Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Targeted Civilian Killings Spiral in Afghan War: UN
KABUL - Targeted killings of civilians in Afghanistan doubled last year, the United Nations said on Wednesday, as an expanding insurgency strikes at Western efforts to build up the Afghan government and security forces.
Head of the United Nations Assistance Mission Afghanistan (UNAMA) Staffan de Mistura holds a copy of the report on the protection of civilians in armed conflict during a press conference in Kabul on March 9, 2011. Last year was the deadliest for civilians in the Afghan war with a 15 percent jump in the death toll, said the UN report, which laid bare the conflict's impact on ordinary people.
(Shah Marai, AFP/Getty Images) In an annual report, the United Nations said 2010 marked the most lethal year for noncombatants in the nearly decade-old war, with a 15 per cent increase in the number of civilians killed to 2,777 — continuing a steady rise over the past four years.
Insurgents were responsible for 75 per cent of those deaths.
UN Assistant Secretary General for Human Rights, Ivan Simonovic, said the UN rights officials had been "in communication with the Taliban", offering guidance to reduce civilian casualties.
UN officials declined to elaborate on the contacts.
Abductions rose 83 per cent, and violence continued to spread from the south to the north, east and west, the report said. Civilian deaths in the north, in particular, rose 76 per cent.
But the most "alarming" trend, it said, was a 105 per cent increase in the targeted killing of government officials, aid workers and civilians perceived to be supportive of the Afghan government or NATO-led foreign forces.
The tactic threatens to undermine further the handover of responsibility for security to the Afghan government, police and army starting this year, as Washington and its NATO allies seek to draw down their combined 150,000-strong force.
Of 462 assassinations in 2010, half occurred in Taliban strongholds in the south, where the United States says it has made most gains from a 30,000-strong troop surge aimed at turning the tide of the war.
In many parts of Afghanistan, local governors live behind sandbags on U.S. military outposts and government officials rarely travel to the areas they are supposed to run.
"People are afraid to go and vote, people are afraid of being elected, people are afraid of actually participating in civilian society," UN envoy to Afghanistan Staffan de Mistura told a news conference.
The report, issued jointly with the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission, said the social and psychological impact of assassinations were "more devastating than a body count would suggest."
VIOLENCE SPREADING
Civilian assassinations were up 588 per cent and 248 per cent in Helmand and Kandahar provinces respectively, the main strongholds of the Taliban and the focus of a U.S. troop surge.
The report noted a 26 per cent decline in the number of civilian deaths caused by coalition and Afghan forces.
Yet the killing of civilians in NATO operations has re-emerged as a major source of friction between Kabul and its Western backers.
Last week, NATO helicopters gunned down nine Afghan boys collecting firewood, drawing condemnation from Afghan President Hamid Karzai and apologies from President Barack Obama and his top commander in Afghanistan, General David Petraeus.
U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates repeated the apology on Monday during a visit to assess security progress before Washington starts gradually withdrawing troops in July.
Casualties among women rose 6 per cent in 2010, and among children by 21 per cent, while "the spread and intensity of the conflict meant that more women and children had even less access to essential services such as health care and education".
Suicide attacks and homemade bombs claimed most lives.
Of the 440 deaths attributed to NATO and Afghan forces, 171 were caused by aerial attacks, sharply down on 2009 as a result of tightened rules of engagement.
The report noted a decline in civilian casualties in "night raids" by foreign forces, a tactic ramped up under Petraeus to the anger of Afghans and Karzai's government.
It attributed the drop to stricter regulations, but expressed concern about "consistent implementation" and a "persistent lack of transparency on investigations and accountability".

12 Comments so far
Show AllI have a feeling that the people of Afghanistan are looking forward to a "Custer Moment".
Considering this article originated with Reuters, we should probably take it with a grain of salt. It's not like Reuters is the bastion of truth-telling.
The report is from the United Nations. Reuters is only the messenger.
More US troops means more people killed as the great superpower tries to conquer Afghanistan. You would think the US would have learned by now but that would assume they are intelligent enough to see what is increasingly obvious to outside observers when in fact they are so dumb they still believe they can win.
Thalidomide
Do you now think Dubya is worst than Obama or Obama the lesser of the two evils in targeted killing?
So sad that people are dying for their resources.
Ain't Democracy Grand!
It may be true that "only" 25% of civilian deaths were caused by NATO forces. But 100% of the deaths are attributable, directly and indirectly, to the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan.
I think every US person and every other non-afghan person involved in this war should immediately come home. As Pogo said, "We have met the enemy and he is us."
For anyone who thinks that U.S. forces would not deliberately target children, and that the massacre of those nine boys gathering firewood was a tragic "accident," think again. Can we really believe that those firing missiles from the helicopters could not distinguish between a 7- or 11-year-old boy and a grown Taliban fighter? I believe that U.S. ("NATO") forces murdered those children KNOWING they were children. Why do I believe this? In the movie, "My Country, My Country," an Iraqi physician complains to U.S. soldiers that among the prisoners being held at the prison is a 9-year-old boy. The response: he can't be released because he is "dangerous." That is the mentality we're dealing with, where even little boys gathering firewood are considered the enemy.
You are right. The pentagon corporate policy now has gotten to such a state of degradation of morality that the goal seems to be the total demoralization of the Afghan people. A similar policy in slow motion was used in Haiti for over a century. The key is to always destroy absolutely any hope of independent action as a country or as a people.
We have some HORRIBLE people in charge of our military and government. They probably have the jolly roger stitched inside of old glory at the pentagon and White House so they can retain a "proper perspective" on the "mission".
Mi Lai mass killings of young, old, men and women, children: 1968 and war waged on til 75. There was, at least, a viable ant-war movement; today? None, nada,why? Many of us marched and it did no good. My opinion? The fix is in and it would take, at least 10 million, to get out in the street because the MSM can marginalize anything smaller.and so effectivally win by denial of critical exposure. Tony