EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Transcript: Today's Live Q&A With NSA Leaker, Edward Snowden
- 'Tip of the Iceberg': Senators Warn Far More Data May Not Be Safe
- Playing the Obama Bumper Sticker Game
- Intentional and Evil: Court Marshall Sexually Assaults Woman, Then Arrests Her When She Protests
- David Brooks, Tom Friedman, Bill Keller Wish Snowden Had Just Followed Orders
- Transcript: Today's Live Q&A With NSA Leaker, Edward Snowden
- Remembering Satyajit Ray’s Hirok Rajar Deshe: On Edward Snowden, Resistance and Inverted Totalitarianism
- The Terror Con
- Pentagon Bracing for Public Dissent Over Climate and Energy Shocks
- Bank of America Lied to Homeowners and Rewarded Foreclosures, Former Employees Say
Popular content
Today's Top News
Blackwater, Missing Guns, Afghanistan and... South Park?
Blackwater Took Hundreds of Guns From U.S. Military, Afghan Police * Senate Inquiry Shows Contractor Signed for Rifles Using 'South Park' Alias
WASHINGTON - Employees of the CIA-connected private security corporation Blackwater diverted hundreds of weapons, including more than 500 AK-47 assault rifles, from a U.S. weapons bunker in Afghanistan intended to equip Afghan policemen, according to an investigation by the Senate Armed Services Committee. On at least one occasion, an individual claiming to work for the company evidently signed for a weapons shipment using the name of a "South Park" cartoon character. And Blackwater has yet to return hundreds of the guns to the military.
Eric Cartman of South Park (Photo courtesy: Comedy Central) A Blackwater subsidiary known as Paravant that until recently
operated in Afghanistan acquired the weapons for its employees'
"personal use," according to committee staffers, as did other
non-Paravant employees of Blackwater. Yet contractors in Afghanistan
are not permitted to operate weapons without explicit permission from
U.S. Central Command, something Blackwater never obtained. A November
2008 email from a Paravant vice president named Brian McCracken,
obtained by the committee, nevertheless reads: "We have not received
formal permission from the Army to carry weapons yet but I will take my
chances."
As a result of Blackwater's disregard for U.S. military restrictions on contractor firearms, four employees of Paravant - which held a subcontract from defense giant Raytheon to train Afghan soldiers - under the influence of alcohol opened fire on a car carrying four Afghan civilians on May 5, 2009, wounding two. That incident, occurring less than two years after Blackwater guards killed 17 Iraqi civilians in Baghdad, prompted the committee's investigation.
"In the fight against the Taliban, the perception that the Afghans have of us is critical," Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), the chairman of the committee, told reporters Tuesday afternoon. "It's clear to me that if we're going to win that struggle, we need to know that contractor personnel are adequately screened, they're adequately supervised and they're adequately held accountable." Levin will hold a hearing on Blackwater's Afghanistan contracts Wednesday morning.
The committee's investigation points to the contrary. Blackwater personnel appear to have gone to exceptional lengths to obtain weapons from U.S. military weapons storehouses intended for use by the Afghan police. According to the committee, at the behest of the company's Afghanistan country manager, Ricky Chambers, Blackwater on at least two occasions acquired hundreds of rifles and pistols from a U.S. military facility near Kabul called 22 Bunkers by the military and Pol-e Charki by the Afghans. Gen. David Petraeus, the commander of all U.S. military forces in the Middle East and South Asia, wrote to the committee to explain that "there is no current or past written policy, order, directive, or instruction that allows U.S. Military contractors or subcontractors in Afghanistan to use weapons stored at 22 Bunkers."
On one of those occasions, in September 2008, Chief Warrant Officer Greg Sailer, who worked at 22 Bunkers and is a friend of a Blackwater officer working in Afghanistan, signed over more than 200 AK-47s to an individual identified as "Eric Cartman" or possibly "Carjman" from Blackwater's Counter Narcotics Training Unit. A Blackwater lawyer told committee staff that no one by those names has ever been employed by the company. Eric Cartman is the name of an obnoxious character from Comedy Central's popular "South Park" cartoon.
Blackwater personnel invoked their Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination when approached by the committee to explain the weapons acquisitions from 22 Bunkers, according to committee staff. Sailer, who is still deployed to Afghanistan, told the committee that he thought Blackwater was signing for the weapons to train Afghan police, a task it has never conducted.
Not all of the guns received from Blackwater have been returned to the Afghan government - and, according to committee staff, many only began to be returned after staff approached the company for an explanation. "It was represented to us that all the weapons had been returned" to 22 Bunkers, Levin said. "That is not true. Hundreds of them were not returned." Asked if that meant Blackwater lied to Congress, Levin replied, "They misrepresented the facts, and I'd like to leave it at that."
Raytheon did not renew Paravant's contract for training the Afghan army, which expired in September. Blackwater still holds a contract with the State Department worth millions of dollars to protect diplomats in Afghanistan. While that contract expires this year, Politico reported on Tuesday that Blackwater, now renamed Xe Services, might acquire a new multimillion-dollar contract from the Defense Department to train Afghan police - the same police force that Blackwater's weapons diversions from 22 Bunkers deprived of hundreds of pistols and rifles.
This is not the first time Blackwater has faced allegations of diverted weapons. In 2007, company employees came under federal investigation for improperly shipping hundreds of weapons to Iraq, some of which are believed to have been sold on the black market and acquired by a Kurdish terrorist group. A Blackwater statement at the time said allegations that the company was "in any way associated or complicit in unlawful arms activities are baseless." The New York Times reported in November that the company is negotiating with regulators over "hundreds of millions of dollars in fines" associated with the illicit weapons shipments.
In January, Blackwater's founder, Erik Prince, confirmed to Vanity Fair that his 12-year-old company - which has earned more than a billion dollars through government contracts in the past decade - was involved in a nascent terrorist assassination program run by the CIA, among other CIA activities. "I'm paying for all sorts of intelligence activities to support American national security, out of my own pocket," Prince told the magazine. Additionally, The Nation recently reported that Blackwater assists the Joint Special Operations Command with the terrorist manhunt in Afghanistan and Pakistan, including with the operations of JSOC's armed unmanned drones.
Levin said his inquiry had uncovered "inadequate oversight by the Army over this contract." The Florida-based Army office supposedly overseeing the contract did not even have a contracting officer representative in Afghanistan when the Paravant employees shot at Afghan civilians on May 5, 2009. Yet as early as December 2008, concerned Raytheon personnel informed that Army office that Paravant personnel were carrying unapproved weapons. An officer in Afghanistan responsible for training Afghan soldiers told the committee, "We should have had better control."
Additionally, Blackwater personnel in Afghanistan, including those involved in both the May shooting and an earlier improper weapons discharge from December 2008, have been cited for, among other infractions, drug and alcohol abuse and, in one case, an "extensive criminal history."
Wednesday's hearing is expected to receive testimony from current and former Blackwater/Paravant officers, including Brian C. McCracken, the former Paravant vice president who now serves as Raytheon's chief Afghanistan program officer; Fred Roitz, a Blackwater vice president; and John Walker, a former Paravant program officer.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



20 Comments so far
Show AllLet's see: Donald Rumsfeld admits that the Department of Defense can not account for 2.3 TRILLION DOLLARS of expenditures....Preparations are being made to use over 140,000 Mercenaries, ooopppps "Civilian Contractors", in the upcoming invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan.....Cofer Black is moved from CIA Director to Vice Chairman of Blackwater....Blackwater murders over 17 people in Iraq and gets no investigation by an independent agency.....Blackwater gets caught shipping weapons illegally to Iraq and then selling them illegally in the Black Market (To the Enemy) and gets no independent investigation....Excuse me Senator Levin, but Blackwater and its many other names has functioned as a CIA "Off Book Operation" for over seven years now! How many hearings since the Church Hearings do you need to rein them in????
I would suggest having Interpol come in and investigate, with subpoena power, Eric Prince and Cofer Black....and good luck, if they could find out all the ghost international companies throughout "Their Global Economy".
"... signed over more than 200 AK-47s to an individual identified as "Eric Cartman" ... from Blackwater's Counter Narcotics Training Unit. A Blackwater lawyer told committee staff that no one by those names has ever been employed by the company. Eric Cartman is the name of an obnoxious character from Comedy Central's popular "South Park" cartoon."
Ha-ha - wild east...
Eric Cartman on druuugs.
"RESPECT MA AUTHORA-TAY!
How do I reach these keeeds?
"A November 2008 email from a Paravant vice president named Brian McCracken, obtained by the committee, nevertheless reads: "We have not received formal permission from the Army to carry weapons yet but I will take my chances."
I wonder if he is related to Phil McCracken?
In conjunction with another article re: Patriot Act... why isn't Blackwater/Xe being held on terrorists charges?
They stole military arms, ignore Congress, and seem to interfer with military actions. Wasn't the Patriot Act written to control people like them?
I do wonder who they sell the stolen arms too. Are they giving "material assistance' to anyone beside themselves?
Aren't they just another rogue group, who sadly, seem to be skimming the public big time? Maybe the Supreme Court actions aren't the country's biggest worry.
"In conjunction with another article re: Patriot Act... why isn't Blackwater/Xe being held on terrorists charges?"
There's a very simple reason why Xe/Blackwater isn't being listed as a terrorist group or having terrorism charges laid: It's not terrorism when the US does it... or at least that's what you tell yourselves.
Just heard today that Jan Schakowsky & Bernie Sanders have introduced The Stop Outsourcing Security Act.
Info below is from Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) website.
-----------------
“The American people have always prided themselves on the strength, conduct, and honor of our United States military. I therefore find it very disturbing that now, in the midst of two wars and a global struggle against terrorism, we are relying more and more on private security contractors – rather than our own service members – to provide for our national defense,” Sanders said.
“The behavior of private contractors has endangered our military, hurt relationships with foreign governments, and undermined our missions overseas,” Schakowsky added.
The Stop Outsourcing Security Act would restore the responsibility of the American military to train troops and police, guard convoys, repair weapons, administer military prisons, and perform military intelligence. The bill also would require that all diplomatic security be undertaken by U.S. government personnel. The White House could seek exceptions, but those contracts would be subject to congressional oversight.
Did you mean the "upcoming" invasion of Iran?"" We already invaded Iraq.
/THIS IS JUAT MORE PROOF THAT SOME OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE ASLEEP AND CLUELESS AND THEN SOME ARE MADE OF THE SAME STUFF AS THE TERRORIST- OOOPPPS I MEAN PRIVATE CONTRACTORS...
The rest of us are twittling our thumbs thinking about what we can do to stop our selves from spinning down the drain...
They are just gangsters. The US has hired a hoard of gangsters -- but of course: the US is being run by gangsters now.
Until the great majority of people wake up and understand this, and stop sweeping it under the rug, it will continue.
Yeah -- the people get the government they deserve. Sadly, the rest of the world does NOT deserve it.
"In 2007, company employees came under federal investigation for improperly shipping hundreds of weapons to Iraq, some of which are believed to have been sold on the black market and acquired by a Kurdish terrorist group."
Well, if they are found guilty, they could always use the excuse that keeping the terrorists in business is good for their business. After all, they are employing some Americans.
We are DOOMED!
Another season, another reason to hold a hearing, for making Whoopie. Remember that you read the article here as you will not read about it again until it is a footnote mentioned in the next 'indiscretion.'
Wow, you nailed. You are the first person I have heard that really understands how mercenaries function. I suggest that you find a forum that will allow you to bring these truths to the general public. Great comment!
as agents employed under the authority of the Constitution, all these "contractors" are bound by this.
why anyone believes them to be exempt is beyond reason.
That's a wicked looking "blow" torch terrorist Cartman has!
I have a feeling that the contractors are holding all the cards. Congress. What is to stop Xe from taking out anyone who is against them? They can do whatever they like.
I also have another feeling. Contract wars among themselves. Corporate wars with all the weapons at their disposal. Who knows if mercenary forces are pissed off at each other and playing it out on the world stage. How would we ever know?