EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Iowa: The People's Caucus
As caucus craziness reaches its peak here in Iowa, the Occupy movement has not been left out. As the Des Moines Register reported Wednesday in a notably favorable top-of-the-front-page story:
About 250 protesters from at least 11 states turned out Tuesday night for the first event of Occupy Iowa’s most aggressive attempt to influence the presidential campaign.
The protesters ramped up for demonstrations at the candidates’ local headquarters and the offices of the Republican and Democratic parties. They were prepared to be arrested en masse, and they were fired up.
Des Moines happens to be my hometown, and so I've watched OccupyDSM for months. The impressive strength and resilience of local activists there is one of the things that first convinced me that this could be a movement with truly national reach.
From its start, OccupyDSM has had a hostile relationship with Republican Governor Terry Branstad--who was known to Iowans, not altogether happily, as "governor for life" when he lorded over the state from 1983 to 1999, and who added a fifth act to his undying reign when he won reelection as part of the Republicans' state-level surge in the 2010 midterms. Branstad swiftly evicted the OccupyDSM protesters from the State Capitol grounds when they set up camp in early October. That event produced some of the movement's first arrests outside of New York.
However, Mayor Frank Cownie offered OccupyDSM a new space for an occupation on city property, which has since hosted a tent city that has persevered into the Iowa winter. OccupyDSM has also maintained a good working relationship with the city police force.
One of the interesting and impressive things about the local movement has how, even as its new occupation continues to stand, it has moved beyond a sole focus on the encampment. With the People's Caucus, activists taken advantage of the intense once-every-four-years national spotlight shined on the state, hosting a week of teach-ins and nonviolent direct actions focused on Occupy issues, most prominently the need to get corporate money out of politics. In addition to scoring a plethora of press hits in the local media, the actions have made the national nightly news coverage and have produced a multiple stories in outlets such as the New York Times.
The Tuesday night opening event for the People's Caucus was designed to mirror the experience of attending one of the actual caucuses in Iowa. After some welcoming speakers, participants were given a chance to offer resolutions to the assembly. Unlike in the Democratic or Republican caucuses, these resolutions were not voted up or down for possible inclusion in a state party platform. But the process gave a wide range of speakers--including Occupy representatives from Iowa City, St. Louis, Los Angeles, Oakland, and Seattle--a chance to speak out in favor of things like nullifying the Citizens United ruling, reversing the National Defense Appropriations Act's violations of civil liberties, "dismantling the U.S. military empire," ending Bush-era tax cuts, and instating public financing of campaigns.
Next, caucus participants would ordinarily form "preference groups" for specific candidates, trying to get together enough support to win a delegate to represent their pick at the state party convention. In the Peoples' Caucus, participants instead formed "dispreference groups," choosing candidates they'd most like to protest.
On Wednesday, I went with the anti-Mitt Romney group to occupy Romney's Des Moines campaign headquarters. Office staffers (who sheepishly removed the Romney banner from their front window while the action was taking place) locked out the crowd of approximately sixty protesters. Seven people were ultimately arrested at the office door, while others worked on building a cardboard pipeline to Wells Fargo, a bank which was conveniently located a few doors down and which has pumped a steady stream of money into Romney's campaign. Police arrested three additional protesters who entered the Wells Fargo branch.
When activists first announced that they would "Occupy the Caucuses," Branstad helped stoke fears that dissidents would be interrupting the democratic process itself. However, People's Caucus delegates emphasized that they would instead be targeting campaign offices, demanding that the candidates be transparent in disclosing the big business contributions that are fueling their efforts. As my younger brother Paul, director of the Los Angeles-based Center for the Working Poor and active OccupyLA participant, stated as part of the People's Caucus's opening panel: "We are not here to disrupt the caucus. We are here to make the caucuses a true representation of democracy... The real disruption is how much money Wall Street has put into our political system."
A good friend of mine, Aaron Jorgensen-Briggs, gave the opening welcome for the People's Caucus on Tuesday night. The following was his statement (as seen on C-Span):
Friends, neighbors, members of the press, visiting Occupy delegates, honored guests, welcome. I’d like to begin with some words from a great American leader of the past. He wrote:
'I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. Corporations have been enthroned, an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money-power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until the wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed.'
These words of President Abraham Lincoln, in 1864, resonate loud and clear tonight, in Des Moines, Iowa, in 2011.
We have gathered here tonight because the political system in the United States no longer represents the values of the American public. Just as President Lincoln predicted, the money-power of the country now resides in the hands of a tiny portion of the population, the 1%.
We are here tonight to overthrow money-power with people power. We are here tonight as citizens and patriots to preserve our democracy from the corrupting influence of Wall Street and big corporations. We are here tonight to raise our voices in defense of the American dream. We are here tonight to restore the American political system and American society, to make it human-centered, not profit-centered. We are here tonight to follow through on the vision of our founders and the vision of the great American social movements of the past, the movements that ended slavery, gave women the right to vote, ended racial segregation in our communities, established safe working conditions and good wages for hard-working Americans and their families. We are here tonight, because our political leaders are no longer able to lead us.
Now is the time for us to lead, for the people of the United States, the 99%, to rise up, and restore America, to recreate it, truly, as a nation of opportunity, equality, and justice. Honored guests, members of the 99%, we are here tonight because of you. 'Join Us!' we cried, and you have answered. And for that, we thank you, and we bid you welcome to the first-in-the-nation People's Caucus!
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


12 Comments so far
Show AllExcellent work. I'm quite happy to hear that OccupyIowa is getting in corporate America's face. Excellent strategy as well with the selection of the candidates with the most disturbing platforms being singled out rather than supporting any particular candidate. Personally I think the Occupy movement should be carrying placards that read... "Vote for anyone as long as they're not a Democrat, Republican or Tea Partier". Unfortunately the current governor is a corporate lackey and therefore he will do whatever he can to make the movement disappear, yet the movement does appear to be gaining traction.
I'm all for Occupy getting in the face of Wells Fargo and other corporate and Wall Street criminals. Such action is long, long overdue. But when Occupy starts invading and getting arrested at campaign headquarters -- no matter how odious the candidate may be -- they start losing the support of mainstream U.S. citizens.
(Just as I suspect most CD readers wouldn't be real thrilled about Tea Partiers tresspassing and getting arrested at the campaign offices of Rocky Anderson or Ralph Nader.)
It's a perception thing. OWS needs to get better at focusing its message if it wants to win over the support of the 99% it seeks to represent.
In Denver, in December, about 30 Occupy protestors heckled and interrupted the mayor during his speech in support of -- I'm not making this up -- a vigil for Denver's homeless who had died over the previous year. Well, I'm sure they had their good reasons. But I also know they succeeded in alienating thousands of Denver citizens who used to be sympathetic to their cause.
It's hard to be the vanguard of a popular movement once you've squandered your popularity.
You wish, Donny-Don, mild-mannered Democratic party apologist. I guess Moon Pie was off today, so someone else had to stand in to "remind us" all of how ineffective this ground swell has become, and/or that it lacks "message."
What a status quo you continue to defend.
Ineffective? Siouxrose, OWS has been very effective at changing the terms of the debate in this country. Maybe you haven't been paying attention, or are trying to downplay the importance of the movement. Thanks to OWS, "income inequality" has become a common topic of public debate, largely replacing the bogus "federal deficit" obsession. I'd like to see that success continue, but can't speak for you.
Challenging the status quo is good. Alienating mainstream citizens with stupid-ass actions like disrupting public vigils held for homeless people is just downright stupid. (Maybe you disagree.) The civil rights movement was successful in the 1960s because it did plenty of the former, and very little of the latter. They were successful at playing to the public's better instincts, and to its inherent sense of moral outrage. OWS must do the same.
I'd have to agree with weighing choices for actions. For instance - its better to create a presence outside of a campaign office - which can achieve its purposes with, say a flash crowd. Arrive, make a statement, record it and leave. I would submit that the campaigns are now called to be present on issues like homelessness precisely because of the Occupy movement.
Born of recognizing the powerlessness of the current configuration, perhaps it is not fully appreciated within the movement that the natural cohesion and coherence coming out of the very real suffering is the root strength of Occupy, and unswerving respect is fundamental for sustained legitimacy.
Another question is whether folks crashing something like a homelessness vigil are actually Occupy people. They certainly are not in spirit.
A separate and more salient question is a reasoned and legitimate response to a politician participating in a vigil if a legitimate legislative proposal to end the problem is not presented - which is of course their ostensible reason for being.
Every single citizen should be there beating on their doors, but then they can't afford the gas and the Koch brothers aren't running buses across the country for us, Glenn beck isn't buying lunch either. Shit, I guess we should just stay home and shut up, that is if you have a home!
This post by siouxrose is the perfect example of how the Left Wing eats its young. Kudos!
As the right so is the left.
I hope to hell these ass holes campaign headquarters are occupied! These bastards are so out of touch they want to break all unions, takeaway collective bargaining, they want our children scrubbing their toilets, they are the one percent and have no idea what it is like to live in The New America that these selfish bastards created. If your poor andlost your home and can't find a job it's because you are lazy? This is the worse congress in history? Who the hell are you protecting the god damn Koch brothers and the bought and paid for tea party thieving bastards? Of course fox news says all these candidates are people for the people, lying bastards! If the OWS people were like tea baggers they would be carrying automatic weapons, just like the tea baggers did, but they didn't get arrested.
So: it would also be OK with you if the Tea Partiers "occupied" the campaign offices of Rocky Anderson or Ralph Nader or Bernie Sanders?
You can't have it both ways. Once you start making exceptions to the rights of any candidate to wage a campaign free of trespassing occupiers, you have to be ready to make that exception for EVERY candidate. Even on this blog, a lot of posters would love to see Ron Paul's campaign "occupied", while others see him as their savior and would be outraged! Be careful what you wish for ...
Indeed. It seems like the cleanest solution would be to just vote all the Tea Party assholes out of office. But I guess that would be too logical. And would require organization, work, and persistence. So -- just shout, eh?
A hopeufl commentary in a sea of despair.
Oh how i believe in what you are doing from here in Australia ,may i please ask what do the OWS’s think about the next war that your President is in propaganda mode to incite war with Iran, oh ! and also the protesters in Israel have and are having their needs met by money that rightfully should be working for the 99% er’s in America did you hear a “thank you, the killing of children around the world is really very very tragic and there is no reason to do this..look > Palestine,Iraq,Libya,Afaganistan,now a your President is sparring with Iran Please hope you can find time to draw some attention to this rather disgusting past time ..you really do not have the right to tell another culture how to be to satisfy your soul please. Keep for families safe at home building your country back up, all your bridges are in need of some tender loving care.:)
Iowa: the people's caucus? If by "people" you mean rednecks, right wing fundamentalist, fanatical whackjobs, then, I guess the answer is "Yes, the people's caucus"