EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Obama's Choice on Housing: A Sweetheart Deal for the 1% or a Fair Deal for the 99%
Rumor has it that as early as today, after months of negotiation with big banks, the White House may announce a settlement that would let the banks off the hook for their role in the foreclosure crisis -- paying a tiny fraction of what's needed in exchange for blanket immunity from future lawsuits.
(Daniel Goodman / Business Insider)
We hope these rumors are untrue.
President Obama has the ability to stop and change the direction of this sweetheart deal. He should reject any deal that benefits the one percent and lets the big banks get away with their crimes. Instead, the president should stand with the 99 percent and push for real accountability and a solution that will help millions of people in this country.
Here are the hard facts about the housing crisis we face:
- 3.5 million Americans are homeless.
- 18.5 million homes sit vacant.
- Since 2007, more than 7.5 million homes have been foreclosed.
Default and foreclosure rates are now several times higher than at any time since the Great Depression.
If President Obama is serious about solving this crisis, he must ensure three things:
First: The banks must pay a minimum $300 billion in principal reduction for homeowners with underwater mortgages and/or restitution for foreclosed-on families. This is essential. Every effort to date to reboot the housing market has failed because it has not done the most essential thing -- actually reduce the massive debt load carried by homeowners.
As it stands, the deal likely to be announced Monday would have the banks pay only $20 billion, an astonishingly small fraction of what's needed. Add up all the underwater homes in America, and there's an estimated $700 billion in negative equity in the country, according to a recent study. If banks fix what they broke and write down principals for all underwater mortgages, this would free up millions of people to pump billions of dollars back into local economies, create jobs, and ultimately generate revenue to help invest in things that will help our economy grow.
Second: There must be a full-fledged, full-blown investigation into Wall Street financial fraud by the Department of Justice. There should be a task force with the staff resources, the authority, and the explicit mission of seriously investigating fraudulent behavior in the way home mortgages were securitized.
Reports of the current deal suggest banks could walk away without any actual investigation into their role in the housing crisis.
Third: There should be no civil or criminal immunity for the banks from future lawsuits. That means there should be no broad release of claims in any current or future negotiation or settlement.
The banks must pay to help solve the crisis they played such a big role in creating. They can afford it.
U.S. banks raked in $35 billion in profits last summer alone and are currently sitting on a historically high level of cash reserves of $1.64 trillion. The six biggest banks -- Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Citigroup, JP Morgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley -- hold assets totaling $9.5 trillion; and together paid an income tax rate of only 11% in 2009 and 2010, far below the federally mandated 35% corporate tax rate.
And that's not all. Despite their bleak performance this year, the nation's top six banks paid out $144 billion in bonuses and compensation for 2011, second only to the record $147 billion they paid out in 2007 at the height of the economic boom.
While banks enjoy record profits and the prospect of total immunity, millions of Americans are drowning in underwater mortgages.
Everyday people are already out front, fighting against the malfeasance of the banks; the White House should stand with them. Our national leaders need look no farther than Atlanta, GA, for an instructive profile in courage. Earlier this month, a community church in Dr. Martin Luther King's old neighborhood refused to be ignored. In 2008, a tornado devastated the historic, 108-year-old Higher Ground Empowerment Center church, and they were forced to take out a loan to cover repairs. The loan went underwater and became harder and harder to pay back. For nearly four years, the church asked the bank to modify their loan, but BB&T bank ignored them. Instead, last week, the bank started to evict the church. Sound familiar? Anyone with an underwater mortgage can tell you: banks these days just can't seem to treat their own customers with decency and manners.
However, after Occupy Atlanta staged a high-profile press conference, and 65,000 people signed a national petition by Rebuild the Dream, the church got BB&T bank to agree to modify their loan to something affordable and reasonable.
This happy ending is, unfortunately, the rare exception. BB&T, after being shaken to their senses (and shamed in the media), came to the table and did the right thing. But millions of homeowners have no way to stage protests and press conferences. Abuse, fraud, conflicts of interest, and lawlessness have been endemic at every stage of the mortgage origination and foreclosure process. This chain of misconduct by many of the nation's largest financial companies is at the root of the foreclosure avalanche and it's time to demand a course of action that will resolve the current crisis and create jobs in the future.
If these folks in Atlanta can show this level of courage in standing up to a big bank, then certainly Obama and state attorneys general can show the same courage.
The banks got their bailout. Now we need a strong and fair settlement to help Americans drowning in underwater mortgages.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



26 Comments so far
Show AllDon't hold your breathe for the current administration to do the right thing.
"However, after Occupy Atlanta staged a high-profile press conference, and 65,000 people signed a national petition by Rebuild the Dream, the church got BB&T bank to agree to modify their loan to something affordable and reasonable."
I'd be interested in the exact terms of this modification. I wonder if there is a balloon payment lurking down the road.
Failing to support this scam will cost Obama a lot of bankster campaign "contributions". Obama is hellbent on being the first politician to amass a corporate funded billion dollar campaign war chest.
"The banks GOT their bailout" is a misleading way to end this article.
The banksters and the government keep telling us that there will be future bubbles, busts and bailouts. They have not told us that each future bust will require a more expensive bailout than the previous one. Taxpayer funded bailouts of banks and other corporations have been institutionalized by the Democratic Party and GOP and should therefore not be referred to in the past tense
expecting obummer to do the right thing at this point is - well - delusional
he is a sock puppet and professional vacation taker
the evidence is in - the verdict levied
obummer is a nwo sapsucker
I hope 'nwo' stands for Nazi World Order.
'Cause that's all it's ever been... whether black faces, white faces, brown faces or Jew or Muslim faces are given well paid positions to help disguise and protect it. It's still the traditional elite group at the top.
Nothing new about this program!
Good article!! A bank can decide to throw a person on the street? That in itself is obscene!! Like one person said, "Do you (in this case, the owners of the banks) want to eat every sandwich?" What a sadistic power trip! I witnessed this gluttony in Argentina. Next phase... CIA set up offices to 'broker' properties and make them available to all their 'preferred' customers... other intelligence and military personnel... who were a few degrees more Euro and/or whiter. Total economic coup... not a shot fired!
BTW, the 'official term' for this is Low Intensity Warfare. We were also told in 2005 that it would be brought to the US soon (and that the dollar would eventually be similarly devalued)... Argentina's program was set in motion by US military personnel... though it was blamed on corrupt government officials and corrupt banks.
Naziism is SO twentieth century.
Neoconservatism and neoliberalism are the twenty first century fascism.
Hows That "Capitalism" working out? . 3.5 million homeless while 18 million houses sit empty.
This is supposed to be efficient. It is about the stupidest most ridiculous thing one can imagine. The USA is "Broke" but 18.5 million houses sit empty billions of dollars in food is just thrown away each year and a trillion a year spent on wars on bigger bombs and guns.
I have read about the latest US MIlitary weapon being teested in Afghanistan on the poor people there. It a Rifle that shoots cartridges that explode in the vicinity of the target thus killing anyone in the immediate area. They wax poetic about how effective this will be as they fire on "terrorists" hiding in their homes.
Militarism and Militarism reminds me of the defintion of the word ECONOMY given by Ambrose Pierce.
Economy; Buying a barrel of whiskey you do not need for the price of a Cow you can not afford.
Buying a barrel of Whiskey is better spent then all of that idiotic Military spending.
Now before somone does the inevitable citing of "The Founding Fathers" and how they would be outraged at these sweetheart deals for the wealthy, the fact is they would most likely have supported them. Indeed one of the clauses in the Constitution was written to ensure the Investor class was paid off for all the bonds and Securities they purchased to support the War effort.Thomas Jefferson used the banks and the concept of debt to have loans made to Native Americans he knew they could not possibly repay so as to allow the State to seize Native lands in payment. They looked after their own "1 percent" then as they do today.
It has always been a Government for the 1 percent and of the one percent and by the 1 percent and the only time that really changed was under the threat of Socialism when the USSR existed. This "Threat of Socialism" is what drove CIA Interventions and Military attacks against thrird world nations for much of the History of the United States of America.
Yet we still have people claiming that "Socialism" the problem and that more Capitalism the solution.
Precisely, gwNorth !
During the 1930s nearly 10% of the US electorate voted for socialist or communist candidates.
The threat of socialism and communism is what enabled Franklin Roosevelt to convince corporations (and the polticians they owned) to pass the New Deal, thereby creating the US middle class.
When the "commie threat" subsided in the 1970s the corporations (and the politicians they owned) started dismantling the New Deal. Ronny Raygun convinced the middle class to accelerate the dismantling of the New Deal. Raygun's four successors have kept New Deal destruction progressing to the satifaction of the 1%.
Until a significant % of the US electorate starts voting for socialists and commies, the transfer of wealth from the 99% to the 1% will not slow down.
Actually sounds alot like socialism is the problem you're describing. Government corruption, corporate welfare, and a huge military build up orchastrated by the state. What I can't understand is how you liberals think the way to fix all of our problems is to give the state unbridled power. Drop the ism's and wake up. Everythings corrupt to the core. Personally I think the root of it is the banks and financial institutions. Regardless it all needs to fall. And when it does you'll get your fucking socialism because if we don't all work together we're gonna starve.
You do not even understand what Socialism IS. Educate yourself.
Socialism IS the people empowered.
Sweetheart deal for the one per cent! Hell it's a no brainer for this president.
How did those doughfaced liberals get into this forum? I thought this was to be a progressive forum. Can't all the liberals just leave to attend their funeral parties which are already post humous.
I'm not going to hold my breath. On the other hand, I wouldn't expect a Republican president to even consider it. So Obama is about the only hope. Though if he gives the banks this sweetheart deal this could be the final straw in terms of Obama's credibility.
>So Obama is about the only hope.
Is this what they refer to as "learned hopelessness"?
Hope plus two bucks still buys a good cup of coffee (except in some high rent areas).
I'm not going to hold my breath either...for either Obama or the Republicans.
The outcome depends on whether the prez consults his campaign donor list to determine who is "needy". The last few years suggests that list is never far from hand.
Thank you Van and George! You have no idea of how much your work inspires us!
From Yves Smith at Naked Capitalism:
"The banks are NOT required to write down the second mortgages that they have on their books. This reverses the contractual hierarchy that junior lienholders take losses before senior lenders. So this deal amounts to a transfer from pension funds and other fixed income investors to the banks, at the Administration’s instigation.
"As I urged last week, please call your state attorney general and tell them you think taking from your pension to enrich banks for abusing homeowners is a lousy idea and they should therefore refuse to sign on to the settlement. You can find their phone numbers here. Please call today if you haven’t already. Thanks!"
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/01/obama-to-give-banks-mortgage-get-out-of-jail-almost-free-card-pressures-state-attorneys-generals-to-capitulate.html
"Abuse, fraud, conflicts of interest, and lawlessness have been endemic at every stage of the mortgage origination and foreclosure process." And the same will continue until "We the People" can stop these predators!
leftown:
..........I sent this link to my attorney general:
http://publicbanking.wordpress.com/. It's about counties being able to take properties from the banks through "eminent domain".
..........If cities, towns and states don't protect its citizens from the massive fraud, who the hell will?
Obama represents the 1%.
He will not side with the 99%.
Get over the delusion that Democrats are any different than the Republicans.
Van Jones is dreaming if he thinks BO will take any action against the financial terrorists.
Alabama Attorney General (334) 242-7300
Alaska Attorney General (907) 465-3600
Arizona Attorney General (602) 542-4266
Arkansas Attorney General (800) 482-8982
California Attorney General (916) 445-9555
Colorado Attorney General (303) 866-4500
Connecticut Attorney General (860) 808-5318
Delaware Attorney General (302) 577-8338
District of Columbia (202) 724-1305
Florida Attorney General (850) 414-3300
Georgia Attorney General (404) 656-3300
Hawaii Attorney General (808) 586-1500
Idaho Attorney General (208) 334-2400
Illinois Attorney General (312) 814-3000
Indiana Attorney General (317) 232-6201
Iowa Attorney General (515) 281-5164
Kansas Attorney General (785) 296-2215
Kentucky Attorney General (502) 696-5300
Louisiana Attorney General 225-326-6000
Maine Attorney General (207) 626-8800
Maryland Attorney General (410) 576-6300
Massachusetts Attorney General (617) 727-2200
Michigan Attorney General (517) 373-1110
Minnesota Attorney General (651) 296-3353
Mississippi Attorney General (601) 359-3680
Missouri Attorney General (573) 751-3321
Montana Attorney General (406) 444-2026
Nebraska Attorney General (402) 471-2682
Nevada Attorney General (775) 684-1100
New Hampshire Attorney General (603) 271-3658
New Jersey Attorney General (609) 292-8740
New Mexico Attorney General (505) 827-6000
New York Attorney General (518) 474-7330
North Carolina Attorney General (919) 716-6400
North Dakota Attorney General (701) 328-2210
Ohio Attorney General (614) 466-4320
Oklahoma Attorney General (405) 521-3921
Oregon Attorney General (503) 378-4732
Pennsylvania Attorney General (717) 787-3391
Puerto Rico Attorney General (787) 721-2900
Rhode Island Attorney General (401) 274-4400
South Carolina Attorney General (803) 734-3970
South Dakota Attorney General (605) 773-3215
Tennessee Attorney General (615) 741-5860
Texas Attorney General (512) 463-2100
Utah Attorney General (801) 538-9600
Vermont Attorney General (802) 828-3173
Virginia Attorney General (804) 786-2071
Washington Attorney General (360) 753-6200
West Virginia Attorney General (304) 558-2021
Wisconsin Attorney General (608) 266-1221
Wyoming Attorney General (307) 777-7841
"we hope these rumors are untrue"....v. jones on oourprez.."i love that guy"
Why would Obama start doing the right thing now? His "lesser of two evils" status guarantees his reelection, and his support of the 1% guarantees easy street for life. Besides, he knows very well what happens to presidents who go up against bankers. Sorry, America, you're screwed. Homeless is the new "free".
"...the worst crisis since the Great Depression. Closures and reduction of production have resulted in a high rate of unemployment and the further immiseration of the people.
…Under the neoliberal policy, the working class has been subjected to wage freezes and reductions, loss of job security, flexibilization or casualization (reducing the number of regular employees and increasing the number of temporaries or casuals), systematic prevention or break up of workers' unions and ceaseless attack on union rights and other democratic rights. The kinds of enterprises generated by the neoliberal policy involve cheap labor and the most tiring and health-damaging processes and conditions. They also limit the number of regular employees and expand the ranks of the casuals subjected to a series of short-term employment contracts in order to circumvent the law on regular employment... Jose Maria Sison on the situation in the phillipines...sound familiar?
So nobody is buying houses because they are over priced. The plan is to keep the values high because...?
"The banks must pay a minimum $300 billion in principal reduction for homeowners with underwater mortgages and/or restitution for foreclosed-on families"
I fail to see why the banks or anyone else should reduce the mortgage of anyone. That's how much the buyer thought his house is worth at the time and promised to pay. As for restitution for foreclosed families, i totally agree, if they were paying their monthly installment and were foreclosed on by mistake. I really have feeling tho that the authors want to give some money to everyone who was foreclosed on.
That being said, where do i sign up? Gotta move quick before the teat gets sucked dry.