Meat Must Be Rationed to Four Portions A Week, says Report on Climate Change
Study looks at food impact on greenhouse gases • Return to old-fashioned cooking habits urged
People will have to be rationed to four modest portions of meat and one litre of milk a week if the world is to avoid run-away climate change, a major new report warns.
The
report, by the Food Climate Research Network, based at the University
of Surrey, also says total food consumption should be reduced,
especially "low nutritional value" treats such as alcohol, sweets and
chocolates.
It urges people to return to habits their mothers or grandmothers would have been familiar with: buying locally in-season products, cooking in bulk and in pots with lids or pressure cookers, avoiding waste and walking to the shops - alongside more modern tips such as using the microwave and internet shopping.
The report goes much further than any previous advice after mounting concern about the impact of the livestock industry on greenhouse gases and rising food prices. It follows a four-year study of the impact of food on climate change and is thought to be the most thorough study of its kind.
Tara Garnett, the report's author, warned that campaigns encouraging people to change their habits voluntarily were doomed to fail and urged the government to use caps on greenhouse gas emissions and carbon pricing to ensure changes were made. "Food is important to us in a great many cultural and symbolic ways, and our food choices are affected by cost, time, habit and other influences," the report says. "Study upon study has shown that awareness-raising campaigns alone are unlikely to work, particularly when it comes to more difficult changes."
The report's findings are in line with an investigation by the October edition of the Ecologist magazine, which found that arguments for people to go vegetarian or vegan to stop climate change and reduce pressure on rising food prices were exaggerated and would damage the developing world in particular, where many people depend on animals for essential food, other products such as leather and wool, and for manure and help in tilling fields to grow other crops.
Instead, it recommended cutting meat consumption by at least half and making sure animals were fed as much as possible on grass and food waste which could not be eaten by humans.
"The notion that cows and sheep are four-legged weapons of mass destruction has become something of a distraction from the real issues in both climate change and food production," said Pat Thomas, the Ecologist's editor.
The head of the United Nations intergovernmental panel on climate change, Rajendra Pachauri, also sparked global debate this month when he urged people to have at least one meat-free day a week.
The Food Climate Research Network found that measured by production, the UK food sector produces greenhouse gases equivalent to 33m tonnes of carbon. Measured by consumption - including imports - the total rises to 43.3m tonnes. Both figures work out at under one fifth of UK emissions, but they exclude the indirect impacts of actions such as clearing rainforest for cattle and crops, which other studies estimate would add up to 5% to 20% of global emissions.
The report found the meat and dairy sectors together accounted for just over half of those emissions; potatoes, fruit and vegetables for 15%; drinks and other products with sugar for another 15%; and bread, pastry and flour for 13%.
It also revealed which parts of the food chain were the most polluting. Although packaging has had a lot of media and political attention, it only ranked fifth in importance behind agriculture - especially the methane produced by livestock burping - manufacturing, transport, and cooking and refrigeration at home.
The report calls for meat and dairy consumption to be cut in developed countries so that global production remains stable as the population grows to an estimated 9bn by 2050.
At the same time emissions from farms, transport, manufacturing and retail could be cut, with improvements including more efficient use of fertilisers, feed and energy, changed diets for livestock, and more renewable fuels - leading to a total reduction in emissions from the sector of 50% to 67%, it says.
The UN and other bodies recommend that developed countries should reduce total emissions by 80% by 2050.
However, the National Farmers' Union warned that its own study, with other industry players, published last year, found net emissions from agriculture could only be cut by up to 50% if the carbon savings from building renewable energy sources on farms were taken into account.
The NFU also called for government incentives to help farmers make the changes. "Farmers aren't going to do this out of the goodness of their hearts, because farmers don't have that luxury; many of our members are very hard pressed at the moment," said Jonathan Scurlock, the NFU's chief adviser on renewable energy and climate change.
Different diets
The way we eat now (average person in the UK, per week)
1.6kg meat and 4.2 litres of milk, which is equivalent to:
6 sausages (450g)
2 chicken breasts (350g)
4 ham sandwiches (100g)
8 slices of bacon (250g)
3 burgers (450g)
3 litres of milk
100g of cheese and a helping of cream
Future recommended diet (average person, per week)
500g of meat and 1 litre of milk, which is equivalent to:
1 quarter-pound beefburger
2 sausages
3 rashers of bacon
1 chicken breast
1 litre of milk or 100g of cheese

Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
15 Comments so far
Show AllWhile I wouldn't want to interfere with anyone's right to do whatever the hell they please, is it possible that this is a symptom of there being too many of us?
HP, I'm going to guess you're not a fan of science.
http://www.jhu.edu/~gazette/2008/29sep08/29newsfood.html
great lets blame cows for the worlds problems. Nothing about the 10 MPG crap America sells or fighting against anytime the average mileage tries to go up. War is very clean and doesn't affect climet change, lets have more wars. This is a very narrow view of the world. Yes it is good to eat healthy. I feel more people are eating better since it is healthy to do so.
OH I forgot lets ban BEER and there is lots of burping and farting there that I am sure is bad for the planet. I feel the story is Bull Sh**
We need more kitchen gardens, and having cities relax their codes so we can turn our backyards into barn yards. Then hope for the best.
I'm a vegan. Go ahead and eat meat. No problem.
Don't support factory farming, hormones, GMO's, deforestation etc...
And perhaps, eat less beef and dairy (methane).
"If we didn't eat meat we wouldn't have evolved like we did." Aha! I will blame the bloody meat then for the mayhem that humans cause against each other and unto the planet. Meat is for the selfish...
Articles like this always seem to bring the adherants of the vegan religion out of the woodwork. You people are more ignorant than Christians, Zionists or Islamo-fascists.
Out of the woodwork? More like scuttling onto the counters when the lights go off. It is a religion pure and simple with adherents, apostles, apostates, gurus, holy writs. Anyone against them is a sinner and needs to be saved. The most unpleasant person I think I ever met was a vegan who cornered me whilst I was demonstrating software at a tradeshow. Wanted to build a vegan web site and wanted to convert me while getting the demo. What a looser. We laughed at him for hours.
why doesn't it surprise me that you wrote such words? excuse me, but veganism is growing and it's hardly a religion. stop writing idiotic words for once. how ridiculous can you be?
to compare veganism with nut-case religious fanaticism, is just plain stupid and out of place. get your facts straight and become a lot more enlightened why don't you.
So the cure is: food austerity for the developing nations. Meat rations? Guess I rationed my sausages when I left them in my rucksack for a week. When those are in the landfill, is that carbon neutral? Or is it just a waste of food?
i'm against pollution, but carbon dioxide is not a pollutant.
Rationed to Four Portions A Year works for me. Christmas, New Years, Grandma's Birthday etc.
So keeping poor countries supplied with animal hides trumps averting global catastrophe?
Ok Ecologist, you really showed some common sense there.
The Ecologist is a Conservative party magazine-of course its going to attack anything that suggests altering of the status quo.
Its like smoking or oil consumption.
Oh no-we dont dare say give up smoking or oil dependency completely, just do it in moderation.
That argument doesnt go far. Not when you have humans-who arent very good at moderation.
And livestock industries cause way more problems than just climate change-and the idea you can have billions of livestock fed off wastelands?
LOL
You cant pretend we are living in the 18th century
You cant feed 6 billion humans on a western wasteful diet.
Water is wasted--cropland, wildlife is slaughtered to protect livestock. And if you keep them in factory farms its cruel.
How retarded do these meat advocates have to be?
You cant reform a broken system.
Just goes to show where humans place their priorities. Having the taste of meat is more important to them than preventing a disaster for their grandchildren.
Typical humanity.
>>You cant feed 6 billion humans on a western wasteful diet.<<
That's the key. You simply need less humans. Here in the US, our population growth to natives is low low low. Europe is actuall losing children of natives. Our growth is in immigrants, legal and illegal. They come from societies that simply cannot stop growing and that need to. Family planning in the third world is a good start to the problem. So is China's one child per couple policy.
You don't seem to understand that it is completely impossible to have any nation give up meat entirely. Just as we cannot physically give up oil entirely in one day. Moderation is the only first step to moving in the right direction.
You also sound like the average vegan, NO MEAT, MEAT IS EVIL!!!!
The truth is, if we didn't eat meat we would not have evolved as we did. There are many of creatures that eat meat alone, should we kill off all Wolves and Lions cause they eat meat? Are they are problem... I knew it, damn wolves.
The problem is how we harvest animals like plants. There is nothing wrong with eating meat, the problem is how get our meat.
"The only means of strengthening one's intellect is to make up one's mind about nothing, to let the mind be a thoroughfare for all thoughts."
-- John Keats