EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Supreme Court Judges Have Access to Guaranteed Care, Shouldn’t You?
Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Stephen Breyer did not have much in common during the three days of debate on the 2010 healthcare law before the Supreme Court March 26-28.
But they did share one essential characteristic. All four will never have to worry about guaranteed access to healthcare.
They won’t have to worry about being bankrupted by medical bills, about being denied needed treatment their doctor recommended because some insurance bean counter deemed it ‘experimental’ or ‘not medically necessary.’
They won’t have to worry about being barred from choosing the provider of their choice because they were ‘out of network’ or forced to keep an unwanted job to maintain their present employer-paid coverage.
Why? It’s not just because of their wealth, or even their federal paychecks or federal health plan.
It’s because all four are over 65, and thus eligible for Medicare – which gives the four justices the same guaranteed coverage that every other American at 65 has. The same coverage that all Americans need and deserve.
Regrettably, none of those roadblocks are removed under the law the judges spent so many hours debating.
More striking, this case which dominated the court’s agenda and massive media coverage this week did not need to be in front of the court at all. If the Obama administration and the Democrats on the Hill had fought for the reform they should have pursued from the outset – lowering the Medicare age to zero.
For more than 45 years, Medicare has stood the test of time and law.
It works, even when its opponents try to underfund or privatize or destabilize Medicare.
Today Medicare remains a more efficient, cost effective, humane system for delivering healthcare, and guaranteeing it to everyone who is eligible, in a far superior manner to the broken dysfunction privatized insurance system that is based on profit and ability to pay, not on patient need.
Sure, the Affordable Care Act does have positive elements, including some restrictions on the abuses that characterize the insurance industry, and the provision that lets young adults up to 26 to remain on their parents’ health plan.
But even if Obamacare survives the court challenge – a prospect looking increasingly dim – it would leave millions of Americans out in the cold.
Despite its name the Affordable Care Act has done little to actually make healthcare affordable. Out of pocket health costs for families continue to soar. It does little to crack down on insurance companies denial of medical treatment they don’t want to pay for. It leaves 27 million Americans with no health coverage, according to a Congressional Budget office estimate in early March.
And for many who are covered, it further tethers them to a callous, insurance system that treats patients as commodities, not as individuals with individual needs.
Whether the law is overturned or left in tact, our healthcare crisis will continue. A mountain of statistics bear the ongoing nightmare faced by far too many. Just a few examples:
A February Pew Center report noted a 16 percent jump in the number of Americans heading to emergency rooms for routine dental problems, at a cost of 10 times more than preventive care with fewer treatment options than a dentist's office.
Medical bills for years have been the leading cause of personal bankruptcy. Increasingly they ruin people’s credit as well. A recent Commonwealth Fund report found that 30 million Americans were contacted by collection agencies in 2010 because of medical bills.
The percentage of adults with no health insurance at 17.3 percent in the third quarter of 2011 was the highest on record, up from 14.4 percent just three years earlier, Gallup reported.
On quality, the U.S. continues to lag far behind other nations.
More than 80 percent of U.S. counties trail life expectancy rates of nations with the best life expectancies, the University of Washington found last June. Some U.S. counties are more than 50 years behind their international counterparts.
There is an alternative, one that most of the other industrialized world has long embraced. One that should be back on the table whether the Court overturns the law or not.
Single payer, Medicare for all. If Medicare is good enough for grandma, and for Scalia and Breyer and Kennedy and Ginsburg, it ought to be good enough for all of us.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


20 Comments so far
Show AllVery true, but the bottom line is what it always is in Amereicha the Land of Mammon: profit. We will NEVER have Medicare-For-All here for that one single reason. There is no way on earth that the gargantuan insurance companies are going to allow a healthcare system that reduces their profits - which Medicare-For-All most certainly would. Sorry, folks - that is the bottom line. In order to get healthcare coverage like that we would need a literal revolution that takes over our country from the Plutocracy and forces it to give us what we want. Otherwise, we can only "work within the system" to effect change, and when the system itself is broken and corrupt beyond recognition, it very simply ain't gonna happen.
Except that if we were ever to have the revolution, which is overdue by at least 30 years, it wouldn't result in forcing the plutocracy to do anything, because the plutocracy would be eliminated from the equation. It's not going to "give us what we want" under any circumstances, since that would mean we're still forced to work within the system, implying that no revolution ever occurred.
You may be right that under the present arrangements we won't be getting Medicare for All, no matter how loudly we holler. But if the Court strikes down the mandate rule, that should open up the debate so the key point that Obama and his insurance and pharma cronies killed the possibility of decent medical care and are just as responsible for the ongoing travesty as any "free market" idiot Republican. Obamacare is a sham, just as its namesake. There's no help for any of us inside the jail the political duopoly has constructed. To hell with the Republicrats and Demoblicans.
I agree with everything you said. But electing a third-party alternative ain't gonna happen, either, due to the sham of an "electoral process" we have here in the U.S. The 2-wing Corporate Party - the D/R tag team - isn't going to ever allow a third party to gain any traction. Again - the system is too rigged, too corrupt, so working within it will accomplish nothing. Revolution is the only way to change anything. Burn the system down and start from scratch. 'Course, in the rising Police State here in this fascist country, any uprising by the populace will result in brutal suppression by the U.S. Military, now that Posse Comitatus is dead, and all labelled as terrorists. So I don't see a Revolution ever happening, even if the lazy Amereichan sheep could get off their couches long enough to give a shit.
I must say I find it very hard going from day to day with the degree of cynicism you reflect, although I can't say I disagree with your assessment of realistic possibilities for revolution. And I know the system's totally rigged against 3rd party efforts, so the system itself is what stands in the way of even moderate reforms, except the ones that are SOOO moderate as to not even warrant the term "reforms."
I'm with Phil Rockstroh and Chris Hedges on these points. It's still worth working at least with the OWS movement even if it means almost certain defeat. The forces of darkness and death have all the firepower to bring to bear against would-be revolutionaries, and they will use it. The more corrupt and dysfunctional the system they protect and defend, the more violent they will be in defending it. Because they have nothing else. The *truth* is so foreign a concept to them that its definition would only suggest those policies and practices which serve to maintain their own wealth and power. They're stone deaf to any other meaning of the term TRUTH.
I agree that I am drowning in cynicism, and I realize it is reflected in my posts. I won't apologize, however; I know that many others just like me are feeling that sense of hopelessness. And understandably so. I am glad, though, that others like yourself refuse to give up and keep fighting the good fight, even knowing the odds are so incredibly stacked against us. I guess after almost 50 years of watching - perhaps too closely - day after day of more revelations of dawning fascism, corruption, Constitution-wrecking, murder, torture, human and civil rights-destruction, offshoring, union-smashing, public employee-demonizing, environmental destruction, regulation-loosening, lying, deceit, Plutocracy, and on and on....I find it hard to be optimistic any longer.
And not to mention, that due to the HUGE amounts of money floating around washington, how long do you think it would take for these "3rd Party" people to corrupted by lobbyists driving dumptrucks full of money up to their doorstep? Some extremely principaled folks may be able to resist, but for most people, the sight of millions of dollars to call their own would cause them to sell their souls.
Wikipedia: Medicare in the United States is a single-payer healthcare system, but is restricted to only senior citizens and certain other classes of people.
Before Medicare: In 1964, only 51 percent of Americans 65 and older had health care coverage.
After Medicare: Today, virtually all Americans 65 and older have health care coverage.
Before Medicare: In 1964, nearly 30 percent of seniors lived below the poverty line.
After Medicare: Today, 8.9 percent of seniors live below the poverty line.
Before Medicare: In 1964, life expectancy for Americans was 70.2 years old.
After Medicare: Today, life expectancy for Americans is 78.2 years old.
Ronald Reagan, in a 1961 LP record “Ronald Reagan Speaks out Against Socialized Medicine” paid for by the AMA, regarding the ongoing battle against Medicar8:
“One of the traditional methods of imposing statism or socialism has been by way of medicine... One of these days you and I are going to spend our years telling our children and our children’s children what it was like in America when men were free.” http://onlinecpi.org/wpcontent/uploads/2011/06/Cry_Wolf_Universal_Healthcare.pdf
The extension of Medicare to every American was what Obama promised:
Obama Said He Supports Single-Payer System And Wants To See One In The U.S., But Knows We “May Not Get There Immediately.” ”I happen to be a proponent of a single-payer universal health care program. I see no reason why the United States of America, the wealthiest country in the history of the world, spending 14 percent of its gross national product on health care, cannot provide basic health insurance to everybody. … A single-payer health care plan, a universal health care plan. That’s what I’d like to see. But as all of you know, we may not get there immediately. Because first we’ve got to take back the White House, we’ve got to take back the Senate, and we’ve got to take back the House.”
http://www.gop.com/index.php/briefing/comments/you_can_bet_on_it
Read: We Can’t See the 47 Million Uninsured, But We Know They are There
The Affordable Care Act: an Allegorical Perspective
by RAVI KATARI*
*Ravi works for a health law firm as a Medicaid reimbursement specialist in downtown Washington D.C. where he also lives. He graduated from the University of Virginia with a degree in Biomedical Engineering.
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Affordable-care-act-an-al-by-Ravi-Katari-120329-501.html
AND on another note, medical science being what it is, can you see the current life-term 9-member team deciding cases when they are 120 years old (although the last estimate I read of was 150 likely by 2025). One term of 10 years pending a renewable term after a grilling by the Senate judiciary. Balls and strikes, indeed!
We will demand it. Medicare for all is health care/equal opportunity for all -for life. What good conscience would determine otherwise and damn themselves in the eyes of his fellows? Vote accordingly for the policy we demand and need. Enough of this fawning sell-out by both parties to the rich.
Hear, hear!
It is that simple, but not that simple. Not before the system implodes and many thousands have died due to lack of health care, will anything change. Call me a cynic if you like, but it is reality. In the words of Winston Churchill, You can always count on Americans to do the right thing -- after they have tried everything else. As for me and mine, we have been thrown under the bus and will likely and very literally not survive the fray.
Our preguduce judges have Socialized health care, Socialized, yes Socialist medicine. The right preaches 24 hours a day that single payer is a Solcialsit program, you wouldn't want a Socialist program would you? America can't be a Socialist nation! They preach on their fox 24 hour station how bad it would be if the government was involved in our health care. Well every representative and every senator, and every judge has the government involved in their health care, a socialist program. The republicans may not be able to afford to give more tax breaks for the one percent if we have socialized single payer health care.
It should also be pointed out that members of congress have no worries that they will receive excellent health care and that they will have no trouble whatsoever paying for their health care.
I will vote for Rocky Anderson of the Justice Party no matter what. Just for info, problem with Medicare as it is today is that doctors won't accept new patients who have Medicare. I know a woman whose doctor told her not to come back because she has Medicare.
In Canada, since there is only 1 source of health insurance, and that is the Universal plan, doctors will NOT turn anyone away due to what insurance they have. Period.
Even if you are not Canadian, you will still receive care. For example, you as an American come to Canada for some reason. You get hit by a car and are injured. You're taken to the hospital and treated. Now you will end up being billed for your treatment, but it won't be nearly as much as you'd pay in the states. But the point is, you will NOT be denied care.
Your comment brings to mind what happened to my wife when she visited Europe in the 1970s. While in Scotland she began to experience terrible pain in her mouth. She went to a dentist in Edinburgh who took x-rays and performed a root canal on her. The charge for the consultation, x-rays and dental procedure? Nothing as Americans would probably be shocked to learn that she was not charged anything at all for those procedures. One does not have to imagine too hard what a foreign person would have to pay here if this had happened to him or her in what is considered by many to be the greatest country in the world.
The Supreme court is supremely corrupt and as such should be called null and void by all American citizens. The Bush-Gore decision; the Citizens United decision and all the rest..... Enough is enough!
one of my goals in raising my two children was to make sure they would achieve post graduate degrees that would allow them to emmigrate to another country. That contingency plan is becoming more of a reality when I observe the shameful activities of our highest "court." Would my kids really want to live in or raise their own kids in a country that allows corporate, psychopathic pursuit of profit to trump all human concerns ?
Roberts should be impeached for his bold faced lies during his nomination process, before the judiciary committee. Thomas should be impeached for lying on his financial disclosure forms. Scalia should be impeached for being insane.
A while back I watched a CSPAN debate/discussion with justices Breyer and Scalia, before an audience of law students. Scalia contradicted his own positions repeatedly, and was thoroughly boxed in by Breyer. Breyer exposed the nonsense that Scalia spews on a regular basis. The students, and this was not some liberal-leaning university were openly mocking Scalia by the end of the discussioin. It was incredible how illogical and incomprehensible the guy is.
Thank you to this author, well said.