Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Iran 'Ready for Talks'
Iranian President Ahmadinejad says 'ready for negotiations,' new report subdues bomb fears
Today Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said his country was ready to sit down for negotiations with the West.
AFP photo Agence France-Presse reports:
"They have this excuse that Iran is dodging negotiations while it is not the case...," the Iranian leader was quoted as saying by state media. "Why should we run away from the negotiations?"
Ahmadinejad was implicitly responding to comments made by Western officials urging the Islamic republic to return to negotiations over its contested nuclear programme.
"The European Union stands together in sending that clear message to the government of Iran: that we wish to go back to negotiations, to invite them to pick up the issues which were left on the table in Istanbul a year ago," EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton said on Tuesday.
* * *
On Monday, the EU had decided on an oil embargo against Iran starting July 1. The BBC reports:
Nuclear row: Iran President Ahmadinejad offers talks
In a joint statement, UK Prime Minister David Cameron, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angela Merkel said Iran had "failed to restore international confidence in the exclusively peaceful nature of its nuclear programme".
The EU said the sanctions prohibit the import, purchase and transport of Iranian crude oil and petroleum products as well as related finance and insurance. All existing contracts will have to be phased out by 1 July.
Investment as well as the export of key equipment and technology for Iran's petrochemical sector is also banned.
EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton said the purpose of the sanctions was "to put pressure on Iran to come back to the negotiating table".
Al Jazeera has video on the EU sanctions decision:
* * *
Two countries not supporting the sanctions are China and India. The Independent reports:
India pledges to continue buying oil from Iran
India has no intention of following suit. The country is hungry for energy, with an economy growing at more than 7 per cent. The AFP news agency reports that India buys 12 per cent of its oil from Iran, which is its second largest supplier after Saudi Arabia.
China is the Islamic Republic’s largest customer, accounting for around 20 per cent of its exports, and has already made clear it has no plan to alter this arrangement. Last year, as the issue of sanctions emerged, there were reports India may seek to barter for the oil, offering steel, electronic goods and food in exchange.
* * *
A new report from the Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS) indicates that Iran will not build a nuclear bomb in 2012. From The Guardian:
Iran won't build nuclear weapon in 2012, says draft Isis report
Iran is unlikely to move towards building a nuclear weapon in 2012 because it cannot yet produce enough weapon-grade uranium and is being deterred by sanctions and the prospect of an Israeli attack, according to a draft report by the Institute for Science and International Security (Isis).
The report by the institute founded by nuclear expert David Albright offers a more temperate view of Iran's nuclear program than some of the heated rhetoric that has surfaced since the United States and its allies stepped up sanctions on Tehran.The Isis analysis is revealed after a prediction that Israel will attack Iran in 2012 to try and stop any nuclear bomb programme.
"Iran is unlikely to decide to dash toward making nuclear weapons as long as its uranium enrichment capability remains as limited as it is today," the report said.[...]
...According to the Isis report: "Although Iran is engaged in nuclear hedging, no evidence has emerged that the regime has decided to build nuclear weapons."
* * *


14 Comments so far
Show AllYour idea is the excuse The War Machine uses to threaten Iran no matter what they do or say and if they don’t have it they must be working on it.
Good thing you are not Iran, who by the way is the only country strongly calling for nuclear disarmament. They have the right idea and are sticking to their non nuclear guns.
If the US Empire hadn't escalated its attempt to rule the planet after 1991, it and the rest of the planet's people would likely be in much better shape than now. But its behavior since 1991 has certainly convinced most of the real international community that it must be contained and its aggression reversed, and that's what we're now seeing: A concerted bloc of nuclear/ICBM armed countries shunning the dollar for commerce while integrateing an Asian energy network of their own design--not one dictated by Washington and meant to serve its hegemonic aspirations.
Here's another "Ghafourifard also slammed Riyadh for claiming to offset Iranian oil in the market, adding that in accordance with the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) rules, the kingdom does not reserve the right to up its oil output.
"He called on the OPEC member states to adopt a decision about Saudi Arabia's move as the country's measure will “undermine” the organization."
And last we have word of another jab connecting to the jaw of Dollar Hegemony: " There is also the auspicious orange in this Year of the Dragon pie - the upcoming foreign exchange bourse trading in yuan in the City of London. Beijing wants it - and the City badly wants it. Tehran already sells oil to Beijing in yuan. Think of Iran using the City foreign exchange to use their yuan and thus keep access to all global markets - no matter the US/EU sanctions/embargo avalanche."
I would bet it would be Israel first and the consequences of a hot war with Iran would escalate out of control very fast.
He claimed Iraq had biological and chemical weapons prior to the war. Here is a quote from fair.org:
Take the ubiquitous David Albright, a former U.N. inspector in Iraq. Over the years, Albright had been cited in hundreds of news articles and made scores of television appearances as an authority on Iraqi weapons. A sample prewar quote from Albright (CNN, 10/5/02): "In terms of the chemical and biological weapons, Iraq has those now. How many, how could they deliver them? I mean, these are the big questions."
But when the postwar weapons hunt started turning up empty, Albright made a rather candid admission (L.A. Times, 4/20/03): "If there are no weapons of mass destruction, I'll be mad as hell. I certainly accepted the administration claims on chemical and biological weapons. I figured they were telling the truth. If there is no [unconventional weapons program], I will feel taken, because they asserted these things with such assurance." (Recently, Albright has become a prominent critic of the government's handling of prewar intelligence on Iraq.)