Zinn: US 'In Need of Rebellion'
Al Jazeera speaks to Howard Zinn, the author, American historian, social critic and activist, about how the Iraq war damaged attitudes towards the US and why the US "empire" is close to collapse.
Q: Where is the United States heading in terms of world power and influence?
HZ: America has been heading - for some time, and is heading right now - toward less and less world power, less and less influence.
This is an empire which is on the one hand the most powerful empire that ever existed; on the other hand an empire that is crumbling - an empire that has no future ... because the rest of the world is alienated and simply because this empire is top-heavy with military commitments, with bases around the world, with the exhaustion of its own resources at home.
[This is] leading to more and more discontent and home, so I think the American empire will go the way of other empires and I think it is on its way now.
Q: Is there any hope the US will change its approach to the rest of the world?
HZ: If there is any hope, the hope lies in the American people.
[It] lies in American people becoming resentful enough and indignant enough over what has happened to their country, over the loss of dignity in the world, over the starving of human resources in the United States, the starving of education and health, the takeover of the political mechanism by corporate power and the result this has on the everyday lives of the American people.[There is also] the higher and higher food prices, the more and more insecurity, the sending of the young people to war.
I think all of this may very well build up into a movement of rebellion.
We have seen movements of rebellion in the past: The labour movement, the civil rights movement, the movement against the war in Vietnam.
I think we may well see, if the United States keeps heading in the same direction, a new popular movement. That is the only hope for the United States.
Q: How did the US get to this point?
HZ: Well, we got to this point because ... I suppose the American people have allowed it to get it to this point because there were enough Americans who were satisfied with their lives, just enough.
Of course, many Americans were not, that is why half of the population doesn't vote, they're alienated.
But there are just enough Americans who have been satisfied, you might say getting some of the "goodies" of the empire, just some of them, just enough people satisfied to support the system, so we got this way because of the ability of the system to maintain itself by satisfying just enough of the population to keep its legitimacy.
And I think that era is coming to an end.
Q: What should the world know about the United States?
HZ: What I find many people in the rest of the world don't know is that there is an opposition in the United States.
Very often, people in the rest of the world think that Bush is popular, they think 'oh, he was elected twice', they don't understand the corruption of the American political system which enabled Bush to win twice.They don't understand the basic undemocratic nature of the American political system in which all power is concentrated within two parties which are not very far from one another and people cannot easily tell the difference.
So I think we are in a situation where we are going to need some very fundamental changes in American society if the American people are going to be finally satisfied with the kind of society we have.
Q: Do you think the US can recover from its current position?
HZ: Well, I am hoping for a recovery process. I mean, so far we haven't seen it.
You asked about what the people of the rest of the world don't know about the United States, and as I said, they don't know that there is an opposition.
There always has been an opposition, but the opposition has always been either crushed or quieted, kept in the shadows, marginalised so their voices are not heard.
People in the rest of the world hear the voices of the American leaders.
They do not hear the voices of the people all over this country who do not like the American leaders who want different policies.
I think also, people in the rest of the world should know that what they see in Iraq now is really a continuation of a long, long term of American imperial expansion in the world.
I think ... a lot of people in the world think that this war in Iraq is an aberration, that before this the United States was a benign power.
It has never been a benign power, from the very first, from the American Revolution, from the taking-over of Indian land, from the Mexican war, the Spanish-American war.
It is embarrassing to say, but we have a long history in this country of violent expansion and I think not only do most people in other countries [not] know this, most Americans don't know this.
Q: Is there a way for this to improve?
HZ: Well you know, whatever hope there is lies in that large number of Americans who are decent, who don't want to go to war, who don't want to kill other people.
It is hard to see that hope because these Americans who feel that way have been shut out of the communications system, so their voices are not heard, they are not seen on the television screen, but they exist.
I have gone through, in my life, a number of social movements and I have seen how at the very beginning of these social movements or just before these social movements develop, there didn't seem to be any hope.
I lived in the [US] south for seven years, in the years of the civil rights movements, and it didn't seem that there was any hope, but there was hope under the surface.
And when people organised, and when people began to act, when people began to work together, people began to take risks, people began to oppose the establishment, people began to commit civil disobedience.
Well, then that hope became manifest ... it actually turned into change.
Q: Do you think there is a way out of this and for the future influence of the US on the world to be a positive one?
HZ: Well, you know for the United States to begin to be a positive influence in the world we are going to have to have a new political leadership that is sensitive to the needs of the American people, and those needs do not include war and aggression.
[It must also be] sensitive to the needs of people in other parts of the world, sensitive enough to know that American resources, instead of being devoted to war, should be devoted to helping people who are suffering.
You've got earthquakes and natural disasters all over the world, but the people in the United States have been in the same position as people in other countries.
The natural disasters here [also] brought little positive reaction - look at [Hurricane] Katrina.
The people in this country, the poor people especially and the people of colour especially, have been as much victims of American power as people in other countries.
Q: Can you give us an overall scope of everything we talked about - the power and influence of the United States?
HZ: The power and influence of the United States has declined rapidly since the war in Iraq because American power, as it has been exercised in the world historically, has been exposed more to the rest of the world in this situation and in other situations.
So the US influence is declining, its power is declining.
However strong a military machine it is, power does not ultimately depend on a military machine. So power is declining.
Ultimately power rests on the moral legitimacy of a system and the United States has been losing moral legitimacy.
My hope is that the American people will rouse themselves and change this situation, for the benefit of themselves and for the benefit of the rest of the world.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
281 Comments so far
Show AllI've been to other countries and people are amazed at the lack of education in the United States and the propaganda which we call "News".
The corporate plutocracy that has taken over the government had a very effective plan: Demolish the education system and create a vast propaganda machine so that people don't even know their history and make them ignorant of the takeover. There was a time when Greek and Latin were required classes in public school. High School graduates were expected to know Civics and United States (and world) History, as well as classical literature. This is now a country where people spend hours watching tabloid gossip and the home shopping club on TV instead of reading. The emphasis in education toward "usefull skills for the job market" instead of learning how to think and base thoughts on historical context is frightening.
Absolutely!
Only knowledge will set you free.
Like a bee to honey, I honed right on "in need of rebellion". In my circles almost everyday when people start discussing their issues with just surviving, paying for food, fuel and housing, after the "rich getting richer and poor getting poorer" comment comes "we need a rebellion". Then someone always says, "yeah, but it'll never happen. Americans are a bunch of sheep and afraid of rocking the boat. Don't want to upset the status quo." I keep wondering who these people are that are sheep, and asleep at the wheel of the 2 ton F250s. Perhaps they are us.
Revolutions don't have to take the traditional guns and roses format. They can be alternative revolutions...say, something radical like - just stop. Stop consuming. Stop buying. Close the highways. No more export/import from ANYWHERE else. Open the doors of all the locals businesses and redistribute the necessities so everyone has exactly the same amount of food, fuel and everyone has a place to stay out of the weather, safely. Then, slowly, slowly, really take a look at what we NEED to live, and what is FUELING THE CONSUMERISM monster that has us all by the shorthairs -- do this in the spring so we have three months to plant gardens, hunt, fish, decide what animals really need to be killed to feed us -- and so on and so on. JUST STOP CONSUMING. Don't allow it. BLock the roads into your towns and cities and decide to fend for yourselves until you see just how much you really need TVs from Taiwan, avocados from California, oranges from Florida, natural gas or oil from Iraq or ALaska...etc. etc.
This is would be the only REAL REVOLUTION worth fighting. If we do this now while we are NOT in crisis mode and being forced to do this anyway, much more painfully at the cost of lives, this would be a VERY POWERFUL WEAPON. But, it must well up and be the most important thing on our agenda. THis kind of grassroots rebellion for the purpose of saving ourselves and the planet and helping one another through to a BRAVE NEW WORLD, is proactive, expansive not contractive, and way outside of the box. Its out of their control but it IS in OUR control to do this -- and its the only thing that will work.
Radical? yes. Rebellious? Hell yes. Will it work? What's the worst that can happen? what will happen anyway. At least we make the choice ourselves and we take the wheel and decide our own destinies instead of having them decided for us by people who couldn't care less about who well we are faring. Sound familiar? Do you feel a stirring in your breasts? Talk amongst yourselves...how can this be done effectively? But don't wait until the "time is right" -- we don't have any left. Just do it. STOP. JUST STOP.
As the global economy collapses, which seems ever more likely, this may happen anyway. But, I certainly agree with you (as you can see from my comment to MiMiCcS above) less and local is always better. But I hope you keep your compassion for the man that feeds his family in the TV assembly factory in Taiwan, too. Does he just slip through the cracks once you and your neighbours are self sufficient?
My compassion, and, hopefully, the new basis for our foreign policy, would be expressed in helping that fellow in Taiwan and his neighbors to be likewise self sufficient. Bioregional self sufficiency would do more to promote individual security and defuse more of the motivations (outside of sheer greed) for conflict than just about any other "plan" I can think of. The idea that we must "be competitive in the global market" is about the most destructive mythology that has been foisted on us, all of us here and abroad, in a very long time.
As a person of colour, a U.S. citisen but not an American (I was born in Kobe, Japan), and a person of low economic class, I must say that even though I hope to see a democrat in power who will hopefully fix this, I myself am rather discouraged by the games they played to get Bush in, from voting or doing anything. I mean, if there were a movement to turn this country around, yeah, I'd probably join it. But, like, me, start something? But maybe someone will. I'm just like, enough with the violence. I mean, this war was under the guise of 'we're going to get the terrourists', but the terrourists were an Afghani rebel group who did NOT represent Afghanistan, and the war is in IRAQ. I mean, like okay, I failed geography, too, mate, but I'm not THAT dumb. Seriously, innocent lives, thousands on both sides, from soldiers to babies are being crushed, and for what? Bloody gas, that's what. Bush is an ARSE who rode his daddy's coattails and borrowed his brother's (?) power. He doesn't deserve to be...anything. I speak better English than him XP.
agoodcupoftea listen friend, the Democrats control the Congress which controls how our tax dollars are spent. If the Democrats wanted to end this horrible war they could simply stop funding it. They don't because both mainstream political parties represent the Military Industrial Complex and Big Oil. If the US can control this oil-rich region they stand to make a lot of money. Conclusion: the Democrats are equally to blame for the war and the sorry state of affairs.
A whole lot of frustration expressed here. Expression is about all any of you will get to release your frustration. Rebellion, that's a laugh. Even if we had a leader, which we don't and even if we had an organization, which we don't and even if there were 1000 times as many as write here it would be hopeless, peaceful or forceful.
Democracy is dead now -- only a fascade remains. Even capitalizm is dead. We are living in a modern day Feudalism, where the rich allow us to rant and rave. The Methane Bubble is near.
Once again, Uncle Howard rises above it all to see the big picture while so many of us just squabble. Thanks. I disagree with nothing he says, and have nothing to add. He says more in a quick interview than most people say in an entire book.
We're not going to elect our problems away, at least not this time. So it's up to us. Talk to your neighbors, your friends, your co-workers, your family. Let them know what's really going on. Chances are they are of the rank and file also, and thusly are the ones who truly have a stake in positive social change and have no legitimate reason to oppose it.
It is (or was) the job of the Democrats to oppose in no uncertain terms the coming of tyranny to this country - even if it costs them every seat in every governmental body in every state of the union and Repimplicans controlled everything. Instead, the Democrats equivocate, rationalize, lie and then head down to the bank to count their money. There is no meaningful opposition to the gradual coming of tyranny. The MSM is lower than any prostitute selling herself in Corkscrew Alley. Most of our fellow Americans are like the pod people in "Invasion of the Body Snatchers". You can watch a great Frank Capra movie like "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington" and jump out of your seat with tears in your eyes and cheer when Jimmy Stewart defeats the villains. But when you get up the next day, shit will still smell like shit and the blank, stupid, smirking kisser of George Wanker Bush will still be lying his ass off to some donkey who calls himself/herself a journalist for station KRAP.
javier September 9th, 2008 11:24 pm
"There was no TV when the people were lining up to go to war with Spain. Boy they were keen. They didn't need TV to go at each other during the civil war. And those 2 glorious world wars can be blamed on TV either. The indians didn't die because of the main stream media and the US wasn't the last country to give up slavery because of the press. When the movies showing the indians getting killed appeared nobody forced the parentsd to send their children to them. And blacks didn't get srung up because they had a bad agent.....................lizard"
Back then, the (s)word was the bible. Today the (s)word is t.v. / MSM
Propaganda always has a tool.
The media and other sources of information (newspapers and books) were controlled by those who profit from wars. The Rothschild bankers and their agents like JP Morgan.
BTW, I have seen a number of references to the Protocols of the Elders of Zion here. This was a document which was published for one purpose, to promote anti-semitism. It was translated to English and published in London/NY in 1920 (first came out in Russian to fuel anti-semitism and get the jewish population onboard with the Communists prior to WW I). Plans for WW II and the holocaust were in the works then since the League of Nations was obviously going to be a failure and WW I did not go as planned (the Bolsheviks were not supposed to make peace with Germany, so they ended up with too little land).
Albert Pike predicted 3 wars would be needed to accomplish One World Government, and the 2nd one would result in a holocaust of Jews and that would be the excuse they needed to for a pro-European state in Palestine to destabilize the region which was known to have great quantities of oil. The letter he wrote in the 1880's was found in the 1920's, and not after WW II.
The British and French elite had already agreed to withdraw from the Middle East and give up their occupation and other colonies to set the stage for the Cold War and the expansion of Communism, thats why Israel was needed, to fill the vacuum as they left. WW II was a tremendous victory for Communism, and Israel.
But the thing about the Protocols is how true they read. Not about a Jewish conspiracy, that is a red herring to fuel anti-semitism after WW II it was useful to discredit it as anti-semitic propaganda. But if you read it and think Luciferian elite (not jew, although they pretend to be Christian, Jew and Muslim to help control these religions) and beast - normal man (not goyim, and all religions including jew) then it makes what's happening today a lot clearer. It's a document worth reading in this context.
The elite fuel anti-semitism and racism as a way to prevent discussion of certain issues that would expose their sinister deeds as well as promote divisions in nations which are becoming increasingly mixed racially.
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion were a Czarist forgery to whip up hatred against the Jews. Looks like you drank the koolaid,
see for example:
http://www.skepdic.com/protocols.html
http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion.aspx
http://www.publiceye.org/tooclose/protocol.html
If we are going to be organized against our true enemies concentrated state power that goes hand in hand with concentrated corporate power our first task is to eliminate superstitious hoaxes from our discourse so we can make an accurate analysis of the extent of the economic and political power of the Haliburtons, Bechtels, Microsofts, GMs, and WTO/U.S. empire on the world. More Chomsky less bull shit please.
I enjoy your comments which I read carefully. A revolution is about being against something. And like Party Politics, Free Masonry, Zionism or Anti-Semitism, many things are held up to be for or against. Are they not just all forms of tribalism, used by the elite?
So somebody wears an apron cuts a trouser leg and bears his left breast… and another believes God gave him an exclusive home lands between the Nile and the Euphrates. Another bunch believes in the second coming of a Messiah and the End Times….. All hocus-pocus to take the power away from people and to control them by an elite…
Is this not just a lot of auto-suggestion and self fulfilling prophesy and sophistry to keep the same elite where they are, and the masses in bondage, to keep them from living in the present and to maintain their existence framed in terms defined by such an elite.
A little further down in this fascinating comments page Revenge Girl writes: ..There was a time when Greek and Latin were required classes in public school. High School graduates were expected to know Civics and United States (and world) History, as well as classical literature. ……The emphasis in education toward "useful skills for the job market" instead of learning how to think and base thoughts on historical context is frightening.
So the conclusion one reaches is society dumbs down because it is lead by insatiable material wants/needs, which are manipulated by and ever present “elite” by the artificial limitation of resources and manipulation of competition.
Therefore the only revolution needed anywhere and everywhere is the self-controlled mineralization of personal material demand as individuals, the acceptance of death in the case that the minimum is unobtainable or eventually anyway, and the maximization of knowledge, and awareness in the meantime. Personally I would add to that, the obvious, that our greatest joy anyway derives not from consumption but from taking away the suffering of others.
What other revolution is needed?
However the tool is often benign, it's the intent of the people and their state of spiritual awareness, and potential for self determination, that is the real cause of the times.
Wow! These are some of the best discussions i've read in a long time on CD. Where the solutions to these problems will lie it's hard to tell, but if more and more americans start to publicly debate the ideas i've been reading (esp welshTerrier2, rtdrury, and malcolm martin's posts; nice!) this place might actually start to change for the better.
I agree.
To keep this rebellion within each of us. We should arise from our sleep, drugs and speed ( we are traveling much too fast now ) . Know what our zodiac sign is. Then use our zodiac personality , which runs deep within us, to target our rebellion.
Here is mine, Pieces.. Are compasionate enforcers and like to make rules fair.
Examining where our tax money is being used in my local community and over all community. It seems like our government is thinking, feeling and doing as if it is a business.
Government is not a business.
Goverment is created to serve the community. Community of species. It must respect all species , not just the human species. It should have compassion and dogged belief that it serves all communities in its jurisdiction.
Here is most important question for any government employee to get right or be fired. What is a definition of community? If it does not include the words, all species. They lack the quality to be a government employee. They should get a job with a business instead. And we will help them get a job with the business in their community. By the way , I mean all government employees, including the Generals.
So to All zodiac signitories. Do what is in you.
toophat for you!
Yes lets get lost in superstition rather than doing concrete practical things like planting gardens, shopping at co-ops, building local Green parties, reducing our carbon foot print, speaking out whenever we see injustice or oppression, getting as off the grid as we can, etc, Medieval European superstition will surely help? Sigh and we wonder why we are losing? If you think Dick Cheney allows himself to be distracted by such fluffy fare you are kidding yourself, he wakes up at 6 am everyday brutally focused on his goal of world domination for his tight circle of globalist corporate exploiters. If we aren't just as focused in providing positive REAL alternatives AND in fighting back we will lose, period end of story. And what's more we will deserve to lose because we weren't serious about fighting for the downtrodden including ourselves and our families. Time to put away your astrology books and get serious boys and girls. Perhaps another harder even more "inconvenient truth."
.
Obama needs to do one thing:
He needs to watch The Lion King, by himself.
Over and over - until it gets into his soul.
He must get in touch with the simple but
extremely powerful narratives it conveys.
Righteous Anger.
Reclaimed Moral Authority.
The collective spirit of his wounded land.
Then he must stand on that rock, and…
ROAR.
The Young Simba needs to claim the “audacity”
of King Mufasa’s fearlessness and valor.
Barack - Remember who you are!
THEN the Sheeple’s of America will say:
Banzai: Oh, Scar, it's just you.
Shenzi: We were afraid it was somebody important.
Banzai: Yeah, you know, like Mufasa.
Scar: I see.
Banzai: Now that's power.
Shenzi: Tell me about it. I just hear that name and I shudder.
Banzai: Mufasa!
Shenzi: Ooooh! Do it again!
Banzai: Mufasa!
Shenzi: Ooooh!
Banzai: Mufasa, Mufasa, Mufasa!
Shenzi: Ooooh!
[breaks into laughter]
Shenzi: And it tingles me!
It is really as simple as a kid’s movie…
Rafiki: It is time.
.
Hahahahahahahahaha... That's SO naive, Obama is talking on a cell phone RIGHT NOW as we type to his major donors who are Wall St. bundlers who bring in untold millions of dollars. It will continue to be a corporate ruled duopoly until people simply pack up and walk away from empire and say no more. In the long run plating a radish in your back yard is FAR more important IMO than voting for either of the corporate sock puppets or a third party that ill fail for quite a ways into the future. The raddish will feed you and your family and hopefully inspire your friends and neighbors to stop buying at the corporate grocery store for example Whole Foods or Krogers BOTH Union busting exploiters. When the stores fall then you will see real "change."
Don't forget we will need to play his trustworthy side kicks. I'll be Timon,
Kieth you be Pumba.
Rally cry, Hakuna Matata!
BTW for all you uptight posters who have been haranguing me for my worry free philosophy as a way to get out of the morass of depression, fear and anger that
seems on the rise here-you should watch the movie again too. It is time. Palin and simple.
.
Thanks Leea,
It may seem a bit crazy to some sophisticated thinkers and intellectuals to mention an animated kid’s movie, but this story presents very powerful metaphors and imagery that average persons relate too.
And it brings into focus Obama’s Achilles' heel; his falling back into his comfort zone of intellectualism – where he mistakenly believes if he just cooly, pleasantly, and professionally presents all the logic and rationale of his positions, most persons will see the stark difference between himself and Bush/McSame – and it does work with us - but for the voters he needs to attract and assure, it doesn’t.
Here is why; in the real world where most people live, if your loved ones or property is threatened or worse, your daughter is raped, you don’t respond cooly, pleasantly, and professionally – you react with RAGE – and rightly so!!!
Obama is far from perfect based on my worldview, but I am supporting him.
That said I strongly believe if the Dems are going to win Barack needs to transcend from the mindset of Young Simba into the ROARING Lion King who reclaims this raped land of ours…
.
Absolutely Keith and you know what they say, don't get mad, get even.
Even is a nice word to focus on here. Right now Obama is going on and on about how the McCain campaign is lying. OMG< OMG< they are lying, waaaaaah. The people are probably shrinking in dismay to this politics as usual tantrum. Instead he could do some speaking truth to power. Not by telling McCains lies, but by telling Obama's truths.
He has fallen off his horse, and all the kings people and all the kings men, won't put him back together again.
Truth will balance these scales, and I guess together we must be the ones to tell the truth to him.
Sigh.
I wish HZ was correct, but the fact is Australia is adopting virtually all of U$A's failed policies by both the Liberal and Labor parties and it's trashing our living standards.
Many of us view U$A as a parasite nation which has been living way beyond its means since the 1950s.
{NB: The Liberal Party misrepresent the term liberal. They're right-wingers. The Labor Party routinely take for granted and sell out the working class for corporate bastards}
That's why I'm a member of the Greens Party. We currently attract 10%+ of primary votes, and electoral support increases with each succeeding election. We are now in over 100 countries through out the world and in 2001 formulated a global charter.
If you want change, you've got to make it happen. So vote Green or independent.
PS. My apologies on behalf of Ozzies for inflicting Rupert Murdoch on you. But please don't send him back. You deserve him more than we do.
I agree with alot of what you say. The Austrailian people dont deserve John Howard ( who served for almost 10 yrs.) anymore thn the Am. People deserved Dubya! I am a Socialist, but I dont get a whole lot of say in what happens here. Truly, the entire "Western civilization" seems to be on the decline. Not al of the EU--but, the UK, certainly. Austrailians are British subjects--which, dont get me wrong, many times I wish to hell we were! US is the worst, as far as pilliging the planet. But we are certainly not alone. The EU "protects " itself ( I wish we did!) and spends alot more money om social welfare programs, and less on defense. We spend a RIDICULOUS amount on military--esp. BOMBS! 10x more than the rest of the world combined! (Correct me if you know better)It has NOT "kept us safe". Even if it did, I would rather go down fighting than with Dubyas's head up my ass! --
That being said, I love the people of Austrailia, UK, EU, New Zealand--been to some of them (Not Austrailia), but their govt joins in many of our military exploits. There were NOT enough protesters in the uS before Iraq (anybody want to take back that beer can they threw at me now?), but I'm not sure that the western powers that joined Dubya are in as good a position to judge, as many others. NO offense intended. If we had an international peoples' labor party--then we would be getting somewhere as a planet and a species!Please come back to blog--US needs to hear more international voices!
General strike: one effective way out of corporate control and narrative--but when, how? A major depression/collapse first, perhaps? Entropy, disintegration are just as likely as a political revolution. Fascism is on the rise in the US. But the call for 'rebellion' still seems valid as an expression of hope. This discussion is not penetrating any significant part of the national discourse at this time. Jack London's _Iron Heel_ is a vision of how an oligarchy might be challenged, yet it was an old notion prior to the rise of corporate media as a dominant force affecting human consciousness, limiting the spectrum of debate. The margins of radical discourse may be growing, hard to measure, and perhaps too late to be proactive. In any case, Zinn should be encouraged to elaborate on this article.
If the number of people get out a vote I feel DIEBOLD couldn't handle the numbers and you may get real results. That is the cornerstone of Democracy none tampered with results.
Given an ill-informed electorate, voting is not the cornerstone of democracy, but rather, its tombstone.
Good one Welshie.
Who's gonna raise the dead?
Just kick back and let the USA finish its meltdown. Nobody listens to its ideas any more. Instead everyone is blazing a different path. For example, nobody follows the US healthcare model, but instead everyone is doing single payer after the successful models elsewhere.
Nobody is following the US model of freeways and cars/trucks. - Everyone is expanding their rail transport, following the models of other countries, getting off fossil fuels, and addressing global warming responsibly.
Nobody is following the US model of opening their borders to imports. Instead, everyone is keeping up the tariffs to protect their own industries, the highly successful model pioneered outside the USA.
Nobody is following the US model of petro-synthetic food production. Everyone is instead following the old traditions producing healthier organic food.
Nobody is following the US model of militarist foreign policy. Instead everyone is keeping their military expenditures very modest and are banning land mines and all those things.
Nobody is following the USA in allowing ridiculous unregulated financial market speculation. Instead everyone else is keeping the same strong regulations that allowed their economies to grow surpluses while the US economy plunges into debt.
Nobody is following the US model of war on drugs. Instead others are legalizing the various mild drugs such as cannibis and coca.
Nobody is following the US model of privatizing government services. Instead, others are keeping all traditional government services in the public sphere at one half the cost or less.
Nobody follows the USA in chucking the rule of law, chucking the rule of international law, and chucking international treaties. Instead everyone is strengthing the rule of laws and treaties in an alternate community of nations that excludes the USA.
Nobody is paying any attention to US ivy league business schools. Everybody knows their prescriptions would lead to millions of citizens rioting in the streets in other countries.
auntEm
Good list, rtdrury! It is worth remembering.
Hmmm his sounds like what HZ was promoting......does this explain McCains new hat,
the irrelevancy of the gov't is forcing it to try to become relevant?
rtdrury,
This is a really great summary of some dynamics at work today. It would be great to build on this.
South America is encouraging.
Unfortunately several major countries in Europe have been electing more conservative governments. The commonality driving the electorate to vote against their own interests is probably racist fear that immigration is diluting their national character and draining their social programs.
Once elected, the conservatives there (who are confusingly called liberals for their free market ideas) align with Bush / Cheney on foreign policy and domestically try over and over to eat into gains won by the unions and progressives. Conservatives bite away bit by bit like a school of bluefish on the leg. First they might try to cut the school week, then to increase the work week etc.
Luckily there is still some organized opposition - people who are not numbed or dumbed, who feel the attack and are willing to react when threatened.
Joe
We had a coup on people's govt in sixty three and then stolen elections after that.
Right wing corp press and bs polls.
A govt torturing people; that's their msg to us.
"According to all myth, the female - not the male -- gives life"
"According to all myth, the female - not the male -- gives life"
Hurray for sexist identity politics lets divide up along gender lines and call each other names so the regressive empire can finish us off even easier, good plan!
...but then along came christ, God's(as man's image) son, who gave rebirth. Everlasting real and redeeming 'life' to his followers.
The woman has taken back seat ever since. But she makes a good back seat driver, just ask Joe Biden. Heh.
Don't worry, some of us don't believe in Christ, and think women are completely equal :-)
You can either concede to the elite ruling class whose concern isn't the pubic good, and take no action. Voting democratic is taking no action.
Or you can vote third party as a start. Then start working with them on a local level. The Green Party certainly could use additional voices. They are open to points of view that support peace and justice. Are they perfect? Hell no, but significantly better than either corporate party.
And to those people who complain that the Green Party or Nader only come out every four years (which, by the way, isn't true), I ask them: What have the progressive members of the democratic party been able to accomplish in 8 years. EIGHT YEARS. The best they can come up with is Obama or worse yet, Hillary? Never mind Biden for VP.
It's simple, you want a different outcome, you have to change the input.
One thing is sure, as eloquently declared by Frederick Douglass- Change will not happen just by hoping for it.
“If there is no struggle, there is no progress,” declared Frederick Douglass in 1857, in response to those who suggested that the great abolitionist was pushing too hard for an end to human bondage. “Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground. They want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters. This struggle may be a moral one; or it may be a physical one; or it may be both moral and physical; but it must be a struggle. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will.”
Or you can concede to the elite ruling class and take action. Don't you all realize this group of people are the real life wizards of Oz? Very malleable and helpful if you pull back the curtain. As I've found through real life experience. Of course pulling that curtain back does take quite a struggle, but then again not pulling it back brings the same struggle in different dynamics.
auntEm
The Frederick Douglas quote is important. A real reminder. Change will not be easy and will take work, hard work, and taking time to understand. Thank you!
No savior is going to appear on the horizon that will solve the problem either. It takes time and a lot of real effort.
And we need to find our allies. That means opening our minds to possibilities we had not thought of or had dismissed before.
But then again if a Savior does appear on the horizon, the thing that sucks is he/she will just offer us a hand off our asses and then give us a kick in the ass.
Any real savior does not do the work for an enslaved mass, because that is just another form of slavery. Waaaaait.....isn't that what McCain is telling us? He will do the work for us for real this time because those who neglected that power can be shook up and shaped up? He's not going to crack under the pressure exerted by special interest groups trying to make him a prisoner of Washingtons corrupted regime this time.
Obama is saying something like, it's about you, we have to do this together.
Where is T&P when you need it!
Good points!
We are the change. The new culture is being developed as we debate and make a thousand little personal changes. The new vision captures our minds and hearts before it manifests. The intersection of our ideas reforms our past beliefs and projects them into a fluid dynamic from which the new culture, or multiple cultures are born. Our decentralized understandings and lifeways render centralized economics and governance weak and ever more quaint. Chaos is an opportunity to form new and more effective strategies. Human talent is still our most precious resource. The effective management of high speed change through the application of new strategies makes order out of chaos. Applying one's talent to the new fluid culture with sustainably reasoned choices will in time supplant the old culture. Peaceful revolution results.
Nice. :)
Howard Zinn ROCKS! His analysis is spot-on!
Zinn: "They don't understand the basic undemocratic nature of the American political system in which all power is concentrated within two parties which are not very far from one another and people cannot easily tell the difference."
-Thank you. It is true Democrats and Republican work like a hand in a glove. If the Democrats were really opposed to Bush and the Republicans they would have impeached him and stopped the war.
Zinn: "There always has been an opposition, but the opposition has always been either crushed or quieted, kept in the shadows, marginalised so their voices are not heard."
-I'm used to the crushing. Here on CD I've been called a Republican troll, a Rove ass, a leftoid, a radical leftist and a naive fool to mention a few for opposing the sold out Democrats that aren't worth a bucket of warm spit.
Zinn: "They do not hear the voices of the people all over this country who do not like the American leaders who want different policies."
-funny how Obama's supporters talk of "change" when we that are voting for 3rd parties are the ones that actually advocate change. Obama is a very conventional status quo politician with a running mate that has endorsed the Republican wars of aggression against both Iraq and Afghanistan.
Zinn: "I think also, people in the rest of the world should know that what they see in Iraq now is really a continuation of a long, long term of American imperial expansion in the world."
-if we are an empire then Obama/McCain are running for emperor. That's why they sound so bellicose and saber rattling.
List the ways voting for a third party in a swing state will help build democracy in the 2008 election, at the top of the ticket. Voting every four years for third party Pres. candidate won't change anything. Please explain how it ever did or could? Isn't there something missing?
A vote for Obama is a vote for the party that has allowed the Republicans to take a crap on our Constitution and wipe their butts with it. If the Democrats can't win against John McBush III without the tiny number of "leftist" votes we represent, then they deserve to lose.
Voting for a Democrat to me is like voting for a Republican. How does that help? Voting for a 3rd party is an attempt to build them up to the point they can reach 5% which qualifies them for federal matching funds. When enough "progressives" start voting for 3rd parties instead of sell outs that will help.
I will not vote for a Democrat because I don't believe in them and I could care less if McCain wins because when it comes to war and militarism I just don't see much of a difference.
Dems don't own my vote. Votes need to be earned. Because Obama voted for the FISA capitulation, hasn't mentioned impeachment or upholding the Constitution and voted for war funding he forfeited my vote. That is why I will vote for Cynthia McKinney of the Green Party.
Zinn would flinch at being called a Marxist, which is reflected in his hopes for "decent people" to launch a rebellion in the US. His uprising will certainly come though around the objective conditions he describes. But it will be lead by class conscious women and men, or Marxists, and they will not fight for whatever is left of our bourgeois democracy but to take power for the only element that deserves to wield it in these perilous times--the working class.
No effective anti-imperialist movement has ever developed inside any empire. There is a mythology among the petty bourgeois, the political circle that Zinn speaks from, that the US domestic anti-war movement had something to do with ending the Vietnam War. The fact is when the US helicopter was pulling those last wretched souls off the embassy roof in 1975 in what was then called Saigon, it marked the military defeat of the US by the Vietnamese people and their armed forces after a protracted guerrilla war. The Vietnamese people were led through this horrendous confrontation with Japanese, French and then US imperialism by Ho Chi Minh and other committed Marxist-Leninists (who understood they were in a class war) and Vietnamese nationalists. The capitalist labor camp that Vietnam has become since then does not change the history.
The Iraqi and Afghan people will end the US occupations of both countries. The US empire and its capitalist economic superstructure will continue to weaken and finally crash. That will create the objective conditions for the revolutionary America where you will be able to get at war criminals like Bush, Cheney, and Pelosi.
Zinn is a learned man and a humanist but the sad truth is that the petty bourgeois cannot defeat the capitalist ruling class! They rail against the outrages and inhumanity of the U.S. government and the Bush Administration. They point out the duplicity, the corruption, the hypocrisy, the inhumanity, and the utter criminality loosed in the world today but to no useful end since capitalism will not be reformed nor shamed to death. Pointing out the defects of capitalism has become as easy as shooting fish in a barrel. The ruling class brushes its liberal democratic critics off like gnats as long as they stay away from the third rail. But let one of these voices dare mention unity based on working class-consciousness and a mobilization to strike at profits and great danger would shortly thereafter visit.
No matter the danger, it must begin to be spoken by a warrior vanguard: socialism is the only way humankind will live into the distant future on this planet. Only a working class with a consciousness of itself and united across all racial, national and cultural boundaries is capable of seizing power. Only a working class in power will see to the end of this madness and willingly share our available resources for the sake of human survival.
Traditional marxism with it's rigid jargon and division is in IMO a god that failed in the same way that laissez affaire capitalism is ALSO a god that failed. In the 21st century we need participatory democracy, co-ops, farmers markets, crafts people, labor unions in large organizations that provide infrastructure, credit unions, community wi-fi, Linux, active resistance against the police state at home and empire abroad, community gardens, local bike shops, wind mills and solar on houses, serious planning that takes ecology into account, complete rebuilds of our unjust inner cities, etc. It's the 21st century and we need to be thinking system theory, humanism, ecology, and empowering traditionally oppressed people not the old tired stale rhetoric of the 19th century. We also IMO at least need to talk to paleo-cons and Libertarians and bond over points of similarity about local control and agriculture and resisting erosions of civil liberites while confronting them on their regressive tendencies. I'd still say though they are better friends than the average tired warmonger global trade supporting corporate sock puppet Democrat.
Hint Malcom, we tried the "dictatorship of the proletariat" and it was a dismal failure and turned into a just plain dictatorship as hierarchical structures ALWAYS do. OTH the democratic socialism in Sweden works pretty well so it's not socialism that's the problem but ossified and rigid control structures. The way we will win against empire is being more creative and intelligent IMO. When people try organic food fresh from the garden they generally don't go back to GMOd crap. Lets show people that sustainable Green humanism with a global communications infrastructure co-ops and less hierarchy is a more joyful vibrant way to live. Or we can refight the same old stale wars of Europe in the 19th century using a lot of outdated Marxist jargon, your choice people.
hie, hootowl
"Zinn would flinch at being called a Marxist, which is reflected in his hopes for "decent people" to launch a rebellion in the US."
Zinn isn't a Marxist but an anarchist, and doesn't flinch from calling himself one:
"I am an anarchist, and according to anarchist principles nation states become obstacles to a true humanistic globalization."
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/smygo/message/11309
Dan Clore
My collected fiction: _The Unspeakable and Others_
http://tinyurl.com/2gcoqt
Lord Weÿrdgliffe & Necronomicon Page:
http://tinyurl.com/292yz9
News & Views for Anarchists & Activists:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/smygo
I have long defined myself as an anarchist, but in the sense of not adhering or blindly submitting to contrived institutions, inequitable legislation and misdirected social policies that impose an unnatural order or are predicated on an obsessive preoccupation with the worst of human nature.
To be constructive as an anarchist requires being quite perceptive, well-informed, and inclined to resonate with the Laws of Nature. In that sense, I believe there exists a natural structure that, to find, first requires the humbling of human ego and would-be man-king aspirations. That includes the ability to sense and identify with the calm and order in chaos, which is simply too esoteric for most to grasp. As a matter of daily course, very few folks relate. It is best said, "Wise men, though all laws were abolished, would live the same lives."
The rule of law can only prove equitable and sustainable when the spirit and intent of the law is grasped and valued more greatly than the letter of it.
SORRY BUT ONLY THE REVOLUTIONARY CLASS, THAT IS, ALL PEOPLE WITH A CONSCIENTIOUSNESS of revolution will make history. Workers are least likely to be such revolutionaries, especially so in the USA. But the old slogans are great.
WORKERS OF THE WORLD UNITE!!!
We desperately need a revolution.
Excellent post malcolm martin!
Socialism is too loosely defined. Where "socialism" has existed alongside financial economics finance has dominated and corrupted the "socialism" toward fascism time and again.
What is really necessary?
Direct democracy and calorie economics.
No more transaction in money. Money allows the REAL value of work and product to be skewed and twisted. Transaction in calories eliminates the potential for monetary abuse. A product requires X human spent calories to produce, the product is thus worth exactly X calories to acquire. To acquire that product you must work worth X calories. There is no more fair system to implement. When by direct democracy calorie economics is instituted, it will be the end of corruption for all time. Crime will plummet as people are easily able to acquire their wants and needs for easy and reasonable effort. Most people's work will not be going into the bank accounts of the financial elite, which is a condition that exists today.
rocyahsoul@yahoo.com
www.lamegame.name
Daniel Vincent Kelley
A starting point perhaps - but there is not a direct relationship in the amount of energy that is used with the value of what is then produced. Aside from the factor of 10 or more inherent in the efficiency levels of people and various processes applied to produce a thing, we also have a factor of 10 or more in the usability and practicality of that which has been produced. And some could argue the factors are more like 100 or more
But there is within this idea two important concepts:
1) there is a real intrinsic value that current money practices do not honor very well at all, and
2) economics must ultimately be a zero-sum game.
To understand money and economics as a zero-sum game, one only needs to understand the Laws of Conservation, and particularly the Laws of Motion. Economics seeks to assert itself as a science, but it cannot without honoring the basic laws that apply.
As an object in motion, money acts as a force that for every action has an equal and opposite reaction. Understanding this simple law explains the lows and highs of economy, and why the stability of a social system always always and always depends on a significantly large and equitable middle class. The more disproportionately income and wealth are distributed the more ineffective and unstable a society becomes. AND that is not about being a liberal, a socialist or believing in any political paradigm at all - that is about simply understanding and respecting the natural laws.
Ah nature. Mans oldest enemy.
Of which he is not without, and cannot exist without.
But it is true - essentially for the white man and most modern cultures, not all.
The irony - making nature into an enemy is like cutting off your nose to spite your face - or more graphically, it is liking shitting in your food store, and where you eat.
thus all the E-coli outbreaks
Huh?
Joe
Nice idea in theory. What are you going to do about the paraplegic people, persons who cannot direct their own activity or those of others such as the senile or babies? Try again. Special education teacher.
May I suggest giving everyone a good education. Give all persons with disabilities all the equipment each needs (and start designing better, cheaper wheelchairs...if the US can put vehicles on Mars, certainly we can all have a decent battery powered wheelchair), as well as education, ....health care for all...........attendant care at home (which is cheaper than nursing home incarceration). Respect for all humans is a nice start.
Howard Zinn is a historian. He has written about Helen Keller being a Socialist and being on picket lines with striking workers.
I think you missed the point of the poster's recommendation. He was talking of direct human calorie expenditure to determine values for labor, productivity and services. If one is not capable of expending much in calories, how will one be supported? I totally agree with supporting all in appropriate education as well as single payer universal coverage health care and respect for all. In fact, that is why I found it necessary to comment on an economic system based on direct human calorie expenditure. In the wrong hands not thought out properly, it smacks too much of "Arbeit mach frei"
Workers here are more right wing than not.
There are just enough people enamoured with the current situation (i.e. being paid enough to stay quiet and enjoy the bread and circuses) to keep everything status quo. There just isn't enough of a groundswell to change anything and the deck has been stacked for some time. Voting 3rd party won't do anything either; the situation is too dire for any one man or group to fix.
However, there are ways to piss off even the elite. So we as a group need to think of a way to do that, perhaps taking away something the elite treasure above all. Ok, money, yes, of course, but how? Or what else can be taken away? Let's put our heads together and come up with something that will by default undermine the status quo.
I agree the country could and possibly will split into smaller, more managable regions, perhaps focusing inward more/becoming more self-sufficient vs. being motivated to buy stuff thus pumping our wealth away to countries with their own self-interests at heart (and why not - the U.S. is really no longer the center of the world).
Mr. Zinn said:
"Well, we got to this point because ... I suppose the American people have allowed it to get it to this point because there were enough Americans who were satisfied with their lives, just enough.
Of course, many Americans were not, that is why half of the population doesn't vote, they're alienated.
But there are just enough Americans who have been satisfied, you might say getting some of the "goodies" of the empire, just some of them, just enough people satisfied to support the system, so we got this way because of the ability of the system to maintain itself by satisfying just enough of the population to keep its legitimacy."
First, let me say that I have the greatest respect for Howard Zinn. I'm not sure, however, that his comments about the American people reflect the true nature of the problems we face.
Let's ask these questions:
1. To what degree should we hold the American people responsible for the actions of their government and the powerful, controlling forces inside the US?
2. Are enough Americans being satisfied just enough, as Zinn asserts, to enable the US government to retain its "legitimacy"?
3. Are Americans aware of the international actions of their government or should we reasonably expect them to be?
To my friends on the left, let me say this: whether we criticize the American people for their role in empire, however we define that, we cannot effect the changes we seek without their support. If we choose to find the American people guilty for their role in empire, our mission must, nevertheless emphasize education over confrontation. Few are persuaded while being attacked. We've made that critical error for far too long.
My answer to the above questions is that, if responsible, the American people are guilty of empire only through their negligence and their failure to take seriously their responsibility as national citizens and as global citizens.
I disagree with Zinn's assertion that too many Americans have been bought off by the good life. I don't think Americans are looking the other way; I just don't think they're looking at all. The crime is negligence; not cover-up and avoidance ... at least that's my take. I wouldn't be surprised to receive a sound thrashing on this belief; that's OK - the truth is I'm not sure I'm right.
Too many people I speak to genuinely find it too painful to discuss the horrors our corporate state has imposed on its own citizens and on foreign citizens as well. We are not taught the truth in our public schools. We are not taught the truth by our media. We are not taught the truth by major party candidates. Does Obama speak about empire? Of course not.
I'm afraid that most Americans believe that good and bad can be resolved with the struggle between the two major parties. If something is wrong, just vote in the other guys. The struggle they see isn't between justice and injustice; it's not between empire and autonomy; it's not between freedom and oppression; it's simply the Democrats versus the Republicans.
Again, they aren't averting their eyes from the great truths of our times; they are naively investing in false hopes. Should we hold them responsible for not learning more and for not understanding the times and the issues? Perhaps. Still, we on the left have failed them miserably.
Until the left finds a way to educate and persuade the masses, the changes we seek are not possible. With the inevitable collapse of empire, things will nevertheless change radically. We damned well better have opened a very real and very serious national dialog before that happens. If we fail to do so, the radical changes we will see will not be to our liking. If the masses are not ready to fight for the values we hold when the empire collapses, a much harsher oppression will be the inevitable result.
You know Welshie,
Your questions are excellent.
Just take me, one of those people you are speaking of.
I'm part of that guilty group, that just didn't care enough, I mean I can say that about myself. Heck I may be the only one that exists in this group for all I know.
But what made me change?
I went from believing that Empire was beyond my life, to the horrible realization that it was my life.
Believe me, you would never need to encourage such a person to change their life, because they cannot 'look the other way'
When it becomes personal, change is inevitable.
So what is the dividing line, what currently makes this impersonal to the persons of this nation?
P.S.
It's interesting that the People and the Government are seen as separate entities.
Do you believe in a government of, for and by the people?
Or people of, for and by the government?
In other words which of these two entities do you see as primary and which do you see as secondary?
VERY well put and thought provoking! Thank you!
1. To what degree should we hold the American people responsible for the actions of their government and the powerful, controlling forces inside the US?
Answer: To the degree they are willing to accept the perks of living in this country, but not willing to fight for the freedoms that have allowed those advantages.
2. Are enough Americans being satisfied just enough, as Zinn asserts, to enable the US government to retain its "legitimacy"?
Answer: I believe so or the rebellion would already have critical mass.
3. Are Americans aware of the international actions of their government or should we reasonably expect them to be?
Answer: This is a world of information in which we now live. If you are not aware of your own governments international actions, you are in a state of mesmerization, a result of the well-controlled MSM OR you are in a state of "plausibility deniability". Many Americans have been de-educated since kindergarten....NOT BY CHANCE.
latest gallup poll shows mccain leading -- 117,500 rigged voting machines to
maybe 2 or 3 hundred tops for obamie n company
Leea,
There's plenty of ready evidence that "our" intellect needs work, but I think you'd better present a list of items to buttress your unsupported assertion that "our spirit is just fine." The list had better be at least twenty pages long to even begin to convince. Nah, we live not only in the United States of Amnesia but in the United States of Pusillanimity, and Howard Zinn has that right.
Hmmm, how to explain.
Your piercing analysis, is awesome.
You are of course right.
It seems that what blocks us from a state of natural healthy spiritual connection and action, is not our spirit, but our ego intellect.
Does this mean our spirit must be enhanced to overcome the intellect?
Or should our intellect be enhanced to include the spirit?
....or should our intellect be enhanced to overcome it's own shortcomings, ie, spiritual, creative deficiencies? Or should it be enhanced to include it's untapped development?
"just enough Americans who have been satisfied". If the ruling class can allow JUST ENOUGH Americans to be satisfied the exploitation of the majority can continue. The reason for leftist governments being elected in Latin America is explained by this revealing statement. Maybe this has always been the plan.
The plan? Divide and conquer man, it's old as Rome, goes back to the earliest churches even before Rome. Set the haves, against the have nots. Keep the haves strong enough to break the backs of the have nots. Give the have nots hell in this life, the have nots get theirs in their next...
rocyahsoul@yahoo.com
www.lamegame.name
Daniel Vincent Kelley
Desert Time Out
Will we all be gone before we can figure out what’s going on?
We can count time but it seems we can’t take a time out.
Wouldn’t it be nice to back up from the bang or inflate a moment
so we would have time to contemplate nada
like why the universe is flat or randomly structured
perhaps we could find some lost time.... maybe time before we started counting
like before the big bang when we weren’t even a pre tick
a black singularity just waiting ...pre everything....a pre form void..... like taxes due.......
but then there was the word
‘In the beginning was the word....’
was that a pre mirror word or pre big bang word
In the beginning was the word and..
was that the pre matter law or non verbalized law
In the beginning was the word and the.....
I think in a word so I am is a word
In the beginning was the word and the word....
can there be a word ‘I am’ without being
In the beginning was the word and the word was.....
was that a promise &/or a series of bits
In the beginning was the word and the word was with
was that the logos lured by the principal governing the universe?
‘In the beginning was the word and the word was with God.’
full stop
time for symbols
and symbols mean progress
marks in stone to praise priests ‘who knew accounting’
cuneiform forms in the dessert
voids in stone in the dessert ....einstein,
from the pre form void
ah
bliss... the one no revolution will miss
A dieing empire?!? By what measure?
We are living in an expanding empire.
We are not losing power or influence - we are gaining them.
We are losing or have already lost the hearts and minds of world.
Yes, but this is causing a heavy burden of instability. We are bloated with this power and growth. Such a top heavy and exasperated structure, though mighty in it's time, is the creator of it's own timely demise.
You said it yourself... "We are losing or have already lost the hearts and minds of world."
and since we can't bomb everything into submission... then yes it is a dieing empire.
Can't bomb everything into submission?
By whose standards? Last time I checked, there is enough nuclear weaponry on the planet to evaporate the surface of the planet 15 times over... Now they're building robot attack jets and attaching nuclear power to space laser weapons...
Can't bomb everything into submission... shyeh, right. That's EXACTLY the plan.
rocyahsoul@yahoo.com
www.lamegame.name
Daniel Vincent Kelley
The nation is drowning in bullshit.
Rebellion. Revolution. Insurrection.
Bless your heart, Howard, I wish it were so, but none will likely happen, neither in this country, the world, nor in any of our lifetimes.
The Controllers, you see, the corporations and politicians, control us, but they don’t and can’t control Earth.
The only solution to the problem is extinction, the extinction of the human species. Not by one or some or even many humans. Humans won’t likely commit their own extinction.
But Earth can cause our extinction. Remember, more than 99% of all species to ever live on this planet are now extinct.
Sadly, humans are moving ever closer to the moment when Earth will do what Earth does naturally--cause the extinction of Homo sapiens, the so-called intelligent one!
I hope we learn before it's too late, but...
Ridiculous!
The greatest threat to people on Earth, is people. As extinction nears there are less and less people meaning less and less threat. What is Earth going to throw at a being type that can travel to space or bunker behind hundreds of feet of concrete? Fact is, humanity, once established, is fairly well irrejectable. We're too greatly adaptable and too massively intelligent, to make it at all easy to wipe us out easily. There seems to have been a space impact about 11,000 years ago that wiped out Mammoths, giant sloths and saber tooth tigers from North America. This is supported by a layer of soil on this side of the planet that contains nano diamonds which are a product of intense pressure. Humanity, particularly the Clovis, disappeared from the east coast. Within a few thousand years humanity had again swollen to inhabit most of the continent. That Earth will find a way to eliminate us entirely is highly unlikely. That there is a tiny elitist organization that wishes to see humanity decimated, that they may continue to rule over the chaos is fact, born out by history. Research, Rockefeller, population control, Eugenics. It goes way further back, in fact evidence of these same financially dominant powers having by disease famine and warfare time and again decimated the population is rife for no less than 4000 years of history and artifacts. The oldest sword found is about 4500 years old. Coins accompanied it's discovery.
rocyahsoul@yahoo.com
www.lamegame.name
Daniel Vincent Kelley
People in and of themselves are not the problem. It is our actions that are problematic. It is the actions that will become extinct, because to survive the calamity we are creating through our actions, they will have to.
You can't put out a fire by throwing fire on it.
http://mb-soft.com/public3/global.html#7
The science in this article good, but the assumptions and conclusions may be a way off. All the same, the earth can sure as hell kick us and every other living thing off the planet and we won't have time to react.
The difference between the US empire and all the other empires in the past, is that the other empires absorbed the lands they conquered, but the USA does not absorb them, for fear of giving their new vassals some human rights, so instead just keeps them as vassal states
"The only means of strengthening one's intellect is to make up one's mind about nothing, to let the mind be a thoroughfare for all thoughts." - John Keats
What rebellion? Sarah speaks for mainstream American women. Have it all, baby! Marry a professional and have a good job yourself, and don't worry about the poor and unemployed. They just aren't applying themselves! Drill for more oil and send the boys off to secure Iraq's oil. Gotta feed the SUV and heat the house that is bigger than a lot of churches! Can't take the kids to soccer in a compact. Wild animals belong in zoos - who needs all those Elk herds, seals, and bears and wolves...? Borrow, borrow, borrow and pay no taxes.
We're spoiled, naive and greedy, on the edge of disaster, and the Republicans promise to hold it all together. Somehow. (and abortion is a sin)
Zinn is a tool of the state. Notice he's calling out insurrection which will surely wind up the real opposition locked up or on a watch list. The REAL solution though is to en mass STOP SUPPORTING the CRIMINAL GOVERNMENT by TAX RESISTANCE! Stop paying taxes. Check exempt, work under the table, apply for SSI, stop paying taxes to people who are going to spend your taxes on jails to house you in and bullets to kill your neighbors.
rocyahsoul@yahoo.com
www.lamegame.name
Daniel Vincent Kelley
You are the one advocating getting people thrown in jail. Anyone remember JCRUMB?
How about a progressive en masse 'withdraw our money from the banks' day? That would send ripples through the pond.
Or we all just call in sick to work for a week, that would crash this game too.
The failure of the People to put the brakes on this system is evidence that the People at least tacitly support it -or that they are blind and ignorant.
In either case, the solution is NOT to attempt to destroy the system, but instead, to create superior, alternative systems and begin a process of education.
The "Left", or the "Progressive Community" -or whatever the "opposition" is calling itself these days- has forgotten this as it has been integrated within the system. Now, the long work -whose results we may never see and whose beginnings lie hundreds, if not thousands, of years in the Past- is largely left undone, and exponentially less and less effective and more and more corrupted and deluded schemes and wishes for immediate change predominate the minds of many.
I personally hope that this fall's "Presidential Election" -or rather its predictable aftermath of disappointment and broken promises and the continuation of the status quo- will act as a kind of "Come to Jesus" moment for the "progressive left" or whatever "we" are.
Our work has been neglected, and we have allowed the Counter-Revolution to morph into a Rightist-Corporatist Revolution that is raging with momentum and sucess as we waste our time in Reaction like some mustascioed and be-ribboned Tsarist General!
I guess we'll see how it goes, won't we?
Have Fun,
-matti.
We need really to crash this system and start one a new. While this system is alive and well [sic], being so vast and monstrous and unbound by any sense of legality or morality, it will surely swat all attempts to change it.
rocyahsoul@yahoo.com
www.lamegame.name
Daniel Vincent Kelley
Further, it has been said "all incrementalism is toward bigger government", which might be expanded to include toward greater dominance, worse corruption and more bold murder. Revolt occurs at a tipping point and then goes all at once. Revulsion of the present heinous rule is but a matter of time. The more preparation we aid these grossly corrupt powers with, by sending them our effort in the form of taxes, the more destruction they will be capable of in suppressing the force in opposition to them which will eventually be all people. The present powers are not just murdering many people, they're damning to bug life as reincarnation those who aid them. Eventually the deception dies, the reality sets in and who is really an enemy to you becomes easily recognizable. They've been plotting your egregious demise, which is not something easily kept secret. They say they want to protect you, yet they subsidize tobacco which kills half a million of you. They say they want to protect you and your family, yet they send your son to fight a war without vehicle armor. They say they have plans to make drugs safe, yet their drugs are time and again implicated in deaths. They say it's their mission to make air breathable yet the coal keeps going airborne. When it's your mission to kill SO VERY MANY people, hiding it can only last so long. And when this games up, they'll want to get plastic surgery and have numerous international identities to morph into, and hopefully a sane directly democratic regime will eventually hunt down them and their abettors and put them to justice. They're planning on using regenerative medicine (adult stem cell therapy) to avoid the justice that will surely befall them in the afterlife. If they're not stripped of the financial power they wield, they may succeed for a long time. Thankfully it won't be so bad for so many for very long, as it won't even BE for very many for long at all. They're nearing totally prepared to get underground or in space and wipe the planet of everyone who isn't of mind to follow their every masochistic whim.
rocyahsoul@yahoo.com
www.lamegame.name
Daniel Vincent Kelley
A good old friend of mine (who'se now deceased) said that in his observation of history, THE USA is ripe for the South American style military revolution of the 30s,40s,50s . . . .
The ONLY PROBLEM is that The US Military is hand-in-hand with the industrial complex, which has bought the politicos (ALLLLLLLLLLLLLL of them).
KEEP DANCING AMERICA. . . . . THE PIPER CAN WAIT!!!!!!
auntEm
I am going to disagree slightly with this. It's true we have nothing comparable to the Zapitistas. But there is opposition within the rank and file of the military itself (just maybe not at the top levels). Take a good look at recently retired generals and admirals though. They didn't all just retire "to spend more time with their families."
Quoting Howard Zinn:
"Well you know, whatever hope there is lies in that large number of Americans who are decent, who don't want to go to war, who don't want to kill other people.
"It is hard to see that hope because these Americans who feel that way have been shut out of the communications system, so their voices are not heard, they are not seen on the television screen, but they exist."
Nither is the average citizen's feedback immediatley apparent at the CommonDreams.org website! Their posts are "hidden." ... For shame, CommonDreams ownership! For shame!
Like I want to be seen or heard by the types of people that currently listen to those who are seen and heard? One the same as the other folks. I ain't crying cause the only people hearing me are the same ones I want to be heard by.
Group hug!
Like the wsws is better to talk! You don't even have a comment feature on your sites articles, for shame wsws. Your leaderships been bought too, evidenced by a few articles I've read on your site carrying subintellectual garbage as commentary on world events.
I've been reading your site for years. Back in the day, while misled toward pushing mere socialism within a finance dominated economy and never recognizing the requisite of direct democracy as a civil social establishment, at least your writers weren't describing government actions in glowing terms. Sadly eventually your leadership was subdued or replaced or bought, but now your articles scream defense of Bushes brand of militarism, describing heinous events in cool terms then going so far as to make the victims out to be the problem in ever so coy terms.
Anyone reading this who isn't representative of wsws, don't take me wrong. They have some good writers over there who are obviously kind and well meaning. They have though hired on some writers who are OBVIOUSLY not well intended. Their leadership seems to be the basis of their dysfunction. Their organization is obviously in no way directly democratic and their leadership having been secured to the fascist powers also obvious.
I wrote them years ago about World Oil Production Decline, this before many people were aware and before gas prices began to rise. I received no reply. To my knowledge their analysis still lacks any acknowledgment that World Oil Production Decline is influencing geopolitics or economics or finance. It's like fascism and it's opposition socialism in a bubble over there.
I've written the editorial board no less than 5 times and each time received in reply complete silence.
rocyahsoul@yahoo.com
www.lamegame.name
Daniel Vincent Kelley
rocyahsoul,
In writing about the wsws.org website -- the website of the SEP (Socialist Equality Party) -- you write.
"but now your (wsws's) articles scream defense of Bushes (sic) brand of militarism."
You're confused -- wsws.org has *condemn" Bush in no uncertain terms; characterizing Bush and Company as the war criminals they so obviously are.
Click here for their website www.wsws.org
hey wsws.org blogger rocyahsould paid you a huge compliment because he thinks you write for and own the wsws.org website.
I have been reading WSWS for years and they are absolutely brilliant. You'll be hard pressed to find any better analysis of what's really going down anywhere.
rocyahsoul you obviously have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. The blogger wsws.org doesn't write the articles on that site. It's not his website. He just calls himself wsws.org. He cites the articles but doesn't write them. I sometimes copy several paragraphs too and post them with a reference to the website.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, in which case I have no idea what I'm talking about!
Reading your comments, it's easy to see why they didn't reply to you.
and so the emperor has created an army of clones, and it is us
Living in a dying Empire sure sucks.
I disagree. Sure its scary, but its pretty interesting to. And, If you have a dark or ironic enough sense of humor, it can be hilarious.
I'll give you one:
Zinn -and other Anti-Imperialists "here"- constantly refering to the U.S. as "America" and U.S. Citizens as "Americans", unconsciously claiming the name of two continents containing dozens of Nation-States as their sole property. Sort of an Imperialist thing to do if you ask me.
I love the bit right at the top where the interviewer asks a question about the "United States" (y'know that place where we're specifically from) and Zinn immediately answers by talking about "America" (a general and lazy term begun as a claim to all this land by right of Providence).
Naming our country "America" and calling ourselves "Americans" is as imperialist as the "British" swallowing (only in their minds as it turned out) the Scots, Irish, and Welsh, or as "Great Russia", or as "Rome" the city-state becoming interchangable with "Rome" the great land that streched from Spain to the Near East.
Y'see? Dying Empire can be fun! You just have to FIND the fun:
"America" the land where even famous "Anarchists" speak like the conquerors of old and worry over their "vote" for CEO of the Central Government! Ha. Ha. Ha.
Just keep in mind the Official Slogan of the Milles Lacs Band Ojibwe Indian Casino:
"Have Fun".
And start annoying people you know by refering to yourself and them as "USAns" (you-ess-eh-ens, 4 syllables).
Do that, and you should start enjoying things more in no time.
Have Fun,
-matti.
Better yet, Zinn is framed as a social "critic" rather than a social advocate, who does this man really work for anyway?
He's a troll!!!!!!!!
Snicker
The american people are too obese to revolt...their will, their minds, their bodies have pigged out on mainstream 'fast-food' news garbage.
They will revolt only if there is real pain. But don't worry. That's what the big drug companies and their political shills in washington are there for...
As Leonard Cohen sings, "The fix is in...the good guys lost...
"may you live in interesting times"
The warmongers are about to go bankrupt. You can help- withdraw your money from the bank.
We should organize a progressive money withdraw.... en masse.
I dont have any money in the bank. I'm not kidding,.
Quoting Howard Zinn from the above interview:
"I think ... a lot of people in the world think that this war in Iraq is an aberration, that before this the United States was a benign power.
"It has never been a benign power, from the very first, from the American Revolution, from the taking-over of Indian land, from the Mexican war, the Spanish-American war.
"It is embarrassing to say, but we have a long history in this country of violent expansion and I think not only do most people in other countries [not] know this, most Americans don't know this."
This is the brutal, murderous reality that the US political establishment -- along with the criminally-complicit mainstream media -- along with both a mis-informed and an ill-informed American public ... are assiduously unwilling to admit.
And unless these mass murders, current and historical, are acknowledged, the United States is doomed -- morally, ethically, biologically -- take your pick.
Here are just *some* of the recent war crimes US imperialism is responsible for.
-- According to the Encyclopedia Britannica (hardly a left-wing source of information), the US killed 2,250,000 million Vietnamese -- at least 900,000 of whom were civilians. They also either killed, wounded or made homeless over 14 million Indochinese.
-- Afghanistan is the 20th country the US has bombed since the end of World War II. All these countries have been poor, already-devastated countries. Many of them didn't have an air forces. With Iraq not even having a standing army. And Afghanistan having 1 in 7 people either starving or in imminent danger of starving *before* the US started bombing that country! (Note: Both McCain and Obama want to "escalate" the war in this country.)
-- Setting aside what the Western powers have done to what is now Iraq *before* the 20st century:
... The US raped Iraq by way of Gulf War I -- killing over 200,000 Iraqis.
... The US then raped Iraq a *second* time, via US and UK-led economic sanctions against the Iraq people -- killing over 1,000,000 Iraqis, many of them children.
For over 10 years, approximately, 300 children a day died as a direct result of these sanctions. ... The following is from a May 12, 1996 interview of Madeline Albright, Bill Clinton's Secretary of State, by Leslie Stahl on "60 Minutes."
-- Leslie Stahl: "We have heard that half a million children have died. I mean, that’s more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?"
-- Madeleine Albright: "I think this is a very hard choice, but the price — we think the price is worth it."
This was the "body count" in 1996 -- with the total number of Iraqis who died as a direct result of the economic sanctions exceeding 1,000,000. See the following -- http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&domains=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.counterpunch.org&sitesearch=http%3A%2F%2Fw...
... The US is now in the process of raping Iraq for a *third* time, having
killed -- sorry, *murdered* -- an additional 1,000,000 Iraqis. See, http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/01/31/6768/
People who are in denial for a long period of time are usually classified as insane. See the following, "Insanity in America" -- http://www.counterpunch.org/chuckman06032004.html
That's what we all need to hear...........bravo...............lizard
sierra7
This is exactly why the "opposition" party has failed the Americans and the Constitution when they took impeachment "off the table."
That was the beginning of the end.....the birth was the notion that we can rule the world...because we are militarily more powerful than all others, except that we have learned that we can't always use our military power to subdue others.....
The proceeding of impeachment would have given all other future presidential candidates room for pause and send a message to the House and Senate that the People are what's important, not corporations.
Howard Zinn is right on!
Do you live here in America wsws?
I live in this world. As you do.
oh, I see, thanks ;)
recommended reading, The Great Turning by David Korten
The Empire is bound to fall, but a better world is already being built. The stronger we make it, the better chance it will survive the storm.
Zinn: US 'In Need of Rebellion'
__________________________________
Incidentally-- isn't this kind of "inflammatory"?
If Zinn isn't careful, he'll be booted right off the genteel Reformed comments!
Zinn is a tool of the state. Notice he's calling out insurrection which will surely wind up the real opposition locked up. The REAL solution though is to en mass STOP SUPPORTING the CRIMINAL GOVERNMENT by TAX RESISTANCE! Stop paying taxes. Check exempt, work under the table, apply for SSI, stop paying taxes to people who are going to spend your taxes on jails to house you in and bullets to kill your neighbors.
rocyahsoul@yahoo.com
www.lamegame.name
Daniel Vincent Kelley
I have posted this concept here before with little notice. Progressives are blind to the power of life culture. No, I'm not speaking of the christian narrow life beliefs, but the broader life issues embodied by Indigenous beliefs.
Death reigns in American culture today. One need not list the death culture item by item because it permeates every aspect of American life. American politics today is just a reflection of the death culture.
Establishing a culture of Life is the ONLY path to defeat the death culture. Life is not a piecemeal process. One cannot support abortion and be against war, and visa versa. Life is all or nothing, and nothing less than a full and complete commitment to life will reverse the world's race toward destruction.
If American's cannot very soon adopt a comprehensive life culture then death will stalk us to an early end.
Do you eat vegetables, Stone? I'm just wondering about the total array of implications of this so-called "Culture of Life."
Is this concept of "life" spiritual for you or material, or both?
This "interview" was more of a taste, or tease, than a substantive dialogue.
What I liked most is that they didn't make a point of drawing out another tepid recommendation from Zinn to pull the lever for You-Know-Who.
Why do you think that's important? Curious.
Agreed. Zinn touched on most of the core in just a few answers. Some of the credit goes to the person/people who constructed the questions. If MSM only ATTEMPTED to ask questions like these, perhaps we might get a real dialog rolling.
I wanted it to be longer but would welcome more "tastes" that revolved around the same line of questioning. Sometimes comprehensive does not equate to comprehension... especially with the diminished attention span epidemic by which this country is plagued.
Who? BHO?
There are in the US cultural elements which make it difficult for people to get together, to function as a genuine society rather than as a collection of individuals serving only themselves.
Though the list of such elements will be long, one is the tradition of strong individuality. And that has led to the diminution of the very idea of the common good. We get around in private cars rather than public transport. Individual cell phones have replaced public phones. City planning, of course, has been structured around the private vehicle—and that has its own consequences for land values, housing prices, air quality, and so forth.
The national values, unfortunately, are not all-embracing; they include only what's dear to me and mine, so to say.
A great truth of life is that no man is an island, that we are all spun together in this very grand and large enterprise called life, and whatever we do has an effect over the entire range of creation. In attending only to our own needs for comfort and material satisfaction, in increasing our material wealth without expanding our inner life—that is what causes not only a national decline, but also a personal decline. The two are inseparable, just as a green forest is made of individually green trees.
Huge financial fortunes are of no worth when the time comes to leave this life behind. Those who are slaves to their efforts to amass a fortune discover far too late that they have wasted all their time.
What the US faces, I submit, is a spiritual crisis, and what that means is that people have become blind to their inner nature, which is where real wealth lies.
Beyond a certain level of material wealth, little is gained in robbing from the self to gather more and more wealth.
It is not difficult to turn the life into better, more fulfilling one. There are techniques of spiritual development available now, making it possible for people to have both kinds of wealth, inner and outer. The transformation of the nation will come only when and if the individuals of the nation decide that they want to experience their true inner nature, which is one of peace and fulfillment. The Almighty Father has designed life that way, that what a man needs in this life is inside him. He needs only to gain access to that inner light and life.
The religions of the world do not offer a man a practical means to dive deep into his inner nature. Religions offer wonderful words and lofty ideals—but no means to achieve those great ideals.
It is not enough to pray and have good thoughts. Thousands of years of history have proven religion not only inadequate but also a divisive force pitting man against man and man against nature.
The mind has to transcend the boundaries of thought and reach boundless, infinite awareness. It is a universal state of life and anyone can reach it, easily and regularly.
The technique of transcending is taught worldwide to people of all flags, all religions, all stations of society, and all ages. It is simple. It is universal. It is effective.
www.tm.org
TM is nice and I highly recommend it but....infinite awareness? Just by generating alpha waves? Aren't you going a bit over the top?lizard
It seems to me that it is our intellect that needs work, our spirit is just fine.
You are quite right we need the three Es in our schools first
Ecology, (socially responsible) economics (to follow the money) and evolution which not only helps us understand biology but how social structures evolve and change as well (not to be confused with social Darwinism).
More serious art, science, and humanism, less new age please, thanks!
USA has been the most successful warring nation state on the planet the past 200+ years. From thirteen states on the Atlantic littoral it has won war after war to become what it is today, a replacement for the British Empire with bases and holdings all around the planet. USA a scarcely had a two year period in its history when its military was not attacking someone or other.It still puts more into military than everyone else put together,so, even with a bit of corruption (others have corruption too) it can do what it wants.
Democracy is relatively young in human history, and we haven't gone very far in figuring to how to work it. My reading of USA media is that a lot of USA people really like UK royalty. Sometimes USA politics seems to be the preserve of a group of families of the nobility, the York and Lancaster clans trying to wrest control for themselves, not with swords and shields, but by manipulating public opinion and running the voting system. Not many people worry about it.So, democracy could be shucked for some other government form quite easily.
USA has for a long time bled its wealth from other parts of the world. It still runs the world finances, and I don't see that ending soon.
Democracy might fade even more in USA, to be replaced by something more openly authoritarian; the structures are already in place.
I don't see the USA sinking under its own top heaviness; history suggests that one-time democracies can easily morph into other forms that can last a long time.
(But...if USA does break up into smaller units, we in Mexico and Canada have a few 'irrendentia' memories of our own we might like to reconsider...Heh,heh,heh!)
I like your post but you are a bit too sanguine. For example, the financial center of the world is now London, not New York. The largest creditor is Japan and the largest debtor is the US. lizard
"Your destiny is a mystery to us."
- Chief Seattle 1854
http://www.barefootsworld.net/seattle.html
And to us.
I wonder if American power (corporate owned state power) really is in decline? Look around the world. The US now has a ring of compliant states surrounding Russia, American corporations are dominating the Chinese economy, and now has the biggest military presence, ever, in the middle east. The US owns the oceans and is the sole dominating presence in space. Military bases, Naval task forces, spy satellites are everywhere, there are no rivals. Where's the decline? It's not a decline from the perspective of an apologist for American Empire.
The US has lost it's moral legitimacy? Did it ever have moral legitimacy? From it's inception it has acted as a state sponsor of terrorism.
The guys with the big guns won and their decline is a long way off, however much we may despise them.
* That "ring of compliant states" is a "mirage" Georgia and the five Central Asia "stan" states are about as compliant as the warlords in Afghanistan, our supposed ally Pakistan, and our oil buddy Saudi Arabia.
* "American corporations are dominating the Chinese economy"
<< "dominating" - you must be joking!>>
* Our big military presence has been there 8 years and hasn't accomplished a thing
* Yes we own the oceans, but we are no longer fighting Japan
* What is powerful about presence in space - it's still open to all nations
* The decine is in our economic health, and the lack of a single ally when WW III arives on the scene. It also lies in a growing internal resentment to our aggressive foreign policy that denies us the ability to improve our quality of life, with the real possibilty of an internal political breakdown.
auntEm
".... the lack of a single ally when WW III arrives...."
Yep. That is becoming very clear as things get uglier and more visible all the time. Although there might be one or two.
The easiest, most convenient, most accessible way to rebel -- to "rise up" -- is to vote for a progressive third party candidate.
Let's say the Election is, again, rigged (and keep in mind that US elections have been rigged going back many, many years) -- let's say the Election in November is rigged, that still doesn't take away the dramatic impact a strong showing by a third party candidate would have on the political status quo.
What if before the Election, Nader and McKinney are, together, polling 8-10% of the vote. If the polls indicate they are at that level, then it would be hard to "fix" their vote-total at anything significantly less than 8-10%. ... And 8-10% represents a vote-total that neither the political establishment nor their Sicilian messenger boys, the mainstream media, can ignore.
So the short-term goal is not to win -- at least not for now -- but, rather, to increase Ralph Nader's 2000 vote total of 2.7% to, say, 5% or 6% -- or, along with Cynthia McKinney, to get the combined progressive vote to, say, 8-10% of the electorate.
And that's a realistic, do-able short-term goal.
Quoting from a recent article by Donna Volatile,
"McCain is a war mongering bully who is in your face, Obama, on the other hand, is a smooth talker, whose own Foreign policy positions aren't too far removed from McCain's and one has to wonder which is worse, or indeed if there really is any difference at all. (The idea of voting for the lesser of two evils, McCain being the more evil, according to Obama supporters, seems ludicrous given that both of these candidates will ultimately do the bidding of their masters and the master plan is the same for both parties. This should be quite apparent by now and if it isn't, well, by all means vote for Obama and reap your just rewards...Do you really think 'Obomba's' idea of war will be kinder and gentler than McCain's?...)
"Obama supporters will tell you 'but he's honest and so sincere', and 'he's run a clean campaign' or 'he's one of us' (that one always gets me) but they remain blinded to what is obvious to many on the radical left and many on the traditional conservative/libertarian right: Obama is a player and he is playing the game of the global elitists.
"Since he has all but secured his party's nomination, he's becoming more militaristic by the minute, in both tone and by his stance on several key Foreign policy issues.
"Obama and his VP Choice, Senator Biden, however, are not the crux of the problem but rather the mainstream voters are the problem as they continue to enable the corrupt two party system by consistently supporting the candidates being foisted upon them by controllers who select them in the first place and who are reinforced by the mainstream media machine in the second. These are not choices, these are lack of choices and if voters continue to participate in this sham, then they truly get what they deserve!
"With Obama supporters, the phrase 'blinded by the light' takes on a whole new meaning. What part don't you get?! (This is the party threatening to place demonstrators at the DNC in recently erected detention camps and the party whose House majority leader, Nancy Pelosi, ridicules the anti-war movement and the homeless: 'If they were poor and they were sleeping on my sidewalk, they'd be arrested for loitering but because they have 'Impeach Bush' across their chest, it's the First Amendment.' Funny how both parties get upset over that whole free speech thing...)
"What is most stunning about delusional Obama supporters is, when confronted by the aforementioned facts about Obama, they counter with this inane idea that Obama is only 'saying' these things, he doesn't really mean them, it's only to get elected and once he gets elected the true altruistic essence of the man will save us all from tyranny! (Can we say reality check?!)
"Their indefensible support of this double talker is beyond comprehension. ...
If you want to help put a stop to the rigged election game, if you really want to make a difference and you want your voice of disapproval to be heard, then do VOTE! Vote for ANYBODY but the two buffoons, who have been pre-selected for you by the global elitist machine. Send a message, loud and clear: We refuse your choices.
"Vote Nader, vote McKinney, vote Ron Paul, vote Bob Barr, write in a vote, do whatever but don't support the corrupt system. Commit to a protest vote. Vote your conscience, do not vote under the 'lesser of two-evils' threat because then YOU are part of the problem, not part of the possible solution. (We've been on this trip too many times before ... From 'hope and help is on the way' Kerry to Obama's constant harping on 'Change We Can Believe In', you have been sold a bill of goods from first to last. For all of Obama's talk of change, his words and actions show quite clearly, he means more of the same...)
"For those die hard Obama supporters who refuse to see the hand writing on the wall... YOU are the problem... For those die-hard Hillary Clinton supporters, promising to vote for McCain because your war-monger wasn't the chosen one, seek psychiatric help immediately.
"And one more thing ... Evil is evil, bad is bad, wrong is wrong regardless of sex, race, creed or color.
"And another thing ... If you vote for Obama, you are neither liberal nor are you progressive, so let's get that straight. If you vote for Obama, you are a neoliberal, so get use to it.
"Stop making excuses, there are none and time is running out as an even larger war may be in the making.
"Get those blinders off!
"This is your wake up call!"
(Words in parenthesis Ms. Volatile's)
Click here for the entire article -- http://www.counterpunch.org/volatile08282008.html
Nomination to the Supreme Court...
In some states it may be safe to vote for a third party candidate; but in others just think: another Scalia? Alito?
Fusion
I think this is an over-reaction. Given its a scary situation, amplified by a RNC that as they say 'sounded better in its original german', but its just a nomination. Vote Democratic for the Senate. I believe there is more to lose by reinforcing the two party presidential con.
I am a lifelong socialist but I have a completely different point of view. I think voting is mostly useless, as the elites would take it away from us if they ever felt threatened by it, and they certainly have the corporate media to pound down any candidates who offer real change. The only thing voting is good for is keeping the absolute worst and most dangerous predators out of office. I do not think it helpful to indulge in the opiate of maintaining the illusion of US democracy.
Then voting IS important!!
Of course voting is important!
Voting in the United States has been corrupted, yes, that's true -- but saying that it's useless to vote *because* the voting system has been corrupted is to, in effect, perpetuate the very corruptness you object to!
Put another way -- the US voting process gets corrupted because millions of Americans *don't* vote. In a presidential election, anywhere from 45% to 55% of the available electorate doesn't vote. What this means is that the most important thing the "democratic-many" has at their disposal in their fight against the oligarchic-few -- their sheer numbers at the polls -- has been neutralized by the "oligarchic-few." (No doubt this give the oligarchic-few a great deal of joy and comfort. ... "Mission Accomplished!")
45% to 55% of the American voting public doesn't vote. Therein lies one form of a peaceful, nonviolent revolution -- that is to say, reversing that reality and getting those millions of people to vote for a progressive third party candidate. To give up on that possibility is, by implication, to simply ... give up .. and thus perpetuate an undemocratic political reality.
With 45% to 55% of the available voters not voting in presidential elections, it takes only about 25% of the electorate to win. And a smaller percentage in non-presidential elections. Now, when you think about it, that's really quite an amazing thing. And it's all made possible by a complacent, cynical, despairing, negative, passive, pessimistic attitude on the part of millions of Americans.
To believe that those millions of people should continue to be marginalized, i.e., to say that voting is useless, is profoundly undemocratic.
How can one believe in democracy and then say that voting is useless? If the system is corrupt, then it needs to be fixed. And that's what activists do, they "do things to fix things." Not cynically give up on them.
Come on, folks! People in other countries, with far worse oligarchic leaders and far fewer democratic tools at their disposal, haven't given up. Shame on us if *we* do.
Voting as a sole form of participation is useless. In a representative democracy, uselessness seems to prevail.
No one is saying that voting should be a citizen's sole form of political expression. Obviously not.
What we're discusing is whether voting is useless or else is, instead, a funadamental "democratic tool."
So you are blaming the ones who don't vote instead of the ones who voted for an imbecile. How does that work? People have many reasons not to vote. What difference does it make? Let the ones who do vote decide. The fact that they are incompetent just means they shouldn't vote either.
Democracy requires a politically competent people or it degenerates into plutocracy. In the US that happened already a long time ago. The people failed, as Benjamin Franklin expected..................lizard
Is is ok to ask how old you are? How have you practised your socialism? Activism? I am curious about someone not voting, one who is a thinker. I see, now, that you appear to have been voting, yes?
I am 50 years old and I used to vote third-party as I believed that such parties could eventually be successful, but now am resigned to vote for the Democrats, just to do my little part in avoiding WWIII for the time being and allowing for the possibility (slightly higher probability with the Democrats) that the empire will decay slowly and peacefully. I joined some activist groups when I was in my 20s, but over time felt unwelcome as a white heterosexual male (a not particularly good looking whm, and I'm sure if I had been a good looking whm, I would have been much more welcome, LOL), so I stopped participating.
Yes. I've had it ingrained in me since I was a kid. You have to VOTE!Well, I always have. No one I've ever really wanted (even in the priamry ) has ever won. I've voted Independent, Democrat and write-ins (that get tossed in oHio)On some of these sites, people seem to make an entire crusade about changin a couple of peoples' minds about how to vote. If it is one of hte two "parties", this usually involves fear-mongering about what will happen if you dont vote for X or Y. I've been a membber of SP-USA for years. I left in 2000 to vote against Dubya. In 2004, I stayed DNC to vote Kerry. I voted DNC in 2006, "we" won back the congresss, and , what has changed? 2000 and 2004 were stolen. Maybe this one wil be, also. But the capitalist machine grinds on. The peopel (sheeples) continue to search for the resurrectin of JFK, (who, no one seems to remember, was quite the war-monger)and on it goes.
This was not the greatest interview considering the source that was available to tap. What "they" don't understand is that apathy is not selective once it sets in--it goes to everyone and everything.
If and when civil disobediance escalates (because as JFK once said,"those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable") the same average achlubs who don't know and don't care about these issues will feel the same way toward those in law enforcement who start getting shot, beaten, or even killed when rage boils over into action.
It is already happening with "our troops" who are all volunteers and increasingly discovering that more and more people really don't much care about their sacrifice from having been in combat be it physical or emotional.
Poet
Bring it on!
quickstepper,
Guess what? The mainstream media is controlled by corporations, and although he doesn't mention it with those words, it is implied when he says corporations control this country. Duh!
As I pointed out earlier, that connection needs to be made more clearly and not simply implied. None of our problems will be solved as long as all dissenting views can be shut out of the national dialogue.
q
Great as always Howard.
It's going to be harder, if not impossible to achieve this change today by dissent, organizing and mass protest. The oligarchy has seen to this.
As if it weren't enough that they steal our public treasure, we continually empower the oligarchy by giving them our money. We buy their stuff and use their banks. We watch, hear and read their media, buy their computers, their stock, food, cars, homes, education, healthcare, transportation, fuel, energy and everything else from them. We have become completely dependent on the oligarchy.
Bloodless means to shackle Mammon, like incorporating We the People or adopting direct democracy by means of Senator Gravel's National Initiative for Democracy are suspect and ignored.
Working within the rigged electoral system isn't working. Passionate pleas to vote third party fall on deaf ears. And starting a civil war against our providers won't fly with the majority.
People are glued to the MSM, praying for miracles, drowning in alcohol, binging on junk food and waving the flag.
Chances of success by historic means are slim. Crowd control devices abound and police repression and publicly traded prisons are de rigeur. Plus nobody wins in war except for maybe oligarchy war profiteers.
At least we still have CD for catharsis.
An open rebellion would lead to mass slaughter, the quick imposition of martial law and subsequent bullet proof totalitarian rule in this country by the Praetorian party, formerly known as the Repimplicans and the Democrats. Neither George Wanker Bush, Cheesedick Cheney nor Nancy Pelosi are going to let anyone threaten one penny of their fortunes, their power or their privilege. In the 1960's the Black Panthers got an enormous amount of publicity since the MSM of its time made a lot of money scaring white people with images of gun toting black men. In the larger sense, the Panthers had no real political power, yet men like Mark Clark and Fred Hampton were openly murdered by the Bushes and Cheneys of their day.
The vast majority of Americans no longer value their civil liberties; they are, as Scott Ritter has said, consumers and no longer citizens. That's the true heart of darkness in the decline of the United States. If that cannot be reversed then it truly is all over. You would think that the easily visible decline of the middle class would eventually result in a progressive government that was dedicated to putting a stop to that decline. It seems, however, that the worse things get for the boorgies, the more they love the Repimplicans. It's irrational; it makes absolutely no sense, but that's the history of the human race, once neatly summed up by Raymond Chandler who wrote that humanity always acts like a gangster gleefully trying out his first machine gun.
This is why, as others have pointed out, we far lefties have a lot in common with the far right libertarians, when it comes to paying attention to the news and caring about our civil liberties.
Most other people are clueless and don't care about their rights.
You might be thinking of some of my comments. And note I don't make them naively I think Libertarians and paleo-con DO need to be confronted on their sexism, homophobia, and immigrant views, and their naive faith that capitalism can somehow be reformed decentralized and humanized which I don't think it can. OTH I think the Libertarians and paleo-cons will fight back if the empire puts Blackwater troops in the street. I also believe perhaps naively that they can be made to understand what bio-regionalism and local growth of food is about as it is in many ways similar to their own localist and village/community living ideals.
auntEm
Yes, Libertarians believe strongly in family farms, which I think means "local agriculture" and getting agriculture out of the hands of corporations. They are very much local community oriented. You will find them as both buyers and sellers in the farmers markets that are active in the summertime everywhere. And the idea of cloning animals that are used for human food is something they are especially opposed to.
The big thing about them is that they are bitterly opposed to these foreign wars of aggression. They want a strong defense, but the emphasis is on DEFENSE of our country. Leave the rest of the world alone and take care of our own affairs.
And YES, the Libertarians will definitely fight for their homes and small towns. They all have guns and their strong support of the Second Amendment is directly connected to times like what could very well lie directly ahead of us.
Even on things like Gay Rights they are clearly on our side. Keep the government out of our bedrooms. Our personal lives are nobody's business. They are among the strongest opponents of the P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act.
pity this busy monster, manunkind,
not. Progress is a comfortable disease:
your victim (death and life safely beyond)
plays with the bigness of his littleness
--- electrons deify one razorblade
into a mountainrange; lenses extend
unwish through curving wherewhen till unwish
returns on its unself.
A world of made
is not a world of born --- pity poor flesh
and trees, poor stars and stones, but never this
fine specimen of hypermagical
ultraomnipotence. We doctors know
a hopeless case if --- listen: there's a hell
of a good universe next door; let's go
-- e e cummings
Excellent we need more poetry. I wrote poetry until the late 90s when the combined onrush of the cyber age and post Seattle WTO/911 fascism semed to stamp it out of my soul. I did get a guitar recently though, gotta keep on keeping on, right?
Reread Howard Zinn on dissent\\\\\\\\\\\\\
It's a slave-master relationship, kind of like a perverted Stockholm Syndrome. We are consumers but we're also more importantly slave-like. Who here has the resources to cast off the shackles of our capitalist society? Most of us are working harder for less money and hoping not to get ARM'd out of our cheap-quality ram-shackle homes. The master holds the keys and the power. Therefore we must work harder to please the master and stay in good grace. Otherwise we'll be fearfully punished.
It takes guts and a willingness to sacrifice to break that kind of grip.
Beautiful.
It seems like when Empires die, they either slowly fade into another (England morphed into the US after WWII) or they die violently, with a nationalistic frenzy and pogrom at the end (Italy and Germany)
The question is how will the USA go? Or will we go like the USSR did (more than likely) where the US will split into different countries?
I think the country splitting in two is perfect: the south and the west (except for the pacific west): Virginia, West Virginia, Tennessee, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana, Missouri, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota, and Alaska could be one (conservative) country. The other country would be: Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Connecticut, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Iowa, Minnesota, New Jersey, Deleware, Maryland, Washington, D.C., Hawaii, California, Oregon, and Washington would be the other country. This is (mostly) what the electoral college map looks like very four years nowadays.
Good comment. I'll trade you Ohio for Montana.
Ohio may suck now, but it was the "line" the Confederacy drew and Harriet Tubman crossed! The Ohio River! If it goes South--I'l go to Monatana. Or Vermont. Or Cuba. Or Canada. Or Mexico. Or EU.lol
Zinn: US 'In Need of Rebellion'
I agree, but ya, right. Where are we going to fit that in between nose to the grindstone and blowtorch to the ass trying to buy the next pet rock?
To the point.
I keep seeing the same old, same old: blame the corporate media for doing their job: which is making money. Just because the media is "Constitutionally protected" doesn't mean it is Constitutionally obligated - corporate media IS Constitutionally obligated to make stockholders maximum profits!
And blame the Republicans for making themselves rich when they call themselves "The business party"? That is why people have businesses: to get rich! And blame the Democrats for taking care of the rich without whose money they couldn't get elected? And blame the Democratic politicians for helping the rich when most of the leaders of the Democratic party are also rich?
Yes, blame Bush, blame big money, blame media, blame parties, blame, blame, blame: blame any and everybody but yourselves and your fellow citizens. Because if you did that you'd be admitting that the majority of the citizens of the United States are greedy, lazy, enablers of mass murder for profit as the greedy, lazy mass murderers they enable by putting into office.
I think your broad sweeping characterization of Americans as greedy and lazy is inaccurate and cruel. Most Americans are too busy working 2-3 jobs trying to make rent to be much in-tuned to politics much less the rest of the world. True, there are those among us who have become hypnotized by the gilded glamor of the super-rich and gulled into believing that if they work hard and support the Republican party THEY might have a chance at such opulence. But most of us are just working hard to keep the job, stay ahead of the bills and trying to find the time to do the right thing.
There are also those of us out here in the heart-land who don't believe that a revolution inside the United States is impossible.
Most Americans are not either greedy or lazy. What they are is intellectually challenged. They are descendants of Calvinism through the Puritans. America is rotten because it was founded by rotten people who managed to perpetuate their belief system. The problem is the mentality of the people. They aren't the only idiots in the world but they are the only RICH idiots in the world. The rest of the developed countries are moving away from religion and towards collective responsability. The US is falling way behind. Why? Because they haven't learned what others have.They are still like the Puritans, overall...................lizard
It is called American primitivism. Just when I thought we were outgrowing it--9/11--everyone got terrified and they're still looking for a daddy to save them. It results in inequal treatment of races, religins and genders. We wil never be a whole nation again unless we can move past the fundamentalism
"If there is any hope, the hope lies in the American people."
Much as I admire Dr. Zinn, as an American, I'm afraid I don't think so. I don't see that there is any real opposition here, and in any case the corporates (Democrats and Republicans) have too tight a grip on everything. There was a time when we could have fought them, but the frigging pacifists decided their idealism was more important than human lives or democracy or human rights or anything else. I think it's now like the case in Germany during the late 30s and early 40s (tho much more violent and much better armed); it's gotten too bad for the people within the country to deal with it. Like with the Nazis, it will take people outside the nation to wake up and deal with it and defeat it once and for all.
What disgusts me the most is that I hear so many people outside the US criticizing the US and yet they are the ones (especially the Europeans) who perpetuate it by doing business with it, maintaining relations with it, contributing to its wars and so on. It's my belief that, at this point, it's business interests outside the US who keep it going. Without their support and continued financing the Democrats and Republicans would be out of power in a day.
I'm unclear how the "pacifists" ruined America...
I'm not, we should have fought back and killed the corporate globalists who are raping ALL of us people of color and poor white people, and the planet years ago. Now the police are militarized and it will be much harder. And note I mean fight back in a lefty general strike, Chavez, Zapatista way, not some stupid antisemitic Nazi shit like a few snakes here have been suggesting. Hint most of the people who have ruined us from the beginning have been more blond haired and blue eyed blue bloods than Zionist (code word for Jewish). Bush crime family ring a bell? President Johnson ring a bell? Dick Cheney ring a bell? Andrew Jackson ("great Indian fighter" i.e. purveyor of genocide) ring a bell?
Now watch me get banned AGAIN because I don't suggest that we should just sit and take it from the fascists and do nothing other than vote for Obama, or ineffectually wave some signs around.
Yes non violence first for the win, and if not, not to misquote Gertrude Stein.
“Hint most of the people who have ruined us from the beginning have been more blond haired and blue eyed blue bloods than Zionist (code word for Jewish).”
Your problem is you see the puppets not the systems or their masters. Bush and Cheney are the tools of a Neocon construction that goes back to the economics of the Chicago School and Milton Friedman and to say Zionist is code for Jewish is just a stupid or Anti-Jewish / Anti-Semitic generalization reflecting either pure ignorance or repeating the propaganda of protagonists and defenders or Zionism.
All Jews are not tribal/ethnological hegemonic chauvinists using nationalism as a cover for international organized criminal and terrorist activities, which are the facts of the history and of today’s Zionism. Not all Zionists are directly linked to criminal activities and not all Zionists are Jews. And no, neither Zionists nor any other exclusive group hold a monopoly on international crime. There are many others inside and outside such syndicated activities.
A little reading of history and the link appended to my comment may help you to make more informed comments.
"Your problem is you see the puppets not the systems or their masters. "
Protocols of the Elders of Zion much? Which BTW is fake antisemetic propaganda from Czarist Russia. Nazis are no help, go crawl in your hold with David Irving... The system we need to oppose is that of corporate control that knows no racial or cultural boundary and whose only creed is greed and exploitation of the poor and the planet.
What have the Protocols of Zion got to do with anything I wrote? Either you cannot read or you cannot think for yourself without falling back on to cliché knee-jerk reflex.
So let me do what you do and twist your words. What was it you said? : “The system we need to oppose is that of corporate control that knows no racial or cultural boundary and whose only creed is greed and exploitation of the poor and the planet.”
So as one so keen to defend the Zionists you are therefore advocating corporate control that DOES HAVE racial or cultural boundary and whose only creed is greed and exploitation of the poor and the planet.
Or could you answer the questions posed above? We are not talking about yesterdays fascism and Nazi tactics, we are talking about today’s and they are being used by Neocon advocates of war who are manipulating both parties of the US Government, to try to fulfill a plan which was written in Israel by Zionists and forms the backbone of the present US foreign/war policy towards the middle east. Who is advocating the use of acts of war and aggression against Iran today?
So if you say wars of aggression, breakdown in the rule of law and democratic balance and control, destruction of economic health and social cohesion, etc.) has nothing to do with Zionism, you either, cannot comprehend what I wrote, or you are trying to avoid the subject. But to try to imply I am some kind of a Nazi, and what I write has any relation to David Irving’s ideas is stupid insulting and just childish name calling.
Blaming the "Zionists" is classic scapegoating and is substituting a cultural group for THE SPECIFIC PEOPLE MAKING POLICY, always a sure sign you are dealing with an actual fascist. Now I disagree strongly with the POLICIES of the STATE of Israel but I put the blame squarely where it belongs on the SPECIFIC decision makers formulating bad policy or as Noam Chomsky says do "institutional analysis" and not "conspiracy theory." If we fall into conspiracy theory against Zionists as a WHOLE as opposed to specific policy makers in the government of Israel then sadly we have crossed the line from good hearted leftists trying to make things better into being racist fascists, screw that 100%!
Now let me guess just like a Nazi you are going to say Chomsky is a "Zionist tool" or some other such rot as thus it goes on, go back to your National Front meeting and leave us alone here we have work to do forming a BROAD based coalition against empire.
What a load of absolute rot you write. Do you even know what you are saying or do just scrible what pops in to your head?
Blaming the "Zionists" is classic scapegoating. Is it now? and who defined that? You?
"substituting a cultural group for THE SPECIFIC PEOPLE MAKING POLICY" Since when are Zionists a "cultural group" I thought they were principally a political organization promoting the interests of what is generally refered to as Jewish home land of Israel.
And as far as the specific people, the NeoCon base and the dual-nationals involved, there is no question that I am not identifying the specific people and policies, above.
That I hold fascist ideas am a Nazi or would think Noam Chomsky aZionist tool is realy laughable since I have tremendous respect for his writing.
You write: "If we fall into conspiracy theory against Zionists as a WHOLE as opposed to specific policy makers in the government of Israel"
If you could read I have been writing about zionists in the government of the USA..... We are talking about the American democracy having been userped by AIPAC and AEI with 27 Neocon advisers in Bush's administration.
You use these lables like racist, fascist, nazi, without much knowledge of what you are talking about. Please stop missing my point, and trying to make me out to be what I'm not. In fact I am trying to help you not look so stupid.
Please, please, get youself an education on : Connecting Israeli Zionist influence on America's Foreign Policy the BBC investigative journalism show Panorama aired The War Party on May 18th, 2003 right after the start of the Iraq War.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vWZTTrceV8&feature=related
Key members of the Bush administration and the powerful American Enterprise Institute were part of a Israeli think tank called The Institute for Advanced Strategic & Political Studies (IASPS):
http://www.israeleconomy.org/index.php
In a report done in 1996, before the formation of PNAC, which was called "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm" they listed Israeli goals and concerns:
REMOVING SADDAM HUSSIEN:
"Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq — an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right"
MIDDLE EAST STABILITY:
"Iraq's future could affect the strategic balance in the Middle East profoundly, it would be understandable that Israel has an interest in supporting the Hashemites in their efforts to redefine Iraq,"
CONTROL IRAQ, HELP ISRAEL:
"Were the Hashemites to control Iraq, they could use their influence over Najf to help Israel wean the south Lebanese Shia away from Hizballah, Iran, and Syria."
MANAGE AND CONSTRAIN US REACTION:
"To anticipate U.S. reactions and plan ways to manage and constrain those reactions, Prime Minister Netanyahu can formulate the policies and stress themes he favors in language familiar to the Americans by tapping into themes of American administrations during the Cold War which apply well to Israel."
Link to the full report:
http://www.iasps.org/strat1.htm
People interviewed or mentioned in this video that hold both USA and Israel citizenship and are Zionists:
Richard Perle
One of Bush's foreign policy advisors, he is the chairman of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board. Perle was expelled from Senator Henry Jackson's office in the 1970's after the National Security Agency (NSA) caught him passing Highly-Classified (National Security) documents to the Israeli Embassy. He later worked for the Israeli weapons firm, Soltam. Perle came from one the above mentioned pro-Israel think tanks, the AEI. Perle is one of the leading pro-Israeli fanatics leading this Iraq war mongering within the administration and now in the media.
Paul Wolfowitz
Former Deputy Defense Secretary, and member of Perle's Defense Policy Board, in the Pentagon. Wolfowitz is a close associate of Perle, and reportedly has close ties to the Israeli military. His sister lives in Israel. Wolfowitz came from the above mentioned Jewish think tank, JINSA. Wolfowitz was the number two leader within the administration behind this Iraq war mongering. He later was appointed head of the World Bank but resigned under pressure from World Bank members over a scandal involving his misuse of power.
David Frum
White House speechwriter behind the "Axis of Evil" label. He lumped together all the lies and accusations against Iraq for Bush to justify the war.
John Bolton
Former UN Representative and Under-Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security. Bolton is also a Senior Advisor to President Bush. Prior to this position, Bolton was Senior Vice President of the above mentioned pro-Israel think tank, AEI. In October 2002 he accused Syria of having a nuclear program, so that they can attack Syria after Iraq.
Meyrav and David Wurmser
Special Assistant to John Bolton, the under-secretary for arms control and international security. Wurmser also worked at the AEI with Perle and Bolton. Along with Colonel Yigal Carmon, formerly of Israeli military intelligence, co-founded the Middle East Media Research Institute (Memri),a Washington-based Israeli outfit which distributes articles translated from Arabic newspapers portraying Arabs in a bad light.
Eliot Cohen
Member of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board under Perle and is another extremist pro-Israel advisor. He wrote an opinion article in the Wall Street Journal openly admitting his hatred of Islam claiming that Islam should be the enemy, not terrorism.
Prominent members of the Bush administration not mentioned in the broadcast but who also hold both USA and Israeli citizenship and are Zionists:
Michael Mukasey
Michael Chertoff
Lawrence (Larry) Franklin
Douglas Feith
Henry Kissinger
I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby
Elliott Abrams
Richard Haass
Robert Zoellick
Ari Fleischer
BBC review of the book "The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy" from 2007:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7...
Transcript of the BBC broadcast:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/spl/...
Of course you aren't OBSSESED with how Jews are "secretly controlling the world" exactly like Mein Kamph and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion are you, Nazi Lucitanian?
Simple question did the Holocaust happen and how many Jews, Roma, and homosexuals were killed? No weaseling or revisionism Nazi just answer the question. It's my efficient sorting out Nazis algorithm.
And I have to say I'm ashamed of leftists who just stand there in silence while these antisemitic scum balls spout off solely because you are pissed at the STATE of Israel for it's own crimes against Palestinians. Would you stand their in silence in someone engaged in conspiracy theories against African Americans, against lesbians, against Native Americans? Well hint to the clueless this bull shit is no better. If we don't stick up for societies most unpopular members our inner hatred produced by living in a repressive CORPORATE controlled empire could easily turn into fascism and not positive revolution for ALL people, think about it please.
Let's say it all together FUCK OFF Nazi! The only good fascist is a DEAD fascist!
I note you have a great difficulty in reading comprehension and staying on subject, and a great propensity to project your blind convictions on others. You seem unable even to understand a video. You have no idea what you are talking about. You use words like socialist, fascist, and Nazi about people without knowledge. And really I'm sorry you are quite so stupid. I have linked you to an Israeli organization showing Zionism is used against the Jews, I have shown you a BBC documentary that shows Zionists of dual nationality that have used their positions of great power inside the US government to take the US into an illegal war of aggression to fulfil a plan established by the Zionists for the conquest and pacification of "greater Israel"....
I am not saying Zionism is the only or even main root of the decay to a fascist imperialist US, but with people as easily lead like you around (that is if you are not an agent of AZM already) it certainly helps.
And all you can say is I'm a Nazi, and anti-Semitic. I will ignore this and your further comments if I read you on CD and not answer your stupid insults, nor will I waste my time trying and help you understand the blind spots you seem to cherish.
You equals obsessed with Jews excuse me "Zionists" secretly controlling the world. Nazis equal obsessed with Jews secretly controlling the world. If it walks like a duck and quakes like a duck it's a duck. And speaking of ducks I notice you ducked out on my question about the Holocaust, were you too busy reading David Irving to notice it Nazi?
And no I'm not a member of the AZM (whatever that is sorry I don't know your skinhead white supremist jargon, not). Not that it should matter if we were wise enough to follow Dr. Kings wise words on the subject but I am an atheiest Caucasian American male from a European Christian ethnic background in middle America. As I said before I vehemently disagree with the specific policies of the state of Israel like the violation of the 1967 green line, the apartheid wall, the fact that the Israelis army has killed 4 times as many Palestinian civilians as suicide bombers have killed Israelis, the killing of Rachel Corrie with a bulldozer, the illegal and immoral bombings in Lebanon, etc, etc, etc. Unlike you though I know who to blame and that is the specific individuals mainly in Israel's Likud party like Areil Sharon who formulate bad policy. Just as I don't blame all Americans for our empire but specific individuals like George Bush and Nancy Pelosi neither do I go around blaming ill defined groups for specific bad policy like "Zionists."
Scapegoating a nebulous unnamed large group of individuals called Zionists in a conspiracy to control the world ("greater Israel + U.S.A. + the UK I would presume) is the language of fascism whether you choose to duck the responsibility to admit that or not.
Again for those with reading comprehension problems I ask you a three part question that I want a clear and specific answers to:
a) Did the Holocaust happen?
b) Was it done by the Nazis in the manner described in scholarly peer reviewed history texts involving gas chambers, crematoria, mobile killing trucks and mass shootings?
b) How many Jews, Roma, homosexuals, priests and intellectuals were killed by the Holocaust?
Again if Lucitanian does not give a clear and specific answer to this three part question I think we can assume he is an actual Nazi and Holocaust denier and that as leftists we ought not to be silent if he doesn't answer this question and then DOES proceed to make another antisemetic conspiracy type statement. No peace for Nazis!
Of course you aren't OBSSESED with how Jews are "secretly controlling the world" exactly like Mein Kamph and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion are you, Nazi Lucitanian?
Simple question did the Holocaust happen and how many Jews, Roma, and homosexuals were killed? No weaseling or revisionism Nazi just answer the question. It's my efficient sorting out Nazis algorithm.
And I have to say I'm ashamed of leftists who just stand there in silence while these antisemitic scum balls spout off solely because you are pissed at the STATE of Israel for it's own crimes against Palestinians. Would you stand their in silence in someone engaged in conspiracy theories against African Americans, against lesbians, against Native Americans? Well hint to the clueless this bull shit is no better. If we don't stick up for societies most unpopular members our inner hatred produced by living in a repressive CORPORATE controlled empire could easily turn into fascism and not positive revolution for ALL people, think about it please.
Let's say it all together FUCK OFF Nazi! The only good fascist is a DEAD fascist!
Blaming the "Zionists" is classic scapegoating and is substituting a cultural group for THE SPECIFIC PEOPLE MAKING POLICY, always a sure sign you are dealing with an actual fascist. Now I disagree strongly with the POLICIES of the STATE of Israel but I put the blame squarely where it belongs on the SPECIFIC decision makers formulating bad policy or as Noam Chomsky says do "institutional analysis" and not "conspiracy theory." If we fall into conspiracy theory against Zionists as a WHOLE as opposed to specific policy makers in the government of Israel then sadly we have crossed the line from good hearted leftists trying to make things better into being racist fascists, screw that 100%!
Now let me guess just like a Nazi you are going to say Chomsky is a "Zionist tool" or some other such rot as thus it goes on, go back to your National Front meeting and leave us alone here we have work to do forming a BROAD based coalition against empire.
Blaming the "Zionists" is classic scapegoating and is substituting a cultural group for THE SPECIFIC PEOPLE MAKING POLICY, always a sure sign you are dealing with an actual fascist. Now I disagree strongly with the POLICIES of the STATE of Israel but I put the blame squarely where it belongs on the SPECIFIC decision makers formulating bad policy or as Noam Chomsky says do "institutional analysis" and not "conspiracy theory." If we fall into conspiracy theory against Zionists as a WHOLE as opposed to specific policy makers in the government of Israel then sadly we have crossed the line from good hearted leftists trying to make things better into being racist fascists, screw that 100%!
Now let me guess just like a Nazi you are going to say Chomsky is a "Zionist tool" or some other such rot as thus it goes on, go back to your National Front meeting and leave us alone here we have work to do forming a BROAD based coalition against empire.
Blaming the "Zionists" is classic scapegoating and is substituting a cultural group for THE SPECIFIC PEOPLE MAKING POLICY, always a sure sign you are dealing with an actual fascist. Now I disagree strongly with the POLICIES of the STATE of Israel but I put the blame squarely where it belongs on the SPECIFIC decision makers formulating bad policy or as Noam Chomsky says do "institutional analysis" and not "conspiracy theory." If we fall into conspiracy theory against Zionists as a WHOLE as opposed to specific policy makers in the government of Israel then sadly we have crossed the line from good hearted leftists trying to make things better into being racist fascists, screw that 100%!
Now let me guess just like a Nazi you are going to say Chomsky is a "Zionist tool" or some other such rot as thus it goes on, go back to your National Front meeting and leave us alone here we have work to do forming a BROAD based coalition against empire.
Blaming the "Zionists" is classic scapegoating and is substituting a cultural group for THE SPECIFIC PEOPLE MAKING POLICY, always a sure sign you are dealing with an actual fascist. Now I disagree strongly with the POLICIES of the STATE of Israel but I put the blame squarely where it belongs on the SPECIFIC decision makers formulating bad policy or as Noam Chomsky says do "institutional analysis" and not "conspiracy theory." If we fall into conspiracy theory against Zionists as a WHOLE as opposed to specific policy makers in the government of Israel then sadly we have crossed the line from good hearted leftists trying to make things better into being racist fascists, screw that 100%!
Now let me guess just like a Nazi you are going to say Chomsky is a "Zionist tool" or some other such rot as thus it goes on, go back to your National Front meeting and leave us alone here we have work to do forming a BROAD based coalition against empire.
Blaming the "Zionists" is classic scapegoating and is substituting a cultural group for THE SPECIFIC PEOPLE MAKING POLICY, always a sure sign you are dealing with an actual fascist. Now I disagree strongly with the POLICIES of the STATE of Israel but I put the blame squarely where it belongs on the SPECIFIC decision makers formulating bad policy or as Noam Chomsky says do "institutional analysis" and not "conspiracy theory." If we fall into conspiracy theory against Zionists as a WHOLE as opposed to specific policy makers in the government of Israel then sadly we have crossed the line from good hearted leftists trying to make things better into being racist fascists, screw that 100%!
Now let me guess just like a Nazi you are going to say Chomsky is a Zionist tool or some other such rot as thus it goes on, go back to your National Front meeting and leave us alone here we have work to do forming a BROAD based coalition against empire.
Pacifism is usually interpreted as the opposite of warmongering or military imperialism. Internecine conflicts are another matter entirely. I doubt that anywhere near the number of Americans who have supported her imperialist wars (Viet Nam, Iraq) would have supported armed rebellion against their own government. In the main the anti-Pacifists are in favor of the warmongering globalist government. Blaming "Pacifists" for allowing the globalist policies of our government is patently ridiculous.
Yeah, the pacifists caused them, they didn't allow them.
Interesting point that the American patient is dead or nearly so, but for being kept alive by the international capitalist life support system… Yes, the malaise has spread globally. You’re absolutely right. Did you see the protests in UK and Italy against the Iraq war? Did you see the decisions of Blair’s and Berlusconi’s governments? The rot has spread. Who supports the illegal occupation of Palestine, in Europe or Asia?
But in the US (and Europe for that matter) the domination of a few very wealthy families not least Jewish money pushing Zionist ideas, combined with delusional Christian fundamentalists corrupting power for some “End Times” hocus-pocus myth, insures that the rest of the American majority are kept with their heads well up their nether regions believing in any of the various and multiple fantasies the trained media are told to feed them. Conspiricy? You want to bet on it! What else would you call it?
And before the likes of RichM and Saturnalia call me anti-Semite perhaps they can answer me, why 90% (yes, this is figurative) of the Senate and House of Representatives or anyone for that matter running for office, not least the candidates for the presidency, apparently require the “approval” of AIPAC? Or perhaps they can show any powerful executives who has tried to overcome AIPAC’s pervasive influence and survived. Also perhaps they can explain why a country in breach of UN resolution, international law, and executing state terrorism under an illegal occupation in Palestine; a state with a population of only 7.3 million can have quite so many fervent supporters and dual-nationals in strategic Government positions in the US, not least Wolfowitz, or Perle, or Feith, or Paulson, or Abrams, or Bolton, or Fleischer, although the list is much, much longer and far, far more persuasive.
Should the United States Worry About `Zionists` as Fifth Column? Yes.
http://www.israelenews.com/view.asp?ID=2000
“The arrest …… of the 84 years old American Jew, Ben-Ami Kadish on charges of spying for Israel is but a tip of the iceberg where committed Zionists with loyalties to Zionism and Israel are in the tens of thousands within the different branches of government especially the State and other security agencies, with many security agencies employing dual nationals (Israelis and US) and employing former members of Mossad in key positions with US security agencies.”
Zinn : "If there is any hope, the hope lies in the American people."
Dr. Zinn points out not only the general ignorance of so many Americans, and suggests the voluntary self-delusion of the overwhelming majority, but suggests that their disillusion or perhaps realism accounts for their rejection of the democratic system in terms of declining to cause change through the ballot box. As a citizen of the world I would be a fool to pin my hopes on such a poorly informed easily lead rabble, who’s military of which they are so proud is essentially being used a the “hit men” for a criminal business syndicate.
No, the only hope is that when the criminality of the global gangsters that “own” America (and making major inroads in Europe) and its fascist political system becomes apparent, when as was the case last week in the Twin Cities they use their militarized polices to harass, threaten, terrorize, arrest and torture their own citizens, with impunity, at home as they do abroad, the “people” of America (and Europe) will wake up and try to take their country back.
The problem is that less than 10% are even thinking, more than 80% are easily frightened and the other 10% are those who work for and believe that they benefit from that same status quo.
remember the greeks?,the romans?,the british, the usa, they and hundreds of empires before them, if you do not believe that a sky god, made all this evidence of a long evolutionary past, complete with fossil samples and supportive empirical studies, simply to "test ones faith", then history repeats as each new iteration of greed, reaches the point where keeping the populace sickly, fat, uninformed and frightened, is the last form of control, as the imbalance of wealth becomes obscene.
by instilling fear and suspicion in the populations, manufacturing "news" containing only the official line, with the odd bit of scandal to appear balanced, the few control the many.
as with all of the empires that preceded the latest greatest "new world order" experiment, it all comes to a boil shortly after this point, resulting in many lives lost and vast treasures being "redistributed" among the many, in a not so pretty, but inevitable way.
simplify now
get off the merry-go round
buy local and only what you need
it's gonna get a lot uglier before it gets better, try to insulate yourself from the crunch.
those who do not depend on all the gadgets and crap will not notice when the whole web comes tumbling down, the unfortunate "wired" ones will be left twisting in the void..
I have lived outside of the States for 20 years and when asked what's wrong with my country I say you have to separate the America people from the American government. When asked why do the American people continue to support the Bush gang I tell them that they don't support him or his policies. I tell them that the people of America can't even get rid of guns in our society, so how can you expect the people to take away the favorite toys of our fathers and the main source of income for their empire.
Hoa binh
Bullshit. Americans do support Bush's policies, they just don't like losing wars, expensive gas and rising prices for food. Who does?.All Americans want is to protect their obesity.....lizard
only 40% support the war and they never took the time to investgate the crap their minister or Fox News told them.