EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
Profit-Chasing Guns-for-Hire Are Killing Us in Iraq and Afghanistan
Drunken shootouts and debauchery, meaningless death and mayhem -- the "Wild West" atmosphere created by the Bush Administration's criminal initiation and execution of the Iraq War is the gift that keeps on giving. Thanks in part to the rapacious greed injected into war-fighting by the liberal use of for-profit armed "security" companies, a brutal, unaccountable and unreliable swagger is increasingly the face of the U.S. in conflict zones around the world. The latest Wikileaks dump adds a sickening granularity to what Brave New Films showed in our documentary, Iraq For Sale: the use of private contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan makes a few people very, very rich, but it's making the rest of us -- Americans and local civilians alike -- much less safe.
Summarizing the logs released by Wikileaks, the New York Times on October 25 made it clear that fat cat war junkies like Blackwater/Xe's Erik Prince have sold the American people a toxic bill of goods:
For all the contractors' bravado -- Iraq was packed with beefy men with beards and flak jackets -- and for all the debates about their necessity, it is clear from the documents that the contractors appeared notably ineffective at keeping themselves and the people they were paid to protect from being killed.
In fact, the documents seem to confirm a common observation on the ground during those years in Iraq: far from providing insurance against sudden death, the easily identifiable, surprisingly vulnerable pickup trucks and S.U.V.'s driven by the security companies were magnets for insurgents, militias, disgruntled Iraqis and anyone else in search of a target.
Shorter version: people died, are still dying, because of these Humvee-chasing war tychoons' ineptitude and brutality, and the toll includes their own employees. Worse, even when we know that these Gordon Geeko's of the war industry oversee a machine that's killing and maiming innocent people (including U.S. soldiers!), our governments seem unwilling to do anything about it:
...But whatever the constellation of reasons -- from war-zone jumpiness to outright disregard for civilian lives -- the security companies are cited time after time for shootings that the documents plainly label as unjustified. This has blackened their reputation, even if it has not lessened the military's dependence on them.
...Many of the companies apparently felt no sense of accountability. Contractors with a Romanian company called Danubia Global killed three Iraqis in Falluja in 2006, another report said, then refused to answer questions on the episode, citing a company policy not to provide information to investigators.
Lest you think this is an attitude unique to Romania, remember that the effort to prosecute Blackwater/Xe is collapsing right here in the U.S., and many of the companies cited for the worst abused continue to get paid to provide their brand of "security" in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Some of these gun-wielding mercenaries seem to be doing their best to give the Cowboy gang from Tombstone a run for their money in alcohol-fueled carnage:
...And still more recently, in July 2009, local contractors with the 77th Security Company drove into a neighborhood in the northern city of Erbil and began shooting at random, setting off a firefight with an off-duty police officer and wounding three women, another report said.
'It is assessed that this drunken group of individuals were out having a good time and firing their weapons,' the incident report concluded.
I'm sure the women injured by the bullets didn't have a very good time.
Because the U.S. has utterly failed to reign in the hired guns under their authority in Iraq, the saloon-and-pistols atmosphere has spread unchecked to Afghanistan. Remember Wackenhut? If you don't remember the name, I'm sure you remember the photos of the great job they've done "protecting" the U.S. embassy there:

I'm fed up with being humiliated -- of seeing our troops in combat zones humiliated! -- by the behavior of these unaccountable, brutal mercenary companies. That's why today, I called 202.224.3121 and told my representative that I want them to support the Stop Outsourcing Our Security Act and phase out the use of armed security contractors. I hope you'll do the same.
You can learn more about the danger posed by these war profiteers by watching Brave New Foundation's documentary, Iraq For Sale.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


8 Comments so far
Show All"Contractors." I'm suprised so many have been duped into accepting this sanitized acronym for Mercenaries. Let's call a spade a spade, shall we? After all, letting corporations and government control the dialogue will continue leading us in the direction we are headed.
Absolutely right regarding calling 'a spade a spade.' It is a basic of the classical art of rhetoric that using the opposition's terms is the first significant step towards losing the argument.
If only the killings and occupations were done by "good soldiers." Then "we" would be winning!!
Hello?
So does this guy identify with the blood-soaked Empire when he says "Us?"
Of course nothing good comes of the killing associated with war, even less of a protracted occupation, but sadly, that’s exactly the reality that’s presented to “us” irrespective of our collective feelings about the Empire. I think the point here was that professional soldiers (at least enlisted ones) are accountable to the law. The only thing that even begins to make the situations in Iraq and Afghanistan better is for U.S. forces to begin a phased and continuous drawdown to zero. However, until that becomes a reality, importing pseudo-professional paramilitaries (mercenaries) and other service contractors (war profiteers) only serves to prolong American involvement in these countries. It’s no secret to anyone who’s paying attention that both of these occupations were just perverse business ventures, and had nothing to do with national security. However, allowing these ventures to expand by letting more and more “contractors” carve themselves a slice of the pie will simply cause any hope of a withdrawal to diminish significantly. I agree that killing is killing and dead is dead, regardless of who’s doing it, but we are sort of stuck dealing with the situation as it is, not the situation as we would like it to be. Unaccountable mercenaries just compound an already unacceptable problem.
SPQR
Merely more confirmation of the historical truism, 'Mercenaries are more trouble than they are worth.' Machiavelli strongly warned against their use in "The Prince." Sadly, but not surprisingly, that advice went unheeded by Dubya, Cheney, & Co., and Obama has been too reticent to correct this...and until that happens, we only need wait for more outrages to come to light.
Which seems odd, as they are all obviously big believers in Machiavelli's better known ideas.
Bah! The solution is obvious. When all else fails, recall the Russians.
__
Russia's military could be drawn back into the Afghanistan theatre for the first time since the Red Army was forcibly expelled by US-backed mujahideen fighters in 1989 under plans being discussed by Nato officials. The proposals precede a landmark alliance summit next month, to be attended by the Russian president, Dmitry Medvedev.
The officials said several joint Nato-Russian initiatives on Afghanistan were on the table. They include the contribution of Russian helicopters and crews to train Afghan pilots, possible Russian assistance in training Afghan national security forces, increased co-operation on counter-narcotics and border security, and improved transit and supply routes for Nato forces.
__
REF:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/oct/26/nato-afghanistan-russia-military
A couple of points. First, the most egregious "profit-chasing" here is Robert Greenwald. I count no fewer than 5 advertisements for his products in the article or the bio. Just because he makes documentaries, doesn't mean he isn't in it for the money. A man has to eat...
Second, the controversy over whether mercenaries are a good idea or a bad one is centuries older than Machiavelli. In most historical cases the mercenaries were soldiers of fortune, without loyalty to state, and could bite their masters as often as benefit them. There really is nothing new.