Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Why is the Most Wasteful Government Agency Not Part of the Deficit Discussion?
Republicans ignore incompetence, bloat and corruption at the Pentagon
In all the talk about the federal deficit, why is the single largest culprit left out of the conversation? Why is the one part of government that best epitomizes everything conservatives say they hate about government—- waste, incompetence, and corruption—all but exempt from conservative criticism?
Of course, I’m talking about the Pentagon. Any serious battle plan to reduce the deficit must take on the Pentagon. In 2011 military spending accounted for more than 58 percent of all federal discretionary spending and even more if the interest on the federal debt that is related to military spending were added. In the last ten years we have spent more than $7.6 trillion on military and homeland security according to the National Priorities Project.

In the last decade military spending has soared from $300 billion to $700 billion.

When debt ceilings and deficits seem to be the only two items on Washington’s agenda, it is both revealing and tragic that both parties give a free pass to military spending. Representative Paul Ryan’s much discussed Tea Party budget accepted Obama’s proposal for a pathetic $78 billion reduction in military spending over 5 years, a recommendation that would only modestly slow the rate of growth of military spending.
Indeed, the Republican government battering ram appears to have stopped at the Pentagon door. This was evident early on. As soon as they took over the House of Representatives, Republicans changed the rules so that military spending does not have to be offset by reduced spending somewhere else, unlike any other kind of government spending. It is the only activity of government they believe does not have to be paid for. Which brings to mind a bit of wisdom from one of their heroes, Adam Smith. “Were the expense of war to be defrayed always by revenue raised within the year … wars would in general be more speedily concluded, and less wantonly undertaken.”
The Tea Party revolution has only strengthened the Republican Party’s resolve that the Pentagon’s budget is untouchable. An analysis by the Heritage Foundation of Republican votes on defense spending found that Tea Party freshmen were even more likely than their Republican elders to vote against cutting any part of the military budget.
What makes the hypocrisy even more revealing is that the Pentagon turns out to be the poster child for government waste and incompetence.
In 2009 the Government Accountability Office (GAO) found “staggering” cost overruns of almost $300 billion in nearly 70 percent of the Pentagon’s 96 major weapons. What’s more, the programs were running, on average, 21 months behind schedule. And when they were completed, they provided less than they promised.
The Defense Logistics Agency had no use for parts worth more than half of the $13.7 billion in equipment stacked up in DOD warehouses in 2006 to 2008.
And these are only the tips of the military’s misspending iceberg. We really don’t know how much the Pentagon wastes because, believe it or not, there hasn’t been a complete audit of the Pentagon in more than 15 years.
In 1994, the Government Management Reform Act required the Inspector General of each federal agency to audit and publish the financial statements of their agency. The Department of Defense was the only agency that has been unable to comply. In fiscal 1998 the Department of Defense used $1.7 trillion of undocumentable adjustments to balance the books. In 2002 the situation was even worse. CBS News reported that Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld admitted, “we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions.”
Imagine that a school district were to reveal that it didn’t know where it spent its money. Now imagine the Republican response. Perhaps, “Off with their desktops!”
How did Congress’ respond to DOD’s delinquency? It gave it absolution and allowed it to opt out of its legal requirement. But as a sop to outraged public opinion Congress required DOD to set a date when it would have its book sufficiently in order to be audited. Which the Pentagon dutiful did, and missed every one of the target dates. The latest is 2017 and DOD has already announced it will be unable to meet that deadline.
Adding insult to injury, last September, the GAO found that the new computer systems intended to improve the Pentagon’s financial oversight are themselves nearly 100 percent or $7 billion over budget and as much as 12 years behind schedule!
The Pentagon is not just incompetent. It is corrupt. In November 2009 the Pentagon’s Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA), the federal watchdog responsible for auditing oversight of military contractors, raised the question of criminal wrongdoing when it found that the audits that did occur were riddled with serious breaches of auditor independence. One Pentagon auditor admitted he did not perform detailed tests because, “The contractor would not appreciate it.”
Why would the Pentagon allow its contractors to get away with fraud? To answer that question we need to understand the incestuous relationship between the Pentagon and its contractors that has been going on for years, and is getting worse. From 2004 to 2008, 80 percent of retiring three and four star officers went to work as consultants or defense industry executives. Thirty-four out of 39 three- and four-star generals and admirals who retired in 2007 are now working in defense industry roles — nearly 90 percent.
retired general working for defense
Generals are recruited for private sector jobs well before they retire. Once employed by the military contractor the general maintains a Pentagon advisory role.
“In almost any other realm it would seem a clear conflict of interest. But this is the Pentagon where…such apparent conflicts are a routine fact of life”, an in-depth investigation by the Boston Globe concluded.
U.S. military spending now exceeds the spending of all other countries combined. Knowledge military experts argue that we can cut at least $1 trillion from the Pentagon budget without changing its currently expressed mission. But a growing number believe that the mission itself is suspect. Economic competitors like India and China certainly approve of our willingness to undermine our economic competitiveness by diverting trillions of dollars into war and weapons production. Some argue that all this spending has made us more secure but all the evidence points in the opposite direction. Certainly our $2 trillion and counting military adventures in the Middle East and Afghanistan and Pakistan have won us few friends and multiplied our enemies.
Defense experts Gordon Adams and Matthew Leatherman, writing in the Washington Post offer another argument against unrestrained military spending.
“Countries feel threatened when rivals ramp up their defenses; this was true in the Cold War, and now it may happen with China. It’s how arms races are born. We spend more, inspiring competitors to do the same — thus inflating defense budgets without making anyone safer. For example, Gates observed in May that no other country has a single ship comparable to our 11 aircraft carriers. Based on the perceived threat that this fleet poses, the Chinese are pursuing an anti-ship ballistic missile program. U.S. military officials have decried this “carrier-killer’‘ effort, and in response we are diversifying our capabilities to strike China, including a new long-range bomber program, and modernizing our carrier fleet at a cost of about $10 billion per ship.”
For tens of millions of Americans real security comes not from fighting wars on foreign soil but from not having to worry losing their house or their job or their medical care. As Joshua Holland, columnist for Alternet points out 46 states faced combined budget shortfalls this year of $130 billion, leading them to fire tens of thousands of workers and cut off assistance to millions of families. Just the supplemental requests for fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan this year were $170 billion.
What is perhaps most astonishing of all is that cutting the military budget is wildly popular. Even back in 1995, when military spending was only a fraction of its present size, a poll by the Program on International Policy Attitudes reported that 42 percent of the US public feeling that defense spending is too high and a majority of Americans were convinced that defense spending “has weakened the US economy and given some allies an economic edge.”
This March Reuters released a new poll that found the majority of Americans support reducing defense spending.
The next time you hear Republicans insist they want to ferret out government waste and reduce spending and stamp out incompetence ask them why the one part of government that exemplifies everything they say is wrong with government is the one part of government they embrace most heartily.


90 Comments so far
Show AllWe should be putting a fair bit of mental energy into working out how to reduce the size of the MIC _without_ sacrificing human beings in the process.
When all of the wealth in the US has been transferred to the wealthiest 1%, a big military will be needed to control the working class when they rebel.
Right. The article implies that someone in Washington actually has the interests of the American people at heart.
But, as billionaire Warren Buffet put it, "There's class warfare, all right, but it's my class, the rich class, that's making war, and we're winning." The vast majority of "our representatives" are either members of this class or are owned and operated by them.
It's clear that their bipartisan goal is to further cripple the American working class and consolidate ruling class power. Thus, cuts to the MIC and the PIC (prison-industrial complex) are, as Nancy Pelosi likes to say, "off the table". All other government programs -- health, welfare and, especially, education -- are not just expendable, but actively to be destroyed.
Do you all remember on Sept, 10, 2001 when Rummy went on tv to tell us $3.9 trillion was missing from the Pentagon? 911 happened the next day and we never heard that statement again. Where are all those trillions? Where is Iraqs billions that were stolen and they are asking for it back? Where are the billions send on crates to Iraq handed out by contractors. Isnt it time to call for an audit of the pentagon before we give them anymore of our money? why isnt the media asking these questions.
That was $2.3 trillion. Get your facts straight.
that was 10 years ago, it's probably up to 3.9 trillion now.
Pentagon is already saying they will most likely miss the 2017 audit date. Or rather the date they are supposed to get their books in order for audit.
The auditors were killed the next day, Sept. 11, when Hani Hanjour, a pilot so bad that the flight instructor refused to go up in a Cessna with him, flew a 757 at 500 miles per hour toward the Pentagon.
His approach was towards the other side of the Pentagon, the side where Rumsfield and the big brass were. Obviously, an anti-American terrorist wouldn't want to kill the top brass!
So he executed a pivot so tight it almost seemed to observers to be like a military plane maneuver, making a 270 degree turn, dropping down to ground level, and smashing into the exact place that the auditors were working.
What a strange coincidence.
Curiously enough, building seven of the World Trade Center was where all the documentary evidence implicating prominent republicans in criminal fraud for the Enron scandal was gathered. This building collapsed even though it wasn't hit by a plane. No steel structure skyscraper has collapsed due to fire since, anywhere in the world. Not one.
They are already waiting for the working class. People need to wake up. They are not interested in the masses here or anyplace else. Welcome to the NWO.
New World Order Plan to Kill 90% of the Worlds Population
www.youtube.com
Mairead,
Well said.
What is unstated in this article is that, while the MIC is incompetent and corrupt in fiscal responsibility, it is rather efficient and single minded at marginalizing/killing people that try to cut off its' funding.
I remember a long time DoD supporting Democratic Representative from Pennsylvania (Murtha) who died less than a year after saying the DoD budget had to be cut by over 50% and the wars had to stop.
Yeah, I know, it was just a coincidence.
Truman created this Frankenstein and it is eating us alive.
Truman also created the CIA & NSA, without even passing it by Congress. Truman dropped atomic bombs on Japan after they had already agreed to surrender.
Many "defense" projects continue long after the technology/weapon system is obsolete. "It's free speech as long as you don't say too much."
Just my opinion, but I think all that missing money is funneled into special CIA, JSOC, FBI projects that no one knows about. Plus, where does all the bribe money come from?
Truman created this Frankenstein and it is eating us alive.
-------------------
Akcherly it was FDR that created it. Truman let it entrench itself and bloat up to the point that it scared Eisenhower, who'd profited by it.
thanks Mairead - this is where a lot of the "peace dividend" arguments fell apart at the end of the cold war. Clinton did close a few bases and every once in a awhile, somebody actually does allow an overbudget, out-of-date weapons system to die. what usually happens is some skilled labor gets laid off, a factory goes dark, and a local town takes a hard economic hit. No wonder voters are hesitant to approve military spending cuts. Every congressional district state in the US has at least some DOD money; that was done deliberately by Congress to ensure support for military spending. It's more or less open blackmail. It's a waste of money in one sense but not in another; most of the money is spent in the US and much of it finds its way into local and regional economies. Districts with high war dollars (Orange Co, CA) are often flush and recession-resistant. If by some miracle, you could get serious military spending cuts, you would have to find a way to keep all those weapons and logistics manufacturer's open, making and selling something else. Like what? It's a good question, our govt should but never will ask.
It's a hard question for us and the answer is not blithe generalities about "green industry". We have to have specifics. Starting with long term, low interest loans from community development banks for workforce-owned coops and other ventures. How about tax breaks for investors willing to gear up and wait for a long term, reasonable return, not a first quarter, bubble-based windfall? How about university-industry partnerships that help work out the economics, urban planning, environmental and technical issues for new, small businesses that can employ experienced machinists, electricians and mid to high level technical people whose jobs would disappear after military spending cuts?
All this would cost billions, so the money would never find its way back into govt coffers nor would it stay in taxpayer pockets. It would still be spent and it would only offset the deficit in the long run by priming the demand side of the economy. It just might work but it would be hard to explain to fellow citizens when both parties have drunk the Friedmanite kool-aid and both spew the same poisonous, economic know-nothing crap. Where to start?
Certainly veterans benefits should be included in the military spending category in the pie chart, which would make the total 63%, or almost two thirds.
It is bizarre that social security/medicare, which is fully self-funding and with a large current surplus, is under attack as a cause of the deficit when military spending is totally to blame. It is even more bewildering that the Democrats, lead by Obama, do not hammer that point home.
Hasn't Obama proven by now beyond the shadow of a doubt that he is a war-monger?????
Obama is a Republican war-monger.
Nah...just an American warmonger. Extreme violence is in the very DNA of Americans now. The entertainment and MIC cartels have made killers (or wanna be killers) out of damn near every one of us. Even many liberals are very, patriotic pro-military.
I just keep wondering when Obama is actually going to lead other than down the same path that Bush did. No he is not going to lead as long as his wallstreet masters keep pulling the strings. This folks is really pathetic.
Standard MIC modus operandi: Misimform, misdirect, mishandle. When all else fails, kill the witnesses.
When exactly did China become a "rival"? Didn't US based multinational corporations and the financial world create "modern" China. Shouldn't we be proud of what we created rather than fearful of it?
Gotta have an enemy to keep the peasants in line.
Serial enemies equal serial occupations and wars that equal eternal war, that equals an eternal revenue stream for the military industrial complex.
You now know everything you need to know about the US economic system.
We've always been at war with Oceania.
Maybe you haven't noticed but China is now a rival for resources which means that all resources will be more expensive and less for any one that is not in the middle and upper classes in China. What our bright people on wall street has created a huge consumer society that believe it or not is a rival.
There is bipartisan agreement that the United States must continue to terrorize the world using the constant threat of mass murder to intimidate countries into supporting the empire and that is why there is no actual debate on the pentagon's budget. The foreign policy of both parties is the same.
Oh, for crying out LOUD!!!! Who is this Morris critter, and why is he blaming it on the Rethugs???!?! Hell, the Rethug Congress just approved a military budget that was $9 billion SMALLER than the one Obomber had asked for!
promote mythology much corvo?
The U.S. military is also the world's largest consumer of oil and the world's worst polluter.
-30-
Yes, OleMan....you are correct.
Just think, IF the Pentagon/military budget were cut in half, we could not only save money; cut the deficit and eliminate the addiction to deficit creating interest payments to the financiers; stop the killing of innocent people, stop destroying their countries and their economies; reduce CO2 emissions; stop the spread of DU contaminated land; prevent the destruction of the environment; stop polluting the oceans; reduce dependency on oil both foreign and domestic; reduce the immeasurable waste of natural resources; reduce the mental & physical health costs of war damaged soldiers, their families and their victims/collateral damage; redirect those funds to education and healthcare; and even reduce the PROFITS OF THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL/FINANCIAL COMPLEX.
Did I miss anything? One would think that with all of these benefits, that a simple GD cost/benefit analysis would make the case for attacking and reducing the Pentagon's budget rather than making my mother (and any other elderly person) suffer more cuts to her/their cost of living increases to social security so that she/they can afford to pay the high price of gasoline!!! One would think that the way the Repubs are attacking Social Security & Medicare that people who need these programs are the enemy.
Obama will not be re-elected!!! He is not only sleeping with the enemy, he's pimping out himself and all the rest of the Dems to the cabal of thugs, profiteers and privateers. Too bad....he had such an opportunity to truly be worthy of that Nobel Peace Prize, but instead he will go down in history as the world's biggest political disappointment. What a sham(e)!!!! and I voted for him...note the past tense.
So you think a Republican is going to do a better job? Even if all you say about Obama is true which it is not --his policies are night and day from those of his predecessor, he would still be the lesser by far of 2 evils.
You're either trolling or have never compared Bush's and Obama's policies. There's a _reason_ people say, in disgust, that this is Bush's third term.
SW1,
Of course if you say so. Rahm Emanuel says “Liberals Are “F-king Retarded”, and you are the proof. Rahm and Obama are correct.
Bush‘s torture, Obama's murder. Bush failed to privatized SS, Obama begging Repug to cut SS and others. Oh, nearly forgot Obama assassinated foreign nationals and US Citizen too!
“night and day” really?
I've read that too. IMagine military run on photo voltaics and windmills. Put that in context with unions etc. investing in war/armament industry(401k, retirement) and how can we possibly slow this train down?
____________________________________________________________
Grab your ankles, these are Anne Herbert moments.
Mainstreet economy collapses. Bipartisan solution endorsed by corporate whore president, shove more money into the pockets of the filthy stinky rich bastards that collapsed the economy. Force feed private military contractors starve the soldiers cut domestic programs.
We need a general strike that literally shuts this country down. Nothing moves until these theives called our elected leaders are held accountable for the corruption they have overseen. Don't stop with this administration either. Papa Bush, Clinton, Baby Bush, Obama along with most of their cabinets belong in jail. Everyone of these administrations have worked to put the Con back in confidence.
The one overriding reason to abandon the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan is the fact that we are accomplishing nothing there. Both countries are far worse now then before we got there. The US is engaged in acts of terrorism against populations instead of concentrating on the criminals. These modern terrorists are little more than gangs, and should be treated as a law enforcement problem with targeted police actions against the responsible individuals. Bombing an entire town because of a few criminals is not only completely wrong, but it is not effective, and the widespread hatred generated by these horrible losses create hatred which adds to the numbers of our opposition. Even more of the very uneducated people can see the difference between capturing criminals and killing innocents. The "war on terror" is a huge pork barrel project for multitudes of people to raid the treasury of funds for their own little parts of the war machine. The goals of the war on terror are unrealistic and unreachable through the methods employed.
Another horrible addition is the financing of mercenary groups like Blackwater (Xe) and other private contractors. They are nothing more than than thugs operating as part of the US warmongering and cost the US billions of dollars each year. To the citizens of these countries, there is no difference between them and our military. Many recruits to these horrible entities are not even US citizens, but they were allowed to operate within our own borders in the post-Katrina days. More often than not, these groups are better equipped, housed and fed than some of our own troops - even notoriously supplied with child prostitutes - all paid for by the US taxpayer. There should be an immediate cessation of funding to these groups. It is estimated that there are now about 150,000 of these thugs operated in the various war theaters of the US. Removing them would save the US taxpayer a good portion of the military budget.
"Accomplishing nothing" in Irafpak ?
We are increasing the revenues and net worth of the military industrial complex exponentially.
I agree and we the ordinary people are getting no benefits from that. No doubt the MIC continues to benefit.
Good comment....also, your characterization of the terrorists/players/military/combatants, etal as "gangs" is spot on. The US is engaging in massive gang warfare and the military contractors are just another gang using their own brand of terror to outmaneuver the other gangs. The US military isn't interested in arresting criminals. With all of the murder and mayhem that the US has spread through its warmongering, the US is hardly in a position to bring anyone let alone a criminal to justice. In fact, the US military and their mercenaries ARE THE CRIMINALS.
Thanks distantviews and courtjester. From consumer to work to serving in the military, we're all tied to the MIC. The military can be corrected but mercenaries must be terminated without any trial. I can't trust the current kangaroo court system to hold them accountable.
Around 1980 Seymour Melman published a book, "The Permanent War Economy," that essentially put forward the thesis that the US economy depended almost entirely on military spending and war making. That's over 30 years ago. All the writing was on the wall back then for anyone to see who cared to look and refused to bow and scrape to this goddamn military monolith President Obama worshipfully calls "the greatest fighting force in the world." Now, everyone half-conscious knows it.
It's taken decades for the progressive punditocracy to call attention to this obvious and self-defeating feature of the broken and corrupted American landscape. Real military spending is now over $1 trillion a year. With less than half of that we could have universal health care for all, and a totally revitalized educational system that actually looked as if it cared a damn about teachers and students. We could even modernize our bankrupt and decrepit transportation system and transition toward alternative energy sources, getting us off the oil addiction.
Instead, we have one warmongering administration after another--because the REAL government in this insane country is THE MILITARY. The Pentagon has orders of magnitude more power than Congress or even the Executive, because both have relinquished power to the Pentagon. They embody our top priorities, which include terrorizing our own population into accepting obscene military budgets with empty threats about terrorists lurking around every corner and behind every door. It's not just wasteful, corrupt and inefficient; it's a criminal enterprise. And without it, none of us would even recognize this country. It's what we are. Now, isn't that something to be proud of!
Good post.
Why is the Most Wasteful Government Agency Not Part of the Deficit Discussion?
The short answer (which everybody should know by now) is that our government - despite the rhetoric to the contrary - cares not one wit about waste nor the deficit.
Ephraim,
Exactly right. I read somewhere that daddy Bush was in a state of total shock when the Berlin Wall was torn down. It was like he had experienced a standing catatonic state. He just stared at the TV with an incredulous expression on his face. This bastard was GRIEVING for our lost enemy! No wonder they started the "Arabs are bad" bullshit right after Russia fell apart.
Throughout the 90s they were throwing negative PR at us about how the Arab countries had the "fastest growing populations" and "Islam was the fastest growing religion" (Danger Will Robinson, Danger!).
And then in the last half of the 90s, the avalanche of "Join the National Guard and get paid for a college education!" commercials bombarded us.
These evil bastards plan ahead.
President Eisenhower's warning about the MIC has come true in spades. It's time we all insist on dismantling it!!!!!
We have a President and a bunch of war-mongers in Congress. Obama should be forced to return his "International Peace Prize!" He thoroughly demeans and dishonors it!!!
FrankS, I'm surprised that you're the only person who's mentioned Eisenhower's warning. Because of Ike's conservative credentials, and the fact that he was right on this issue, the conservatives don't have a credible response to his warning. Progressives should take full advantage of that.
This most informative and well written article brings to mind the scene in the 2006 documentary Why We Fight when congress person after congress person would give a speech on the House floor which would attempt to justify why a particular missile or bomber should be built in their particular state.
"Endless money forms the sinews of war."-Cicero [106-43 BC], Roman statesman and philosopher
Hitler, Stalin, Hirohito, Mussolini and Mao headed five totalitarian systems during less than half of the 20th century. Clinically insane, historically psychopathological and legally dead, now. But, the U.S. has had to fight them all directly and through proxies, building up its military, defense and police forces for most of two generations, now.
The U.S. system has become secretly, yet fiercely totalitarian in the face of these challenges, even while slavery, the nearly complete destruction of native American culture, support for Latin American dictators and wars across Asia demonstrate a long history of imperialist violence.
I have been involved in the development of the totalitarian U.S. system we live in, but the press refuses to acknowledge this, including the alternative press. I have been a consultant and architect of the U.S. military-industrial-organized crime complex and it is more grandiose and corrupt than the Eurasian totalitarian systems it has followed. The public is in darkness even with accurate information from articles like David Morris'.
I very strongly believe the U.S. will be attacked by nuclear and biological devices before it even begins to straighten out. I do not think the current good information in this article can generate any remedy whatsoever. But, thanks if it can possibly lead to my own offering of information and analysis, which may generate a remedial process for the U.S. of A. Good people of Common Dreams -- read a startling true story about totalitarian America: It is absolutely free and safe -- http://www.lulu.com/product/file-download/revolution-or-extinction/11772671
marcos,
While I agree with you that the US government is fiercely totalitarian, I don't believe we will be nuked.
The current totalitarian state was built DIRECTLY from the enforced secrecy and the "anything goes for national security" attitude of the Manhattan project. Out of nuclear project secrecy came the excuse to label any damn gross violation of democracy or human rights as top secret, eyes only so the public never knew and the MIC cancer could grow and consume more and more of the national resources.
Wall Street latched on to this cash cow and has taken over. Wall Street is NOT loyal to the USA despite their big US flag on the New York Stock Exchange. They have globalized. The next big thing is resource control by corporations that owe no allegiance to any country (multi-nationals).
Now here in the USA we've got a LOT of land and resources as compared to, say, China. Why would the multi-nationals want to mess up all that land with nukes? No, there is a greater possibility that China gets nuked to reduce world population in a resource poor area (you can still mine for rare earth metals with robots in a depopulated nuclear waste land).
Remember the mindset of these multi-national corporation reptiles is geared to control and PRESERVE resources that can be profited from.
When you see the world as a cash cow to be milked, the Americas and sub-Saharan Africa are NUMERO UNO as areas to avoid nuking. Overpopulated areas like China and India are seen as potential nuclear targets.
I realize this is an insane way to think because you cannot nuke one place on the planet and expect to avoid fallout all over the planet but I really think these multi-national monsters believe their own koolaid about nuclear war being "winnable".
Democratic processes in any country are destroyed by secrecy. In the USA, the atomic bomb development was the reason we lost what little democracy we had. The Manhattan project destroyed democracy in the USA. As long as we still have nukes, we will continue to be a totalitarian militaristic society.
Here's more of my slightly jaundiced, deeply cynical views of the forces behind recent American history.
America does not really exist as a country anymore. Our sons and daughters are being sent overseas to fight and die in wars against nations that pose no threat to our national security. Those wars are being fought for one purpose only: to transfer more and more of our wealth to the already super wealthy multinational corporations and the oligarchs who control them. Instead of strengthening us, these wars are destroying what little remains of our sense of "country" because they leave us with nothing left to build and maintain a nation.
We are also being pillaged internally. No, it is not the way invading armies once pillaged nations. It is much more insidious than that. Every day, more and more of what once constituted our wealth is being stripped from the American people, gobbled up by multinational corporations and transferred into the private accounts of wealthy oligarchs and entire nations that pose as our allies, but see us only as a means of increasing their own standing in the world.
Permanent war is only one of the many ways our nation's wealth is being transferred into the accounts of these multinational corporations and other oligarchs. It is, however, one of the easier ways to pillage a country because it exploits the people's sense of patriotism and uses it as a form of psychological blackmail to demand an ever-greater percentage of a nation's wealth.
Virtually our entire federal government under the two-party system has been functioning as corrupt gatekeepers who, instead of protecting the interests of the American people, have opened up the vaults and made our resources available to these thieves.
There is good reason why Social Security is under attack, and why Obama and his minions, together with the entire Republican Party, are aiding and abetting yet another criminal transfer of our resources. Social Security is where the money that is used to support the American people is still protected--somewhat. Once that vault is completely compromised by our political leaders, it will be quickly stripped of all revenue (indeed, much of this has already happened) and quietly slipped into the accounts of these same multinational corporations, while the nation's infrastructure quite literally falls apart.
Any attempt to direct even a modest percentage of our tax money into domestic needs will be quickly undermined because the whole GOAL IS TO DESTROY THE AMERICAN PEOPLE and render them incapable of standing up to corporate exploitation. An entire lower- and middle-class population, reduced to scrounging through garbage cans for a little something to eat, cannot offer much in the way of resistance to the multinational corporations that control most of the world's wealth.
It would have been much easier to repel an invading army that announced as its intentions the pillaging of America. These new corporate pillagers have completely corrupted our political leaders, the media, and the two major political parties. They are like some insidious virus that gets inside healthy cells and turns them into genetic factories to replicate more and more of themselves.
The only certainty is that if our generation does not act more effectively to expose and repel these corporate pillagers, our children and grandchildren will be reduced to the status of a slave work force with no future--and certainly no reason to live.
OLD GUY: Great post!
MARCOS: Watch you back, friend... the MIC hates whistleblowers as you know.