EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- As Death Toll Rises Beyond 500, Garment Factory Disaster 'Worst in World History'
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
Popular content
Today's Top News
Coal Mining Industry Ducks Punishment For Safety Sins By 'Clogging the System' With Appeals, Critics Say
Large Mining Firms Like Massey Energy Avoid Tough Penalties By Fighting Two Out of Three Fines
Coal mining companies have successfully thwarted tough new safety rules that were intended to help prevent a disaster like the one that killed 25 West Virginia miners Monday, top labor and mine safety officials said, by overloading the regulatory system with appeals.
Massey Energy Co., CEO Don Blankenship speaks to reporters, Tuesday, April 6, 2010, in Montcoal, W.Va. The blast Monday at Massey's Upper Big Branch mine — the nation's deadliest mining disaster since at least 1984 — was believed to have been caused by a buildup of highly combustible methane. (AP Photo/Haraz N. Ghanbari) The companies, including the massive coal producer Massey
Energy, which owns the Upper Big Branch mine, developed a novel
strategy to respond to more aggressive safety regulations that were
imposed by Congress after two deadly mining accidents in 2006, the
officials say. The companies now appeal twice as many citations as they
did just four years ago.
As federal safety regulators began to impose more fines, the companies responded by contesting the citations. Each challenge chewed up more time and resources. The result is an enforcement system bogged down and behind schedule, said U.S. Rep. George Miller, a California Democrat who began investigating the problem earlier this year.
As the contested cases sit and wait to be reviewed, the companies don't have to pay fines, and they don't face closer scrutiny or risk being shut down -- for having a pattern of violations that put workers in danger.
In 2005, before increased penalties took effect, mine operators appealed one in three fines, and the commission that reviewed the cases carried a backlog of about 2,100 cases. Now, Miller said, mine operators contest two-thirds of all fines, with some of the largest mine owners including Massey Energy -- challenging the vast majority of the citations they receive.
The backlog of appeals has shot up to 16,000 cases. And federal safety officials are waiting out appeals over $210 million dollars in contested fines.
"These appeals are clogging the system," Miller said during a congressional hearing on the topic in February. Mining industry officials acknowledge the flurry of appeals has been viewed in some circles as an attempt to gum up the system and delay the payment of civil penalties. Bruce Watzman, Sr. Vice President of Regulatory Affairs for the National Mining Association told Congress in February that "honest and reasonable people can disagree as to the underlying cause for this," but "one fact that is not in dispute is that these actions in no way jeopardize miner safety and health."
Mine Safety 'Being Subverted'
In testimony that came prior to this week's fatal explosion, Watzman pointed out that American mines had experienced two consecutive years of record safety, with 86 percent of U.S. mines finishing last year without a single lost-time accident.Cecil E. Roberts, president of the United Mine Workers of America, said it has become clear that the intent to use harsher fines to create a safer work climate for miners is "being subverted by the huge contested rate that has overwhelmed the government's ability to deal with its caseload."
Where the problem becomes serious is in situations similar to the one at the Upper Big Branch mine, J. Davitt McAteer, a former top federal mine safety official, told ABC News.
The company that operated the mine for Massey Energy, called Performance Coal Co., has had roughly 1,000 violations processed since 2007. Of them, 335 are still being contested, while 80 more show the company is delinquent in paying fines that were levied.
Normally, when federal regulators determine that a mine has shown a "pattern of violations," the government can tighten the screws, hiking fines or even shutting the mine down until the safety problems are resolved. But while the infractions are being contested, all of that has to wait.
Roberts made specific note of this point in February, speaking in front of a congressional committee. He wanted to make the point that the consequences of the industry's delay tactics were not insubstantial. "You must recognize that many of these violations are quite serious," he said. They are "the kind of violations that have contributed to mine fires, explosions and the deaths of coal miners."
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

15 Comments so far
Show AllEvery step of the coal process is dangerous, deadly and unnecasary. Most of the coal that Massey rapes from the earth of Appalachia goes to China and India. Massey does not allow unions on their jobsites. Don Blankenship,public enemy #1, should be indicted for murder. Profit and production over people,Don's mantra!The rest of his co-conspirators should be indicted as well. WV politicians and federal regulators have ignored 1000's of violations and have created loopholes in legislation designed to protect our world AND ourselves! Why does it always take a huge disaster to wake people up! Do not let these deaths be in vain! Time to close Massey and stop this brutal insanity!
It is impossible to "clog" a system unless that system is designed to be clogged.
For starters, Obama needs to declare a state of emergency in US coal mines and suspend all appeals.
If coal is truly vital to the energy needs of the US then the mines should be nationalized.
q
"It is impossible to "clog" a system unless that system is designed to be clogged."
Well, unfortunately, there is this thing called due process. If a person or corporation is written up for violation of a law, it is their right in a democratic country (the 5th Amendment in the US) to go to court and challenge the accusation. In this case the operator takes the MSHA citations before an independent adminsitrative law judge, where due the the complexity of the mining processes being regulated, their lawyers can obfuscate the technical details of the issue to death. One misplaced word or comma in the MSHA inspector's description of the violation can get the violation shot down, which is increasingly irrelavant anyway, becasue the backlog of cases is years long.
The mine must still abate the cited deficiency whether they challenge it ot not. In the case of unwarantable violations, the affected parts of the mine are shut down until the condition is corrected. Usually the condition can be corrected in a few hours so it is not too big a deal. The court challenges are only over the fines and the mines violation record. Before the '06 MINER act fines were so low that few citations were challenged. The higher fines were supposed to encourage complance, but instead, the corporations simply hired some lawyers (who are cheaper to hire than miners, considering the glut of lawyers in the US) and they challenge the citations - even ones that are just a few hundred dollars!.
Ultimately, the problem is that corporations wield much more political power than the regulatory agencies.
If you want to see the all the citations for yourself, go here:
http://www.msha.gov/drs/drshome.htm
And enter the upper Big Branch's mine ID - 4608436
"The mine must still abate the cited deficiency whether they challenge it ot not. In the case of unwarantable violations, the affected parts of the mine are shut down until the condition is corrected."
It is abundantly clear from both the article and Massey's safety record that these statements are not true.
q
Well, I'm talking about what the law says. They probably undo many corrections as soon as the MSHA inspector is out of sight.
If I remember correctly, Blankenship bought a seat on the W.Va Supreme Court for a friend, who returned the favor by casting a deciding vote that prevented a lawsuit against Massey.
Even our pro-business U.S. Supreme Court could not stomach that, and ruled that the judge should not have voted on the matter.
Even ABC news covered that point in Sawyer's newscast the other night.
q
In a union steel fabricating company i worked at our union united Auto workers, had hundreds of grievances backlogged, that was how it was clogged up.
Here a non union company is using the same tactics against our government's safety regulations.
they should what they do for regular people
in traffic court, pay it right away, appeal it if you want but you have already paid
and if you don't pay you don't drive
so if they don't pay, close the mine while they are appealing
No traffic court I've eve been in requires this. If you pay the ticket, you also sign a atatement admitting guilt or no contest. If you choose instead to see the judge, you don't pay until you are found guilty.
In the case of the mine operators, they are persons too (per the 14th amendment) so such law allowing orders to close the mine until payment of fines would be quickly be struck down as unconstitutional.
What we badly need is a constitutional amendment abolishing corporate personhood.
In Democracy Now yesterday, a miner, Chuck Nelson, made some pretty alarming accusations of Massey - fradulent use of personal resporable dust monitoring devices, blatant ventilation defficinecies, 19th century-style production quotas and mandatory long hours, and blacklisting of troublemakers.
Go here:
http://www.democracynow.org/2010/4/7/massey_energy_mine_cited_for_1
So people's lives become the topic of executive decision and weighted at $39k/person while the entity "Massey" enjoys the constitutional protections designed for humans.
1st, let's eliminate corporate personhood.
Then let's redraft laws to make stockholding less convenient than cooperative ownership.
Massey probably has dead-peasant insurance on the miners. They will make money off their deaths.
The NY Times today has a story that, in Massey's case, shows how they have avoided being shut down. The controls, or lack of such, was all part of the "energy" policy put in place by George II at the behest of Cheney and the GOP controlled congress. And I will give you odds that Blankenship was one of the mystery people who got input into the "energy" policy and whose name was so carefully kept from public attention. (Remember the ruckus over how public policy was written with no public input and the identity of the "advisors" protected by executive privilege?) Now we see the fruit of their labors. Be certain that critics will blame Obama for the lack of oversight. This story started TWO years ago.