Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Coping in a World of 'Peak Water'
UNITED NATIONS - As more than 20,000 people meet in Istanbul for a major week-long conference on future management of the world's water supplies, women's groups are working to ensure that policy decisions about this critical natural resource take their concerns into account.
Women carry buckets of water in Bissau March 6, 2009. (REUTERS/Luc Gnago/GUINEA-BISSAU) About a billion people currently lack safe drinking water, and another two and a half billion have no access to sanitation.
Experts note that women and girls carry the burden of the water crisis since they bear more household responsibilities, such as hygiene, cooking, gathering water, and taking care of children and the sick.
Those tasks expose them to many risks, like contamination by water-related diseases and violence in conflict zones, and often prevent them from going to school or having a job.
According to the U.N. children's agency UNICEF, in developing countries women and girls walk an average of six kilometers a day carrying 20 liters of water.
"When we use water faster than it is naturally recharged, it is not sustainable," said Peter Gleick, director of the Pacific Institute, a nonpartisan research organization based in California.
Unlike oil, water is not a non-renewable resource. However, it is limited by its location and flow. Many experts say the world has now reached "peak water" - meaning that available resources are eclipsed by massive, and growing, demand.
"In a few years, [the problem] will be exacerbated by climate change," Tracy Rackez, an expert on environmental issues at the U.N. Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM), told IPS. "We need to find ways to make women and men have equal access to clean water."
She added that women also tend to be more responsible for growing food for household consumption and local markets - in some areas they are 70 percent of small farmers - and play a critical role in improving water-use efficiency, especially with drip irrigation and rain catches.
"There are a lot of innovations and numerous tools that have to be in the hands of women to help them to be more efficient," she said.
In addition to the waste and inefficiency of current water use models - particularly in the agricultural sector, where 40 percent of production comes from non-renewable resources - they also have dramatic environmental impacts.
For example, rapid population growth and industrialization in China has caused 80 percent of wetland plants to dry up and driven species to extinction. Chinese water quality has severely decreased because of industrial waste and untreated contaminated sewage aquifers.
This excessive use of water also has economic repercussions - companies and industries have had to cancel projects and close ventures because they could not find the water quality that they needed.
"For developing countries, it is extremely important that they look forward in their economic and social development to the recognition of what level of renewable water resources they have available within the national boundaries and that they seek to optimize their use in all sectors - and in particular in agriculture," Andrew Hudson, head of the Water Governance Program at the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), told IPS.
Expanding on existing solutions like drip irrigation and recycling water requires advanced technology, smart economics and better governance in water management. "There is no doubt we can grow more food with less water," Gleick said.
In fact, water efficiency programs could also cut greenhouse gas emissions by saving energy, as 80 percent of the world's water is used to produce food and industrial products.
However, few governments prioritize water and even less sanitation, so these issues get neglected, Hudson said.
At the same time, access to clean water is internationally recognised as a human right, implying a responsibility for governments to provide it to the one out of six people lacking access.
The water industry rakes in an average of 400 billion dollars a year in services, equipment and selling water itself.
Meanwhile, an additional 11.3 billion dollars each year could help to meet the Millennium Development Goal target of reducing by half the estimated 2.6 billion people living without adequate water and sanitation, according to UNICEF.
"Most countries have to recognize that provision of water supplies and sanitation services to people is the most important driver for long-term economic growth," said Hudson.
In Istanbul, groups like the Gender and Water Alliance (GWA), Turkish Women's Water Platform and Women for Water Partnership (WfWP) have been organizing sessions to enhance the participation and visibility of female community leaders, experts and policy makers.
Anta Seck, a water engineer and director of water resource management and planning in Senegal, noted that "it is important for men to open up this world to women."
"Women are responsible for the usage of water, therefore, it is important to develop the capacity of women in the management of water - and that includes getting advanced degrees," she said at the conference.
- Posted in

13 Comments so far
Show AllThe best answer to peak water is using birth control in underdeveloped nations. Less people use less water, and overpopulation is the source of this problem to begin with.
Birth control is essential in ALL nations, not just "underdeveloped nations." By the way, there are no "underdeveloped nations."
"Underdevelopment" is a Marxist Term from the late 1970s. It is the process where development is engineered to favor the rich (countries and national elites) to the detriment of the poor and usually the nation as a whole
Family farmers in the US have undergone an "underdevelopment" process, where all the rules favor large corporate farms to the entent that small farmers are forced out of agriculture. Laws, subsidies and environmental legislation favor industrial farms - notthe small family farmer.
The Pope says using condoms is a no-no.
How about a mandatory closing off the fallopian tubes of women who have already given birth to say, 3 children? It (Essure) only takes 15 minutes to perform the outpatient procedure. Has to be a lot less costly than tubal ligation or what it would cost for the raising of an unwanted child to its 18th birthday (10,000 or more "woman-hours").
By making it mandatory (for women with 3 children), cases like the "octamom" in California could have been avoided. Now, we only get outrage for a couple of months, and then it disappears down the memory hole. Meanwhile, some other unbalanced women thinks--hey, she made out great!!! Her kids are getting 'round the clock care. Maybe I can cash in also, while becoming famous at the same time!!!
Birth control and controlling global capitalism are the two key elements to solving this problem.
By keeping interest rates low while throwing trillions of dollars to unregulated speculators, US Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernake is not only enabling but enhancing the ability of the Enron pirates and their ilk to manipulate energy, housing, food and now water markets.
Overpopulation is not a problem in underdeveloped countries. Population is essential for subsistence agriculture where the labor force experiences high mortality rates.
As countries become more urban and economically developed, population rates usually decline dramatically. In China, for example, there are low population growth rates in the cities and high population growth rates in the country and in less-developed areas - in spite of government intervention.
Most debveloped countries have a low population growth rate. In the US we are running out of population to provide the labor to pay for our entitlement programs.
No problem...we all just need to work longer and never retire.
Great article on the Global Water Crisis.
here is an article i wrote years ago on the subject:
Global Water Crisis:
http://www.geocities.com/alquedahq/water.html
steve jones
global environmentalist
california USA
e-mail: ecostar774@gmail.com
"Those tasks expose them to many risks, like contamination by water-related diseases and violence in conflict zones, and often prevent them from going to school or having a job."
How long are we going to continue to insist that 'normal' life consists of school and work, when work leads to the destruction of the planet, and school doesn't teach that?? School and work, together, are a big part of the problem, not the solution...
Not enough clean water? Why don't these people just go down to their corner store and buy a nice $1.00 bottle of cold refreshing Nestle water? [note: this is sarcasm}
this is supposed to be about water, not birth control. No we will not agree to prevent people from having children.
First of all there is no shortage of water. To much is being wasted. I see the women with those buckets on their heads and I see the golf course down the road spraying enough water to supply theos women with all the water they will ever need. Guy across the street is filling a swimming pool with clan, safe, drinkable water. Could supply the next village over. And so on. Finally 90% of all clean fresh water is used by industrial capitalism.
So enough already with your sinister plans to neuter the women of the Global South. First make sure everyone in the world is getting enough water to drink. Then you can use what's left over for rich country "development".
Agreed ...poor people in developing nations do not waste water. If you had to carry it bucket by bucket on your head, you would not waste water.
People in the developing world do not grow Mc Donald's perfect tomatoes. You would not buy most of the tomatoes found in third world markets. The amount of misting in an average US supermarket would provide enough water for a relatively large village in most countries.
We are spoiled ...and extremely ignorant about our water use.
From one abuelo to another:
You should carefully read what people have actually written before attempting to criticize it.
First of all, I never said anything about preventing people from having (some) children--only excessive numbers of them. To say "we" will not agree, is to completely ignore the efforts of China, where it needed to be done for the benefit of the living. Unfortunately, during the Mao era, large families were encouraged, and now the "chickens" have come home to roost.
Furthermore, the only reference I made as to where or to whom such a birth control policy should be adopted was in the case of "octa-mom" who lives in California, not in the "Global South" you have referred to.
You say you see women carrying buckets of water in the same location where there is a golf course "down the road"? Pray tell--inform us where that location might be.
Finally, 70% of all clean fresh water is used in agricultural applications. This would be so independently of who "owned" the product of that agriculture.
The only item we agree upon is that much water is wasted in any number of ways. For that reason I have been advocating that people in arid regions near source of salt water consider using techniques demonstrated at: http://www.seawatergreenhouse.com
As I write this, I am in south-central Taiwan, a tropical region of rice padis and exotic (for US) fruits. The area also uses ground water for irrigation. So much water has been pumped from below ground, the surface has slumped several meters, almost below seal level.
Ground slumping over huge areas due to pumping fluids is not new; large swathes of Texas has slumped not from pumping water, but oil.
Never criticize a man until you've walked a mile in his moccasins - Native American proverb.