EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- 'The Gilded Age' Statistics Corporations Don't Want Workers, or Anyone, to See
- As Death Toll Rises Beyond 500, Garment Factory Disaster 'Worst in World History'
- Report: Toxic Chemicals Found in Thousands of Children's Products
- Pregnant Anti-War Soldier Sent to Prison
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- Report: Toxic Chemicals Found in Thousands of Children's Products
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- 'The Gilded Age' Statistics Corporations Don't Want Workers, or Anyone, to See
- After Boston, Eyes-Wide Open Hope?
- Time for Big Green to Go Fossil Free
Popular content
Today's Top News
Non-Profit Sues Feds Over Border Fence
McALLEN, Texas - A national consumer advocacy group sued the federal government Wednesday on behalf of a University of Texas law professor seeking documents about the planning of the border fence.
U.S. Border Patrol agents block the path of protestor Pedro Rios, right, as he attempts to walk up to the U.S.-Mexico border fence at Border Field State Park in San Diego Saturday, Feb. 21, 2009. (AP Photo/Denis Poroy) Public Citizen, the group founded by Ralph Nader, filed a lawsuit in U.S. district court in Washington against the Department of Homeland Security, Customs and Border Protection and the Army Corps of Engineers.
The suit alleges the agencies didn't comply with a request from the University of Texas Working Group on Human Rights and the Border Wall. Denise Gilman, a law professor and member of the group, used the Freedom of Information Act to request documents in April regarding the location of the fence segments and criteria used in determining its placement.
The lawsuit asks that the government provide the documents.
The government is nearing completion of 670 miles of fencing along the U.S.-Mexico border. The project has met widespread opposition in South Texas, where segments will touch hundreds of private property owners and leave thousands of acres of farmland between the fence and the Rio Grande.
The Texas group has suggested the fence disproportionately impacted low-income minorities.
"Researchers have found statistically significant differences between the income and race of property owners whose land will be affected by the wall versus those whose land will remain unaffected," the lawsuit reads. "Affected property owners are, on average, less wealthy and include more people of color than property owners whose land will not be affected."
According to the lawsuit, the Department of Homeland Security referred Gilman's request to Customs and Border Protection, which is overseeing the fence project.
That agency has provided a partial response to Gilman's request. The Army Corps of Engineers told Gilman that her request would incur copying costs of $54,545 and after appeals partially filled her request.
A Customs and Border Protection spokesman did not immediately return a call for comment.
"We sincerely hope that the Obama administration, which has pledged greater transparency and accountability in government, will release the requested documents so that informed debate and consultation regarding the border wall can take place before there is any further construction." Gilman said in a prepared statement.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

8 Comments so far
Show AllThe fence is a joke. But these folks better start paying attention to the real problems along the border instead of their pathetic little games. This is getting serious.
If something isn't done there will be troops all along the border by late 2010 or 2011.
Pass an Amnesty bill this year and it will speed things up. New illegals will have to come across to take the jobs the new citizens used to hold.
Why pass an Amnesty Bill?
When "Jose Gomez-Smith" or his spouse "Carlita" cannot speak English and do not have a 'Green Card' the "employer" by law is required to report them that day, instead of hiring them at below standard wages, and abusing them all along the line, until the employer tires of them and THEN decides to report them.
If employers actually stood the risk of jail and fines for hiring anyone who is not in the US legally, they would see the reality of the need to comply with the laws and the problem would disappear.
The illegal aliens are in Texas for one reason; they know that they can find jobs from people just like you, and people just like you will hire them, use them, then fire them, and hire new ones. Then offer 'wisdom' on how to solve the problem that people just like YOU have created, with greed and exploitation on your mind; and of course 'God' on your side.
When Reagan pushed through the last 'amnesty bill' it was to open the door for new illegals----and keep organized labor from gaining any strength. It worked, but then, for only a few, while now, the option for Spanish on the phone when calling the Fed Gov numbers is the rule.
'There are none so blind as those who will not see'
Do you have a 'seeing eye dog' Thomas? You obviously need one.
Good luck America, you really need it.
I think T. More was making a point about the futility of amnesty.
In my state it is actually the native Hispanics who are enabling illegal immigration. After all, they do have more in common. Jaurez and Palomas used to be nice places back in the 70s and 80s; in the 90s my kids would even go there for a weekend of clubbing. All that is over now. To me it's an indication of what you can expect if immigration is not restricted. Hell, I'll even go so far as to say that you shouldn't get US citizenship unless you bring "something to the table", an education or profession. My brother who has lived in Silver Spring for nearly 30 years said the number of burglaries and car break-ins has skyrocketed because adjacent neighborhoods are being overtaken by poor working-class Latinos, often several families to a house with half a dozen cars parked all over the lawn, hanging laundry, etc. All this in suburbia D.C.
If we're in the process of redefining the path forward for our society lets not tolerate uncivil/illegal behavior for the sake of political correctness -and that includes business owners who hire illegals.
The bigotry and violence here is astonishing.
Please don't forget WE are the illegal aliens to native Americans! When will we learn that hate does not work.
Whatever happened to the "common dreams"for the "common good?"
What really bothers me is the fact that the environment and habitat of animals have been really messed up by this ridiculous fence. We get angry when other countries put up walls, but we do it and it is OK. Obama has a lot on his plate and I know this fence cost money, but I would love to see him "tear down the wall!"
busterkikki
There would be no reason for a fence other than deterring drug runners if the owners and/or managers of businesses convicted of hiring illegals were to receive fines substantial enough to ensure that they would quit the practice. If there were no jobs for illegals, they would quit coming to the USA.
As for drug-runners who are apprehended, I am not interested in paying for their jail time, either. Caught once, a small tattoo near the armpit would identify them were they to be caught again. The second time they automatically get "Ley Fuego" which is still popular in Mexico -- that is, the firing squad.
The third thing is to legalize marijuana in the USA. It is not as dangerous as alcohol and could be priced too low to encourage illegal import.
Not the end of problems, I realize, but a good start.