EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Happy as a Hangman
Innocence, as defined by law, makes us complicit with the crimes of the state. To do nothing, to be judged by the state as an innocent, is to be guilty. It is to sanction, through passivity and obedience, the array of crimes carried out by the state.
To be innocent in America means we passively permit offshore penal colonies where we torture human beings, some of whom are children. To be innocent in America is to acquiesce to the relentless corporate destruction of the ecosystem that sustains the human species. To be innocent in America is to permit the continued theft of hundreds of billions of dollars from the state by Wall Street swindlers and speculators. To be innocent in America is to stand by as insurance and pharmaceutical companies, in the name of profit, condemn ill people, including children, to die. To be innocent in America is refusing to resist wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that are not only illegal under international law but responsible for the murder of hundreds of thousands of people. This is the odd age we live in. Innocence is complicity.
The steady impoverishment and misery inflicted by the corporate state on the working class and increasingly the middle class has a terrible logic. It consolidates corporate centers of power. It weakens us morally and politically. The fraud and violence committed by the corporate state become secondary as we scramble to feed our families, find a job and pay our bills and mortgages. Those who cling to insecure, poorly paid jobs and who struggle with crippling credit card debt, those who are mired in long-term unemployment and who know that huge medical bills would bankrupt them, those who owe more on their houses than they are worth and who fear the future, become frightened and timid. They seek only to survive. They accept the pathetic scraps tossed to them by the corporate elite. The internal and external corporate abuse accelerates as we become every day more pliant.
Our corrupt legal system, perverting the concept that “all men are created equal,” has radically redefined civic society. Citizens, regardless of their status or misfortune, are now treated with the same studied indifference by the state. They have been transformed from citizens to commodities whose worth is determined solely by the market and whose value is measured by their social and economic functions. The rich, therefore, are rewarded by the state with tax cuts because they are rich. It is their function to monopolize wealth and invest. The poor are supposed to be poor. The poor should not be a drain on the resources of the state or the oligarchic elite. Equality, in this new legal paradigm, means we are all treated alike, no matter what our circumstances. This new interpretation of equality, under which the poor are abandoned and the powerful are unchecked, has demolished the system of regulations, legal restraints and services that once protected the underclass from wealthy and corporate predators.
The creation of a permanent, insecure and frightened underclass is the most effective weapon to thwart rebellion and resistance as our economy worsens. Huge pools of unemployed and underemployed blunt labor organizing, since any job, no matter how menial, is zealously coveted. As state and federal social welfare programs, especially in education, are gutted, we create a wider and wider gulf between the resources available to the tiny elite and the deprivation and suffering visited on our permanent underclass. Access to education, for example, is now largely defined by class. The middle class, taking on huge debt, desperately flees to private institutions to make sure their children have a chance to enter the managerial ranks of the corporate elite. And this is the idea. Public education, which, when it functions, gives opportunities to all citizens, hinders a system of corporate neofeudalism. Corporations are advancing, with Barack Obama’s assistance, charter schools and educational services that are stripped down and designed to train classes for their appropriate vocations, which, if you’re poor means a future in the service sector. The eradication of teachers’ unions, under way in states such as New Jersey, is a vital component in the dismantling of public education. Corporations know that good systems of public education are a hindrance to a rigid caste system. In corporate America everyone will be kept in his or her place.
The beating down of workers, exacerbated by the prospect that unemployment benefits will not be renewed for millions of Americans and that public sector unions will soon be broken, has transformed those in the working class from full members of society, able to participate in its debates, the economy and governance, into terrified people in fragmented pools preoccupied with the struggle of private existence. Those who are economically broken usually cease to be concerned with civic virtues. They will, history has demonstrated, serve any system, no matter how evil, and do anything for a salary, job security and the protection of their families.
There will be sectors of the society that, as the situation worsens, attempt to rebel. But the state can rely on a huge number of people who, for work and meager benefits, will transform themselves into willing executioners. The reconfiguration of American society into a corporate oligarchy is conditioning tens of millions not only to passively accept state and corporate crimes, but to actively participate in the mechanisms that ensure their own enslavement.
“Each time society, through unemployment, frustrates the small man in his normal functioning and normal self-respect,” Hannah Arendt wrote in her 1945 essay “Organized Guilt and Universal Responsibility,” “it trains him for that last stage in which he will willingly undertake any function, even that of hangman.”
Organs of state repression do not rely so much on fanatics and sadists as ordinary citizens who are desperate, who need a job, who are willing to obey. Arendt relates a story of a Jew who is released from Buchenwald. The freed Jew encountered, among the SS men who gave him certificates of release, a former schoolmate, whom he did not address but stared at. The SS guard spontaneously explained to his former friend: “You must understand, I have five years of unemployment behind me. They can do anything they want with me.”
Arendt also quotes an interview with a camp official at Majdanek. The camp official concedes that he has assisted in the gassing and burying of people alive. But when he is asked, “Do you know the Russians will hang you?” he bursts into tears. “Why should they? What have I done?” he says.
I can imagine, should the rule of law ever one day be applied to the insurance companies responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands of Americans denied medical care, that there will be the same confused response from insurance executives. What is frightening in collapsing societies is not only the killers, sadists, murderers and psychopaths who rise up out of the moral swamp to take power, but the huge numbers of ordinary people who become complicit in state crimes. I saw this during the war in El Salvador and the war in Bosnia. It is easy to understand a demented enemy. It is puzzling to understand a rational and normal one. True evil, as Goethe understood, is not always palpable. It is “to render invisible another human consciousness.”
Alexander Solzhenitsyn in his book “The Gulag Archipelago” writes about a close friend who served with him in World War II. Solzhenitsyn’s defiance of the Communist regime after the war saw him sent to the Soviet gulags. His friend, loyal to the state, was sent there as an interrogator. Solzhenitsyn was forced to articulate a painful truth. The mass of those who serve systems of terrible oppression and state crime are not evil. They are weak.
“If only there were vile people ... committing evil deeds, and if it were only necessary to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them,” Solzhenitsyn wrote. “But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?”
The expansions of public and private organs of state security, from Homeland Security to the mercenary forces we are building in Iraq and Afghanistan, to the burgeoning internal intelligence organizations, exist because these “ordinary” citizens, many of whom are caring fathers and mothers, husbands and wives, sons and daughters, have confused conformity to the state with innocence. Family values are used, especially by the Christian right, as the exclusive definition of public morality. Politicians, including President Obama, who betray the working class, wage doomed imperial wars, abandon families to home foreclosures and bank repossessions, and refuse to restore habeas corpus, are morally “good” because they are loyal husbands and fathers. Infidelity, instead of corporate murder, becomes in this absurd moral reasoning the highest and most unforgivable offense.
The bureaucrats who maintain these repressive state organs, who prosecute the illegal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan or who maintain corporate structures that perpetuate human suffering, can define themselves as good—as innocent—as long as they are seen as traditional family men and women who are compliant to the laws of the state. And this redefinition of civic engagement permits us to suspend moral judgment and finally common sense. Do your job. Do not ask questions. Do not think. If these bureaucrats were challenged for the crimes they are complicit in committing, including the steady dismantling of the democratic state, they would react with the same disbelief as the camp guard at Majdanek.
Those who serve as functionaries within corporations such as Goldman Sachs or ExxonMobil and carry out crimes ask of their masters that they be exempted from personal responsibility for the acts they commit. They serve corporate structures that kill, but, as Arendt notes, the corporate employee “does not regard himself as a murderer because he has not done it out of inclination but in his professional capacity.” At home the corporate man or woman is meek. He or she has no proclivity to violence, although the corporate systems they serve by day pollute, impoverish, maim and kill.
Those who do not carry out acts of rebellion, no matter how small or seemingly insignificant, are guilty of solidifying and perpetuating these crimes. Those who do not act delude themselves into believing they are innocent. They are not.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


240 Comments so far
Show AllI'd be with you in DC if I could, Mr Hedges (and others), chains and all. I certainly hope there are thousands upon thousands of supporters there with you!
I'll keep doing my own little part fomenting revolution/re-evolution however I can!
May America awaken from the nightmare of Empire.
The notion that a radical is one who hates his country is naive and usually idiotic. He is, more likely, one who likes his country more than the rest of us, and is thus more disturbed than the rest of us when he sees it debauched. He is not a bad citizen turning to crime; he is a good citizen driven to despair.
--H.L. Mencken
When I tell co-workers that their disdain for wikileaks is the same behavior that enabled Hitler to take power and commit atrocities, they accuse me of wanting the terrorists to win.
In response to Hedges' final paragraph, I have noticed a delusion epidemic in America, the most serious afflictions in associates who work in the mainstream media.
I think, as another article here on CD pointed out recently, that the alternatives for most Americans have become too frightening for their mainstream-TV fed brains to handle.
They know the problems go too deep for any mild effort to address, but the necessary efforts, what they entail, frighten the average American on a core level. They can't even face the idea that we may need to do something radical to fix the place where we've found ourselves.
They'd rather sit in place, doing the sames things they've always done, pretending like the water isn't getting hotter and hotter.
Hmmmm, do I smell something cooking?
Quite correct. And one can look at the TSA screening, x-ray, groping operation as a mass conditioning of the US population using the psychological tools of learned helplessness. Experiments by Martin Seligman in the 1960s in which he used dogs in situations where they could not escape painful electric shocks, produced dogs whose will to escape or resist was destroyed such that they would lie down in the metal cages accepting the inevitable pain. Docile and helpless. When one buys an airline ticket today and enters the airport TSA screening area, there is no escape without repercussions. Resistance to the x-ray or groping is subject to a large fine and/or listing or detention as a potential threat. Most permit the highly intrustive/abusive process of x-ray scanning or body groping. Even those citizens not flying know what is happening and thus understand that resistance is futile. Soon the ruling oligarchs will have a passive and obedient population unable to resist any intrusion. Yes we all love Big Brother and will do what Big Brother and his minions want us to do without question.
The complacency and denial (other than on the most superficial and self-indulgent level) is happening mostly with the intellectuals. Let's not project that onto the general public.
Declining conditions drive resistance and lad to rebellion, not enlightenment or bright ideas or sparks. Describing history as a procession of great men with great ideas igniting sparks that lead to change is the ruling class narrative, looking back in retrospect at previous uprisings and whitewashing and neutering them in such a way that they are not available as examples and instruction to people today.
Most working class people well know that something radical will be required, and are not sitting in place, they are struggling to survive, and that struggle to survive is what will transform into mass uprisings, not the musings and speculation of intellectuals.
The alternatives are too frightening to intellectuals - to liberals and progressives. It is here that there is a great fear of revolution. At the local bar after the shift at the iron works ends, there is consensus that "it is going to take a revolution" and also a consensus that this is an ongoing battle between the haves and have-nots, between labor and management, between the working class and the ruling class and not a battle between groups of people with different ideas or beliefs.
It happens to people in all walks of life and with all levels of education, Ray. Indeed, I find that the most highly educated seem to fall for the delusion the most as they are usually the wealthiest and have the most to lose (those on the bottom having already lost most of what they have accumulated).
People don't seem to understand the power of mass psychology and marketing and propaganda. It requires constant awareness and sharpening lest we fall back asleep.
Ted, Chomsky often makes the same point that the highly educated are often the most brainwashed believers in the system because it has served them well.
Well, it makes sense.
I think there is something else going on. I think many middle/lower class folks are also brainwashed because they've bought the lie that we are the richest/most free country in the world. They don't see that we've been sold a pig in a polk and so don't rise up to fight those who have picked our pockets.
Bread and circus does wonders.
You make a good point. Those serving in the various professions, as assistants and technocrats and publicists for the ruling class are the most heavily indoctrinated in the various myths about Americanism.
I hear you Ray, I fear America is too far gone to save. If that is the case, now what?
Who cares about "saving America?" What does that even mean? Our concern is with the working class people, not with some fiction, some myth, some delusion called "America" that is supposedly in need of "saving."
A fair point.
BTW I changed my mind and if you want to contact me (once) send an e-mail to scremingguitar@mailinator.com/
Thinking about it, it was really Vox's comment in that thread that really pissed me off...
Anyway... Back to Hedges.
America is an ideal, with tangible evidence and promise of fulfillment. What we are experiencing now is the test that Lincoln envisioned "whether this nation or any nation so conceived". Mr. Hedges sees the possible and the real, suffering is a cleansing process, the Native American and the Negro have faced these circumstances and endured, the Negro more than the Indian. The 'balm in Gilead' may well be the ideal of Democracy, lest we faint. Within the heart of the innocent doth lie the Spirit. The cup remains half-full.
The way forward may contain violence, yet violence is not a prerequisite to change. Non-violence requires the greater strength masked in patience and willing to endure and perhaps, find comfort in the night.
have you ever wondered why the natives of this continent didn't become the source for slave labor? i'm thinkin' you fail to comprehend the soul of those of peoples now living as a captured sub-culture. those that could not take the jesus path nor cut their hair and yet wear the roach proudly.
The ideals have been used for too long to justify terrible violence and oppression. The ideals themselves flawed, as is the notion that ideals are more important than reality. The Anglo-American ruling class - exploiters, slaver traders and owners, murderers, colonialists and imperialists - have always said "don't look at what we are doing. Look at our bright shiny ideals!" By moving the discussion over into the mystical realm of beliefs and ideals, we are distracted from the objective reality, from the plain truth.
This way surely leads to War and War is insane. There is no victor, we are all diminished. You my friend are the warrior, Noble yes, but there openeth a way and ways and a way, convincing no one, I go on.
How does what I said lead to war?
Ray: I only get into a discussion with others about terrorism by limiting my comments to this: You can have no honest discussion of terrorism without a discussion of the American Empire.
Yes, we are guilty as charged because of our complicity. Also, when I learned of pilotless drones, operated from some boondocks facility in the U.S., bombing the hell out of people half way around the world, I came to the realization we are also insane or, perhaps, evil.
Lingum: Eckert Tolle stated: "The greatest achievement of humanity is not its works of art, science or technology, but the recognition of its own dysfunction, its own madness".
Rebellion can take many effective forms. One will happen tomorrow, December 7th, when (hopefully) hundreds of thousands of people around the world withdraw their money from banks and put it in credit unions or other democratic forms of money holding.
Who amongst us on Common Dreams will join them?
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/11/24-2
Excellent suggestion Ted. By the way, I got back late last evening but I'm still unable to reply to yesterday's thread on Amazon and Paypal. Maybe CD will fix that bug later today and I will reply there. If not, I'll see what I can say here about it. Weird !
Yeah CD seems to have disabled replying to the old items WTF. I was by no means done with the Helen Thomas item for example. They also didn't really upgrade functionality and allow us a way to privatively contact each other, or have a forum about local actions, both *badly* needed here IMO.
Dunno. They haven't removed their message about the upgrade either. It appears as if they're scrambling to get something done.
Oddly, the server that hosts the peace and justice listserv that I administrate was down for almost 5 days. They had a terse message the the spam blocking agency, Spamhaus, had shut outbound messages. Since nothing was going on for a few days with no real info, I checked out Spamhaus. They are in Switzerland and work with law enforcement agencies, including one near and dear to us: the FBI.
Hmmm, I said to myself. How interesting.
Well, we're back up and running, but the server people won't expand on what happened other than a member who owns another list on the server did a no-no. Really? Spamhaus would shut down a server because of what one member is doing?
Hmmmm. Things are getting curious.
Folks, if/when the shit hits the fan in this country, the first thing to go is our communication lines. We had better be prepared to meet and plan with people face to face. Might want to start doing that now. And, of course, there is much we can do on our own. We've talked about that ad infinitum here. Time to act.
Download TOR so you can reach foreign sites with a non U.S. identity and get gpg for encrypted messages while you are at it IMO.
Think like you live in China.
Thanks for the info.
I miss USENET and my ISP joined the others in taking down NNTP. It's terrible.
By the way, to answer the earlier question on Paypal and Amazon, here goes. Paypal used to start out with good intentions and the concept of emailing each other payments looked good. I haven't used it at all since 2005 and took my credit union account source out so there's no way anyone can misuse my account short of somehow guessing my pw. Amazon is a different story because I would use it for getting what I couldn't find locally and it wouldn't be just books but also computer parts to keep my old system working. Amazon has so many ways to lure each and every one of us. I'll bet most young adults in their 20s will find the 99 cent per MP3 feature very attractive. There's also students using Amazon to get their college books at prices 30-50% of what they'd have to pay in college and don't forget that textbook editions usually don't change much in content so there's another advantage there.
I don't use Amazon much but I'm just saying how it has become a more attractive option. We need more independent stores dedicated on what they sell instead of all-rounders. It reminds me of how I built my computer a decade ago and why it's still lasting to this day. An all-in-one anything may be cheap but often outdates itself sooner and performance is always much lower than if a machine were assembled with dedicated parts. It's the same with stores and selling. With some efforts, we might get more independent stores that will even carry more books that were otherwise unthinkable of obtaining short of popping up Amazon or Ebay to find them.
Independent stores can't compete with Amazon because people buy from Amazon. We keep losing independents as long as we take the cheap way out. I've done it myself, but have come to realize the fallacy of "saving a buck" at the online and big box stores. Ultimately, it comes back to hurt us in lost jobs, lost revenues, and the loss of human interaction.
As far as young people: They learn by what their elders do. If we don't make hard decisions, even those that inconvenience or cost us but that are morally correct, our kids don't stand a chance of learning what is right and important. That's just the way it works.
I don't know about local action forums. Adding more forums would require more raw server power and bandwidth. There's already the power of creating one's own blogging site and linking to it from there. I think that this site should stay exclusively a public forum but private contacting features should be doable without compromising privacy or security.
I'm in. Got the accounts opened at the credit union and will be at Wells Fargo at 10 AM to do my part and, with luck, be able to explain in an audible voice for others near me *why* I'm doing what I'm doing. Then I'll endure the confused looks and occasional mockery and go on my way.
Excellent! I'd join you had I not already done that 20 years ago.
I hope many more people do the same.
Maybe Julian Assange did more than open up some secret cables. Maybe he opened up the ire of the people so that they finally, at long last, act.
ok that's nice but after you move your money, what will you do next? or is that enough?
Let's take it one act at a time. Each thing we do that is in concert with our values will spur us on to the next. We don't need to create the solution with one act. Indeed, we can't.
Mines already in a credit Union. Also effective is shopping at food co-ops. Don't patronize Whole Foods which is owned by a Libertarian who wants to slash the social safety net.
Thank you for posting that again, Ted. And I hope you, like me, have emailed it or sent it to as many of your friends as possible to spread the word.
My money has been in a local bank and a credit union since February, when I closed down my Wells Fargo accounts. I hope many many more will do the same.
Already done. Been banking with a community bank now for over a year and very happily so.
Do you think it will occur that the finger will now point in the other direction? Will the "Good Guys" ever recognize their own complicity in evil or see themselves reflected in Arendt's work? Or will exceptionalism override self-knowledge?
{Will the 'Good Guys" ever recognize their own complicity?}
NO - or - hardly ever. I grew up in Germany and after the war asked a lot of questions and found that most people said something like: Oh I only did... (this little thing), etc. So one person hints that someone should be reprimanded or investigated or questioned; someone else signs an order; someone else has a "talk"; someone else gets sent to do a job and another person is dead or disappeared. Everyone just doing their little bit.
I grew up in a very repressive Communist regime. Torture, murder, disappearances, night raids, unjust incarcerations, beatings, injustices everywhere. Initially, everybody had hopes and everybody would whisper "one day, they'll all pay" or "it'll be a bloodbath" - You know what? 51 (almost 52 now) years later, the hardship has been such and it has been so long, so many losses, so much pain, so much suffering and people are so beaten that nobody remembers anymore. People have even lost the desire to hate or take revenge. The people have forgotten. History has taken its course. Sadly, the younger generations don't even know about it. There's just such a sense of general despair with resignation. Such total malaise. People are defeated. Nobody remembers the horrors. Nobody cares anymore.
I'm wondering, would you tell us where you grew up?
"Nobody remembers" is a statement that speaks to our humanity. What young people want to dwell on the horrors of their parents? They have their own lives to live.
What's difficult to take is that the more we scratch on our culture's surface, the more dysfunction we see. And I don't mean the American culture or Communist culture, but the culture of taking and forgetting. This is what our culture does. We don't know respect and we don't know soul. It's all on the material side of the equation and we are starving ourselves.
What is happening in the United States is happening everywhere. Our culture was bound to end this way (not that it's over yet). As the late, great, Chalmers Johnson once said: What is unsustainable will not be sustained.
Tough(er) times are guaranteed ahead. Yet, I can't help but do what I can do. I guess what keeps me getting out of bed in the morning is my hope that what I do now might help build whatever comes after the horrors. So, I pray, and I move my feet.
Hedges has made no changes in the world.
Just spoken a truth to a group of people who already knew it.
Those who need to hear it never will. As Orwell said
"Until the become conscious they will never rebel, and until after they they have rebelled they cannot become conscious."
So, are you going to chain yourself to the Whitehouse fence and be part of the shout to awaken people from their apathy,
Or will you be another one of the apathetic, as your post suggests?
As Orwell said:
"And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed -- if all records told the same tale -- then the lie passed into history and became truth. 'Who controls the past' ran the Party slogan, 'controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.'"
"The simple step of a courageous individual is not to take part in the lie. One word of truth outweighs the world."
--Alexander Solzhenitsyn
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent".
--Thomas Jefferson
.
.
.
Futility is NOT an option.
It would be too expensive for me to travel to DC, so that's a no.
But, since we're quoting here
"If you remain neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor."
I don't remain neutral and I'm not apathetic. I'm local. My friends, my family, my neighbors.
If you want real change, do it locally. Find a group of like-minded people and put into action what you want to see being done.
We have a political system that is top-down. So, unless you're on the top, you have no say in the political process. By going local, we can create a bottom-up political system. Local communities pass laws, or repeal laws, that they find important or disruptive and those laws are passed from local, to city, to regional, to state, then federal.
I think it's funny though, that we praise ourselves for being a democracy but then we walk into work and accept a total dictatorship. People are always trying to change Government, but it's ran by Corporations. If only people ran the corporations, but that would require a democracy.
While there is some preaching to the choir going on, I largely disagree when it comes to Hedges. Unlike some of the of the others who's writings are posted here, that simply do the bidding for democratic party, Hedges speaks truth to power. Its comforting to know he's still here fighting and helping the ones still clinging to the status quo to move forward.
If I could physically join them at The Fence and be arrested, I'd go.
Godspeed to them all that will be there.
There is that other element of God-fearing, patriotic big-hearted humans in mostly western societies who do not believe that their governments or co-patriots or anyone of "their kind" is even capable of doing wrong. They are so convinced of their moral rightness and "God is on our side" thinking that they quite easily become "Good Germans" deliberately and will still wave a flag while the ovens are warming up and "Evil Others" are being killed or persecuted. "It can't happen here", is a very reality denying thought process including here in beloved "Amerika".
This is not to say that there aren't zealots or evil humans elesewhere in the world, but per capita, western societies have killed, conquered and stolen the most using their righteous right to goodness, and converting others through physical strength and religion, believing it is their divine right to do so and their actions are always justified by ridding the world of evil and defending their perceived morality and innocent populations against godless minorities being threatening just by their different beliefs and perceptions about the world. And there are plenty of "people", to use the term loosely, right here in good old USA that are gladly taking advantage of this fact to make "it" happen here.
So I don't believe that it is just the frightened poor and those afraid of losing what they have that support atrocities against others or allow their "powers-that-be" to do whatever they want. It takes a little more than that in a person (less of a "person") to actively ignore and turn one's head away from injustice of all kind regardless of fiscal status. The majority don't know it because the media prevents the showing of it or purposely plays down the significance and numbers in support of the staus quo and as the paid for propaganda arm of those in charge.
Unfortunately, even the most educated and intelligent among us still believes that 9-11 was committed by 19 Arabs with box cutters. I'm specifically speaking of Noam Chomsky, whom I admire greatly. But if intelligent individuals like Chomsky still beleive the government's version, what chance do we generic citizens have to speak truth to power?
I think Mr. Chomsky knows better but, for whatever reason, hasn't made that public. As far as speaking truth to power, the powerful know the truth and use it as a club against the rest of us. It's the "generic citizens" that need to be made aware of truth after all the lies they are force fed by the powerful.
"I think Mr. Chomsky knows better but, for whatever reason, hasn't made that public"
What evidence do you have for thinking this? I prefer to take Chomsky at his word rather than put my own words into his mouth.
I believe Chomsky has stated that it doesn't matter whether the boxcutter tale is true or not, as the net effect is the same. The government utilized the event to tip us over the precipice into fascism.
So, he's simply being rational. The fascists assumed power, which is the situation we must overcome. It makes more sense, to him, to focus his energies on that.
Chomsky is completely sold on the utter corruption of the gov't edifice and the need for its elimination. 300 or so books and many times more articles and speeches tells us so, nearly all of them preceding 9-11.
Cut the man some slack. He still fights the good fight. I personally wish he agreed that 911 was an inside job, but I can see that if he did (or actually does) think so, it wouldn't change his actions one whit.
I saw him answer this question in a video interview, but I do not have the link. I'll google the series of tubes and see if I can track it down. Dude gives a lot of them--
Word Puffin, I also think Chomsky correctly perceives 911 as being a small crime compared to a war of aggression that killed hundreds of thousands of innocents and devastated an entire culture. I think Chomsky's view is sound, focus on the big war crime we *know* happened not the relatively small crime of 911 that people endlessly and IMO distractedly *speculate* about.
I'd add that a focus on 911 reflects the ethnocentrism of considering 3000 dead Americans to somehow be more more important than hundreds of TIMES as many dead Iraqis in a country that of course had nothing to do with 911 in the first place, but was just on the neo-cons war of aggression hit list.
Finally know that 911 "truth" attracts a *lot* of right wingers most of whom are somewhat benign (but wrong about the economy) Libertarians but a number of whom are full on Nazis. I have seen more than "truther" on Face Book start busting out with full on Holocaust denial. :( x 10000000000000000000