Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Noam Chomsky Denied Entry into Israel
Left-wing linguist, who was scheduled to speak at Bir Zeit University, told by Israeli inspectors at Allenby Bridge that a reason for the refusal would be sent to the American embassy.
Professor Noam Chomsky, an American linguist and left-wing activist, was denied entry into Israel on Sunday, for reasons that were not immediately clear.
US linguist, philosopher and political activist Noam Chomsky, pictured in March 2010, is among US actors and liberal intellectuals who joined a list to be published Friday accusing President Barack Obama of allowing human rights violations and war crimes. (AFP/DDP/File/Sascha Schuermann) Chomsky, who was scheduled to deliver a lecture at Bir Zeit University near Jerusalem, told the Right to Enter activist group by telephone that inspectors had stamped the words "denied entry" onto his passport when he tried to cross from Jordan over Allenby Bridge.
When he asked an Israeli inspector why he had not received permission, he was told that an explanation would be sent in writing to the American embassy.
Chomsky arrived at the Allenby Bridge at around 1:30 in the afternoon and was taken for questioning, before being released back to Amman at 4:30 P.M.
Interior Ministry spokeswoman Sabine Haddad said Chomsky was turned away for various reasons but declined to elaborate. The ministry was looking into allowing him to enter only the West Bank, said Haddad.
In a telephone interview with Channel 10, Chomsky said the interrogators had told him he had written things that the Israeli government did not like.
"I suggested [the interrogator try to] find any government in the world that likes anything I say," he said.
Chomsky is a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and is considered among the foremost academics in the world. He identifies with the radical left and is often critical of both Israeli and American policies.



140 Comments so far
Show AllAt least they didn't hand him over to Shin Bet for a few days of "detention".
Who knows what will happen when he tries to get back into the 'homeland'?
Look on the bright side. Israel hasn't decided to bulldoze Chomsky's house or shut off his water, power, food, and medical supplies, or build a wall around Lexington, MA.
Yet.
They should go ahead and try. I'm sure they would have no trouble from the United States government.
Is anyone surprised.
I`m sure Mr. Chomsky isn`t.
There is no room in Israel for advocates of democracy. Far form being someone who represents the `far Left`, Chomsky represents basic democracy, is against racism in any shape or form, is anti-corporate when corporate interests trump the public interest and has the highest respect for human rights. I guess in contemporary America he might be viewed as a radical leftist by teabaggers and corporate lackies, but in reality Chomsky is a spokesperson for average people around the world who feel that a handful of powerful elites have highjacked their governments, airwaves, resources and freedoms all in the name of the mighty dollar.
Keep in mind that people who questioned the Third Reich`s decision to dispose of the Jews or Stalin`s decision to send 20 million of its citizens to Siberian labour camps, were quickly labelled as radicals, unpatriotic and enemies of the State. Some things never change.
I do wish that Israel would stop billing itself as one of the best and true democracies in the world. Ditto the United States.
Glad it wasn't worse, Noam, and that you weren't held for more serious interrogation on some pretext or other. Now you are on your way home to that other great democracy ... uh, oh.
/cm
++++++++++++++++++++++++
There is no heartbeat on earth that is somehow not our own.
Israel is a crime against humanity.
But let us give love and honor to Noam !
Israel USA are one nation and as they limit who may
speak to you and what you may know, like the mind of
child that we mold and control, they are,
“Babylon, land of deepest shadow and deep darkness,
where even light is like darkness.”
I would like to see a letter of complaint/action alert drafted by academic freedom groups to Secretary of State Clinton. A formal complaint by the United States government should be demanded.
(People, I know it doesn't DO anything to write letters, but it is important to hold people to their alleged principles.)
Please don't wish that Hillary or OBomber be held to their principles. Then we'd be flushed down the toilet even faster!
Only people that possess principles can be held to them; that eliminates Clinton and Obama.
This article describes yet another technique that Israel uses to silence it's critics. This article is ripe for Megaphone Desktop type commentators (see below), so I'll post my usual response below.
Apologists' tactics in regards to the US/Israel policy of ethnic cleansing of Palestinians:
1 – Attack the messenger (CD poster or whoever criticizes the US/Israel's ethnic cleansing)
2 – If the critic is a Jew, call the Jew anti-semetic or a self-hating Jew
3 – Make it sound like Israel is the victim although Israel is the aggressor and occupier
4 – Quantify attacks by Palestinians and quantify Israeli dead and wounded while, not quantifying Israeli attacks on Palestinians nor mention Palestinian dead and wounded.
5 – Justify all Israeli attacks as justifiable retaliations while calling all Palestinian attacks unprovoked although the West Bank is illegally occupied and Gaza is illegally blockaded (act of war) and regularly subject to invasions and air-raids..
6 – Point to other injustices in the world to deflect attention of Israel's illegal acts.
7 – State that Jews and Palestinians have a long history of conflict therefore the situation is unresolvable (ignoring Israel's illegal occupation) in order to maintain status quo and further Israel's expansion of illegal settlements
8 – Claim Israel has biblical rights to Palestinian land (thus God supports the ethnic cleansing)
9 – Claim the occupied territory was either no man's land or another countries land to justify Israel's illegal confiscation of the land and the people on it.
10 – Defend the occupation and ethnic cleansing without mentioning the illegal acts: land confiscation, house demolitions and evictions, burning and razing of Palestinian farmland, illegal land annexations, specific apartheid policies in the West Bank, shooting and arrests of non-violent demonstrators on occupied land, restriction of movement, land and sea blockade, restrictions of imports of medicine, food, school supplies and building materials, illegal shooting of Gazan farmers and fishermen...
11 – Make so many illegitimate arguments or use so many inaccurate/misleading facts to justify Israel's illegal occupation and ethnic cleansing policy that it is impossible to respond to them all because every time you try, another illegitimate argument is made. (The Bush administration was a master of this in the buildup to the Iraq war. It seemed every week, another piece of unsupported evidence was made to support attacking Iraq. And every time you challenged one illegitimate argument, the arguer (usually a Fox News viewer) would abandon that argument and jump to the next illegitimate argument and this would continue to the point of exhaustion.)
12 – Rewrite history with your comments.
13 – Switch between tactics 1-12 above in your non-stop argument whenever one of the tactics runs out of steam.
14 – In regards to blogging, create discussion fights and go off topic.
15 – In regards to blogging, apologist is either ignorant or feigns ignorance and attempts to attack the credibility of the comment by asking for a link to the source (effort to waste time of blogger when information is readily available on the internet and the apologist doesn't provide support for his own misinformation). If you don't respond, e.g., because you don't monitor the site all day, apologist discounts your argument, and if you respond, the apologist changes the subject, makes a new attack, or ignores the response.
Apologists use tools such as Megaphone Desktop (www.giyus.org) to alert themselves when articles about Israel's destructive policies appear on the internet so they can use tactics like the above to try and win public opinion.
" In regards to blogging ... "
I go onto rabid web sites to present what I believe are more rational arguments - not in any hope of converting the paid shills and brain-dead, but to give the casual reader an alternative point of view to consider.
It is always a help when there are others doing the same thing and reinforcing reality. Join us. Don't think of it as a waste of time, but as a way to try to reduce the effectiveness of the shills.
Well summed up. Worth the read-through.
Dear progressive 101, thank you for articulating so well the art of deception by the world's biggest terorists. Peace.
Edip
Interestingly, NC's denial of entry is reported by Haaretz, not say, al Jazeera. I'm surprised that they would find Chomsky a threat. Israel is getting pretty paranoid. How much longer will Amira Hass have a job? Has their facade of "democracy" crumbled so much that they can't hide the police state lurking behind it?
Let's not interfere with Israel's sovereignty by externally defining who can and cannot cross their borders. Every country deserves this same respect.
Also, a democracy doesn't mean a porous border. It merely directs how laws are defined. The US isn't a democracy. It's a democratic republic, which is MUCH different.
So if your definition of democracy "does not mean a porous border", I don't think it wise to limit freedom of speech to a false definition of "porous borders" defining what democracy is not.
Everybody knows that a republic at best is a representative democracy, not a democratic ideal where everyone has equal say on matters.
Sounds like the latest defense of Israel's criminal Ethnic Cleansing and now Intellectual Cleansing.
Chomsky is just too good for them at this point.
Ha-ha.
What complete nonsense. First Israel gives all jews a right to return to Isrel, but apparently only if they are not critical of Isreal.
Second, we have every right to criticize this decision. That's called freedom of speech.
Third, the West Bank is not Israel and is illegally occupied by Israel; so, Isreal has no right to stop Chomsky from entering there.
Fourth, if Israel refuses to allow entry for Chomsky the world has a right to know why. Sovereignty doesn't mean immunity from criticism.
Fifth, the US should end all aid to Israel until it ends its illegal occupations. There si no good reason for another dollar to go to this Apartrheid state.
It's not a democratic republic either. Obviously, you don't even know what the words mean, let alone the elementary rules of logical relationships between and among them?
We are not a 'democratic republic' - that's a reich-wing talking point (started recently), so they can get 'republic' in there. We are a 'representative democracy'. Period.
Once again, the reich-wing are clueless, lying turds. Wikipedia has the reference:
"Other titles commonly used by Marxist-Leninist states are Democratic Republic (e.g. the German Democratic Republic or the Democratic Federal Yugoslavia between 1943 and 1946), and "Socialist Republic" (e.g. the Socialist Republic of Vietnam)."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_republic
A "democratic" republic would be one in which representatives of the PEOPLE govern for the best interests of the people. We most emphatically do NOT have that here.
We have a CORPORATOCRATIC republic in which representatives of corporations govern for the corporate interests and for their own continuing re-election.
As the bumper sticker tells us: "We don't have a democracy. We have an auction."
and it's going...going...
Denial of Professor Chomsky's entry to Israel is outrageous. Could Israel be morphing into an anti-democratic theocratic state?
No, Israel couldn't "be morphing into an anti-democratic theocratic state". It's been that for many years. The current development is called "metastasis".
Bring America Back !!!!
****Yes, these are our same little Zion sisters to whom
Sec/State Hillary Clinton pledged unwavering fielty just last week, to show AIPAC that the USA really was not insulted just because Vice Prez Joe Biden became angered during his recent visit to Israel.
****yes, these are the same Darlings of Benjamin Netanahu,
who visiting our Prez Obama 2 weeks ago, gained Obama's
promise that the US is Israel's Number One Supporter.
****Who of us may even presume that Chomsky was blackballed
by his own Nation==under the table==esp if he was going to
discuss 'GAZA' at the University. You see in the Obama
Administration the Genocide at Gaza is a non-mentionable.
Not one whisper of protest vs. Zion for the slaughter of
1500 Gazans--including 300 to 400 innocent children.
****Barak's silence on Gaza implicates the US as child killers, esp since the US Army Corps of Engineers were
co-trainors of the Israeli Defense Force that carried out
the Gazan Genocides.
During the Obama Inaugural Balls, the Attendees were dancing
on the fresh graves of 300 poor, dead Gazan Children !
**So who would want to disrupt an occaison such as that ???
****Remember GAZA< NORM, and please write about this
latest incident you experienced, and about Zion's attitude
and treatment of its own educational Universities.
Truthknoller,
This is why I maintain that "studies" showing little genetic variation between eastern europeans claiming to be more sementic than the real Semites: Palestinians are invalid. Those studies were all done by labs in Israel (one in Germany by dual citizens).
A University in a country which won't permit visiting professors to collaborate with it's faculty and student body is not credible.
Noam Chomsky is a distinguished Socialist-Libertarian who advocates citizen rights. To bar him is to discredit Israel. As John Wayne corrected: "You mean Palestine, don't you?" The place is now a police state by any other name.
TJ
["I suggested [the interrogator try to] find any government in the world that likes anything I say," {Chomsky} said.]
I would die a happy man if such words were honestly written on my tombstone.
I think it's long past time that people stopped refering to Israel as a 'democracy'. Elections don't make a democracy, as the Soviets proved long ago. Israel has long had minority parliaments, yet the arabs who get elected to the parliament are never considered for a position in any government. Moreover, not all of the people who are or were born in the land Israel controls are able to vote.
Elections don't make a democracy, as the United States has proven time and again.
Here is an excerpt of Noam describing his experiences as a twenty-something on a Israeli kibbutz--hailed as some kind of libertarian+communitarian haven by many writers in the Fifties:
...I did have a lot of interest in the kibbutz and I liked it very much when I was there. But there were things I didn't like, too. In particular, the ideological conformity was appalling. I don't know if I could have survived long in that environment because I was very strongly opposed to the Leninist ideology, as well as the general conformism, and uneasy -- less so than I should have been -- about the the exclusiveness and the racist institutional setting.
What I did not then face honestly was the fairly obvious fact that these are Jewish institutions and are so because of legal and administrative structures and practice. So, for example, I doubt if there's an Arab in any kibbutz, and there hardly could be, because of the land laws and the role the institution plays in the Israeli system. In fact, even the Oriental Jews, some of whom were marginally at the kibbutz or in the immigrant town nearby, were treated rather shabbily, with a good deal of contempt and fear. I also visited some Arab villages, and learned some unpleasant things, which I've never seen in print, about the military administration to which Arab citizens were subjected.
Being banned in Israel is like being banned in Boston; it's a real badge of courage
Chomsky was sympathetic to Israel not long after it was formed and even went there to explore the possibility of permanently moving there. This was just 5 years after expulsion of the Palestinians when US relations with Israel were rather tepid. He left not long after because of the "racist institutional" nature of the society he found there:
http://www.chomsky.info/books/reader01.htm
The interesting thing is that others like Jeff Blankfort, who also went to Israel as a young Jewish man expecting to find a decent, democratic society but was repelled by what he saw, criticize Chomsky for still treating the subject of Israeli lobby power with kid gloves:
http://www.electricpolitics.com/podcast/2010/04/whither_the_israel_lobby.html
I will check the link, but haven't noticed this about Chomsky.
Also. Even if it is true. I'll let it slide and say that what he's done in his 80+ years makes up for it.
I met him about four years ago at a lecture. I found i was alone with him, suddenly, in a hallway. It took me by surprise.
I put my hand on his shoulder and said, "Thank you for being on the planet at this time". That's what spontaneously came out. And he laughed and thanked me for being here too.
rita
I think he went to Israel not expecting to find a rational, just 'state' but to explore the anarcho-syndicalist aspects of the kibbutzim. It also helped that he was jewish, in a sense, and had a history with far left 'zionism' (profoundly different from today's zionism.) And there are many places where he describes his horror at seeing the ruins of Palestinian villages which had recently been demolished, not to mention the constant armed patrols the members of the collective participated in.
Anyone who thinks Chomsky has treated the Israel lobby with "kid golves" cannot be taken seriously. Chomsky, as a younger man, did work on a kibbutz in Israel. Over time, Chomsky became critical of Israel's abuses toward Palistinians and its anti-democratic policies. This recent incident is indicative of how Chomsky's ideas are still considered dangerous to the world's imperial/military powers. If you wish to fixate on Chomsky's hopeful attitude toward Israel as a younger man as if that somehow invalidates the body of work he's done in opposition to its policies, then you cannot be taken seriouly.
noam chomsky, german export dominance, and the israeli atomic bomb are the three things that the mainstream media dare not discuss. tea partiers and right wing hate mongers can command media coverage every day, but the mainstream media dare not speak chomsky's name, for fear of giving his ideas the coverage that might make a policy difference, the failures of capitalism and militarism having provided fertile ground for his ideas to take root, were they reasonably publicized. similarly obscured is the fact that germany, which features high wages and universal healthcare coverage, is the world's leading exporter, even after spending hundreds of billions of marks to integrate its eastern and western economies. this contrast, embarassing to the u.s., must be suppressed. and, we have all heard barbara walters and the o'bomber failing to acknowledge israel's status as a nuclear weapon's superpower. most people know far more about the balloon boy than any of the three topics i just briefly broached.
And what was Chomsky actually expecting to accomplish by visiting the 4th Reich?
To let Israel know that the Jewish Revolt is happening.
Shalom
I will second that, Jim!
rita
Thank You.
He can do that without setting foot in that abominable entity.
"Professor Noam Chomsky, an American linguist and left-wing activist, was denied entry into Israel on Sunday, for reasons that were not immediately clear."
Funny. Very funny. LOL funny.
One of the world's preeminent jews denied entry into the "democratic" jewish state, for having been critical of it. Nice.
No way could Israel condemn itself more efficiently in three hours than through this quick little act.
Hilarious how self-undermining the apartheidists in Israel are. Israel just can't be taken seriously any more, even on the most basic levels. Their apartheid keeps them apart, for sure.
I really look forward to Chomsky's writing on this. Pretty bad move by Israel. Intelligent it is not.
Though how the OECD could let Israel into the organization recently, is a mystery that speaks ill of the OECD too.
What an outrage! I'm beginning to sympathize with Ahmadinejad.
Our own government barred Doctor Tariq Ramadan, a European scholar of Islam who had been given a tenured position as well as a home by the University of Notre Dame. His children and wife were already there setting up house.
Shakespeare wrote: security is mortal's chiefest enemy.
This is a nice, little, propaganda stunt. More DECEIT designed to reinforce your belief that Chomsky isn't keeping the gate.
Mr. Chomsky should count himself lucky that the border guards did not borrow a bulldozer and murder him the way that the government did to Rachel Corrie.
A further irony is that "Rachel" in Herbrew means "lamb."
Israeli government, you are such a disappointment; you are murdering lambs and trying to stiffle free speech with government duct tape.
Oh yes, and what does "Israel" translate into.." He who strives with God." I'm sorry, but that's actually funny. You need to look over that 10 commandment stuff again; it's not working for you.
stardust,
Just for the sake of accuracy, and actually, in my own opinion an even more poignant irony regarding the name Israel. It is "struggles" or "wrestles" with God".
peace
.....modern israel is more about
golden calves than ten commandments.
He's lucky they didn't do a rectal probe to determine if he were carrying drugs. One of the border military's favorite toys is humiliation.
Few care and the few that do no longer count for much, for now.