EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Obama Did It For the Money
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Renowned Scientist Stephen Hawking Joins Academic Boycott of Israel
Popular content
Today's Top News
This Land Is Their Land
I took a little vacation recently -- nine hours in Sun Valley, Idaho, before an evening speaking engagement. The sky was deep blue, the air crystalline, the hills green and not yet on fire. Strolling out of the Sun Valley Lodge, I found a tiny tourist village, complete with Swiss-style bakery, multistar restaurant and "opera house." What luck -- the boutiques were displaying outdoor racks of summer clothing on sale! Nature and commerce were conspiring to make this the perfect micro-vacation.
But as I approached the stores things started to get a little sinister -- maybe I had wandered into a movie set or Paris Hilton's closet? -- because even at a 60 percent discount, I couldn't find a sleeveless cotton shirt for less than $100. These items shouldn't have been outdoors; they should have been in locked glass cases.
Then I remembered the general rule, which has been in effect since sometime in the 1990s: if a place is truly beautiful, you can't afford to be there. All right, I'm sure there are still exceptions -- a few scenic spots not yet eaten up by mansions. But they're going fast.
About ten years ago, for example, a friend and I rented a snug, inexpensive one-bedroom house in Driggs, Idaho, just over the Teton Range from wealthy Jackson Hole, Wyoming. At that time, Driggs was where the workers lived, driving over the Teton Pass every day to wait tables and make beds on the stylish side of the mountains. The point is, we low-rent folks got to wake up to the same scenery the rich people enjoyed and hike along the same pine-shadowed trails.
But the money was already starting to pour into Driggs -- Paul Allen of Microsoft, August Busch III of Anheuser-Busch, Harrison Ford -- transforming family potato farms into vast dynastic estates. I haven't been back, but I understand Driggs has become another unaffordable Jackson Hole. Where the wait staff and bed-makers live today I do not know.
I witnessed this kind of deterioration up close in Key West, Florida, where I first went in 1986, attracted not only by the turquoise waters and frangipani-scented nights but by the fluid, egalitarian social scene. At a typical party you might find literary stars like Alison Lurie, Annie Dillard and Robert Stone, along with commercial fishermen, waitresses and men who risked their lives diving for treasure (once a major blue-collar occupation). Then, at some point in the '90s, the rich started pouring in. You'd see them on the small planes coming down from Miami -- taut-skinned, linen-clad and impatient. They drove house prices into the seven-figure range. They encouraged restaurants to charge upward of $30 for an entree. They tore down working-class tiki bars to make room for their waterfront "condotels."
Of all the crimes of the rich, the aesthetic deprivation of the rest of us may seem to be the merest misdemeanor. Many of them owe their wealth to the usual tricks: squeezing their employees, overcharging their customers and polluting any land they're not going to need for their third or fourth homes. Once they've made (or inherited) their fortunes, the rich can bid up the price of goods that ordinary people also need -- housing, for example. Gentrification is dispersing the urban poor into overcrowded suburban ranch houses, while billionaires' horse farms displace rural Americans into trailer homes. Similarly, the rich can easily fork over annual tuitions of $50,000 and up, which has helped make college education a privilege of the upper classes.
There are other ways, too, that the rich are robbing the rest of us of beauty and pleasure. As the bleachers in stadiums and arenas are cleared to make way for skybox "suites" costing more than $100,000 for a season, going out to a ballgame has become prohibitively expensive for the average family. At the other end of the cultural spectrum, superrich collectors have driven up the price of artworks, leading museums to charge ever rising prices for admission.
It shouldn't be a surprise that the Pew Research Center finds happiness to be unequally distributed, with 50 percent of people earning more than $150,000 a year describing themselves as "very happy," compared with only 23 percent of those earning less than $20,000. When nations are compared, inequality itself seems to reduce well-being, with some of the most equal nations -- Iceland and Norway -- ranking highest, according to the UN's Human Development Index. We are used to thinking that poverty is a "social problem" and wealth is only something to celebrate, but extreme wealth is also a social problem, and the superrich have become a burden on everyone else.
If Edward O. Wilson is right about "biophilia" -- an innate human need to interact with nature -- there may even be serious mental health consequences to letting the rich hog all the good scenery. I know that if I don't get to see vast expanses of water, 360-degree horizons and mountains piercing the sky for at least a week or two of the year, chronic, cumulative claustrophobia sets in. According to evolutionary psychologist Nancy Etcoff, the need for scenery is hard-wired into us. "People like to be on a hill, where they can see a landscape. And they like somewhere to go where they can not be seen themselves," she told Harvard Magazine last year. "That's a place desirable to a predator who wants to avoid becoming prey." We also like to be able to see water (for drinking), low-canopy trees (for shade) and animals (whose presence signals that a place is habitable).
Ultimately, the plutocratic takeover of rural America has a downside for the wealthy too. The more expensive a resort town gets, the farther its workers have to commute to keep it functioning. And if your heart doesn't bleed for the dishwasher or landscaper who commutes two to four hours a day, at least shed a tear for the wealthy vacationer who gets stuck in the ensuing traffic. It's bumper to bumper westbound out of Telluride, Colorado, every day at 5, or eastbound on Route 1 out of Key West, for the Lexuses as well as the beat-up old pickup trucks.
Or a place may simply run out of workers. Monroe County, which includes Key West, has seen more than 2,000 workers leave since the 2000 Census, a loss the Los Angeles Times calls "a body blow to the service-oriented economy of a county with only 75,000 residents and 2.25 million overnight visitors a year." Among those driven out by rents of more than $1,600 for a one-bedroom apartment are many of Key West's wait staff, hotel housekeepers, gardeners, plumbers and handymen. No matter how much money you have, everything takes longer -- from getting a toilet fixed to getting a fish sandwich at Pepe's.
Then there's the elusive element of charm, which quickly drains away in a uniform population of multimillionaires. The Hamptons had their fishermen. Key West still advertises its "characters" -- sun-bleached, weather-beaten misfits who drifted down for the weather or to escape some difficult situation on the mainland. But the fishermen are long gone from the Hamptons and disappearing from Cape Cod. As for Key West's characters -- with the traditional little conch houses once favored by shrimpers flipped into million-dollar second homes, these human sources of local color have to be prepared to sleep with the scorpions under the highway overpass.
In Telluride even a local developer is complaining about the lack of affordable housing. "To have a real town," he told the Financial Times, "Telluride needs some locals hanging out" -- in old-fashioned diners, for example, where you don't have to speak Italian to order a cup of coffee.
When I was a child, I sang "America the Beautiful" and meant it. I was born in the Rocky Mountains and raised, at various times, on the coasts. The Big Sky, the rolling surf, the jagged, snowcapped mountains -- all this seemed to be my birthright. But now I flinch when I hear Woody Guthrie's line "This land was made for you and me." Somehow, I don't think it was meant to be sung by a chorus of hedge-fund operators.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


43 Comments so far
Show AllYou don't even have to go to a fancy resort area to see this happening. Northwest Arkansas has had an influx of Wal-Mart vendors driving up housing costs, bulldozing homes and farms to build McMansions and making affordable housing a thing of the past for working people. To fill the lousy paying jobs at the Wal-Mart home office and in the service sector, people drive in from Missouri, Oklahoma and the poorer outlying areas of Arkansas. Any wonder that we are consuming so much oil when people spend hours each day just to get to a crappy job?
{{{sigh}}}
Where are the angry mobs and the guillotines when you need them?
You know, it's so true, and depressingly so. I would even go further to highlight the disparities than the author... The traffic he discusses as affecting the poor and the rich doesn't actually, at least not as equally as you'd think. The super-rich are, after all, super-rich. Many of them own aircraft - a private helicopter or jet - and no, they really don't worry about the traffic. Or the fuel prices caused in part by their excess. Even if they don't, there are rent-a-copter operations out there. I read a story just a few months back about a special helicopter shuttle to bring our illustrious elite from JFK airport, over my apartment in Brooklyn to Manhattan, without having to set foot in Kings County. They don't care that the BQE is backed up because no one can live anywhere close to Manhattan, nor do they care that the public transit system is so stressed you often have to wait 2 or 3 trains before you can even fit on one of them. It doesn't affect them. They have their own infrastructure and we are not invited.
I'm not exactly poor either - my income's smack in the middle of that 20-150K range. But my rent alone is just over 50% of that... meanwhile, condos pop up everywhere around in me in my neighborhood, sandwiched between Crown Heights and Prospect Heights. What is in many ways still a ghetto is being transformed - sounds good, except it pushes even people with my purchasing power still further out. I'm supposedly firmly middle class and yet my neighbors are largely on welfare. Next year god knows where I might have to live if my rent goes up again. But the rich don't care that their condos are destroying our lives - they think they're improving the neighborhood with their bravado.
We are becoming a banana republic very much like those generated by United Fruit. Even if you're doing well, you're still on the bottom. There really is no middle class anymore - anyone that tells you they're in it is probably more simply described as poor. With infrastructure crumbling (remember that bridge in Minnesota that just suddenly wasn't there anymore?), prices increasing for everything (I just paid $9 for one pack of cigarettes!), and few if any opportunities to do any better unless you already *are* super-rich, it doesn't matter how much money you have. Unless you have millions and millions of dollars, there's really nothing you can do with that money anyway to make your life any better. It's like running up the down escalator on one leg.
"...extreme wealth is also a social problem, and the superrich have become a burden on everyone else."
AMEN
When I first moved to Los Angeles in 1986, I was thrilled because here was a place where I could afford a decent apt. in a nice area, buy a new car afford my bills, etc. and all on a salary considered too low for those things most everywhere else. But since then, I've seen the rich in Malibu cut off the non-rich from a long stretch of beach access. Who the hell ever gave anyone the right to own a piece of the COAST??
Now I live in a crumbling apt with bad pipes. A building that will probably be bull-dozed at some point leaving the 70 residents to scrounge for to rent something in a poorer neighborhood.
This is happening everywhere in the USA. Yes, the super-rich are a BIG social problem. They don't want to pay their fair share of taxes and they get away with it. And then when the fires came -- guess who had to use the city resources the rest of us were paying for --- THEM! They all became "PARASITES" overnight.
Chakra Khan is right --- off with their heads!
I wonder how many lives are wasted chasing Other People's Values. Happiness is not measured with money nor is Eternity measured with a watch. I enjoy watching watching the Obliterati running in ever tighting circles as if they were rushing to life's destination. Life is the journey.
P.S. I liked your book Barbara and with the proper outlook you can have 52 weeks of sanity anywhere.
Barbara, the place to go for your 2 weeks of sanity every year is in the Queen Charlotte Islands of the coast of British Columbia and Bluewater Adventures of North Vancouver, BC. will bring you there on their 70 ft sailboats. For info. e-mail explore@bluewateradventures.ca or check their website www.bluewateradventures.ca. Here is a link to recent documentaries on Global TV about these trips: www.canada.com/globaltv/bc/microsites/queencharlotte/index.
One sign I see of things coming apart for the greedy wealthy --- These high-priced condos they built on the land previously holding an affordable apt. house -- are sitting EMPTY. FOR SALE signs linger for years. Who did they expect was going to fill all their rich caves? Numbnuts. They don't THINK that the damage they do will come around to effect THEM. The boomerang is on its way back.
Hey, let's pay for the Iraq War by selling the Grand Canyon to Bill Gates and the Grand Tetons to Donald Trump.
The Wapoo Indians settled here 8,000 years ago, bathing in the warm waters. The Spanish found it and named the grounds "Agua Caliente." Notable Californian Sam Brannan was an early promoter of the area and, in 1861, created the original spa, mud baths, and water plunge.
IOW, For 8,000 years anyone who visited the valley and the people who lived there, freely enjoyed the spa waters.
That ended once these lands and their healing properties were "discovered" by the corPirate capitalists.
Employees drive over two different mountains to get there, or along 25-50 mile stretches of two lane roads. Also, most are not employees, but rather private contractors with no benefits.
The title of this article is also the title of an excellent book by Evaggelos Vallianatos, "This Land is their Land: How Corporate Farms Threaten the World" (2006).
Beginning with Reagun, the goal of the Neocons was to eliminate the middle class. I believe they have pretty much succeeded. I used to be middle class, but am now what you would call the lower class, or near poor. Without my Social Security check I'd be living in my old car. I don't know who in the hell they think is going to pay the taxes for their big "Defense" spending. Do you think they might have to give up some of the Cold War weapons they are still building?
"This land was made for you and me." Somehow, I don't think it was meant to be sung by a chorus of hedge-fund operators."
What a terrific line!!
RichM June 13th, 2008 3:24 pm
"The rich are becoming a luxury we can no longer afford"
Great post!!!
The trouble is we can fix this. We just need to get started. This country is still the best around with all our faults.
We need to bring back some reality to government. The nasties will be gone by January and it doesn't look like Obama will win (and we still don't know much about this guy), so we need to concentrate at the local level, Congressmen and Senators. They can be moved, they can be controlled. Look at what happened last year when big business, Bush and the racist organizations/politicians tried to push through their slave labor bill. They were stopped dead in their tracks because more than 80% of Americans opposed it.
We can certainly do it again if we can decide what to do. And it looks like the American people are going to have to do it without leadership.
The funny thing is, I know we can. Its a great country.
Probably the super rich will just wind up hiring live-in help. With the plentiful undocumented immigrant population presently available, this shouldn't be much of a problem. On the other hand, they better hope the lower classes never come gunning for them, because then they'll need tall fences and armed guards as well.
Well, we all seem to agree on the problem, the rich have taken over the country that used to belong to us all. The trouble is, once people have the assets and also control, they are not going to gfive it back easily.
McCain will be FOUR MORE YEARS, and it is doubful our country can survive another round of the same old greed, lies, and mischief that we have been through. Obama will surely have his hands full making changes if he somehow gets elected, but at least we need to try to get every congressperson that goes along with the present disaster thrown out.
We will hear a constant drumbeat of "they want to raise your taxes" and to many people, that sounds scary and works well. However, if the rich cannot be made to help support the country they now own most of, we are out of luck.
This land is your land,
This land is my land ...
sing it with a fist in the air.
The problem is that Obama is four more years also.
Kernel June 13th, 6:18 pm "...they are not going to give it back easily."
Kernel, they ain't giving ANYTHING back EVER. Are we prepared to TAKE OUR COUNTRY BACK from the ANIMALS by any means necessary? Yet? MASTER doesn't share, never has never will. Having abandoned ANY humanity, they regard us with less consideration than any Tommy Jefferson ever gave to his slaves, and he gave NO consideration to his slaves at all (never wanted to even see them), except for the 14yo child Sally Hemmings who he FUCKED whenever he wanted and the children they produced who served his white family their meals. We are ALL DISPOSABLE MEAT to these ANIMALS and they suck the marrow from the bones of our children for breakfast. Can I be any more plain than that?
Regrettably, we are a degraded and debased people without honor and without integrity. Americans are merely waiting to be told where to line up to have their Slave Chip installed and praying to the flat-earth Hebrew blood god Jahweh and his plastic Savior boy that some crumbs will fall to them from Master's table. What they don't know is that Jahweh and the carpenter's kid work for MASTER now. It's all one very neat package. Dinner is being served. We're all on the menu.
Will you go quietly onto the spit, like good Xrstians?
Barabara went to Sun Valley and was surprised that it was expensive? She used to be pretty shrewd.
There are beautiful places to stay for moderate money. They are not filled with beautiful people. They may not have discussion of great literature, or of any literature. One just has to want to be around a different kind of people.
I've known a few rich people in my relatively long life and the only one I still know inherited his money and takes philanthropy very seriously and very locally. While he lives in a small and hidden mansion he inherited, he actually lives very modestly, drives an old car, and takes a broad interest in things intellectual. There is something to be said for Noblesse Oblige, something that first-generation hedge fund wealth probably laughs at in a coke-crazed cackle.
Growing up in a Post-WWII small midwestern college town where my parents were professors, enabled a kind of egalitarianism. I entered high school in 1957---the Year of Sputnik---and all hell broke loose! Suddenly my ivy-towered easy-going intellectual college town became a center for intense recruitment of brain power and within a year the entire high school curriculum was shifting heavily into math and science using hastily written MIT manuals as substitutes for hard-cover textbooks. I believe that America changed in 1957 in much the same way it changed after 9/11---politically induced capitalist paranoia.
OMyGod the backward Commies beat us into Space!
Back in the late 50s the average professor had a modest income, not all that much above what a janitor was paid. I remember that our family of 5 with two working parents, one a Ph.D. researcher, were by no means coasting. The socioeconomic disparities that exist today did not exist then. The Great Depression and World War II had put us all in the same boat and we either all rowed together or...
Today, that college town of yesteryear is a University City. The full-time Staff do not earn a "living wage" and many professors are receiving 6-figure salaries and full benefits (even as compared with their predeccessors they teach less than half the time and are ignorant). They are driving SUVs to their ex-urban clustered McMansions and guarding their newfound wealth jealously, while the academic backstabbing has become endemic. Back then, the college's backbone was the School of Arts and Science; today it is the Business School, with millions and millions of dollars given to the PUBLIC University by a small sect of Alumni who got rich in the Private Sector and increasingly control what is to be taught, and what is to be researched and what is to be said.
I grew up in a small college town where I could go to a lecture by Norman Thomas and sit in the football stadium and hear Jack Kennedy campaign in 1960. Today, there is wealth and poverty in extremes, a local newspaper owned by Cox that has lately abandoned even the semblance of an editorial page, and the total lack of intellectual cogency as any part of once was a "community." It is very, very sad.
So, just take your overpriced and poison meds and "be happy." And go out and shop, if you can, to "stimulate the economy" with your rebate check, in the lie that is the "United States." "Untied States" since around 1829.
Love you Barbara. Keep it up at The Nation!
-30-
I had an economics professor once who was a true master. One day, in the middle of a lecture, he suddenly asked,"why are the rich, rich?" He was very fond of trick questions and we smelled one lurking in this seemingly straight forward query. But he could not be ignored and the lecture would not continue until someone attempted an answer. He glared at us for five minutes until someone finally screwed up the courage to respond,"uh...I guess...because they earned wealth or inherited it." "NO, STUPID!" he exclaimed! "Its because the poor don't get guns and take it away!"
The bloated, soft, sheltered, and spoiled need to keep in mind one thing...
...WE outnumber THEM. Their perpetuation of inequality and maintenance of the status quo will ultimately be their downfall. God help them when the majority becomes too hungry, thirsty, frustrated, and desperate.
In my city, there's this big push to woo people in from the affluent suburbs. There's this fixation on attracting and keeping "young professionals." Yet there's no apparent desire to make things better for the people who already live here.
I work in a lower income neighborhood that is undergoing gentrification. All I see opening are businesses that regular people can't and don't want to frequent. You see empty art galleries, restaurants with overpriced food, and little boutiques full of clothing that's too expensive and actually somewhat ridiculous looking.
I mean, what is fashion but a sort of status symbol?
Look at how much my clothes cost.
God, I thought that garbage ended in high school.
You spent 200 dollars on that skirt or pair of shoes. YOU rock!
And speaking of what rocks, you can barely if at all afford to go to a concert anymore. What's lamer than going to a rock show full of wealthy people? The music wasn't made for or by them. Can you imagine what would have happened had Birmingham, England been Happy Valley? The music I love wouldn't exist. Now you have to spend a couple hundred dollars to see them live and get raked over the coals for food, drink, and even parking. Even when you go to see a movie you get gouged.
But they work hard and are smarter than us right? We deserve our unhappiness. 'Cause all ya gotta do is get an education right? Yet somehow all the "successful" people, the ones we are conned into believing are the only people that deserve pleasure, love, companionship, adventure, and fulfillment all seem to come from already affluent backgrounds.
Well most anyway. A few sneak into the club by hook or by crook. It helps keep the illusion alive. Y'know? YOU TOO can be one of us. Just pick up a book by Robert Kiyosaki or a DVD by Tony Robbins.
Yeah right.
"Characters." Isn't that quaint? As if working and poor people are cute little animals.
"Oooh, look at that guy over there driving a garbage truck." Like they're watching a lion at the zoo.
We have some group here in Pittsburgh called PUMP. It's an acronym for something. Basically it's a yuppie organization designed to chase the workers and poor out of the city so the young, privileged people can use Pittsburgh as their playground/toilet until they flee to the 'burbs once they have kids. Anyway, a number of years ago, a few of their reps were on a local talk show. And of course they were going on and on about what was wrong with the city, and what was wrong was the people of course. They ran us down as they are wont to do. One girl stated said that she was excited to see a transvestite standing around downtown. She felt the city was showing signs of hipness. It angered me because what this twit didn't seem to realize is that he/she was probably waiting on a john either to fuel a drug habit or simply because they can't find a real job due to discrimination.
They feed societal problems and then think the symptoms are "neat."
At least Barbara Ehrenreich got to go on vacation. In all my working years, I've never been able to afford to go on one. And I really don't even want to. You get a day off, and all you want to do is sleep. Or you use that day to do things you didn't have time to do during the week. They just want us to work, eat, sleep, piss, shit, use, abuse, and procreate. Keeping us distracted, worn down, misguided in our anger, and duped helps insure that we won't rise up.
There are those who criticize folks who are in debt, telling them that they're living "beyond their means." Why? Because they want a little joy in their life? They want a nice memory? They want to feel good? They want to taste something yummy? If the majority of us lived within our means, we'd do nothing but go to work, come home, eat mush, and sleep.
I know a guy who works two jobs just so he can keep his trailer at a campground in the country. The man almost lost his house to foreclosure last year.
My dad who's owes more money than he'll ever pay back, who has been working for 40 years plus with little to show for it, bought a motorcycle. He's 62. He just wanted to have one and ride it around before he dies. "It's all I have," he told me once. That's his joy. He feels alive when he's on the open road. He looks at it when it shines in the sun and smiles. What are you going to tell him? Sell the damn thing, you can't afford it! Eat ramen noodles for the rest of your life because you screwed up. My dad works with people who do just that and have been doing so their whole adult lives. They're in their 70's and won't retire even thought they can afford to, socking away their money for no one. One guy who's almost 80 rations soup and takes pride on what a miser he is. He has no family, no friends, no hobbies. The guy who owns the company I work for is the same way. Rumor has it he has no running water in his own home because he doesn't want a water bill. So he bottles water from company taps.
Is that how the people are supposed to live? Should we all deny ourselves joy, deprive ourselves, punish ourselves until we "make it?" Until we feel that we "deserve" it?
Hell, try being a young single person sans a college degree, a car, and your own home. You're not even "allowed" to date. You're not "marriageable." You're made to feel as if you're stupid, slothful, and untalented. THAT's why you haven't made it. You have no "character." And therefore you had just better get used to being lonely or settle for whoever will give you the time of day because you need two middle-incomes to get a house.
I try to keep my mind active. Even when I don't want to and my body is weak, I come on this site and read. I force myself to read the good, healthy non-fiction. It's like downing prune juice at times, but I do it.
But they won't take away my music or my fantasy either. The wealthy can't take away a good song or story and if they do, we can just make another that's better than what they stole and diluted.
At what I make I feel like I'm struggling and people tell me I'm making "good" money. Theydon't realize that I'm not only trying to keep myself afloat, but that I'm also helping out my sister and have to give my parents money. I can only imagine how it is for the people making less or nothing at all.
End of disorganized rant.
Oh...anyone know who Heidi Montag is? The pampered Aryan brat from MTV's reality show universe?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heidi_Montag#Personal_life
Who didn't know that a girl like her would be a Republican and endorse John McCain? What's that tell ya?
But girls...you too can be Heidi Montag. Just color your hair, go in debt getting some plastic surgery done, and take pics of yourself in various states of undress. Be a little sluttier though since you lack the silver spoon.
hate to say this, but where were you whiners when we were exporting this kind of society? history's justice is poetic.
Well, with gas hitting five bucks a gallon and food prices going up, jobs dissapearing, no health care or safety net it seems the only thing the poor can afford is matches.
Buy a match mister? Quarter each. Light a little fire and warm your hands.
"Today, that college town of yesteryear is a University City. The full-time Staff do not earn a "living wage" and many professors are receiving 6-figure salaries and full benefits (even as compared with their predeccessors they teach less than half the time and are ignorant). They are driving SUVs to their ex-urban clustered McMansions and guarding their newfound wealth jealously, while the academic backstabbing has become endemic. Back then, the college's backbone was the School of Arts and Science"
A wonderful comment on the betrayal of America by the "educrats", thiose that keep telling you all these wonderful things you should be doing, how wonderful multicuturalism is, how wonderful Marxist philosophies are, "Poweer to the people!" as they do exactly the opposite and don't even teach that much.
This is a disgusting bunch of "intellectuals" without any intellectual diversity at all for all their rants on diversity. Most deserve contempt.
Somewhat tangential, but mostly concurrent: the same thing is probably happening worldwide. I know it's happening here in Taiwan. We've got a similar situation just a few decades behind the US: aboriginals are the workers, the creators of cozy and quaint local environs, but they're being evicted and outpriced in their scenic (albeit marginal--in the ecological and agricultural sense) towns by the "new rich" (my French is a little rusty, otherwise I'd have typed that in French to highlight the haughty connotations) who come in and build McMansions (Taiwan-style, which means absolutely zero insulation and monster A/C units.)
My brother bought some farm land down south along the coast last year. His only hope is to be able to get down there and start his grand permaculture adventure (he's a certified teacher now) before McMansions start poisoning the upstream water table. Environmental damage is one major aspect the author didn't touch.
Oh, and if you're actually reading this, it means CD isn't screwing with my privilege to post comments any more. Yippie for that!
Dear iwarrior......my son is very involved in PUMP--the Pittsburgh Urban Magnet Project. Instead of partying it up every weekend ,he is volunteering his time to make Pittsburgh a friendlier city,one with activities that can involve anyone who cares to join in. Instead of being bitter,why don't you try it out. You might enjoy it!
Truthseeker58;
Just a question. You mention the wealthy don't pay their 'fair share' of the taxes. What do you mean by that, exactly? The top 5% accounts for over half of all tax revenues. The top 50% accounts for virtually all tax revenues.
The top 5% accounts for over half of all tax revenues. The top 50% accounts for virtually all tax revenues.
Simply match the income of the top 5% and the top 50% to the taxes they pay and you will find out exactly what truthseeker58 is talking about. And that only refers to Federal taxes......
I certainly wish my taxes were only around 15.5% at worst. The average American is paying around 44% per year in taxes today.
The same thing is happening in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, where homes that used to go for around 40-70K have been either torn down or 'remodeled' to to attract a higher price for more out of town wealthy homeowners.
We have never had as many rich subdivisions in 'progress' as we do now, as seemingly each tract of useable land is gobbled up by developers and then, ultimately bought by out of state wealthy people who build homes that cost 6 times what they used to (and more than what our area could sustain before the rich came).
Our largest city- Marquette (population 20,488)- now has an 'arborist' to tend to the trees and flowers planted for the rich folks (!?) and our two highways into the city are getting more and more heavy traffic every weekday morning and evening during the 'commute' hours, as expensive Cadillac Escolades and Hummers fight for pavement along with the natives' used cars and beat up pickup trucks.
We increasingly have heavy tandem trucks carrying away our precious metals, ores, and trees on all of our roads, and every day logging companies peel away what's left of our remaining natural forests and cart it away, without replanting most of what they 'harvest'.
And now the new Condo owners along the city's lakeshore want to 'own' the lakefront too, city streets be damned.
Where will it end? Is greed the only acceptable attitude in this 'new' milennium- and if it is, where do the rest of us natives go now after they've cut down all of our forests, stolen our minerals, and bought up all the lakefront property?
While we winge, with justification, about the rich here at home, all of us Americans are the filthy rich to those 3 billion people abroad earning less than $2 a day--and their condemnation of us has a strong moral underpinning.
If the global community was using less of the Earth's biocapacity than was being produced, then the fact that the average American or anyone else uses 9.8 hectares of this biocapacity (vs. .8 hectares for those in low income countries) might just be considered a sign of success, God's will, obscene, whatever. But that is not the case as we have been in a state of growing ecological overshoot since some time in the late 1980's.
(See WWF's Living Planet Report)
As long as we remain in this state of ecological overshoot, the resulting slide in the hectares of biocapacity available per person will continue. To halt this ultimately homicidal habit—this spending of the natural capital on which future generations will be dependent—is going to require our expanding our view of equity from just equality of opportunity to entitlement to an equal share of the Earth's biocapacity and no more or "equality of take" if you will. Otherwise, the individuals (and countries) who are taking more than their per capita share will continue driving the overshoot and at the same time keep the stage set so that as people in the developing world continue raising their standard of living, they will also continue driving the overshoot—this though they might still be taking less than their fair share. We can see this with China's weekly additions of coal fired power plants and their gigantic contributions of CO2 to the atmosphere—a gas which, as we all know, the Ecosystem is already failing to adequately regulate. The current per capita share of available biocapacity is 1.8 hectares, and the amount currently used per capita is 2.2.
www.StudentsForTheEarth.org
iwarrior -- Keep those rants coming. I always enjoy them. Watch a few Suzie Ormon DVD's; she'll tell you exactly how to be miserably fiscally responsible! Yes, people work their lives away, with that golden hope that someday, someday, they will retire and travel the world, and... Then they reach 75, their lives are nearly over, and all they want to do is sit and twiddle the rest away. My adivice is to be an iconoclast in the decisions you make; and try to be as daring as possible. What we know for sure is that going by the book is NOT going to work.
Veros-I did look into it at one point, and I found that they're not my kind of people, and I'm not their kind of people. They're yuppies. I'm not one. What am I gonna do? Play kickball with a bunch of lawyers and financial planners? As if they want someone like me in their group. They're not doing anything for people like me or people who are worse off. I see them trying to make Pittsburgh more habitable for people like themselves. I'm not worried about paintball tournaments, networking, and how we can make the city "cooler." Our city is falling apart like every other in the US.
Thanks lpenek. I'm cringing at my draft. :D Typo gremlins and shoddy writing.
Thomas More said, "This country is still the best around with all our faults."
Could you post what criteria you are using for this claim?
4thefuture June 14th, 2008 11:53 pm
Simply look around you, or go vist other countries. Better yet, take no money with you and go visit other countries.
The old saw is correct, which other country do you know of that if you give a choice to anyone leaving their own country as to the country they want to go to....they almost invariably choose ours.
If you want to see what poverty is, what hunger is, you'll have to go somewhere else.
Better yet.....which country do you consider better than ours? I've been to a lot of countries and haven't seen one thats close. But I haven't been everywhere. Which one would you say?
Better yet, what other country has the criteria to make that claim?
"Property is theft! - Pierre-Joseph Proudhon.
The big mistake of the U.S.' "founding fathers" was to enshrine private property as part of the new republic, thus ensuring disenfranchisement of the general population over time. (It also helped in the stealing of native Americans' lands.) Those with money for speculation simply drive up the price for everyone else. Of course, the founding fathers were "men of substance" already, meaning they owned property and were rich (and could vote).
Here in California, you now have to be a millionaire to buy a crummy lot on the remaining open land, such as an abandoned polluted military base.
Camping on public lands now costs about half the cost of a night's stay in cheap hotel room, even though the U.S. public collectively owns the national and state parklands.
Homelessness is a common sight. When I was growing up, you didn't see them.
Ehrenreich didn't mention that wages for workers are typically depressed in "tourist towns" compared with big cities. So, if you work in a tourist town and don't do high-paid professional work, your net income is flat or worse. And that means no savings and no future.
"If you want to see what poverty is, what hunger is, you'll have to go somewhere else."
You don't have homeless people where you live?
4thefuture June 14th, 2008 11:53 pm
Simply look around you, or go vist other countries. Better yet, take no money with you and go visit other countries.
The old saw is correct, which other country do you know of that if you give a choice to anyone leaving their own country as to the country they want to go to….they almost invariably choose ours.
--Better is often subjective, Thomas, no? Now, if you talking about natural beauty, I agree America is unparalleled. On the other hand, if you are poor and lack medical insurance, then no (I know, I know, there's Medicaid--ever try to qualify for it?). If you get sick in America, and do not have insurance (even if you do they may deny you care), the medical establishment is all too happy to steal your property and let you die like a dog. And visiting a country is not the same as being a citizen or resident, Thomas.
And for the worker...in other industrialized nations, workers are given more paid vacation time, a living wage, and many other protections and benefits American workers do not share. Lately, here, if you been working in manufacturing, most likely you've been given the shaft--probably more than once. That's an added bonus.
So maybe you are insulated from these harsh realities, maybe not. If not, do not be too quick to preach the virtues that MSM propaganda feeds you about the 'greatness' of America.
Oh and why do they come here, instead of elsewhere? Because it's easier to get in, and especially to stay here once you are in!
http://johnmcpain.blogspot.com
Scandinavian countries have free education,
5 week vacation and free health care.
But they don't attack other countries or spend most of the budget on useless weapons.
Their masters remember all populist uprisings,
French Revolution including and cannot behave the way our masters do.Western Europe is more egalitarian.
WAAAH
What a bunch of whiners. Its this culture of victimization and hatred of those better off than us that is ruining our country, and turning us into a nation of wimps. For every sob story iwarrior posts here, I have 20 of people in worse circumstances than them who pulled themselves up by the bootstraps and made something of their lives. Places, cities and towns change. Quit whining, and go out and DO SOMETHING about it.