EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- How the US Turned Three Pacifists into Violent Terrorists
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Revealed: How US State Department 'Twists Arms' on Monsanto's Behalf
- Victory in Seattle as Teachers Win Battle in Standardized Test Boycott
Popular content
Today's Top News
'Global Square': Wikileaks-Backed Activist Platform Launching in March
'To perpetuate and spread the creative and cooperative spirit of the occupations'
WikiLeaks Central announced a "Call to Coders" Tuesday as they prepare for the March launch of the "first massive decentralized social network in the history of the Internet."
"The goal of the Global Square is to perpetuate and spread the creative and cooperative spirit of the occupations and transform this into lasting forms of social organization, at the global as well as the local level. [...]
"The aim of the platform, in this respect, should not be to replace the physical assemblies but rather to empower them by providing the online tools for local and (trans)national organization and collaboration. The ideal would be both to foster individual participation and to structure collective action. The Global Square will be our own public space where different groups can come together to organize their local squares and assemblies."
* * *
ComputerWorldUK reports:
The Global Square, an online global collaboration platform for activists backed by WikiLeaks among others, plans to have a functional prototype by March, its sponsors said.
Styled on social networks like Facebook and Twitter, The Global Square, targeted at activists and the global community, will be developed around Tribler peer-to-peer technology.
"The goal of the Global Square is to perpetuate and spread the creative and cooperative spirit of the occupations and transform this into lasting forms of social organization, at the global as well as the local level."By using this particular existing P2P technology it becomes virtually impossible to break or censor the network, The Global Square said in a statement earlier this week. "The content files are not centralized in any physical server, so the network belongs to its users," it said.
The project has called for volunteer coders and developers to help implement the features planned for the new platform, which will be open source and multilingual.
WikiLeaks said in November that The Global Square would be an online platform for its movement.
Some activists said last year that there was a need for a global square "where people of all nations can come together as equals to participate in the coordination of collective actions and the formulation of common goals and aspirations".
Some of the tools for the platform will be an interactive map that lists all ongoing assemblies around the world, search options allowing users to find squares, events, and working-groups, an aggregated news feed, a public and private messaging system, and a forum for public debate and voting on specific decisions.
The project will start with a standalone PC application followed by a smartphone application later in the year. The team will use the Agile software development methodology, focusing on one feature or module for a few weeks, conduct tests, and do a release, and then focus on the next feature.
# # #
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

58 Comments so far
Show AllSOCIAL MEDIA "TACTICAL INTELLIGENCE COLLECTION": Spying and Propaganda using Facebook, Twitter - by Julie Lévesque
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=29288
...peace...
Perhaps I'm not techie enough, but how will messages get from thither to yon without existing Internet servers? Pls explain how this would work.
.....They can only stop it by shutting the whole internet down.....
Ahahahahahaaaaaaa!!!!!
LOVE it!
This will be a social network I can believe in. I really like P to P networking and file sharing such as bit-torrent. It is wonderfully solidarity-enhancing - the more the peers cooperate, the faster the data is shared.
But unfortunately, unlike most of the world, USAn ISP's - besides providing fourth-world speeds unless you pay an exhorbitant fee, use "asymmetric" service that allows upload speeds only a fraction of the download speed. I refuse to subscribe to FIOS or anything else from the contemptable union-busting Verizon - and the only other choice, Comcast, is just as bad, so I make do with the cheapest DSL service Verizon offers - about $43 a month with the phone line. It is supposed to provide "between 500 and 1000 kbps down and 324 kbps up. My bit torrent client runs as fast as 720 kbps - about the advertized speed, but on upload, never runs faster than 128 kbps. This upload speed is so slow I am basically snubbed as an electronic paraplegic in any peer-to-per effort. Of course, the reasons for this throttling in upload speed is not technical, it is political-economic. They don't want us sharing informaiton to fellow human beings, only downoloading from corporations, and only the things the corporations want us to see, hear, learn feel, and "like".
Estonia has the highest mbps at 40.82 (50.18 download). I didn't check all 50 states, but I don't think any get over 16 mbps. Nevada gets 15.9. The greatest country in the world.
http://www.netindex.com/
The newest efforts are to pass legislation that will make it mandatory for ISP's to spy on subscribers' downloading/uploading, websites they visit, etc, and then pass that information along to the government for use in determining if subscribers have been involved in P2P activity, and then criminalized for it. Just because Wikileaks is finally using P2P for a legitimate, just cause (instead of what the vast majority of P2P sites do - sharing copyrighted media) will not slow down the efforts of governments to make P2P illegal. In fact, I think it will speed up their efforts.
I've got Bittorrent, Vuze, etc, and have admittedly done my share of P2P file sharing - mostly my own books and albums, written and recorded by myself - but I have slowed down in recent years due to the efforts by the government to criminalize such activity. This Wikileaks "Global Square" idea, however, is re-igniting my interest.
www.onebigtorrent.org
There are lots of lots of good documentary .torrent files there, plus the usual Noam Chomsky lectures and the like which I don't feel very guilty sharing. And, for the most part, the persons who made the documentary probably don't care very much either. Josh Fox would really be shooting himself in the foot if he sues me for promoting his anti-fracking cause with a technically-illegal copy of his movie.
Are you also the maker of Metanoia Films?
And no comment :)
This is an old Jean Shepherd story, when he's this kid, see, and he sends away the round seal - from inside an Ovaltine jar - plus a quarter for his Little Orphan Annie Message Decoding Ring.
"Look, Ma, that's Atilla the Hun - - comin' down OUR street!"
Trylon
What a great idea! Tnx Wikileaks and Julian Assange.
This may be exactly what we (people of the world) need.
"People of the World - net work!"
"[T]he tools for the platform will be an interactive map that lists all ongoing assemblies around the world, search options allowing users to find squares, events, and working-groups, an aggregated news feed, a public and private messaging system, and a forum for public debate and voting on specific decisions."
- This can be just what we humans need to get together in this One World of ours.
It could evolve into the first rudimentary global democracy - and not like UN from the top-down, but a real bottom-up platform for governing ourselves: the 99 % simply side-stepping the 1 % - without head-on confrontation.
- Bottoms up!
Sorely needed, for needs to be heeded.
I doubt most of the wiki content contributors are rw Libs, though those writing politically-focused articles might well be judging by the articles' bias. It's that rw Libs apparently control (and own? I don't know) the physical nodes that annoys and worries me.
If the same pattern plays out in this wiki venture, it seems to me that any shift it produces will not be toward democracy, but further to the right, and that perhaps its biggest effect will be to sink the energy of the participants.
I agree. The CIA, some other henchgroup, or simply the rw fellow-travellers, but definitely individuals with a commitment to maintaining the primacy of the "party line". The very definitions wikipedia use and enforce virtually guarantee party-line conformity -- in the aggregate they're practically a textbook example of how to restrict discourse and manufacture consent.
I don't really think the underlying structure of WikiPedia is related to what this article is talking about, except in the spirit that it will be a communal effort using open-source software.
I was really referring to the underlying technical structure, though obviously that has implications for the functional structure. It might be spelled out somewhere, but if so I've no idea where: who owns the hardware, how are the admins chosen and empowered, etc. The admins are the ones who exercise de-facto control of the content.
Isn't this like democracies around the world? When you open it up to everyone, then the bad guys can get in and corrupt it. Oh well.
Certainly that's how it's played out so far, where nearly all (I think Iceland might have now escaped) the nominal "democracies" are in fact plutocratic oligarchies or worse, maintained by force from above and ignorance/fear/apathy from below. But does it have to be that way? Should it be that way? How can we ever escape if we accept such outcomes as inevitable?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_John_F._Kennedy
I checked both the sections on the assassinations of RFK and MLK and found extensive sections in both about conspiracy theories and the evidence for them. There is also a whole article on 9/11 conspiracy theories.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories
So, unless you want them to present your pet theories as fact, I don't see how you could be more wrong.
If you really don't see this as being biased in any way,
"9/11 conspiracy theories are theories that disagree with the widely accepted account that the September 11 attacks were perpetrated solely by al-Qaeda,[1] without any detailed advanced knowledge on the part of any government agency."
then they've certainly done their job, haven't they.