Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Kill Them
Michael Enright, a 21-year-old college student, slashed a NYC cab driver in the face and neck because this man was Muslim. Enright is being held in a psychiatric ward. If he is mad, then the United States is also insane. Enright's assault merely mirrors what we, as a nation, have done for nearly a decade.
The United States has responded criminally and incoherently to what happened on September 11, 2001. Lopped of our twin members, downtown, we also lost our authoritative voice. Two days after that disaster, George Bush grimly declared, "The most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden. It is our number one priority and we will not rest until we find him." Six months later, Bush shrugged, "I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority." Our current president never mentions bin Laden, yet Obama has sent many more troops into Afghanistan. We're not leaving any time soon, that's for sure. Congress has just approved 1.3 billion dollars to expand our military bases there. Our new mission, if Time Magazine is to be believed, is to defend Afghan women against the Taliban, whom we created in the first place, to fight the Soviets. America gets a kick out of these flip flops. We propped up Saddam Hussein, then we had him hanged. We fought Communist Vietnam, then we staged a naval exercise with that same regime, as happened just recently, riling up China. Tension feeds the military industrial complex. Wars are even better.
Responding to 9/11, America also invaded Iraq, a country that had nothing to do with that catastrophe. Since the real reasons for our two current conflicts, access to oil and natural gas, defense of the petrodollar, war profiteering, are never admitted to, many Americans have concluded that we're simply waging war against Islam, which is, frankly, not that far off the mark considering our unequivocal support for Israel whenever it attacks Gaza, Lebanon, Syria or any other Muslim population. The U.S. has also been killing Pakistani civilians and threatening Iran. It's a miracle many Muslims don't hate us more.
Without Israel and oil, it's a safe bet we wouldn't be demonizing Muslims so relentlessly. As is, this stoked hatred is bringing out the worst in our character. On Yahoo! News, many comments on the Enright story don't condemn but applaud his obvious crime, and also bash Islam.
Bruce, "Slay the infidel.....stone the rape victim......beat your wife........mate with your goat.....wipe your bu tt with your bare hand.....AHHH the joys of islam!"
David, "this guy should get a medal and be aloud [sic] to blow up the mosque at the ground zero sight, its [sic] about time someone in ny stepped up and showed some american balls!!!"
Spreading like cancer across the internet, openly hateful and racist comments are especially common after stories about Muslims, blacks or Mexicans, the top three scapegoats at the moment. Obama is a lightning rod for anti-black racism, which is ironic because he does not favor blacks in any way. Like Bush, Clinton and the rest of our bank-bailing-out, paid-for politicians, Obama couldn't care less about the little guys. Eyeing his own wallet and his future after the White House, Obama's here to defend the moneyed interest. His blackness is merely symbolic, but that's enough to enrage the racists.
After Michelle Obama went to Spain, Alternative Right, a webzine with contributions from several established authors, had an article titled, "Michelle's Vacation in Whitey World." Among the comments, one man suggested that she should have gone to a blacker destination, like "Ghana or the Maldives."
One Sheila wrote, "I cringe every time I see a photo of the Sasquatch/Wookie as purportedly "First Lady" of American women. My spouse always comments that she reminds him of a chimp with her underbite, and I am always struck by her enormous feet and trapezius muscles. Either way I feel a sort of cognitive dissonance, such as when I view old photos and see 19th century blacks dressed in Victorian clothing. As far as her amazing European adventure, she is putting herself in white people's faces. Her very presence is a way of announcing the new order."
There's no new order, lady. Obama himself is a head fake! Scratch that skin lightly, and you'll see your beloved Dubya again. Everything is still in place, including the torture chambers. After another article in Alternative Right, a reader lamented, "After 9/11, we saw the lack of a white nation identity. There was abject surrender to Islam." Only the most deluded can call the killing of hundreds of thousands of Muslims, and the occupation of two Islamic countries, an "abject surrender to Islam." Although not all Americans think this way, of course, this man is hardly alone. As the world's biggest source of terror, we're posing as its most helpless victims.
The scapegoating of Muslims, blacks and Mexicans gives the appearance that we're being threatened from without and below, when we're actually being mugged from above, from the inside. It's the entrenched who are killing us, not outsiders. Even with 9/11, too many questions remain. One must remember that Bin Laden began as a CIA asset, and two months before the attack, he was at the American hospital in Dubai, where a CIA agent visited him. On September 10, 2001, bin Laden was at the Army Hospital in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, to receive dialysis treatment. Again, no attempt was made to arrest him. Today, we're also not trying to arrest this man, and that's no conspiracy theory.




168 Comments so far
Show All//Our new mission, if Time Magazine is to be believed, is to defend Afghan women against the Taliban, whom we created in the first place, to fight the Soviets. America gets a kick out these flip flops. We propped up Saddam Hussein, then we had him hung. We fought Communist Vietnam, then we staged a naval exercise with that same regime, as happened just recently, riling up China. Tension feeds the military industrial complex. Wars are even better. //
Compare that with this:
"At this moment, for example, in 1984 (if it was 1984), Oceania was at war with Eurasia and in alliance with Eastasia. In no public or private utterance was it ever admitted that the three powers had at any time been grouped along different lines. Actually, as Winston well knew, it was only four years since Oceania had been at war with Eastasia and in alliance with Eurasia. But that was merely a piece of furtive knowledge which he happened to possess because his memory was not satisfactorily under control. Officially the change of partners had never happened. Oceania was at war with Eurasia: therefore Oceania had always been at war with Eurasia. The enemy of the moment always represented absolute evil, and it followed that any past or future agreement with him was impossible. " (Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell)
"The most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden
As I recall he said the most important thing was to keep shopping,,
That is the real job of the Amerikan sheeple.
Try this reality: Congress approves 400 Million Dollars for the destabilization of Iran, July 2008. Most of the money is to go to a group known as Jundallah. Last month Jundallah claimed responsibility for an attack on an Iranian Mosque that killed 27 people.....Iran was quick to blame the United States and England for the attack.....Hillary Clinton, who was a member of that July 2008 Congress, lied via the press and denied any knowledge....
But, the story goes on....Jundallah is a Taliban Rebel Group in Iran and was once led by Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the guy who confessed, after five years of torture and brainwashing, to planning the attacks of 9/11. (CIA Truth Serums would not have gotten that confession).
So, whether it was Saddam Hussein who was a CIA Asset from 1959, or Osama Bin Laden. The CIA's friends always turn into The Enemy of The United States....Even Lee Harvey Oswald was "An Intelligence Asset" before he was made into a "CIA Patsy".
God, 2,000 Private Companies working for Intelligence Agencies. Over 1.3 Billion Emails being spied on daily by those companies and agencies.
The right wing republican elite have never done their own dirty work,why thats just not Christian, they look for people that are mentally challenged, brain dead, uneducated or have criminal and violent backgrounds to recruit for doing criminal or bad deeds.
As a victim of right wing Christian gang stalking, and having been in situations that came close to major conflicts or fatal accidents because of these zombies, the question should be where does this Michael Enright hang out and with who.
You will get all your answers.
FYI ,, The right wing Christian elite that organize and run community watch gang stalking groups are cruel viscous torture freaks,they wont kill you, but they will do everything they can to push you to suicide or being homeless and destitute.
These people are real scumbags.
When the general American public find out, the hunt for the gang stalking leaders will be relentless.
Somebody posted this on HuffPo a few days ago. Worth posting here, although I know I'm preaching to the choir here, but if anybody here can make it go viral, it would be a good idea:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwgNzi4tNL8
What It Means To Be An American
It's long and worth watching the whole thing.
And here's something that is very sad and scary. It's sad because these youth will gain nothing courtesy of Obama -- and will most likely get worse (if they haven't already). Second, it's damn scary to see kids who believe that they're going to be something because of somebody else instead of their own self worth. I can't remember in my lifetime where I've seen this kind of thing happening with a President candidate or a President of the United States.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onXd8iH3OVQ&feature=related
And then there's this Obama Youth/Hitler Youth comparison -- one of many on the web. From what I can see these are not being put out just by right wingers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdPSqL9_mfM&feature=related
Hi Samalabear,
I watched the 3 videos that you linked to. Your first was interesting. It very strongly made the point that whipping up hatred for the minorities in our communities leads to nowhere good. It pointed out that Germmany's Nazi party did exactly that, and showed how those actions brought misery to everyone. The video, although 50 years old, tied in closely with the current scapegoating of Muslims.
The other two videos that you linked to only showed idolization of Obama. The first, in military style by chubby black teenage males, the second in Sunday school style by mixed race seven year olds. This idolization did not victimize anyone. That is important. It wasnt spreading hate, and although foolish, was harmless and hopeless. I really dont see the cult of Obama going anywhere, especially since he isn't going to change a damn thing.
The general thrust of those last two videos and the accompanying comments was to compare this idolization of Obama to the German idolization of Hitler in the build up to the second world war. But really, the hopeless idolization of Obama was/is not enough to create a plausible Obama_is_Hitler scare.
"The corporate media will do everything it can to incite the redneck white working class. Its the classic strategy mastered by Hitler in his climb to power. First, give the people enemies to hate. Second, give them enemies who are visible, have darker skin and are relatively powerless"
Overall, I agree with your post. I just don't see why Americans always want to bring Hitler in as a sort of reference point for evil. I think it would be more accurate to say; "It's the classic strategy mastered by the English to maintain their power and dominance." If you read up on what people like Hitler, Goebbels and Goering had to say about Imperialism and propaganda I think you will find they acknowledged the Anglo-Americans as the masters to be imitated in these fields.
If it makes you feel better to throw your ink pot at the Devil, go ahead. It just seems silly for Americans to continuously pat themselves on the back for being less brutal and racist then the Nazis (at least lately, or, um, openly, well...in the movies anyways!) while taking great pride in being far more successful at militarily and economically dominating the planet then Hitler could have ever dreamed of being.
"If you're not idealistic when you're young, you don't have a heart. If you're not nihilistic when you're old, you don't have a brain." - Sydlitz
Most people do not bring up comparisons of Nazi's. The one's that do don't know much about them at all in reality. Its mostly sound bites.
SYDLITZ: Good points. I've noticed that this dynamic functions as one of history's leit-motifs. As I related in a post yesterday, due to the conceit that the past is now gone, it's easier for plot-lines to recur. Today's citizens don't recognize the same dynamics merely because the era's costumes and names have altered. All the better for those inducements that depend upon elaborate tributes to smoke and mirrors.
RED WRITE: That's the script and plot-line in a nutshell. I see the same dynamics you do.
Pulease!!-- the elite do not laugh their asses off. They do chuckle from time to time however, over tea or a martini.
Thanks. A Kristalnacht is in the making.
The first paragraph is a devastating analysis and should be on every newspaper front page across the country.
I love Dinh's writing. This is not a long article. It's right to point, cuts through any kind of BS and gives such a stark clear picture of where we're at in regards to Obama. And, of course, it is very bad. For so many of us who don't like Obama -- or Michelle "I-don't-have-time-for-the-Congo" Obama (this was one of the last straws for me regarding this lady) -- this has nothing to do with race. It has to do with the facts of what these two are about and, also, perceptions. Not having a crystal ball I don't know for sure what would happen if we had an all-white version of the Obamas in WH and the same garbage was going on. People weren't too happy with Dubya, though. If a white First Lady took a lavish trip to Spain how would we feel at this point I would feel the same anger and resentment. I would not mind these people having the time of their life in the WH with all their lavish parties, movie nights and all the other baloney that is going on, and the vacations IF ANYTHING WAS BEING DONE FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
Thanks to the hate mongers, if you don't like Barack and Michelle Obama you are automatically racist. And that, my friends, I think was also part of the plan all along.
"eye on the wallet," yep, that's all you need to know about these two.
Obama's stance on Muslims -- support the mosque over here and murder them over there. I'm just not impressed.
I am a HUGE fan of concise writing. Make your point and get out. I realize sometimes an article needs to be long because of complicated issues, but many times the authors just blather on when the really don't need to.
Samalabear
Well said! Hate mongers come in all colors and of all political persuasions.
Was GWB a fool and doing the wrong thing because he was white? From the South? Ivy league educated? is Barack Obama a fool and doing the wrong thing because he is black? From the North? Ivy league educated?
Only the weak minded attribute actions and motives based on this criteria.
Again, thanks for speaking up about the Obama's general behavior during a depression.
Bush was born and raised in Conn.
No that was Bush I. W was born and raised in TX (to our shame) and has been wearing that redneck authenticity badge his whole worthless life.
Nope, Bush 2 was also born in Connecticut but he did grow up in Texas.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W_Bush
He was raised most of the time in Texas but it wasn't Texas that fully made him who he became.
Samalabear wrote:
".....I love Dinh's writing. This is not a long article. It's right to (the) point, cuts through any kind of BS....."
***
I agree! And my other immediate response to Linh Dinh's succinct, extremely well written pieces is that he is so clearly an exceptionally mature and compassionate human being. In other words, an excellent role model.
Someone really needs to proofread this piece. It is embarrassing in the number of mistakes it contains:
not loped--lopped
not authorative--authoritative. (or perhaps another word altogether)
misused commas everywhere
people are hanged, not hung (though some are quite well hung!)
"Like Bush, Clinton and the rest of our bank bailing out, paid for politicians, Obama..."--so many things wrong here, it might be better to start over.
Linh Dinh may not be a native speaker of English. That is fine--I like to hear voices influenced by other cultures. But he should hand his work over to someone who can identify and correct the mistakes. Hell--I am a native speaker and I do that for material that will be read by the general public.
'lopped', 'hanged', and 'authoritative' are all used in the second paragraph.
As for the commas, you are exaggerating.
Now, not earlier.
Did you get the message?
Do you value language used well?
It was an excellent article, though it should have been proofed. I have a friend who proof reads for a living. She is short of work since the crash and subsequent depression. Maybe I can get the two together.
George,
I don't want to push the correctness issue too far. The most important thing is the idea, not grammar or spelling--and Linh Dinh deserves to be cut some slack when it comes to style. I have studied Chinese for many years, but my written Chinese would be like a child's.
I have to admit when I see something like "definately not", the idea under consideration comes under greater scrutiny. If the writer doesn't know how to spell something simple or ignores spelling check, then that person's thinking might be slipshod in a similar way. You don't have to be perfect, but--damn it--you should care enough to get most things right.
drosera: I couldn't agree more, and have noted the same thing here about 8,000 times, usually to howls of derision and ridicule. One of the more recurrent misuses, not really a misspelling, is confusing "then" and "than," which is done persistently of late. Why, I have no idea. It's like a virus that's taken hold. "Definately" is another I've noted many times, along with about 50 others. Not to even wander into the minefield of apostrophes and commas. Only a few seem to understand how they're used, and most will rip your head off if you point out their errors.
As an aging sufferer of dyslexia, I feel for those who have a hard time with the language, for whatever reason. I used to spend much of my time correcting inverted letters and looking up misspelt words in dictionaries. But now, with spelling correct and all the other computer aids, it's a lot simpler to proof oneself. But the idea IS the important thing. There are even a lot of people who have had terrible public educations who have a lot to say.
No nearly as much as the message.
My apologies to all for the typos and "hung," simply a grammatical error. I was up till 3AM typing this out, slept for 4 hours, then was out of the house by 8AM to catch a 3 hour bus to Washington DC. I wanted to see the Tea Party rally first hand. Granted, that's no excuse for sloppy proof reading, which is exactly what my wife said before she left the house for her less-than-minimum-wage job this morning. Forgive me for slipping in these personal details, if only to provide some context. If schmucks like me feel compelled to contribute to a forum such as this, it's because the main stream, "professional" media distract and confuse more than they inform. Last year, I wrote two articles for the New York Times. Unlike Common Dreams, they do pay, and, yes, they also proof. They proof so well, in fact, that they edit out whatever they feel like. A piece like the above would have no chance. OK, enough of this figleafing over "hung." I'll hang in there!
LINH: I love your writing, and apart from the 3 hours of sleep part, you can also blame "Retrograde Mercury." More typos prove the rule at these times, even in a respected (by some) paper like The New York Times.
Thanks for seeing things for what they are, and having the wit and writing style to impart your vision to others... especially those who notice little at all.
Hi Linh Dinh, I've always liked your perspective on the things you write about. I know those who read and post here on CD do not have to agree on everything, and this insistence on perfect grammar and spelling is one area where I completely disagree with some of the other folks - so much so that I feel like the odd man out at a party. The grammar and spelling rules of the English language are highly arbitrary, and so insisting on some "perfection" does not make sense to me at all - as long as we understand what the other guy is saying. I understand that the objection is over "proof reading", but even then I think it should be a non-issue - because, technically, even the "correct" spelling or grammar or pronunciation is somewhat arbitrary and not consistent at all - clearly a result of the history of the language itself. It's a quirk of history that made this a global language and it's even more of a quirk that people care so much about its correct usage, even more than voting right, eating right and living right. Anyway, let me also take this opportunity to thank you for the work you are doing.
interesting that it takes a vietnamese immigrant to this geopolitical entity called the usa to write so concisely on the way it is here...
I think you may have something there.
Mr. Lind does write concisely and insightfully about the way it is here, but so do many American writers, including, I am sure, many of those who post comments on this site.
With the mass of printed material I go over each day. I tend to speed-read and not worry about every word of grammar, and the placement on each comma and period. If I did I'd cut my information gathering in half.
Thats all I do with the internet, gather information, and opinions. to parphrase one of my favorate Gene Rodenberry characters. "Dammit Jim; I'm a network anayalist not a prof-reader!"
>^^<
P.S. "He's still dead Jim!"
IT is so obvious from outside the USA, that 9/11 was an inside job, used to provide cover for the USA acting as Israel's muscle in the ME. Hell, even the Jewish businessman that owned the buildings made a billion on the deal.
The first sign that you are near the truth is when the establishment starts to call you a conspiracy nut.
Through the simple use of Occam's Razor, and a brief look at the bloody imperialist history of the USA, confirms that this MUST be the case..
Consider this: Israel is a suburb of the United States. The leaders of Israel, it's ruling class, belong to the American Oligarchy.
Please don't be confused by names and labels. Israel should be considered an American State. Without the United States, Israel would or could not exist.
As for the 'conspiracy theory' of 9/11: ever hear of Murder in the Cathedral? If the ruling power wants something, it will be done. Bush and his cronies wanted to invade Iraq. They had wanted it for years. 9/11 was done and very convenient for them it was too. Bush senior didn't have a good enough excuse, but Bush Jr. was given one on a silver platter. It doesn't matter one whit if the Bush administration was directly involved in 9/11 or not. The results were the same.
A most rational and just world military domination.
A twisted plot of airline terrorist attack,
with well prepared demolition and betrayal of trust,
The twin towers collapsed down as a pancake stack,
Followed by a nearby block, all into concrete dust.
Al Queda was the villain so very easily named,
The chief miscreant was found at a Taliban location
Rather than legal extradition with evidence claimed,
The US launched war to occupy yet another nation.
Playing for keeps was always the chosen plan
A massive carpet bombing was followed by invasion,
even if this failed to capture the culprit or his gang.
the armed forces next task was long term occupation,
This destitute place that grows the poppy flower
with tribes and religion, a crowded land and hard.
The Taliban are not easily destroyed by corrupt power,
but withdrew in strategem, to the mountains guard.
The expensive forces of the empire and its agents
battalions equipped with high technology, every military tool,
continues the war by killing both civilians and insurgents
but only just manages to keep a corrupt government in Kabul
Stage two of the master plan was brought into play
Saddam Hussein of Iraq, opposed the will of the empire.
His people and forces were weakened by siege every day,
of a decade of sanctions and bombing that made their lives dire.
The land of Iraq, much wrecked by war, was falsely accused,
of being packed with invisible weapons of destruction.
So against the United Nations final vote that refused
The empire geared up for a final knock out production.
The worlds most dangerous threat did immediately succumb,
the shock and awe was far overdone, and it broke apart a nation.
Religion and race fought each other and many did themselves entomb.
Millions more have fled the insurgent religious infestation.
So now the two former countries are sort of pacified, but only just.
They have the worlds largest military bases, to grimly enforce,
that hopes of freedom of its subject peoples are now totally bust.
and their puppets of power should hand over every resource.
So there is no imminent danger yet that the oil empire will fall,
Just to be sure there is plan Stage three still lying in the works.
The nation of Iran, broken free of empire yoke, plays to stall,
as beneath its deserts much of the world oil wealth still lurks.
Again a weapons and sanctions ploy is trotted out and abused
Every single move that Iran makes, and every word it says,
by the oil and blood thirsty world, is of deception accused,
since the empire knows well that deceit really pays.
The most obscene amount of wealth by military power still leads
is bent on killing for oil to comfort the end of its days.
On keeping the military at enormous strength it always succeeds,
To the detriment of all the other possible tasks and ways.
On spending more on technologies to harvest the eternal sun,
instead of burning coal and the very last of the cheap oil,
They would rather put in your childrens faces a bomb or a gun.
A right to consume and kill over your right in horror to recoil.
Good writing!
That was excellent. Thank you!
Well, You have to give Obama credit for bringing the nation together - nearly everyone can agree that they despise the man! The only people who still seem to like him are a certain class of bourgeois liberals who cling to the belief that having a token negro in the White House, by itself, represents real progress - even if he does nothing to help minorities and the working class.
Take my dear father and myself as an example. He is a traditional Archie Bunker style bigot and racist. I have become something of a radical, sort of a anarcho-primitivist Waspophobe. We have terrible fights over political and historical topics, yet we can both agree that we don't like Obama, my father because of the color of his skin, myself for the man inside!
"If you're not idealistic when you're young, you don't have a heart. If you're not nihilistic when you're old, you don't have a brain." - Sydlitz
I have the same fights with both of my parents, my dad's a gas station owner who got rich off exploiting and under-paying his employees for 20 years. Not only do I despise the fact that the product that he sells is poisoning the Earth but also the legalized slavery going on in the business. Two years ago the cameras caught a former employee holding up the convenience store at gunpoint (he had worked there for over 4 years) and a shot was fired. Thankfully no one got hurt.
I try explaining to my parents that crime and terrorism are direct result of social and economic injustice, of greedy business owners like him up to the CEO of GE. But he blames it on "ingrate punks" like me, people who refuse to do what they're told, work for $6 an hour, make him richer while starving to death and accept the rules of the game with our heads down.
I'm almost sure 9/11 was an inside job a la Reichstag Fire, but even if it wasn't, the attacks were a direct result of the US foreign policy of invading, bombing and exploiting defenseless nations for pure capitalist profit. The real culprits, like my dad, will never admit their guilt, let alone learn the lesson.
DELIA: Thank you for sharing this info. It's interesting.
Would you agree with me that the times are ripe for a new media incarnation of "All In The Family?" Sometimes humor is the only way to drive home points that would otherwise shock for their sheer enlightenment value.
I think a sit-com that featured a "Red state/blue state" divided household could bring forth the relevant issues of our day. Under such a scenario, the Glenn Beck types would be FORCED to hear the other side; and progressives might gain more empathy for fellow citizens and WHY they don't get it. In fact I'd base the family in California and entitle it, "Not My Fault-line!"
Many of us in the forum have friends, spouses, family members who still don't "get it," and it makes me wonder if the Divine Order set it up this way to make sure that light is present to do what it can to pierce the din cast over our land. What we're otherwise seeing is increasing identification with specific "camps," just as the nation's financial and actual infrastructure breaks down. That's an explosive combination.
"Not My Fault line" would make a good show.
"Would you agree with me that the times are ripe for a new media incarnation of "All In The Family?"
–(Sioux Rose)
Sioux,
Please forgive in advance our pedantry here. A quick take here on this projected sit com.
It would default, not to comedy but to the macabre, perhaps conflated with "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre." Even sadism and horror, in the post modern incarnation, has a component of entertainment to it. Many would even say it is conducive to humor.
The point being: One should be careful what one wishes for.
Media studies mavens and assorted academics who have studied these things are no longer so sanguine that such 'entertainments,' even if they could be created, which is highly unlikely, would be remotely funny. The theoretical tendency now is that converting the fascist mindset to 'entertainment,' serves more to trivialize fascism, to the point it is not taken seriously, and subsequently made acceptable.
This is also the revisionist view of entertainments from which the 'Archie Bunker' paradigm is the most salient example. It original TV show neutered a critique of American fascism, by attempting to humanize it through humor; it created space for the 'apolitical.' Liberals and other political 'innocents' flocked to it, not ever understanding how fundamentally reactionary it was.
In other words, sanctioning what is unconscionable by streaming it through the prism of 'entertainment' is a prescription for mitigation.
The point of fascism is not to laugh at, or with it, but to destroy it.
We might also add that the problem with 'progressives' is not that they lack 'empathy' for the other side, but they believe such empathy is even possible, when it is not.
When progressives understand that there should be no empathy, 'zero tolerance' for fascism, (something that the right wing understands all too clearly about progressives!) only at that point will a serious politics begin to fructify. Right wing politics in America are deadly serious as the article in question clearly enumerates; there is nothing equally serious about progressive politics.
It was never a 'laughing matter,' then or now.
I'm sure no one would get it, we have gone from being concerened with ideas to being concerned over feelings. If it was only a few of the entertainments I wouldn't be too worried, but every offering today it seems is about feelings, with a cut rate band to play over the half-assed dioluge just to make sure you get the feeling.
I love the old shows All in the Family, and Mash. try to show it today and you get no ratings. Everybody knows old white men are stupid, and why would we fight in Korea? it's not like there are Muslims there.
>^^<
VASHKAR: Thank you for holding up the mirror rather gently. You are right. I was schooled in the idea that good writing/film could make a difference. Now the time line for engendering that difference grows narrower by the hour.
When "All In The Family" aired, the world had its wars, its corrupt politicians, and its greedy captains of industry; but the dovetailing of all of these trends has precipitated a convergence that's effectively led society to the edge of the abyss. No longer does the luxury of comedy wait to hold up the mirror that would make us see ourselves all the clearer.
As the paradigm shifts under and through us, I'm sure I'm not alone in questioning what role it is that I am now intended to play? To the extent each of us gravitates towards that which holds meaning (while also seeking to serve an altruistic ideal), how can those drives be actualized in a phase where so much is coming asunder?
Just today learning that the floods in Pakistan are considered a worse environmental disaster than either the quake in Haiti or the tsunami that hit the shores of Thailand blew my mind. It's like "Disaster Relief" is becoming the new norm... lest humanity turn away from war/weapons and learn to move towards peace. (I posted the words of Yogananda on this very subject on 3 prior occasions.)
To the astrologer, we have come to the end of the Age of Pisces. Based on Jesus, as fisher of men, its highest ideal is that of compassion. Few things summon compassion more than personal suffering, and each day it becomes more clear to me that there's a whole lot of suffering going on.
When we see the ferocious misfits like Glenn Beck and his followers turn their personal challenges & difficulties into an excuse to hate others, we note that even this great impetus to turn humanity closer to compassion (to invoke the Greater Love) can become upended.
Pisces, where two fish swim in opposing directions, clearly portrays the great dichotomies that human beings live by, and sometimes must choose between. Scott Peck alluded to this (as did Robert Frost) in "The Road Less Traveled By."
It is is time to choose the path to compassion over that of war & contention; and in that regard, the Buddhists have been way ahead of the curve, diligently holding the higher understanding for centuries.
By the way, I would love to send you something. Your opinion matters to me. So if you have the time or inclination, feel free to email me. Astrologo77 at yahoo dot com.
Your posted insights are always powerful and profound. I love your humor, too!
Sioux, i hope you read this. Oh, i will send you a note!
Empathy precedes compassion as you most assuredly know. And neither one can be legislated. I run into many people who simply do not have that those attributes. Sure, the potential is there. However, it is an evolutionary journey to arrive 'there'.
Some are born with it and others are not. A whole other discourse, i know. But what i do know very well, is that to tell people to just 'be compassionate' is not going to change anything. It is like telling someone, "quit being depressed - just change your attitude". If someone could empathize and truly care, they would already be doing it. There is surely enough going on out there to invoke those sensibilities.
I think part of the problem is that religions turned compassion, which has true depth and connection with the Self and the Other, into being 'nice' and giving money to charities. I call it the 'Yellow Ribbon' or Hallmark version or sentimentalism. In fact, i have watched this happen over the past ten years at least. It is connected to political correctness in certain ways.
Unfortunately, organized Christianity doesn't give a process for 'getting there'. And they don't even know where 'there' IS.
I just felt like sharing these thoughts with you.
rita