EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Transcript: Today's Live Q&A With NSA Leaker, Edward Snowden
- 'Tip of the Iceberg': Senators Warn Far More Data May Not Be Safe
- Playing the Obama Bumper Sticker Game
- Intentional and Evil: Court Marshall Sexually Assaults Woman, Then Arrests Her When She Protests
- David Brooks, Tom Friedman, Bill Keller Wish Snowden Had Just Followed Orders
- Transcript: Today's Live Q&A With NSA Leaker, Edward Snowden
- Remembering Satyajit Ray’s Hirok Rajar Deshe: On Edward Snowden, Resistance and Inverted Totalitarianism
- The Terror Con
- Pentagon Bracing for Public Dissent Over Climate and Energy Shocks
- Bank of America Lied to Homeowners and Rewarded Foreclosures, Former Employees Say
Popular content
Today's Top News
US Silences on the Arab Spring are Deafening
Even amidst crackdowns, the Obama administration has hardly said a peep about the need for democracy in Saudi Arabia or the other oil-rich states of the Gulf
The U.S. response to the democratic uprisings sweeping the Middle East and North Africa is as notable for its silence as for its uneven support for the Arab Spring.
It took weeks of incessant protest in Tunisia and Egypt before the Obama administration would say much or do anything to support the protesters in those countries. While Washington intervened in Libya to protect civilians from Muammar Gaddafi's attacks, it's responding to uprisings in Bahrain, Yemen, and Iraq with a particular quiescence. The Obama administration has hardly said a peep about the need for democracy in Saudi Arabia or the other oil-rich states of the Gulf, even as those regimes are cracking down on the small but growing number of democracy activists in their midst.
In recent weeks, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has joined the list of Gulf states that, without eliciting much outrage from the United States, have silenced individuals demanding even modest steps toward democratic reform. The UAE, a federation of emirates including Dubai and Abu Dhabi, has no political parties and never holds free elections. In response to the revolutions in the region, public intellectuals, academics, and political activists in the country have advanced a democracy campaign of their own.
So far, in comparison to the massive street protests in Tunisia, Egypt, Bahrain, and Syria, their activities have been tame, but nonetheless historic. On March 9, the activists published a petition, probably the UAE's first. Signed by 133 citizens, it calls for constitutional and parliamentary reforms, including free and fair elections.
It didn't take long before UAE authorities began to crack down on the nascent democracy movement.
On April 8, a team of security forces and police officers in Dubai arrested one of the movement's most prominent voices, Ahmed Mansour. After several days, he was finally charged with the possession of alcohol. Two days later, the authorities arrested Nasser bin Ghaith, an eminent economics professor, and Fahad Salem al-Shehhy, a prominent blogger. Both participated in the democracy campaign. Two more activists have since been arrested and detained.
The authorities now admit that Mansour's real crime is speaking out against the government. Meanwhile, the government has dissolved the board of directors of the Jurist Association, one of four prominent civil rights organizations calling for direct elections.
Instead of publicly condemning this crackdown, Washington is underscoring its firm alliance with the UAE government. President Barack Obama met with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahayan of Abu Dhabi on April 26 to discuss "strong ties between the United States and the UAE and our common strategic interests in the region." Journalists were barred from the White House encounter, aside from a photo-op. When Secretary of State Hillary Clinton met with UAE Foreign Minister Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed in March, she told reporters that he's her "colleague, counterpart, and friend."
U.S.-UAE chumminess comes as no surprise. The UAE is a central ally in the region, a partner with the Libya military strikes, and a major purchaser of U.S. weapons. In 2009, the UAE was the largest foreign buyer of U.S. military equipment.
It's increasingly a strategic partner for Western non-profit cultural and educational institutions as well. For example, New York University opened its Abu Dhabi campus this past fall and Manhattan's Guggenheim museum is building an outpost off the coast of Abu Dhabi on Saadiyat Island.
Since their inception, these projects have stirred up controversy among artists, academics, and human rights organizations. Their concerns cover a wide span of social and political justice issues, ranging from the status of the migrant laborers who are building and maintaining the lavish extension sites to the protection of artistic and academic freedom for the artists and intellectuals who work there.
Human Rights Watch cited evidence of labor abuses at both the Guggenheim and NYU sites in a 2009 report. Now, NYU and the Guggenheim are refusing to condemn the recent arrests.
States, businesses, museums, and universities have a long history of divorcing the lofty ends that their leaders espouse from the means through which they actually function. In the Gulf states, this stance continues to promote the political and economic interests of "friendly" dictatorships.
With the Arab Spring in full force, it's time for the United States to break the silence.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...




11 Comments so far
Show All. . .Global corporate rule and the American empire are crumbling. It is a shift in global consciousnes, a humger for human dignity and democracy. . The capitalists still rule, but justly so, they are scared to death. These are exciting times.
I wish it were true.
As always actions speak louder than words. In this case there are few words at least, other than the traditional support for mum, apple pie and democracy.
I suppose the actions of support for the mums is a bit off these days too, after all there are legislators who want to throw any woman who seeks an abortion into jail for life. Not to mention that while the conservatives may indeed like the fetus, they have not been in favour of health care or education for the children of those mums the tories claim to revere.
I'm also not sure they support apple pie anymore either. Given the support for the large industrial farms and the lack of support for ensuring that the pies that hit your table are actually safe to eat. Or that the people who pick the apples get enough pay to buy the pies.
Democracy, well this article shows how much the US gov't will back their words with action. It seems that they support 'democracy' when the product of the democracy is support for the corporations of the rich.
Bugger.
If protesters staged a sit-in at the Suez there would have been tomahawks
"While Washington intervened in Libya to protect civilians from Muammar Gaddafi's attacks..."
_______________
I agree with and appreciate the overall thrust of the article, but the word "ostensibly" really needs to be inserted between "Washington and "intervened".
This article assumes that the US government is on the side of democracy in other countries. That was partially true until World War II, but post-WWII it's sadly no longer the case. Lip service to democracy notwithstanding, USA now only pursues its own interests, and is indifferent to the form of government in other countries.
Here are some well-known examples of anti-democracy actions by the US government, perpetrated equally by Democrat and Republican administrations: USA (1) conspired to topple popularly elected leaders, replacing them by despots, e.g., Iran 1953, Indonesia 1965, Chili 1973, Haiti 1991; (2) supported military coup d'etats, e.g., Venezuela 2002, Honduras 2009; (3) opposed the results of popular elections when it didn't like the people who won, e.g., Algeria 1992, Palestine 2007; (4) did not support democratic uprisings where it had befriended despotic rulers, e.g., Yemen 2011, Bahrain 2011.
The Arab people (and any other people) aspiring for democracy would be foolish to count on any help from USA. If anything, they should watch out for US acting to suppress democracy in their countries.
Post WWII, the Carter administration did support human rights, and many of the democratic leaders in South America credit him with saving their lives.
But otherwise, the US has been on the side of tyrants in the global south, especially in the middle east.
"Instead of publicly condemning this crackdown, Washington is underscoring its firm alliance with the UAE government. President Barack Obama met with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahayan of Abu Dhabi on April 26 to discuss "strong ties between the United States and the UAE and our common strategic interests in the region."
it's clear that Oourprez is nothing more than a mafia boss...
The Fact that our leaders are forced to Support Dictators: should not suprise anyone when you think about how much the wealthy, have invested in the Military Industrial Complex and Oil. Money has been worth more than Human Life for a long time. Change will require Sacrifice.
We're very concerned about democracy in Libya.
Gaza? Not so much...
We're very concerned about citizens in Libya.
Gaza? Not so much...
Barack Obama cravenly supports Israeli Apartheid.
Bur Obama has an essentially evil lineage. He is in fact some kind of fiend.
Obama's father was brought to Hawaii by a CIA sponsored educational exchange program and there is a photo of Obama Sr being welcomed to hawaii by Anne Durham's father, who was also likely a CIA asset
Obomber's step father was a killer in the Indonesian Suharto bloodbath.