Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Tea Party Climate Change Deniers Funded by BP and Other Major Polluters
BP and several other big European companies are funding the midterm election campaigns of Tea Party favourites who deny the existence of global warming or oppose Barack Obama's energy agenda, the Guardian has learned.
US Senate climate change deniers and Tea Party favourites including Jim DeMint and James Inhofe are being funded by BP and other polluters. (Photograph: Ethan Miller/Getty Images) An analysis of campaign finance by Climate Action Network
Europe (Cane) found nearly 80% of campaign donations from a number of
major European firms were directed towards senators who blocked action
on climate change.
These included incumbents who have been embraced by the Tea Party such
as Jim DeMint, a Republican from South Carolina, and the notorious
climate change denier James Inhofe, a Republican from Oklahoma.
The report, released tomorrow, used information on the Open Secrets.org database to track what it called a co-ordinated attempt by some of Europe's biggest polluters to influence the US midterms. It said: "The European companies are funding almost exclusively Senate candidates who have been outspoken in their opposition to comprehensive climate policy in the US and candidates who actively deny the scientific consensus that climate change is happening and is caused by people."
Obama and Democrats have accused corporate interests and anonymous donors of trying to hijack the midterms by funnelling money to the Chamber of Commerce and to conservative Tea Party groups. The Chamber of Commerce reportedly has raised $75m (£47m) for pro-business, mainly Republican candidates.
"Oil companies and the other special interests are spending millions on a campaign to gut clean-air standards and clean-energy standards, jeopardising the health and prosperity of this state," Obama told a rally in California on Friday night.
Much of the speculation has focused on Karl Rove, the mastermind of George Bush's victories, who has raised $15m for Republican candidates since September through a new organisation, American Crossroads. An NBC report warned that Rove was spearheading an effort to inject some $250m in television advertising for Republican candidates in the final days before the 2 November elections.
But Rove, appearing today on CBS television's Face the Nation, accused Democrats of deploying the same tactics in 2008. "The president of the US had no problem at all when the Democrats did this," he said. "It was not a threat to democracy when it helped him get elected."
The Cane report said the companies, including BP, BASF, Bayer and Solvay, which are some of Europe's biggest emitters, had collectively donated $240,200 to senators who blocked action on global warming – more even than the $217,000 the oil billionaires and Tea Party bankrollers, David and Charles Koch, have donated to Senate campaigns.
The biggest single donor was the German pharmaceutical company Bayer, which gave $108,100 to senators. BP made $25,000 in campaign donations, of which $18,000 went to senators who opposed action on climate change. Recipients of the European campaign donations included some of the biggest climate deniers in the Senate, such as Inhofe of Oklahoma, who has called global warming a hoax.
The foreign corporate interest in America's midterms is not restricted to Europe. A report by ThinkProgress, operated by the Centre for American Progress, tracked donations to the Chamber of Commerce from a number of Indian and Middle Eastern oil coal and electricity companies.
Foreign interest does not stop with the elections. The Guardian reported earlier this year that a Belgian-based chemical company, Solvay, was behind a front group that is suing to strip the Obama administration of its powers to regulate greenhouse gas emissions.

22 Comments so far
Show AllThe Tea Party gang isn't even American at least not when it comes to the bankrolling. Gee, but the fruit cake storm troopers still continue as the loony thugs they are, nothing more than useful stooges for these slime ball foreign and domestic power elites' hidden agendas. Despotism, Tea Party gangsterism is thy name.
AD
So is everyone else...what's your point, CD?
Good points.
I was miffed at the "...or oppose Barack Obama's energy agenda" remark. Are they not aware that Obamas energy agenda is just more drill and dig???
It seems that, through wishful thinking or other reason, most left-thinking poeple outside the US still think that Obama is a "good guy" who represents some kind of refreshing change. Forget the Atlantic; one encounters such Obama-loving pollyania as soon as one crosses the Niagara River.
@SaboCat "It seems that, through wishful thinking or other reason, most left-thinking poeple outside the US still think that Obama is a "good guy" who represents some kind of refreshing change"
That's because he is a "good guy" who does represent a refreshing change. He has withdrawn over 100,000 troops from Iraq, signed the most sweeping wall street regulations since the Great Depression, negotiated historic cuts in nuclear arms with China and Russia --our last president couldn't even say, "nuclear."
He's invested more of todays dollars on alternative energy than we spent on the moon landings --I think that constitutes change. All of these accomplishments (including deficit cutting much needed health care reform and an end to the corporate welfare that was Medicare Advantage) all in spite of the most obstructionist minority in congressional history and a constant flood of mis-information and lies about him and his policies flooding the media on a daily basis. He's truly a great president and all the haters should... oh what is it they used to tell us? oh yeah GET OVER IT!
Sure the Tea Party is taking big money. The Tea Party, Jim DeMint and Palin are wackos and not good for this country. How do "We" stop them? Why not ask Scott McAdams (D) to withdraw from the Alaska Senate race and endorse Murkowski. Would "we" not all be better off.
I'd like to see Meek (D) step aside and endorse Crist in Florida also. "We" don't know how to play hardball.
Am I the only one thinking this?
The only difference between the Tea Party and the Democrats when it comes to the environment is that Democrats pay lip service to environmental issues while the Right Wing is still disputing the science.
The end result is exactly the same.
Some Republicans, including Junior Bush, acknowledge global warming.
Obama with his Clean Coal and his offshore drilling plans and his BP oil spill incompetence is no better than the worst Republican on the environment, but the words coming out of his mouth are a little less offensive.
Corporations are still getting their way on every issue.
Jill ---- while I am on your side ---- progressive and liberal ----- I have no fear of the publication of viewpoints by CD or other sites of opinions with which I strongly disagree. We do (for the moment at least) still have freedom of speech in this country.
jstevens,
You're spot on.
C :)
I thought the yanks didn't like it when foreigners weighed in on their voting habits. Guess I was wrong...
Or maybe they don't like being told what to do by those who just aren't rich enough to bribe their political parties.
They don't.
Yet don't feel the slightest bit shame when they support active interference in the elections of other countries.
Who benefits from the mortgage scam or the carbon trading scam? Wall Street and the Banks.
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE69O2CX20101025
Ethiopia has just completed its first Carbon based transaction.
http://allafrica.com/stories/201010220379.html
The tea party is just an annoying distraction.
"BP and several other big European companies are funding the midterm election campaigns of Tea Party favourites who deny the existence of global warming or oppose Barack Obama's energy agenda, the Guardian has learned."
I guess the only thing that would surprise me about this, is that it suprises anyone at all...
Amerika - the greatest democracy money can buy.
Save our liberty from Corporate Parasite Capitalism.
To late!!
Jill
"If Mr. Obama was certain of global warming he would not be increasing wars for oil."
You think? Of course he would be increasing wars for oil if he were 'certain' of global warming..
~sc
"Obama and Democrats have accused corporate interests and anonymous donors of trying to hijack the midterms by funnelling money to the Chamber of Commerce and to conservative Tea Party groups."
instead of funnelling it to them.
BASTARDS!!! all of them. How can so much ignorance create so much vile.