EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Everything Is Rigged: The Biggest Price-Fixing Scandal Ever
- Study: Monsanto's Roundup Herbicide Linked to Cancer, Autism, Parkinson's
- Picture of the Week
- 'The Gilded Age' Statistics Corporations Don't Want Workers, or Anyone, to See
- As Death Toll Rises Beyond 500, Garment Factory Disaster 'Worst in World History'
- Study: Monsanto's Roundup Herbicide Linked to Cancer, Autism, Parkinson's
- Everything Is Rigged: The Biggest Price-Fixing Scandal Ever
- Report: Toxic Chemicals Found in Thousands of Children's Products
- The Life and Death of Words, People, and Even Nature
- You and Your Family Are Guinea Pigs for the Chemical Corporations
Popular content
Today's Top News
Why the Attacks in India Should Surprise Nobody
Most Americans were shocked to learn that coordinated terrorist attacks struck the heart of Mumbai, India's commercial capital on Wednesday evening. After all, India is not Iraq or Afghanistan or even Pakistan. According to pundits such as Thomas Friedman of the New York Times, India is a shining capitalist success story and the next global superpower. In the pro-globalization narrative, India's eager-beaver working class has benefited greatly from neoliberal economic policies. Intellectuals extol India as the world's largest democracy and an example for the rest of the developing world to follow. Today, India is a popular tourist destination for everyone from backpackers on spiritual voyages to white-collar executives on business meetings.
Americans are largely shielded from the shocking reality of India. According to the World Bank's own estimates on poverty, almost half of all Indians live below the new international poverty line of $1.25 (PPP) per day.[1] The World Bank further estimates that 33% of the global poor now reside in India. [2] Moreover, India also has 828 million people, or 75.6% of the population living below $2 a day, compared to 72.2% for Sub-Saharan Africa.[3] A quarter of the nation's population earns less than the government-specified poverty threshold of $0.40/day. Someone should tell the starving masses who have remained largely marginalized and subjugated that India is a "success story" because that's not reflected in most Indian's lives. Income inequality in India, as measured by the Gini coefficient, is increasing at a disturbingly destabilizing rate.[4] In addition, India has a higher rate of malnutrition among children under the age of three than any other country in the world (46% in year 2007).[5],[6] India is possibly the world's largest democracy by some definitions; however, as Mahatma Gandhi, once asked, "What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans, and the homeless, whether the mad destruction is wrought under the name of totalitarianism or the holy name of liberty and democracy?"
Pundits such as Friedman play golf with the global elite and then pontificate on perceived economic trends. In Friedman's book, The World is Flat, he suggests that "Indians should celebrate Y2K as its second independence day." Yet, by some estimates, the high-tech sector employs just 0.2 percent of India's one billion people. Americans are largely unaware of the violent, systemic poverty plaguing India because the country is reduced to a caricature where everyone fielding Americans' inquiries in call centers is prospering. Having lived in India for four years and visited the country every other year, I am painfully aware of the reality on the ground. India is a country where children are forcefully amputated by beggar-masters and sent to elicit money; where poor women sell their bodies to truck drivers and contract HIV at alarming rates; and, where American tourists nonchalantly spend enough money in one day to support a hungry family for months.
The recent attacks in India are morally repugnant, but the debate on how to curb terrorism needs to consider why people engage in such desperate acts in the first place. The perpetrators of yesterday's violence targeted two of Mumbai's most luxurious hotels: Taj Mahal and the Oberioi Trident. One night at either of these hotels costs, on average, Rupees 17,500 (US $ 355) in a country where the annual salary is Rupees 29,069 (US $590).[7] The death of over a hundred people on Wednesday should deeply upset the world, but it should also lead us to question the death of the 18 million people who die annually from the systemic violence of endemic poverty.[8] As Yale professor Thomas Pogge notes, the affects of poverty are felt exponentially more in certain parts of our "unflat" world: "If the developed Western countries had their proportional shares of [gratuitous] deaths, severe poverty would kill some 3,500 Britons and 16,500 Americans per week."[9]
Mahan Abedin, an insurgency analyst, told Al Jazeera after Wednesday nights attacks: "We have seen an increase in recent years in indigenous Indian Muslim organizations beginning to take a violent stance towards the Indian state and sections of the Indian society, particularly the commercial elite of places like Mumbai, in order to highlight, they would say, the sheer inequality of life in India."[10] Abedin continued, "there is a middle class of around 100 million who live very well but 800 million-plus people live in miserable conditions." Even people who commit heinous acts of violence occasionally make a valid point. The latest attacks should not evoke a knee-jerk effort to ratchet up the so-called Global War on Terror but, instead, make us question how to avoid such attacks in the future. By showing genuine concern for the plight of the millions of people who are at risk of death from poverty and by honoring the sanctity of the lives of the most destitute, we have the best chance of defeating the ideologies of hate.[11]
[1] http://timesofindia.
[2] http://www.thehindu.com/2008/
[3] http://economictimes.
[4] http://www.legco.gov.hk/yr04-
[5] http://siteresources.
[6] http://www.timesonline.co.uk/
[7] http://www.hindu.com/2007/02/
[8] Thomas Pogge, World Poverty and Human Rights p. 99
[9] Pogge, Thomas W. World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms . Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 2002 p. 98
[10] http://english.aljazeera.net/
[11] Jeffrey D. Sachs "Net Gains." New York Times. April 29, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

125 Comments so far
Show AllThe population of the planet increases at three people per second.
There will never be economic justice for everyone since there is no qualifier for what is a need and what is a luxury.
The only solution is to stop breeding more people.
The more people, the more wealth concentrates, the less to go around, the more nature kills.
Jihadists are trying to tell us something and it's not "they hate us for our freedom".
Spain listened and attacks stopped.
Why don't we listen?
How can we justify the deaths of millions in WOTs and WODs in the name of "not negotiating with terrorists" or "not sending the wrong message".
You ever notice when the economy tanks, both U.S. and world economy, violence goes way up. After the 1929 stock market crash, folks like Bonnie and Clyde, John Dillinger, Baby Face Nelson and the Ma Barker Gang were all over the media
at that time. As far as the violence in India, MSM is trying to say it's terrorists. I think it's just a really, really pissed off bunch of "po folk" who
have had quite enough.
Yes!!
We've ALL had "enough", and it's way past time to send a message that it is not only the uberwealthy that count. AIG's CEOs, the banks, Wall St., they are partying, while many of the rest of us are, literally, starving.
We have the means- spread the wealth around!
Do we have the will?
Doubt it. The attack shows all the hallmarks of Al Qaeda.
Bullshit
You mean the "po folk" such as the Deccan Mujahideen who have claimed responsibility for the attack? The "po folk" who are standing up for the poor by demanding the release of the poverty stricket Mujahideen in prison? Those "po folk" who stood up for the poor by targeting the outreach center of another religion?
Standing up for the poor doesn't mean being a bloody terrorist. These terrorist groups deserve to be condemned and given swift punishment !
You don't have any sense of sarcasm and irony do you? Or do you have a problem with reading comprehension?
I see you're the loser who can't read or comprehend but instead relies on bad versions of Islam to "defend" the terrorists and screw the poor in the Muslim community but keep being an Islamofascist and keep dragging good Muslims down the toilet.
"As far as the violence in India, MSM is trying to say it's terrorists. I think it's just a really, really pissed off bunch of "po folk" who"
Really ? Maybe you should visit India to see what "po folk" really means. Attempting to cast this terror attack in terms of 'class' does not cut it. While socio-economic injustice is fuel for any number of revolutions, these attacks had more to do with perceived injustices to a religious minority (marginilization of muslims). They are terrorists, as there is no other way to characterize them or justify their actions. Terror is a very effective weapon but too often ends up hurting innocents. Do you really believe the 9-11 terrorists were a pissed off bunch of 'po folks' ?
Bullshit
"marginilization of muslims" ? And you're just "fine" with marginalization of non-Muslims elsewhere? You need to take off your Islamofascist goggles and pay attention to reality.
"And you're just "fine" with marginalization of non-Muslims elsewhere?"
How did you just assume that ? Pull your head out of whatever 'dark region' youve shoved it into.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/kashmir.htm
Tell me the population percentage of non-Muslims in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Besides, you know that the Muslim extremists went out of their way to purge and murder the non-Muslims in Kashmir and Pakistan. No wonder those two regions are severely povertized. Those two regions need to allow for diversity if the people ever want to recover because those Islamofascist terrorists and militants are crushing their own Muslims who are dumb enough to support them to begin with. And you call yourself a "liberal" or a "progressive" by saying it's ok for Islamofascists to crush their own people and terrorize and murder people who aren't "Muslim" enough ? You're pathetic !
We do not know who was behind those terror attacks. We should not make any assumptions. We should find out. And when we find out, the reaction should be to handle any trials and punishments in a peaceful and legal manner.
Let's not be stampeded again.
Joe
Good article!
I would add- that the corporate news media spin of about this terrorist attack is, once again, whipping the U.S. people into a frenzy of fear, and is helping to hype support for (in the final days of GWBush) the GWOT.
There HAD to be some kind of terrorism event before Georgie left office, right?
The newsmedia are finding it convenient (the attacks are oh-so-usefully timed to the holiday season) to get the American people stirred up just enough to comfort themselves with second helpings of pumpkin pie, topped by a credit-card busting therapuetic shopping spree on Black Friday.
Valuing American lives over any others is such a strong theme in the news it can be difficult to remember not only the dire poverty in most of India (and other nations), but the fact that our military is killing Iraqis on a daily basis, when
only American deaths are ever mentioned and mourned.
The attacks that just took place in India are sickening.
We wonder how Obama will respond.
Is this what was meant (forget who said it) by the warning "he will be tested"?
Diplomacy, an end to extreme income disparities and support for social justice for ALL the world's people is the only effective response.
Let's hope Obama is up to it.
Yes, right. No Indian civilians were killed in these attack. Just the Evil Americans.
If Americans lives were valued over any others, WTF is this even being reported in the American news media?
Well finally you're waking up. Thanks for giving the Indian civilians a look. And I thought your brain was corn-fed for a minute !
a very comprehensive and truthful article...........
Our planet can not sustain the current reproduction rates.
This president has waged war against family planning and the environment since his first day in office, when he essentially halted our international aid to these essential programs.
Bush’s contribution to over population, as well as his other enviromental crimes, have already caused immeasurable suffering & environmental damage to our planet. Until effective family planning programs can proceed without blockages from such irrational zealots guided by religious right radicals, starvation and environmental degradation from overpopulation can only worsen.
Good comment.
The Root Cause of Terrorism is Overpopulation
from: The Public Report of the Vice President's Task Force on Combatting Terrorism
Arguably the most authoritative work on terrorism was the February 1986 Report of the Vice President's Task Force on Combatting Terrorism, chaired by Vice President George Bush, Sr. Yet no mention of the study has appeared in the press since September 11, 2001. On that day, the George Bush Library archivist, Melissa Walker, pulled it from her files in anticipation of interest by the media. But not until October 29th did she receive her first request. It was from CRPS. This report concludes that the root cause of terrorism is overpopulation. This determination the Vatican no doubt finds highly offensive since all of the solutions to the population problem undermine papal authority. This report appears in its entirety. Download 782 Kb PDF file
http://www.population-security.org/issue_a.htm
dogwood
Thank you Deena.
I disagree with the premise of this article. As usual, many well-intentioned people on the left try to make a case that there is a strong connection between poverty and terrorism. To them, it is a rather simple cause(poverty) and effect(terrorism) relationship. When it comes to dealing with Islamic terror, the connection is a rather weak one at best. The 9/11 hijackers were mostly middle class, educated Muslims. The London train bombings and other Islamic terrorist acts in the U.K were committed by middle class Muslims. Even the bombings in Spain, and terrorist acts in Russia show virtually no connection to poverty, but do show a connection to radical Islam and centuries of religious and/or ethnic conflicts. There is nothing wrong with bringing attention to poverty, and trying to do something about it, but trying to connect it to issues that have little to do with it is disingenuous. In trying to understand the motives of terrorists, this "it's due to poverty" interpretation misses the mark, in my opinion. Examine various other recent terrorist acts committed by Muslim extremists, and you will notice that poverty almost always has little to do with them. As for crime in general, the crime statistics do not suggest a significant rise in violent crime in most industrialized countries during economic hard times(Depression era U.S for instance comes to mind).
I'm not saying that poverty isn't a serious problem, or has nothing to do with terrorism. It's just that assuming, often erroneously that extreme poverty breeds terrorism misses so many other more important factors. There have even been studies demonstrating that college graduates in Muslim countries are more likely to commit terrorist acts than poorly educated Muslims. Even the terrorist groups who claim responsibility for these atrocious acts usually don't say they are acting on behalf of the world's downtrodden, for the most part; it is an extremist, unquestioning religious faith that makes them act psychotic(and the U.S of course helped arm and finance this so long as they were fighting communists). Even if Islamic terror organizations do claim they are motivated by a desire to fight capitalism on behalf of the world's poor, this is at best a secondary reason; they do this perhaps to make themselves appear more virtuous, and is meant to win the support of much of the world's poor in their war against the west. I see little reason to believe they actually care about the poor, Muslim or not. In some parts of the world Muslims may even have legitimate grievances, and are entitled to self-defense, but this does not justify their wanton murder of civilians. If these terrorist acts were primarily economically motivated, why aren't the terrorists Hindus or both Hindus and Muslims? Indian socialists and communists who engage in violence or terrorism seem to use different tactics than Islamic terrorists, and usually make much less news than Islamic terrorists since they are much quieter.
That said, I do not support the War on Terror and hope that Obama will pull U.S forces out of Iraq. I hope there is no war with Iran, and I also hope there will soon be an independent Palestine. While I disagree with much of the left, the neoconservatives use their own set of lies and distortions to get people to support their war-mongering("they hate our freedom" and other nonsense). The neoconservatives are much more dangerous.
I totally agree with you. The naxalites (maoists) use different tactics altogether.
Thank you peaceistruth for your rational and thoughtful comment.
The truth is the Muslim community can stand up to the terrorists giving Muslims a bad name but all too often, they REFUSE which is why they're suffering the consequences. Much as I hate it, these good people need to show some spine or be prepared to suffer more of the same.
Youre idiocy knows no bounds. You are basically condemning a 125 Million Muslims because of the action of a few. What about the Hindu extremists who have committed crimes that are as horrifying as these attacks ? Are Hindus standing up to them ?
don't forget the americans!!
It's not just idiocy, it's bigoted idiocy, and she's been spouting it all over the place.
And all you've been spouting is mere name-calling without justification. Either learn to make a point or shut up.
You refuse to acknowledge the fault of the Muslims and so you desperately try to divert the discussion by showing your very own hatred for other religious groups that have nothing to do with this mess. If you had even studied history and current events and not been a terrorist "defender", you would have realized that there are very few Hindu extremists you keep making a big deal of. And most of these so-called "Hindu extremists" were either financed by evangelical groups or some chose to be vigilantes. Besides, it's not Hindus or Christians or even non-religious people doing all the terrorism but the extremists in the Muslim community that are doing it. And since Hindus have suffered and lost enough to the Muslim dictators at this point despite their very own generosity just like the Native Americans being murdered and robbed of their own lands by the settlers, I say let them stand up and defend themselves. If you have a problem with that, go train your Muslim brothers and sisters to stand up to the extremists in the Muslim community giving Muslims a bad rap. Call me whatever you want but I'm proud to be an atheist.
You are not an atheist. You are a right-wing, hindutva, bigoted prick. Everybody can recognize you and youre kind ... we have similar types here in our own country ... right-wing christian fundamentalists and zionist pigs.
While the entire world focuses on islamic fundamentalism with justifiable reason, too often the causes of this very fundamentalism is steeped in our own bigotry like what you exhibit.
Muslims at large are not at fault, neither are Hindus or Christians or Jews or any other religion you choose to pick. You're attempt to smear the entire community for the actions of a few smacks of intolerance and bigotry.
She's a fundamentalist atheist. It's a strain of extreme atheism that is has become very popular among certain circles.
If she lived 500 years ago, she probably would be burning books, and even people, in the name of her religion.
Maybe so, or possibly she may have been burned at the stake from another just as fundamentalist group just as certain of their "rightness."
The problem sems to be human nature which desires inclusion even when that may mean exclusion of others - and in the extreme, eradication of others.
I used to believe in the basic "goodness" of humankind, but now I'm not so certain.
I used to be a Christian but having been the victim of religious abuse, I switched to atheism and haven't gone back and I'm proud of it ! Thanks for understanding.
P.S.: I'll give the Muslims a break when they can prove to us all that they'll take down their bad apples first and quit blaming non-Muslims alone for their suffering.
Excuse me but which country do you live in, Egypt? Egypt is a pure Islamofascist nation that engages in the worst of human rights abuses and yet you blindly condone them simply because they're Islamofascist. And your bullshit on claiming that I'm a hindutva is completely laughable because you refuse to understand other religions whereas I actually took the time to understand them all. You need to remove your Islamofascist goggles and seriously improve your comprehension and critical thinking skills. By the way, why isn't Egypt helping those poor Palestinians who are being targeted by Israel?
Youre very embrace of the term islamofascist speaks volumes about your lack of knowledge or comprehension. You assuming im egyptian shows us what a complete moron you are.
Excuse me but if you even bothered to compare the spelling of your own user name and the name Egyptian, you wouldn't be making a fool of yourself. You're the one who refuses to take off your Islamofascist goggles and thinks it's ok for Muslims to be terrorists. What country do you live in anyway?
Here's something gyptian does not want America to know:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/kashmir.htm
A true liberal would not accept Islamofascists as "friends" and would give Christians, Hindus, Jews, non-religious, non-sectarians the same chance Muslims are given.
Seriously, put your idiocy to rest. You sound like you have multiple buzzing sounds in your head which accounts for all the assumptions you are making. So according to you im an islamofascist whatever that means, i love muslim terrorists and im egyptian. Oh and i wear goggles. If you have anything other than regurgitated bile to offer please spit it out. You are a bigoted fundamentalist who plain refuses to see it in yourself.
WOW ! I didn't know that lefties such as yourself could show such hatred towards others. I'd expect this shit from the righties. You know that Pakistan harbours terrorists and yet you refuse to hold them accountable. Have you even tried living there? My wife's brother has and he later moved to India but couldn't move back to Pakistan, not that he cared to after the religious hostility in Pakistan against peace loving Christians. At least in India, you're free to be what you want whereas in Pakistan, it's worse than a police state.
Jason Jordan
Sandpoint, Idaho
My hatred is directed to bigots and fundamentalists of all stripes wether Pakistani, Indian, American or whatever. You should read all my posts before you follow that other blowhard and vomit all over the board.
Blowhard? You can't handle the truth can you? At least SPG lived in Pakistan to make his case whereas you shut ramble like a typical foam at the mouth republican.
heh, heh, heh ... so now im a republican !! Is that the best youve got ? You really do hate being called out dont you ... it must be hard being a right-wing bigot. Youre hate speech needs to be banned. Period.
"Youre hate speech needs to be banned. Period."
Speak for yourself loser. You're the one doing all the hate speech. If you don't like it here, then leave the country.
Actually asswipe i like it where i am. How do you even know where im at ? Assumptions anyone ? You are a bigot and you know it. All your comments place you squarely in the realm of the rightwing, fundamentalist Hindus and Christians.
You and DCBeltway1, the same person, are no less of a bigot than you accuse me of. You don't even know the Christians and Hindus given your Islamofascist attitude. You're the asswipe who needs a tough spanking.
What Hindu community in which country is suffering and has "lost enough" to Muslim dictators?
Pakistan, Kashmir, Afghanistan, Bangladeh. You won't find anyone other than Muslims.