EPA To Gut Mountaintop Mining Rule That Protects Streams
WASHINGTON - The Environmental Protection Agency on Tuesday approved a last-minute rule change by the Bush administration that will allow coal companies to bury streams under the rocks leftover from mining.
The 1983 rule prohibited dumping the fill
from mountaintop removal mining within 100 feet of streams. In
practice, the government hadn't been enforcing the rule. Government
figures show that 535 miles of streams were buried or diverted from
2001 to 2005, more than half of them in the mountains of Appalachia.
Along with the loss of the streams has been an increase of erosion and
flooding.
The 11th hour change before President George W. Bush leaves office would eliminate a tool that citizens groups have used in lawsuits to keep mining waste out of streams. Mining companies had been pushing for the change for years.
It also means that President-elect Barack Obama's administration will have to decide whether to try to restore and enforce the rule, a process that could take many months of new rulemaking. Obama's transition team declined to comment on its plans on Tuesday.
Another option would be for opponents to go through the courts. Opponents have argued that the rule change is illegal.
For now, however, the EPA's approval means there are no further obstacles to the Office of Surface Mining's plans to change the rule. The White House's Office of Management and Budget approved it on Monday. The Department of Interior, which includes the mining office, plans to make the rule final in December after briefing members of Congress, and it will go into effect 30 days after that, said spokesman Peter Mali.
The timing means the rule is expected to be in effect when Obama takes office in January.
In approving the change in writing as required by law, EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson rejected the appeals of environmentalists and some coal-country officials, including Kentucky Gov. Steve Beshear and Tennessee Gov. Phil Bredesen, both Democrats.
In a letter in November to Johnson, Beshear said his state had to protect its water and that while coal was important to the economy, it should be mined in environmentally responsible ways.
The new rule says the buffer zone around streams would not apply to the disposal of rocks, dirt and sludge from mining. It would allow companies to get a permit for the disposal as long as they show on a case-by-case basis that they are trying to minimize the waste.
Carl Shoupe, 62, of Benham, Ky., said mining already had buried many streams and he and others worried that the rule change would lead to more losses.
"They're taking our water away. They're taking our mountains away," said Shoupe, a former underground coal miner disabled in a roof fall. "We ain't got all the water resources that we used to have up here."
Headwater areas deserve protection because that's where the entire stream system begins, said Shoupe, who also is a member of the citizens group Kentuckians for the Commonwealth. And he said it's not true that the only opposition to the rule change comes from outside the coalfields.
"It's ridiculous what they're doing," he said.
EPA said in a statement that the rule would not violate federal or state water quality standards. EPA spokeswoman Enesta Jones said she could not provide any further explanation.
Joan Mulhern, a senior attorney at Earthjustice, a nonprofit law firm that has fought mountaintop mining, said the EPA had failed to do its job.
"With less than two months left in power, the Bush administration is determined to cement its legacy as having the worst environmental record in history," she said in a statement. "This is a sad day for all people who are thankful for the clear mountain streams and stately summits of the Appalachians."
However, coal mining companies and lawmakers who argued on their behalf in letters to the EPA said the rule change was necessary.
Kentucky State Rep. Hubert Collins said that in a national recession, only coal was keeping eastern Kentucky out of a depression.
"It's a matter of keeping people working," he said. "It's a matter of keeping food on the table here in the coalfields."
Bill Caylor, president of the Kentucky Coal Association, said the rule change clarifies the intent of the federal surface-mining law. He said the law was never intended to ban putting excess rock and dirt from mining operations into the headwater sections where streams only flow when it rains.
"If you can't be within 100 feet of a dry ditch, we're finished," he said. Caylor also noted that the new rule would have little impact because coal companies already work to keep valley fills as small as possible.
Kentucky's best known environmentalist, Tom FitzGerald, called the new rule "a regrettable exclamation point on a litany of Bush-era regulatory and policy changes that have weakened the stream protection and mining and reclamation requirements intended by Congress - an early Christmas present to the industry."
States had applied the stream buffer rule unevenly and federal enforcement was lax, FitzGerald said. But the elimination of the buffer zone requirement makes it possible for the coal industry to expand dumping in headwater streams, he said.
FitzGerald said the rule change applied to mountaintop mining and all other forms of surface mining, as well as disposal of coal mine processing waste, disposal of waste from underground mining and the use of streams for sedimentation ponds.
Estep reports for the Lexington Herald-Leader. Andy Mead of the Herald Leader contributed to this article.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
45 Comments so far
Show AllSomeone already posted the link for ILoveMountains, but I'll repeat it; having just done a Web search to try to find pictures and videos showing enough of these destroyed mountain tops and ILM being one of the resources the search turned up. I haven't read much there and read little, only having examined the contents of the site; and it definitely seems to be an excellent resource on the topic of mountaintop coal mining or else simply mountaintop mining, open pit and very destructive kind, reminding of the pits, the ugly or horror aspects of "Lord of the Rings".
www.ilovemountains.org
Some of the other links my Web search provided are the following.
Video of Ralph Nader on "Coal Mining and Mountaintop Removal", 03:21, posted by voteNader08, Oct 3 2008
http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=-o5NzrO5Hn0
Video, "Mountaintop Removal Movie from iLoveMountains.org", 08:24, posted by AppalachianVoices, Sep 29 2006
http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=RPixjCneseE
OhioCitizen.org on mountaintop removal for coal mining:
http://www.ohiocitizen.org/campaigns/coal/coal.html
The latter is also new to me, but looks like another good resource on this topic.
I just took a look at the two other resource websites people posted links for in this page, www.wisecountyissues.com being one of these, and that one looks very important. I don't know if it is for economic considerations, but it certainly seems very important with respect to the impacts on human health; some very scary pictures of such impacts in just the homepage. Also plenty of aerial photographs of these destructions of mountaintops.
Actually, taking another quick look at the vbs.tv resource someone posted a specific link for below, this also looks important with respect to impact on human health; just haven't viewed the video yet, but see links specifically referring to health conditions. The video is surely good, if not important. And, well, launched the loading of the video while completing the editing of this post and from what I just hear from what's said on the video, it's clearly an important one.
The silence is deafening! Where the F*CK are the damn "news" media?! The bastards just help to cover up [critical] information about very [critical] issues everyone should be well informed about; not just a little informed, by very well. We cannot vote responsibly when we're not well enough informed!
I don't live near these affected areas, but love nature and therefore also mountains, while also caring about other people's lives. So ... let us all [care].
We need to NATIONALIZE not only oil, but all of
our natural resources. Why should these resources be in
the hands of the few?''
Look at the way of the world in the quest for oil --!!
We are bringing death to Nature -- and killing ourselves.
"According to all myth, the female - not the male -- gives life"
Peace
What is it about little boys having to play in dirt? And with all their toys.
Mother Earth needs to spank them, wash them, and put them to bed.
Ha! : )
The Bush and Cheney families should have to go live in one of these areas they have profited by destroying. What a disgrace.
Destroying our planet by sheer viciousness! The very people that always talk about 'God bless America', yet they take the right to abuse it.
HOW IN GODS NAME can we sit and watch this merciless destruction of life?
please please please visit http://www.ilovemountains.org/ if you care.
Look at the photo. It's a barren waste land of scorched earth where a beautiful mountain range once existed for millions of years. All for the obscene profit of a couple of coal mining companies that contribute large amounts of money to Republican campaigns. Don't blame the EPA. That agency has too been gutted during Bush and Cheney's regime. These two are the true criminals.
Maybe the mining company will put a golf course there, or better yet a Super Wal-Mart to make up for all the destruction. Something to keep the masses of ignorant and arrogant happy.
What's really going on in W. Va.?
Why are people sad, or better, enraged?
This link might help you see why:
http://www.vbs.tv/video.php?id=494918454
Was there a cost/benefit analysis done for the rule change, or is just a "no brainer"? Of course, a brain isn't required when all you do is the lobbyists' bidding.
Is the rule change to protect the non-enforcers?
Paul Siemering
Tell me what is hard to understand about why "mountain top removal" is a bad idea. The phrase itself is enough to send shivers up the spine of anyone who's ever seen a mountain. or a picture of one.
Yes it will be kind of a test of the new administration, but not a very difficult one. Let's see if we can get Obama to say something about it. Could he say " mountains are the geological glories our world. There will be no more beheadings of mountaintops while I am president"?
yes and also i bet the mountaineers are not "sad". I bet they are mad as hell. Like me.
To paraphrase Ronald Reagan: you seen one mountain top, you seen em all.
The best defense is a good offense.....who are the mining company execs and board members and where do they reside....maybe there should be some demonstrations about their dirty activities in the neighborhoods where they live!!! Shouldn't the neighbors and towns-people know what their members in their community are doing to get rich???
EMBARASSMENT IS THE BEST NON-VIOLENT RESPONSE to start with. Investigating who the people are and organizing people in the community to rally in protest is a good idea I think.
peace
You can bet your bottom dollar NONE of these coal barons live within sight of the mountains they are destroying!
They all have Manhatten apatments,ski lodges,and tickets to a game in NYC or Philly. It has been that way forever and they scream they are providing jobs! jobs! jobs!
No matter that the poor strip miners children will have filthy water and spoiled views. Those nights on the city are horribly expensive.
Having organized against a skuzzy slumlord in my building where the heat and hot water was cut off for months, I have seen that it is very effective if a motley crew of tenants repeatedly pickets the landlords' lovely houses in their staid neighborhoods. It is especially effective if the "innocent" wives going out with the children are embarrassed by the publicity that reveals how much misery of elderly people and children finances their gracious lives. The wives can bring the war home.
After months of freezing in our buildings, two encounters with the wife and our heat and hot water was restored.
Joe
PS - not to assume all the key coal operators are male. It was just the case with our landlords.
This makes about as much sense as the Alberta Tar Sands. :-(
It's nice that Americans are raping their own country for a change instead of countries belonging to others.
It shows just how destructive Americans are, how greedy, how foolish.
I don't know what the world is going to do about America. Like a bull in a china shop, it rampages around the planet causing immense problems for everyone.
Obama isn't going to be any different. Did you hear his speech when he introduced his security team? He spoke like a true megalomaniac.
I featured his speech in a new post. I made a few comments about it, harsh ones!
www.dangerouscreation.com
Anyone seen the Black Forrest lately?
I don't see how 'raping' the environment is nice, no matter which country it is. I especially don't think that American's have a monopoly on destructive, greedy and foolish behavior.
In fact, Australian mining companies have a pretty reprehensible history with regards to destructive, greedy and foolish behavior themselves. But its pretty easy to kick the dead horse of American industrial capitalism.
In reality, the problem isn't the country of origin, its a cultural pattern of valuing money over community, and the insane belief that humans' can exploit the Earth in order to satisfy the perpetual growth of the economy. Those are qualities that can be found in just about every 'civilized' country.
As far as the world 'doing something about America', I hardly think that is the issue to be pondering. Maybe DavidG, you should ponder more if Western civilization is redeemable. It appears from you blog that is a question on your radar.
But its so much more fun to rant about how bad America and Americans are isn't it.
Well, the answer to that is that as Americans we are supposed to be responsible for what Americans do, not Australians. If you want to view the problem of human rapaciousness from a wide camera angle, you might as well say that all of life is genetically programmed to self serving behavior and forget about holding Mssrs. Massey and Peabody and Bush accountable for their sociopathic atrocities.
Just another set of reasons for never letting another Republican back in the White House. And if it takes a year or two to undo the damage done by a cynical W on the way out, so be it. Neither he nor they will be back. Three of the last four Republican administrations have ended in criminal disgrace: Nixon--Watergate, Reagan--Iran/Conta, and Bush 43--you name it. As a party, they have squandered their opportunities to lead the country. They need to go away now. Surely Newt, Sarah and Bobby can lead them as far as the desert wherein they my wonder for, say, forty years--enough time maybe to repair the damage they have caused. And they can contemplate the lack of water; drink, perhaps the oil.
Finally, nothing suits my sense of ironic possibility more than that they thought they had achieved a permanent majority by wedging their phony values up our behinds.
CQ from Maine
.The demise of the union mine progressed as rapidly under Clinton as it did under any Republican administration. It is a hindrance to progress to believe that one party is the enemy and one our ally. The system is the problem and both parties support and further that system.
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
Appalachia is Third World America ! http://www.wisecountyissues.com Please click my link to see photos of Main Street prosperity in Appalachia and Pound, VA.
FrJon:
Attitudes and conditions have changed several times in WVa. over 50 years. Don't forget that WVa was vital to JFK's victory since there were so few Catholics there.
The state has dropped from about 2.3 million to 1.8 million pop. in 25 years.
Now those remaining won't be able to enjoy the beauty that was once theirs.However,all should be concerned about that area because what's left of it is for everyone to enjoy.I haven't been back home [and once a Mountaineer ,always a Mountaineer] in 35 years because of poor health,but I am heartsick at what has gone on in the area.
.The real question here is whether our new President will overturn these travesties.........Perhaps we could gather up all the waste and dump it on a certain ranch in Crawford,Texas?
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
Are we so dumb that we have to destroy our environment to exist?
Are we like the worms at work in dead earnest?
What happens to the worms when they run out of dead Earnest?
It's way past due to update the 1872 Mining Law. Talk about living in the past -- This law has caused just about more environmental damage to this country than anything else. Hopefully Obama will do something about this but bush and cheney's legacies will keep him busy on other things unfortunately. At least that's their plan it appears.
When will the citizens of W Va. realize that the Republican Party is not the party of God, but of the Great Deceiver?
Perhaps when most of them learn to read.
q
The problem is- most of todays educated West Virginians all have a soft spot in their heart for coal mining. It provided for their education. Hard to argue with that.
That was before the demise of union mining.
Gol durn--they did learn us to read!
.One should understand that insulting our potential allies is not a very intelligent way to make progress. Those who work the mines are as much pawns of industry as are we all.
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
It's practically impossible to fight this destruction when the citizens of WV themselves will not stand up for their own environment. Until they do, they are not our allies; they're willing victims.
q
.Are you at all familiar with the struggle of the miners to unionise? Do you recall the struggles of Joe Hill, have you read of the strikes being broken up by troops firing into striking miners? Ever here of the Wobblies? Did you read about prisoners being used to work the mines in place of the strikers?
These folks may not be your allies, but I consider them mine.
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
ardee,
I live near and frequently visit, as part of my job, the SW West Virginia coalfields, and, while I likewise honor the coal miner's struggle, but the facts are, you could go right into the Wal-Mart on Highway 119 what's left of Matewan, and you would have trouble finding anyone who could answer the question what historic event happened there in 1920.
---USAn---
.But that does not matter at all. The working class is our staunchest ally in the fight against rampant capitalism and whether or not you think them misguided the fact remains that you cannot do this yourself. Throw away all your allies if you wish, I refuse to follow that lead.
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
What a disgrace the EPA is to the very idea of environmental protection (same with FDA and other federal bodies entrusted with protecting the public)They have become too close to business to enforce the laws/regulations for which they have been given responsibilities of oversight. Everything is about money, quick money,I guess, to hell with everything else -- literally.
The EPA, FDA, and USDA exist to protect corporate power and profits. Unfortunately, they are supported by our tax dollars. At one time I had respect for their actions and pronouncements. Now, I automatically disbelieve anything they say. We would probably be healthier without them.
I am sorry too say but that's what you get when you have Republicans in government. The people in these states were brainwashed to believe that only being "pro-life", "pro-gun" and "anti-gay" were the only things that mattered - the environment be damned. I don't know if they even want things to change.
The EPA. The new oxymoron.
Cheney Crime Syndicate propaganda translation:
EPA = Extralegal Planetary Abattoir
Humanity needs clean water to drink. No one has given up their rights of survival to this government or these corporations. This is a taking of our required clean water and replacing it with mine sewage. This is a crime against humanity. This is the toxic legacy George and Laura Bush have left for America's children. How long will it take America be worse off than Zimbabwe?
As long as greed and $ are more important than people; nothing will change and the perdition of our environment will never end.
What a shameful waste of beauty and life. Rot in hell Bush/Cheney and company.
The class wars are winding down, the Eugenics wars are just starting.