Maine Dairy 'Somewhat Vindicated' As Monsanto Leaves Bovine Hormone Business
PORTLAND, Maine - Oakhurst Dairy owner Stanley Bennett welcomed the news that Monsanto was divesting itself of its controversial dairy hormone business, after taking on the agribusiness giant in an expensive David-and-Goliath legal battle five years ago."We feel somewhat vindicated, given our position," Bennett said. "I'd like to think that, in some small part, we played a role in that decision."
The lawsuit centered on Oakhurst Dairy's label, which read: "Our Farmers' Pledge: No Artificial Growth Hormones Used."
Monsanto, the St. Louis-based biotechnology company known primarily for its genetically engineered seeds, sued Oakhurst, alleging the label misled consumers into thinking there's something wrong with milk from cows treated with the hormone.
After months of talks, the dairy kept the label, but added a disclaimer: "FDA states: No significant difference in milk from cows treated with artificial growth hormones."
Oakhurst was the first dairy in the nation to label its milk as hormone-free, something that is increasingly common. In the past year, Starbucks announced it would start using only hormone-free milk, and Wal-Mart announced its house brand of milk would be hormone-free.
At the time of the lawsuit, Bennett said he worried that people would think Oakhurst had caved in. That hasn't been the case.
"Universally, people have congratulated us that we stuck by our guns, because we still have the label," he said.
Although Monsanto settled with Oakhurst five years ago, the labeling issue has never gone away for the company. Most recently, several state legislatures have taken up the issue. All have essentially repeated the same argument as in the Oakhurst case, with Monsanto arguing for a disclaimer on labels for hormone-free milk.
"Some consumers prefer to purchase milk from cows that have not been treated with (growth hormone). Monsanto respects this choice, but we want to make sure that consumers have all of the information they need to make this decision," the company said in an e-mail statement.
The statement describes milk processors as using the labeling issue "to profit from unfounded fears."
Organic dairy farmer Spencer Aitel said the Oakhurst lawsuit was a major victory for consumers.
"Monsanto is really used to throwing their muscle around, and for Stan Bennett to choose to fight them, that was an awesome thing," said Aitel, who owns Two Loons Farm in South China with his wife, Paige Tyson. "Stan listened to the consumers, and the consumer here has managed to change the industry, and you don't often get that chance."
Cheryl Beyeler, director of the Maine Dairy and Nutrition Council, agreed the lawsuit was a turning point.
"There wasn't a lot of consumer knowledge about (the growth hormone). I think initially it was a very smart marketing technique," she said.
With food recalls and other scares, the issue is becoming more important to consumers.
"They don't like the idea that things are being put into our food supply that they don't know about or have control over," Beyeler said.
The growth hormone, a synthetic version of a natural substance, can boost milk production by 5 percent to 15 percent. Despite the FDA's position that there is no difference in the milk, critics argue that the hormones increase stress for the animals.
Maine's three major dairies, Oakhurst, Hood and Garelick Farms, all require that their farmers not use hormones, and they pay the farmers a premium for the milk.
"People want to know where their food is coming from, and more than that, they want to know how far away it was grown, who grew it and how they can support those farmers," said Heather Spaulding, associate director of Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association.
"Labeling has always been important to our constituent base," Spaulding said. "(Consumers) want to be reassured that they know where their food is coming from and that the label means something, that there is integrity in what is on the label."
At the time, the lawsuit was very difficult, Bennett acknowledged.
"It did take our attention away from the day-to-day business, and it was very expensive," he said. "But it raised our profile, and it made us think about how we really do have not just a marketing interest but an obligation to do what's best for dairy consumers."
In the years since, many dairies have gone "hormone-free." In fact, Bennett says Oakhurst has largely lost its competitive advantage.
"In a sense, we've become a victim of our own success," Bennett said. "We've lost that hook for our consumers."
Today, the company describes its label as "America's first farmers' pledge."
The Maine Dairy Industry Association doesn't have an official position on use of the growth hormone, because it represents farmers on both sides of the issue, said director Julie Marie Bickford.
"A lot of this issue is about marketing and perception," she said. "It's been a positive thing because it promoted a Maine product, but it took away from Maine farmers a production tool."
Some farmers are still upset about that.
"It's sort of the principle of the thing," Bickford said. "We're told to get more efficient and use modern technology, and this was an example of that. The people who used it really loved it. Then they were told they couldn't do it. I have some farmers who are still very upset about it. And some farmers who are resigned to it - they grumbled, but they did it."
Aitel agreed that the dairy community is split over the issue, describing it as an "industrywide identity crisis."
"There are a lot of farmers who don't like the idea that milk can be set apart from other milk," he said. "It was important that Stan Bennett and the family stood up for the idea that there is a difference in producing milk."
Bennett said that despite the lawsuit being the biggest controversy to ever hit the dairy, it isn't something he dwells on.
"It has come and gone, and we deal with the here and now," Bennett said.
© 2008 Blethen Maine Newspapers
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
23 Comments so far
Show AllGreat news. I was one of those who encouraged Oakhurst to stick to its guns, even though I didn't live in Maine and had no choice of hormone-free milk here in WV. The article leaves out important information, however--such as that, while the FDA HAS declared that there is no difference between milk produced with and without artificial hormones, the FDA has been stuffed to the gills with employees who worked for Monsanto before and/or after their stint at FDA, and that rBGH has been banned by nearly all developed countries.
I agree with Kelmer. I don't use any kind of milk or milk derivatives because they're not specially formulated for our brand of mammal. Using another mammal's milk is a bizarre and relatively recent development, and there are many educated folks (such as Ray Kurzweil) who don't think it's a good idea.
Excellent!
This is an important story because it reveals the thread that will lead us out of the global-multi-national labyrinth.
Government is unresponsive. We seem to have only one broad power left to us. The power of how we spend our dollar.
Consumer demand for hormone-free milk brought the rbGH Goliath to it's knees.
So, how will we spend our meager pennies today? On TV dinners and cable?
Enlightened self-interest - in this case, health concerns - may be the only thing that gets people's attention. So start there.Read Nina Planck's new book "Real Food," and pass it around so people wake up.
Buy organic and support the farmers that lay it on the line to farm sustainably.
Eat whole foods, purchased locally if possible. This alone is radical, with the benefits of preserving open land, improving our health, keeping local dollars within the community to strengthen it (sustainability, again) rather than shipping dollars elsewhere.
Go further - substitute xylitol or stevia for sugar, our health and waistline thank us for it (Nu-Stevia is a near-perfect sugar substitute, very palatable). Forgo Coke and bottled drinks, try refreshing and healthful teas with a sqeeeze from a real lemon. Eat more vegetables and fresh fruits. If you're a carnivore, use meat more as a condiment. Use olive oil rather than industrial oils. Go as unprocessed ("value-added") as workable.
Better health AND, finally, some real power that is understood in the highest halls of power - the consumer dollar.
Oakhurst/Stanley Bennett served the dairy business, his customers, his dairy herd, and his nation by standing by his ethics, and using his common sense - understanding that running an "extra" percentage of milk through his cows through chemical manipulation couldn't help but stress them!
We cannot begin to measure the stresses on plants and animals in food production - let alone how those foods actually affect us. Once again a Mainer's integrity leads on a Common Sense issue... and we are all benefited!
This is good news. Hormones have complex and poorly understood cascades of effects on living beings and should not be introduced en masse into anybody. They should be used under close supervision as a one-on-one medical treatment for a specific situation in a specific individual..
I don't know what Kelmer feeds his small children, but many people rely on milk. If milk is filled with hormones, foodstuffs manufactured from offal and waste, antibiotics and other chemicals it is not good for the cows nor for the people who use the product.
In my opinion, we should subsidize humane dairy practices such as individual stalls for cows, time out in the meadow grass in good weather, natural food and some kind of life for male calves. These practices are too expensive for many dairy farmers who live on a margin and never have a day off, but would benefit all of us including the animal lovers.
Just to show how the food industry operates.
Do people remember that story of how various meat packers went to the Governmnet to have them pressure another meat packer who decided on its own they would test every cow they slaughtered for mad cow disease?
Their rationale was that it would force them to prove their meat safe as well.
These guys that process our foodstuffs have no morals whatsoever. Yet we still have people who suggest that the regulation of the food supply is an unwarranted intervention into the Free market.
We have food suppliers in Canada that want country of origin lables and such things removed from packaging in Canada for much the same reason.
They are out of control and it about high time the consumer started fighting back .
We are told to believe that the "products" sold in the supermarket are all good, nutritious food. Is anyone really dim enough to buy that claim without reflection? Sadly, yes. I fear for the young people when they get to be my age (60s). I have been rewarded for my care over diet, and the fact that I have the health stats. of a 20-something make me a freak (no meds. even). I know it is hard to fight the lies of the industry/FDA, but at least try to pay some attention! Come on, people - you only get one body this time around!
Provide all Americans, all Earth people, a chance for being healthy.
LABEL ALL GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS NOW!
Get your ACT together, FDA, start testing the GM foods NOW! Just saying that
there are no adverse effects without proof continues to prove FDA ineptitude.
(meaning bigtime full of sh!!t)
ORGANICALLY GROWN FOODS ARE TAKING OVER thank the Universe!
Because products that screw people are beginning to be discovered and
the food revolution has begun.
Congratulations Stanley Bennett for your strong backbone, happy cows and quality milk products.
another example of transnationals' tyranny over us: a producer is not allowed to make a simple statement of interest to his consumers, but instead must add gobbledygook that kisses the ass of the ruling class. americans, remember your heritage and the tyrants you've destroyed.
Russ said "it is simply sinful and contrary to God and the laws of nature."
One could say the same thing about every Monsanto product.
As former dairy farmer Howard Lyman says: give up milk.
Its bad.
Its bad for you and the planet.
Cows are not meant to be giving milk to humans--its meant for calves-who end up in veal grates because of selfish ignorant humans.
If you care about water that gets wasted on livestock-give it up.
If you care about wildlife that is slaughtered to stop them from doing what they do naturally(unlike humans, who need tools to do it) give it up.
If you care about global warming--give it up.
If you care about justice-give it up.
Meat and dairy are unnecessary and bad for every party concerned.
We dont need more studies from idiot scientists, we need people to stop eating meat and dairy.
Its simple, easy, logical.
But humans dont do logic very well.
We need studies of pituitary, thyroid and other endocrine disorders in humans that may be linked to the consumption of products coming from animals treated with BGH. Just because the milk looks the same and supposedly "tastes" the same does NOT mean it is not affecting humans adversely. I have read medical estimates that 20% of the population has a benign pituitary tumor. Of course, the media being the way it is, just glossed over that horrific statistic, rather than asking why and seemed to treat this symptom as "normal" since most people don't exhibit symptoms.
But what about the marked increase in pituitary and other endocrine cancers? Might not what we eat be causing some or most of this increase? They have already showed that carcinogens in our foods and environment can cause cancer. How do we know that the hormones given to cows don't in turn affect our own hormonal systems. (The pituitary gland is the master endocrine gland and is in charge of growth, and of the function of the thyroid, parathyroid, and adrenal glands, so any damage done to the pituitary gland could conceivably contribute to obesity, fatty tumors, malfunctioning tyroids, parathyroids, etc.)
I myself am having to have my thyroid and one of my parathyroid glands out soon and may have a pituitary tumor as well. I have been a big milk drinker and have eaten beef for years, not aware of possible dangers of BGH. I am very happy that some producers are finally looking out for consumers rather than simply dumping all kinds of untested additives into our food supply either directly or indirectly through the animal sources.
Well, yes, lost the battle, won the war. The people united taking back the world 1 victory at a time.
separation of corporations and state? Not a bad idea, however what will all thoese lobyests do? Maybe they could try manufacturing, that is after all what stimulates an economy. Not shopping, or outsourcing!
http://www.douglassreport.com/reports/aspartame_3.html?gclid=CLmK8OXM75QCFRRhnAodrU9vqw
One small step for (WE THE PEOPLE)
Good News! I'd like to know how we lost our "freedom of speech" regarding labeling. The big corporations have take our protections for themselves and our congress (having been bought and paid for) lets them. Time to take it all back!
maelstrom,
Do a google search on
FDA aspartame stevia "high fructose corn syrup"
and you'll see the real evil FDA has been throughout. Amazing the America would keep such a criminal agency !
As long as both parties are beholden to Big Agri and Big Oil, Monsanto and the likes are still "free" to POISON the public as they wish. At least Ron Paul was the best candidate to stand up to Big Agri and Big Government on the banning of raw milk and Big Brother's weapon against small farmers, NAIS. We need people like Ralph Nader and Ron Paul to get Big Government off of our backs and to stop oversubsidizing agri-business with our taxpayer money !!
"Milk Makes It" Uses a milk moustashe
Hormomed Milk Makes You Grow a REAL Moustashe
I noticed too maelstrom, that the the FDA just had to tell one more lie before allowing the incident to die.
YES! Great news! A few more knockout punches and Monsanto will be history.
Cows have been giving milk for thousands of years without interference from the likes of Monsanto. It is more than presumptuous of such industries to assault innocent animals with their phony knowledge: it is simply sinful and contrary to God and the laws of nature.
Here's to more victories that will remove this obscenity of tampering with nature!
Nice article.
The fact that the FDA has ruled 'no difference' between artificial hormones and natural hormones in milk is not reassuring.
The FDA has pretty much become the corporate spokesman for agribusiness: food profits come first; food safety somewhere down the line...