projects in half or cause agency operating budgets to exceed his request. Democrats ignored the edict as they drafted the plan and the White House has apparently backed down.
Taxpayers for Common Sense, a watchdog group, discovered 2,322 pet projects totaling $6.6 billion. That included 2,025 in the defense portion alone that cost a total of $4.9 billion. Critics of such projects are likely to discover numerous examples of links to lobbyists and campaign contributions.
On the Net:- Taxpayers for Common Sense: http://www.taxpayer.net/
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
10 Comments so far
Show AllIf you are anti-war yet still support Obama I say "shame on you" for voting for someone who supports pro-war policies and ever escalating military spending. The blood is on your hands, the deaths of hundreds of thousands of INNOCENT human beings, who want to live their lives as much as you or I do, for YOUR continued support of occupations, imperialism, aggression, and uneccesary deaths and destroyed lives of those who live through the carnage. McCain is worse? I agree but so what? Why are the lives of non-americans of so little value to you? It's time to WAKE UP and stop supporting both "major" parties.
Another scam while everyone falls for the decoy scam-de-jour!!
A $684 billion budget that is 60% military (including $40 billion for Homeland
Security so they cn search our shoes at he airport!) looks like the yearly
military-industrial complex bailout!!! The $700 billion Wall Street
bailout is just the bankers screaming for their share of the loot already
stolen annually by the military and friends. Oh and Detroit needs $25 billion --
thier fair share -- chump change by military and banker standards... on and on it goes...
Enough already!
RawFoodDude
Another scam while everyone falls for the decoy scam-de-jour!!
A $684 billion budget that is 60% military (including $40 billion for Homeland
Security so they cn search our shoes at he airport!) looks like the yearly
military-industrial complex bailout!!! The $700 billion Wall Street
bailout is just the bankers screaming for their share of the loot already
stolen annually by the military and friends.
Enough already!
RawFoodDude
The Democrats and Republicans just voted the reward the Pentagon with a 6% raise.
How much more will Obama feel the need to "bump up" the military budget?
OBAMA: "We need to maintain a strategic force posture that allows us to manage threats posed by rogue nations like North Korea and Iran, and to meet the challenges presented by potential rivals like China,"
"Indeed, given the depletion of our forces after the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, we will probably need a somewhat higher budget in the intermediate future just to restore readiness and replace equipment."
OBAMA: "I will do everything in my power to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. Everything in my power... everything," he said, adding, "I will always keep the threat of military action on the table."
Obama's strikingly pro-Israel address to AIPAC included a pledge to provide a $30 billion, ten-year aid package "that will not be tied to any other nation" and that will "ensure Israel's qualitative military advantage."
OBAMA: “I strongly support the expansion of our ground forces by adding 65,000 soldiers to the Army and 27,000 Marines,”
(That’s precisely the number favored by President Bush’s Defense Secretary Robert Gates over a five-year period at a cost of $108 billion, as estimated by the Congressional Budget Office.)
OBAMA: "I dismiss the cynics who say that this new century cannot be another [in which] we lead the world in battling immediate evils and promoting the ultimate good,"
Which reminds me of...
PALIN: "It is obvious to me who the good guys are in this one and who the bad guys are. The bad guys are the ones who say Israel is a stinking corpse and should be wiped off the face of the earth. That's not a good guy who is saying that. Now, one who would seek to protect the good guys in this, the leaders of Israel and her friends, her allies, including the United States, in my world, those are the good guys."
And yet White House spokesman Tony Fratto has the gall to say the bill "stands as a reminder of the Failure of the Democratic Congress to fund the government in regular order"!
THE REPUBLICANS FUCK THINGS UP BEYOND ALL RECOGNITION AND STILL HAVE THE GALL TO BLAME THE DEMOCRATS! Can the Democrats ever see through the Republican "bi-partisan" stratagem, which in BushSpeak means the Republicans decide, and if the decision works, take all the credit, and if the decision fails, it fails due to the Democrats' meddling and Dems should take all the blame?
They are "bi-partisan" in the same way that Lieberman is "bi-partisan"... just so long as they get to interpret what is bi-partisan and what is "partisan politics"... surely not running against your own party because you did not like the voters' choice? Dems should forget the Liebermans, the DLC, and the capitalist-mole-consultants in their party, and JUST SAY NO to the "bi-partisanship" malarkey being used against them by the Repugs and their enablers.
Tony Fratto sure did not show ANY bi-partisanship in this little dig at Democrats. The Congress is still NOT ruled by Democrats, it is effectively controlled by Republican filibusters and Republican presidential veto threat. Democrats ARE wimps and have been corrupted, but the Republicans are goons and thugs and are MASSIVELY CORRUPT. Sadly, this is the choice at this time in America. The voters must first GET RID OF ALL REPUBLICANS, or at least put them in a weak minority position, then new parties should arise to push things even more towards progressive and liberal social structures, to lead this nation forward and stop the slide into NeoFeudalism, Fascism, and/or Oblivion.
But Republican lies, that are not called out and exposed, persuade some voters that the lies are true, or that truth is only politics, and voters feel they can return Republican crooks, hypocrites and liars to government. Of course, calling out the lies will receive the 'partisan politics' howl from the Right-Wingers, as if they were an innocent, injured party and not THE MOST PARTISAN POLARIZING REGIME that has run America since the days of the Confederacy (the NeoCon Repugs' apparent ideal and role model... they may as well fly the "states' rights" stars-and-bars flag! Sarah Palin was actually involved with a secessionist party!)
Truth will out in some way. Look at the Truth outing in the breakdown of the "Free Market" myth and the unfettered capitalism which is destroying this nation. I admit, the Dems are afraid to call out the Republicans like Nader does, because the Truth IS an attack on the Repugs. The Dems play way too 'safe' to actually go on the attack and, say for example, start impeachment proceedings against Bush and Cheney. How un-"bi-partisan" that would be!
But the Republicans then will continue to get away with their DISGUSTING HYPOCRICY. Like McCain stating in that first debate that McCain is positive Obama is not experienced enough to be President... but forgetting to mention that presumably McCain thinks PALIN IS, as the main job of Vice President is to replace the President if necessary. If McCain/Palin is elected, and McCain dies before next year, guess who is President of the United States? Yet no one calls McCain out on his stupid, stupid train of thought. In essence, MCCAIN VOTES FOR SARAH PALIN FOR PRESIDENT!!! Because Obama does not have enough experience! Must be the Democrats' fault that he did so.
Bring our military home. End wars now. Protect our borders (not from the poor illegals) from Military attack. Yes we have made many enemies! This government has been derelict in its duty. Time to go to DC. to demonstrate again!
does going all the way to washington help? no! get the hell out in the streets of YOUR town and say no! loudly!
One more sellout. One more reason to vote 3rd party!
In addition to $70 billion approved this summer for operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Defense Department would receive $488 billion, a 6 percent increase.
-Has Obama ever suggested reducing the military budget so we can invest in social programs that help people not the Military Industrial Complex? To ask the question is to answer it.
Democrats wrested concessions from the White House on $23 billion
-WOW! How magnanimous! S600 billion for them and $23 for us! Hooray the Democrats!
Republicans made ending the coastal drilling ban a central campaign issue this summer as $4-plus per gallon gasoline stoked voter anger...
-I just knew the Dims would cave in like they always do and not because they are cowards but because they are following the same agenda and have the same masters.
Democrats also wanted to avoid an election-year clash with Bush that would have played in his favor.
-of course everything always works in the Republicans favor hence the necessity for always caving in. How predictable.
Ric Abreu, regardless of whom you cast your vote for, are you that naive to think any damn thing will change? I am not attacking you because of wanting a Third Party candidate in, the other 2 are worth shit but if you do believe something will change, you are young, or full of good kharma, or something. I've been about too long, never ever ever ever changes. Indeed with what they will have dumped in their lap, it will take decades to repair, decades. The entire World is ruined because of the Occupant @ 1600, our Constitution decimated, financial ruins, MN's of HUMAN BEINGS Murdered, Tortured, Kidnapped, denied CAT3 because that person whose name I refuse to speak rewrote CAT3 in an amended TITLE 18-CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, Chapter 18-WAR CRIMES, Ss2441, Page 531, 532 in US Code in 2006, released a PDD on 20 July 2007, 1 month prior to Gonzales releasing the Secret Memo, that he pretended was never secret, that was first written by Ashcroft in 2003, both related to CAT3, both were F$$KED with and released the time the shit started hitting the fan, it well they think it does, releases them and all Torturers from Prosecution, WAR CRIMES, if you read it you'd laugh then vomit. Timelines, all in the time lines. That presidential directive was released 1 year after he amended the US Code, and 4 years after he knew there was authorization to screw with CAT3.
Will not end, the Executive over reach was unchecked for 7 3/4 years, too late.
BillofRights
Dear Bill,
I am not as naive as you think and Ill be 50 yrs old soon. Actually, I'm very cynical and jaded. I know that absolutely nothing is going to change until we reach a critical mass of of awakening in which people realize the current system of Dims vs. Pugs is a sham in which both parties of Big Business pretend to be in conflict while they secretly agree on doing the work of enriching the establishment and the PTB (powers that be).
Until the majority of the people understand this, you're right, nothing will change. I know third parties have a snowball's chance. It's a protest vote. It's a refusal to buy into a system that is screwing us.
You are naive to think that one man is responsible for all the wrongs in America and that he operated in a vacuum, in a system that had no checks and balances, and no separation of powers. The Democrats laid down and allowed him to get away with murder because they agree with the agenda of imperialism, militarism and curtailing civil rights.
Democrats are not spineless wimps. They pretend to cave in, but in reality they are as compromised as Republicans and agree with the policies that favor the wealthy and powerful. Both parties have been bought off. The PTB owns them stock and barrel.
Obama has gotten more money from Wall St. than even Republican McCain. I think the establishment prefers Obama because he puts a fresh new face and spin on the same old policies. Nothing will change until we change. Wake up America!